tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6495264582589825361.post521624230721995499..comments2023-10-29T07:35:49.286-04:00Comments on Aaron's Reality (Standard Vibration Model): Equality is highly overratedAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15135433850653035435noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6495264582589825361.post-76329381037355574022010-07-18T21:43:18.443-04:002010-07-18T21:43:18.443-04:00I have written a new posting for these questions. ...I have written a new posting for these questions. It is called 'Equality is highly overrated part 2' <br /><br />Thanks<br />AaronAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15135433850653035435noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6495264582589825361.post-66969261935090953112010-07-18T17:05:22.059-04:002010-07-18T17:05:22.059-04:00Dear Anon,
Certainly, I will post concrete exampl...Dear Anon,<br /><br />Certainly, I will post concrete examples here tomorrow.<br /><br />Thanks<br />AaronAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15135433850653035435noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6495264582589825361.post-48468161806954180352010-07-18T00:59:16.957-04:002010-07-18T00:59:16.957-04:00Calculus seems analog, not digital. It is the mat...Calculus seems analog, not digital. It is the mathematics of limits. The entire foundation of calculus is the study of what happens when we take something discrete and push the intervals to the infinitesimal.<br /><br />DNA seems digital, not analog. There are a finite number of bases arranged in a finite number of pairs. In what way is that analog?<br /><br />And as to equality, you offered some examples of how everyday things aren't equal, but can you offer any concrete examples of where physics goes wrong in assuming equality when it shouldn't?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6495264582589825361.post-64691048339084679402010-06-16T19:34:59.961-04:002010-06-16T19:34:59.961-04:00Hi, Thanks.
It is amazing how so many things are ...Hi, Thanks.<br /><br />It is amazing how so many things are assumed to be one thing and yet are so vastly different. I have known these problems existed. Every time I tried to explain them to someone of 'knowledge', I was shot down as never understanding physics. I came to the arrogant realization. I was right. <br /><br />It is still hard to have a conversation with anyone in the know. The need to defend the religion of gravity always interferes with peoples thinking. I am glad to have conversations with people like you, people who can see outside the box. <br /><br />The reason we have done so much with computers and technology is because calculus is digital. The rule match is amazing. No matter how we try, we cannot solve analog problems using digital tools. <br /><br />The language of DNA is an analog ruleset. There are so many analog problems, that these analog tools will solve more problems then the digital set. <br /><br />I believe it was Ada or Pascal who built the first analog computer. <br /><br />Thanks so very much for reading and commenting on my work. Those simple responses help push me. It means so much to me to read that someone does understand.<br /><br />Thanks Again,<br /><br />AaronAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15135433850653035435noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6495264582589825361.post-6304005056182997002010-06-16T18:55:39.004-04:002010-06-16T18:55:39.004-04:00Dear Aaron: Thank-you for your illustrous example ...Dear Aaron: Thank-you for your illustrous example of how there is no such thing as "true equality" in Physics. This may hold true against the board, as is the case in all faculties. There are so many variables that nothing is an exact copy even if it a twin or dopple-ganger. So nothing is that concise by example; only estimated. I get this! Thanks!chiccorealhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16902834462795623856noreply@blogger.com