Credit Mesic,Astronomie.CZ
There are many of these on youtube.
Thanks for your work everyone.
a
Saturday, June 26, 2010
Thursday, June 24, 2010
Z Boson and mass
http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/217306/files/199103478.pdf?version=1
I know this is a preprint. I know this is your understanding of the motion of electricity. I have a few questions. I love the fact that this document is pictures instead of text so questions cannot be asked. You cannot copy an area of text and question it. So I will retype the information.
On page two, you have defined the mass of a Z-Boson to\pm .020 GeV "M_{Z}=91.177\pm .006(stat)\pm .020 GeV")
That is a very specific number to be a new constant. That is not the direct problem I have with this. You are measuring mass in voltage.
Since you are measuring the cross section of the Z-Boson as
of which we both agree.
Call me crazy, and I know you will, but intensity of electricity is always measured in Amperes. Thus the intensity of a Z-Boson can never be measured as mass.
Using Ohm's law we can determine the current(intensity) of a Z-Boson, which is variable not constant.
Why is it that you measure electricity as mass? At best that does not make sense with what is known.
I know this is a preprint. I know this is your understanding of the motion of electricity. I have a few questions. I love the fact that this document is pictures instead of text so questions cannot be asked. You cannot copy an area of text and question it. So I will retype the information.
On page two, you have defined the mass of a Z-Boson to
That is a very specific number to be a new constant. That is not the direct problem I have with this. You are measuring mass in voltage.
Since you are measuring the cross section of the Z-Boson as
Call me crazy, and I know you will, but intensity of electricity is always measured in Amperes. Thus the intensity of a Z-Boson can never be measured as mass.
Using Ohm's law we can determine the current(intensity) of a Z-Boson, which is variable not constant.
Why is it that you measure electricity as mass? At best that does not make sense with what is known.
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
NGC 3603 Interesting cluster
Credit: NASA, ESA and Wolfgang Brandner (MPIA), Boyke Rochau (MPIA) and Andrea Stolte (University of Cologne)"The cluster, formally known as the NGC 3603 Young Cluster, is about 20 000 light-years from the Sun which makes these measurements extraordinarily difficult."
---------------------
This is 17 light-years across. This picture cast severe doubts on Newtonian mechanics and Kepler orbits. I need to think more about that distance and number of stars in the cluster.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2007/34/fastfacts/
-----------------------------
Another great paper on NGC 3603
Galactic Starburst NGC 3603 from XRay to Radio
---------------------
This is 17 light-years across. This picture cast severe doubts on Newtonian mechanics and Kepler orbits. I need to think more about that distance and number of stars in the cluster.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2007/34/fastfacts/
-----------------------------
Another great paper on NGC 3603
Galactic Starburst NGC 3603 from XRay to Radio
A. F. J. Moffat ,1 M. F. Corcoran ,2,3 I. R. Stevens ,4 G. Skalkowski ,1 S. V. Marchenko ,1,5 A. Mücke ,1,6 A. Ptak ,7B. S. Koribalski ,8 L. Brenneman ,3 R. Mushotzky ,3 J. M. Pittard ,9 A. M. T. Pollock ,10 and W. Brandner 11
The Astrophysical Journal, 573:191-198, 2002 July 1
© 2002. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A.
© 2002. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A.
Search Amazon.com for the astrophysical journal
-----------
This picture was taken on
--------------------
There is a Zoomable picture from ESO at
Credit ESO
-----------
This picture was taken on
2007 October 5
--------------------
There is a Zoomable picture from ESO at
Credit ESO
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
