This is a model that explain the interactions of the universe without gravity. This is not a decay model, It is an interactive information model. Inorder to realize a need for a new model requires disproving certain understandings that permiate cosmology. A field (E) cannot equal a scalar (mass) * a vector (C) ^2. It also describes baryonic expression of information. Comments are welcome, Anonymous comments with non-relevant links will not be posted.
Friday, April 9, 2010
Sunday, April 4, 2010
Again I caught that on my unshielded CRT
It was upgraded to 7.2.
Credit NASA
Great pictures of the solar flare that caused that earthquake.
http://stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov/browse/2010/04/04/index.shtml
This theory show that earthquakes originate from the sun. NASA can now predict earthquakes. It will take some time to match previous data to earthquakes. This matching of datasets will show magnitude. NASA just cannot predict the location of the event, yet. The tools already exist. Congratulations to NASA for their work and results.
Earthquakes are a result of solar flares. The intense Z Boson flares from the sun and strikes the earth. This causes a discharge in the magnetosphere that strikes the earth in the most vulnerable fault. This theory shows that earthquakes are the result of coronal mass ejections.
A simple solar radiation detector.
Credit NASA
Great pictures of the solar flare that caused that earthquake.
http://stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov/browse/2010/04/04/index.shtml
This theory show that earthquakes originate from the sun. NASA can now predict earthquakes. It will take some time to match previous data to earthquakes. This matching of datasets will show magnitude. NASA just cannot predict the location of the event, yet. The tools already exist. Congratulations to NASA for their work and results.
Earthquakes are a result of solar flares. The intense Z Boson flares from the sun and strikes the earth. This causes a discharge in the magnetosphere that strikes the earth in the most vulnerable fault. This theory shows that earthquakes are the result of coronal mass ejections.
A simple solar radiation detector.
Take a CRT TV attached to a cable line. Remove some of the shielding on the antenna. Leave the TV power on. I had company over and was able to show him the solar radiation intensity as it was happening. It was so intense that I shut down my computer.
-----------
04/06/10 Extreme changes from black to blue from 7:00 am est.
It is my speculation that every earthquake has a corresponding solar event.
-----------
04/06/10 Extreme changes from black to blue from 7:00 am est.
It is my speculation that every earthquake has a corresponding solar event.
Atlas : Jet Events
Congratulations on the work all of you have done to build these detectors.
This is the main paper with data. Although I had some difficulty in downloading it.
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0901/0901.0512.pdf
This paper is huge. 1100+ pages. This paper does not download correctly using any web browser.
http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1254503/files/ATL-PHYS-SLIDE-2010-036.pdf
This paper is far more manageable. It is only 29 pages.
I have questions: On pages 8 and 10 of the smaller doc. MC is that Mass*C or is it Muon Candidate? Do those lines going through the data point show the min/max of the run? How many runs were put together to create those maps?
On page 8, why are there data points outside the line? Is the line what you expect and the data point is what you get?
Are these all simulations and what you EXPECT to see, or are these based on real data? That is what I understood from the conclusions. That these maps are simulations. The conclusion says you expect to see the Higg's at these points. Not that you did. Am I correct in that statement?
Why are the maps in 2d and not the expected 3d? I would expect to see the energy, distance, and time to be the factors of any broken vibrations. The general questions are: How did the energy transform over time? Was there a general direction these broken energies transformed over time? When did the baryon transform into heat, electricity, or magnetism?
This is the main paper with data. Although I had some difficulty in downloading it.
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0901/0901.0512.pdf
This paper is huge. 1100+ pages. This paper does not download correctly using any web browser.
http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1254503/files/ATL-PHYS-SLIDE-2010-036.pdf
This paper is far more manageable. It is only 29 pages.
I have questions: On pages 8 and 10 of the smaller doc. MC is that Mass*C or is it Muon Candidate? Do those lines going through the data point show the min/max of the run? How many runs were put together to create those maps?
On page 8, why are there data points outside the line? Is the line what you expect and the data point is what you get?
Are these all simulations and what you EXPECT to see, or are these based on real data? That is what I understood from the conclusions. That these maps are simulations. The conclusion says you expect to see the Higg's at these points. Not that you did. Am I correct in that statement?
Why are the maps in 2d and not the expected 3d? I would expect to see the energy, distance, and time to be the factors of any broken vibrations. The general questions are: How did the energy transform over time? Was there a general direction these broken energies transformed over time? When did the baryon transform into heat, electricity, or magnetism?