Friday, December 13, 2013

How the Higg's Boson Must work in The SVM

Dark Energy Rulesets:  Reasons, Functions and Rules.

Let's say I am wrong and there is a Higg's Boson.Of which there is a Higg's Boson and I am wrong, This posting will describe the Higg's Boson and its effects and interactions. What would the purpose of this effect (Boson)? When does this Boson interact with the Dark Energy Ruleset?

The simple version creates the basis of the Coriolis Effect.

The other version forms crystals

This problem has two solutions in this model. The simple (integer) version that will always show chaos, and the complex (irrational) that will solve these issues. Please read the paper "The Structure of Dark Energy" a basic abstract.

The Dark Energy Ruleset:
The space created by Dark Energy is not defined by any previous space; Hilbert, Einstein, or
others. Previously defined space requires a flat universe, a vacuum and single point mass.

A discrete single Dark Energy unit is called a Ruleset. A Ruleset domain is exactly the width of
one bit of information of a boson.
• A Ruleset is the medium in which vibrations transverse.
• A Ruleset is a 3 dimensional structure.
• A Ruleset is not aware of which vibration it holds or if it is void of vibrations.
• A Ruleset domain is the width of a bit of information of a boson.

A Ruleset is where the interactions of boson information occurs. In the simple solution I will describe these interactions over time using familiar equations. I will use this model to describe simple baryonic motion, boson to boson interaction and boson to baryon interaction. This model must displais changes in elemental variables ( Gluons ,W+/- Bosons, Z Bosons and Photons). This model must result in producing chemistry examples.

The Higg's Boson transmits information to the Ruleset at .  On 4 July 2012, it was announced that a previously unknown particle with a mass between 125 and 127 GeV/c2 (134.2 and 136.3 amu) had been detected; physicists suspected at the time that it was the Higgs boson.[14][9][15].

 In my mind this means that three bits of information is the Coriolis solution begins.  Neutrinos transmitted the temperature information, frequency, and the wavelength to the next ruleset at those voltages. Information about two touching baryons are compared at these points on the ruleset.

These are the three strands of information I described in the paper about photons. The information travelling down the Higg's is the inverse of the information held in the photon. It tells the ruleset it is entering the information required. The ruleset compares the new information to current information then makes changes to the bosons involved.

This is how small information traveling over small distances can have a great impact on other baryons.

Aaron 

Tuesday, November 5, 2013

Letters of Curiosity

I received this letter.
Thanks for reading my work.

6/11/13

Dear Aaron,

         My name is Fenton Doolan, I've been teaching Science for the past twenty years in Australia and overseas. I have a BSc in Biochemistry but lately have been more interested in Physics. I have been researching Einstein's theory of relativity in particular his ideas about space-time. To me his theory seems more like science fiction than a plausible scientific theory. As I have become more interested I've researched more and more. I came across the following Youtube clip which explains an unusual magnetic phenomena. When I saw this clip I came up with the following theory concerning what causes the moon to orbit the earth. No it's not due to a gravitational attraction between the two and no it's not due to a curvature in space-time. The moon orbits the Earth due to a magnetic attraction. This magnetic attraction is explained in the Youtube clip.


I believe the Earth is acting as an inverter magnet. The movement of molten rock inside the Earth and its iron core act like the large central magnet and deposits of iron ore (magnetite) under the Earth's surface are acting like the small satellite magnets in the clip. I read on the NASA website that the Earth's magnetic field has been weakening since 1850. I wonder if that is due to mining of iron ore over the last 163 years ? My theory would also suggest that the sun acts like a gigantic inverter magnet which the planets are magnetically attracted to. At school we learn about Our Solar System maybe we should be learning about Our Magnetic Solar System. I am not a physicist or an expert in magnetism. I am just a high school science teacher interested in understanding the universe.  What do you think about my theory? I know it’s a very simple concept but I think that often in science we often disregard the obvious and try to over-complicate ideas and theories.

Thanks,

Fenton Doolan ( High School Science Teacher )

Dear Fenton,
Thanks again for reading this model. I agree, we should be searching for magnetic anomalies within our area of influence. What we are learning about magnetism is improving. Within the "Standard Vibration Model" this phenomena is not dismissed. The magnets are aligning themselves. With molys that alteration is small. So +1/-1 charge is opposite to the one above it. Each disk magnet produces a torus. In this case the top magnet's torus is squashed against the bottom magnet's torus. With an asymptote at 0 it is not possible for the two sets (Ring and disk) to meet or exceed a certain distance, unless the direction of fields changes. You have to bend one magnet out of the other

The Sun has a molten Iron surface. We can see Iron tsunamis on the Sun's surface. Then the planets are ordered by density, not mass. Irons, (Iron, rock, Nickel...), Gasses, Ices...

This is by far one of the most important new (to me) observation. Thank you

Aaron Guerami

Thursday, September 12, 2013

Chandra shows ejects young stars

NASA's Chandra Observatory Catches Giant Black Hole Rejecting Material

ScienceDaily

Here is more observational proof that black holes eject material. This article shows with observations over time that black holes do not gravitationally attract. They eject material. They eject stars. Stars that are large enough to produce X-rays. The black hole is a massive star. I have described this in various postings through out the blog.  

This is really the death nail for current models of gravity.

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

SVM Physical Pressure

In the Standard Vibration Model, physical pressure is the result of two or more non bonding Baryon's electron shells impact one another deforming the shell. The greater the impact the greater the deformity in the shell. This causes electrons to move across the shell in a non-uniform manner. This deformation also affects the rotation of the Baryon.

Gluon length is vital in pressure. The greater the pressure on the Baryon, the smaller the Gluons become to increase rotation speed. The less pressure on the Baryon, the Gluons grow in length slowing rotation. 

Sunday, March 17, 2013

Why are we still talking about the Higg`s Boson?

You have found a result that lies on the E/M scale. If it is found on the E/M scale then it must be Electricity or Magnetic. Your rules define this.

The rules of gravity create the problems that point out that gravity as a concept cannot exist.

1) Hydrogen and Helium are not affected by gravity. Thus their masses push against larger masses.

2) Data about mass exceeds the speed of light. The speed of gravity must be instantaneous to exist.

3) Gravity has no provisions for E/M. Equations of gravity do not involve E/M.

About the process. Something happens at 7tv that may support an anomalous event. But it is important to note that this event does not occur on all tests at 7tv. The hunt for the glue that bind mass to gravity would be everywhere since it is the most important concept of current physics. Every result would show events at 7tv.

Peer Review. People. If the model does not change it is either correct or being funded.

Saturday, March 9, 2013

4 dimensions, I count at least five.

The usual definition to 4 dimensions is x,y,z plus time. I find this to be a little limiting.

I am changing the word dimension to tier. Tier works just as well if not better, thanks to the reader for the help. You are correct in the word dimension has a specific definition and it would be better to use another word to define the levels involved in this model. Thanks.

Each tier must have that many independent tools

1 tier: 1) Numbers: Number is the rule of data. A data object is defined by a Real Number or asymptote.

2 tier: A Dark Energy is the area where numbers transform. 1) Size of data. 2) Rules of transformations. A Dark Energy Ruleset.

3 tier: Space x,y,z but not motion or objects. Also can be defined as Dark Energy as a whole universe.

4 tier  Time is object in motion through Space. Rules of 1) Baryonic Matter and  Dark Matter are defined here. The rules of motion by 2) Baryonic Matter and Dark Matter through Dark Energy are defined here.

These rules begin the basic rules of chemistry. I would call The Corialis Effect, The Zeeman Effect, The Electron are tools which fit into the catagory of the rules of Baryonic Matter in motion.

5 tier: Consciousness is the collection of objects at the same time.
This tier ncorperates 1) cooperation, 2) neural networks, 3) randomization, 4) intelligence and memory and 5) organic chemistry.
Some objects learn to cooperate to survive, others to strive.

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Superwifi

Just a thought. Let's use the existing 120v system as the basis of the superwifi system. I think IBM owns the patent on that technology. By expanding our Wifi we will build our economy. Also an AC routing system would require fewer routers. The last 100 feet problem is resolved by just plugging the inexpensive Wifi device into the wall socket. 

Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Large Quasar Group


The discovery in the deep Universe was made by a team led by Roger Clowes at the Jeremiah Horrocks Institute at Britain's University of Central Lancashire.

This object is 4 billion ly across. 

Amazing pictures that push physics beyond what we believe.
I wonder how close it is to the center of the known universe? If this thing took 4bly to get to this point. What was it before the explosion?

It also looks like a torus.

Aaron

-------------------------------
Addendum: 1//22/2013

This is a huge magnetic field. I wonder if we can see any rotation on this because of its magnetic field needs tremendous rotation. They might be able to compare this to the next series of pictures. 


Saturday, November 24, 2012

New thought on universe expansion

The theory that the universe is expanding is based on SR and GR.

A more simple thought is that our tools and methods are improving allowing scientist to see more and further. First there was the solar system. Then the Milkyway galaxy. Then other galaxies were found. After that the galactic super clusters.

I am of the notion that our scientist are getting better at seeing great distances. When we send telescopes outside the solar system where photons are collected before hitting the solar winds and the heliosphere, we will have a far better picture of the universe. Also array telescopes seperated on an orbit between Earth and Mars will bring greater focus and reduce error.

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

CME Video

CME VIDEO

I like this video because the author starts the mass to density transition.

A

Friday, November 2, 2012

Android tools for space weather and earthquakes

I have two android tools that have made understanding the basics of the relationship of space weather and earthquakes.

By using the NASA Space Weather app and the Earthquake Alert app one can observe CMEs leave the sun and impact the earth. From flares to the impact of the magnetosphere, more data is being added all the time.

The Earthquake Alert app also tells the depth of the impact of the electrical discharge rupturing the tectonic plate. 

I use these tools along with Google Alerts "Coronal Mass Ejections", to give myself about 2 days lead time to a major seizure. I have written before that these major seizure occur at the same time +/- speed and distance from the impact.

Thankyou for building these tools.
Aaron

Thursday, November 1, 2012

Immediate education solution

All the education needs can be resolved using mobile devices and Youtube. Teachers would develope plans and share them with each other. This way students would be learning the same information each day. Portable structures can house the students during the day. This way we are not relying on damaged books and destroyed infrastructure to get the education system up and running by Monday.

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Another Excellent paper on the Sun and Heilo sciences

Gravity is an easy way to dismiss chemistry

To a physist, the dust surrounding the sun coalesed through gravity a little heat and poof a planet is formed. Simple right.

But what happened to chemistry; Bonding of molecules, magnetoelectrodynamics, plasma and so many other issues. Physist rarely incorperate known chemical interactions into their models. Chemistry introduces too many problems into physics models. So it has its own field.

Gravity dismissed Electromagnetism in much the same manner. It is said by mainstream physists that solar weather has little effect on the earth or its inhabitants.

This model describes the interaction of gluon density and how baryons produce bosons to interact with other baryons. This model describes all the interactions required for a baryon to affect the baryons around it.

The rules of this model show a net attempt to attain symmetry but through baryonic interaction symmetry is never attained.

A baryon expresses information about itself by using bosons. The Z Boson transfers electric information to and from electrons.

The W+/- Boson is magnetism. The W+/- has one other interaction with photons. This is called the Zeeman Effect. This effect stops a photon if the W+/- is powerful enough and pulls the photon to the Electron.

The photon expresses information about temperature and spectra. It uses wavelength, frequency and rotation to produce this information. Spectra is everything on the frequency except what the emittor is not and the magnetic fields the photon passed through.

A new problem. CMEs travel through space creating a MACH speed. So much for the vacuum of space!

Do thinkers and scientist need to flee Italy?

So seven scientist were convicted of not predicting an earthquake.

What does that mean? Is is the engineer fault if a driver dives his car off a cliff and destroys a village. Is it the engineer's fault? No. But according to the italian legal system a scientist is liable for the earth's motion. To the point that these scientist were charged with the manslaughter of ~300 people.

It is time to flee italy!

Aaron Guerami

Monday, October 1, 2012

Non-relativistic gluon motion

Medium Induced Gluon Branching

This is a powerful paper that describes gluon motion using non-relativistic tools. It describes this process using many equations with explanations of those equations.

A

Friday, September 28, 2012

Dark Energy Camera

The Dark Energy Camera (DECam) is a beautiful large format array Near Infrared and visual telescope. The intention of this camera in my opinion is to look for redshift, amongst many other things. It is hoped that observations of this expansion and curvature dynamics of space can prove Dark Energy and its role in physics.

The Standard Vibration Model holds that Dark Energy is the place where the math is done to support the physics. This will be impossible to see since Dark Energy cannot support electrons. What this model shows is the expansion/contraction observations are densitiy differentials between Baryonic Matter and Dark Matter.

The pictures will be beautiful and it will collect incredible new data.

Aaron

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Baryon Halo around Milkyway

These are some important articles about a halo of baryons found around the milkyway.

Lee Rannals at RedOrbit.com

Phys.org

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

ALICE shows difficulty with gravity at the subatomic level.





Image: CERN
This comes from an article at Symmetry.


What I want to show is that pictures like these show no evidence of gravity. The massive particles arc in all directions. If gravity was a force, then there would be more consistant arcing towards the earth.


This has been a known problem since QM and again found in the Standard Model. It shows the need for a Grand Unification Theory. This need for a unification shows there are errors of logic in gravity models.



Aaron

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Frame of Reference Issues

This is a paper on frame reference system. It describes in detail some of the major issues in SR and GR.

A Logical Analysis of Albert Einstein's Mirror-Light-Clock Gedankin

Congratulations to Curt Youngs. And keep up the good work.

Wednesday, July 4, 2012

Addendum to the higgs

In the previous posting I listed several math and logic examples of the disproof of mass. But here is something everyone who saw the collision pattern of all the results of CERN or other supercolliders. This should be obvious.

Why is it that 'massive' particles like Quarks do not arc towards the earth? They don't.

If 100% of your data shows this issue, then a 5 sigma deviation about higgs is useless.

Aaron Guerami

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

So you found the Higgs???

Nobel prizes for everyone! Congratulations you managed to see the the entire magnetic field from 1 volt to 300+ Teravolts.

Have you solved the Basic Dimensional Analysis problem for mass? Mass is a one dimentional measure of an object's weight. Gravity is a two dimensional data structure that holds mass and distance. A Matrix cannot ever equal a vector * a vector, or a vector * a scalar. So I have serious problems with the concept of mass.

Let's evaluate a real object and what mathematically occurs when you reduce the natural three dimensional traits to the one dimensional concept of mass. When reducing the object from three dimensions to two, you lose x,y,z, size of the object. You lose I,j,k position of the object. You lose temperature data. You lose E/M data. You lose spectral identification data. You have effectively disregarded vital information about the object just to have mass. More importantly you have no manner of retaining that information or using it.

I know some recent reports proved that gold travelling through the particle accellators pass through the double slit test as waves not particles. I believe that was done at the LHC. I could be wrong as to where the test was done. But that alone kills the particle concept.

Now let's again look at that funny concept of gravity. The larger mass will always attract the less massive object at a rate of... So if an apple hits the ground something more massive then the earth is the only thing that can reverse the apple's direction.

Marketing in physics. I know we all need to get paid. Do the math. Don't just say we found the "GOD" particle. Show me the math that proves you found many particles in the Higg's range and how the attach.

Another thing. Particle accellerators are showing what happens after traumatic collisions of proton beams. This is a decay model. It does nothing to show interactions of bosons prior to the collision.

Archemedes disproved gravity by running naked yelling Eureka. It was not gravity that he discovered it was density!!! Using density you get to keep all your amazing data about an object. So good luck with the god thing. One more thing. Gravity requires omnisence,omnipresence, and omnipotence. Gravity requires that distance data travel instantanously from object to object. That exceeds the speed of light.

The Standard Vibration Model as described here is an expression model. There is a vital difference in those two concepts.  

Sunday, June 24, 2012

Lunar Lightning Strikes

I have noticed and have blogged before about this.
Spacecraft Clementine produced these pictures of the moon. I notice there are far more craters on the poles then there were on the equators.

There are craters on top of craters. This model asserts these are polar lightning from the sun. Almost all of these craters are approximately circular in nature. This would not be the case with solid rock hitting the moon. There are interesting craters that have higher reflective ejecta patterns. But these are few.

These are high energy lightning strikes. From the sun.
 



Friday, June 22, 2012

Order of Operations in Reality

I have thought on this subject for some time. The question I asked for some time now is which boson might have priority in the equations of density, movement, and energy influncing a baryon?

After much reflection, the equations cannot have an order of operations for the influence of bosons upon a baryon. The equation for motion reads the current position of a baryon is equal to the previous position plus the changes in temperature, magnetism, electricity upon the baryon. This shows that the order of operations occur within the Dark Energy Ruleset at the same time.

This allows the order of operations to be one dimentional in aspect for the ruleset to evaluate two dimensional structures. Read, Calculate, Write.

It is the Bosons themselves that express order of operations. The W+/- Boson attracts or repels both the Z Boson and the Photon to the Electron. These are all secondary derived interactions. It is at this point that the Electron divides informaton up to be expressed by the expression bosons.

It is worth a note that a Gluon cannot occupy the same ruleset as the other bosons. The W+/-, Z and Photon are all converted by the electron before being introduced to the Baryon's Gluons.

Sunday, April 29, 2012

Information Transformation through the W+/- Boson


The W+/- Boson's object shape is a torus where information travels. The points approaching zero from both the positive and negative aspects of the torus result in information transformation. One area of information transformation occurs at the electron. The other occurs at the midpoint of the other gluon. The W+/- Boson can transfer information in both directions, but only one direction at a time. When W+/- Bosons interact, it takes an extreme magnetic field to change the direction of the flow of information. A change in the direction of rotation of the emitting baryon will also cause a reversal of charge.

The lateral wave of the W+/- Boson is the strength of which its information can extend along the torus. This exertion of the lateral wave is only affected by the properties of the emitting baryon plus the change of other magnetic fields minus the resistance of dark matter plus collected information by the electron. The lateral wave of the W+/- Boson is the distance at which this information can travel most efficiently. The strength of the lateral wave is the corresponding inverse resistance data transfered by the baryon through the Z Boson to the electron.

The longitudinal wave is where the data flows through the W+/- Boson. Data travelling from the midpoint of the other gluon to the electron creates a wave along the lateral wave. The longitudinal wave never exceeds the max point of the lateral wave. The effect of which is the accordian like shape of the magnetic field. The data flows down the longitudinal aspect of the W+/- Boson. This data is the current and the capacitance information of the emitting baryon. A rupture of the W+/- Boson will occur if the longitudinal wave data exceeds the lateral wave data.

The rotation of this data presents the shape of the W+/- Boson object. The information travelling down the W+/- Boson is always perpendicular in location and inverse in data with the corresponding Z Boson vortex. The torus is the inverse of the vortex in motion.

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

It is Quite Obvious my Seizures are directly connected to solar flares

I would normally say the Oscars caused them, but I was already alerted by Google of the impending CMEs. I flopped like a fish for about an hour before I recovered from the event.

I am getting a new therapy for day to day living with seizures. Neuropsycologist use neuroplasty to help with many neurological issues. I have seen some remarkable things in me. I am no longer ataxic, I have some fine motor skills, I can think more productively... Oh yeah, I am having fewer petit seizures. I feel better then I have in years. Remarkable for only 2 months treatment.

Centerforbrain.com

Mysterious Magnetosphere tail solved

From MIT: Mysterious Electron Acceleration Explained.

This is an attempt to model the complexities of the tail of the magnetosphere ant the rubberband like auoras. They are taking data collected from several sattelites for analysis.

This will be interesting.

Saturday, February 25, 2012

Massive Densities of Galactic Cores will cause New Elements!

The massive densities of galactic cores has no choice but to crush elements that we consider dense into new elements. This model predicts that the element table must expand by factors. We will see the results of this in our supercoliders when we can contain the collisions of current dense element tests. Some radioactive decay will occur as elemental H,He,Li...

By using multidirectional precise timed collisions in a magnetic sealed chamber with the target pellet of dense radioactive material stabalized by Z boson, photons and pressure waves will allow the user to define the stability of the new element.

We have already done this in the great elemental discovey era. This model demands and predicts ~8^10 increase in our elemental table. It could be much higher.

The 8 is a strange number but it is the valence number of each shell.

And we still should examine the spiral shape of the elemental table as defined in a previos posting on this blog.

Friday, February 24, 2012

Death of the Concept of the Black Hole

Black Hole Ejecting Massive Wind

The pictures from the Chandra Telescope are forcing the reexamination of the amazing winds in our galaxy. Dust from the galactic center shows that the Superdense core is using radiation to emit particles from the core along the Galactic plane. We also see hyperactive jets emitting from the poles of the galactic core.

This galaxy is an amazing display of the scalabilty of the Standard Vibration Model to go from baryonic information to galactic scale.

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Our Heroic Legomen and Legowomen.

This comes from a comment about the Lego balloon.

Legosats launch from helium balloons. They can rise to a maximum ceiling of the density of the craft/atmosphere. At that point the legosat should store the helium to be used as thrust. Fill much he and use ionizer to provide thrust. Use a exectable chemical engine for the initial thrusting. Saving your he for fine stationkeep. Then it should detach from the balloon. Immediatly drop away from the balloon and its legosat attachments. (These will be different in every system and launch so be weary of that balloon). In order to move Legoman Balloonist from 33km to 300+km LEO, you would need thrust. You need to use the Hohmann Transfer to attain the new orbit. Then stationkeeping. To go to GSO is a whole different Legoman. Start small.

Legoman systems should allow many excellent detection deviced;video, temp, magetic, radiowaves with extending antenna. Many excellent systems can provide supurb monitoring. Like a firesat system. Looking for forest fires.
Please notify local FAA AND NASA OF ANY PLANNED LAUNCHES!!! Minisat opensource platform Space Mission Analysis And Design should be on your desk with every page taped to the next. Enjoy!!

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Defeat SOPA

It is ignorance that a to even come up. The people drafting this remind me of Germany 1935. You must restricted to what they want you to know.

Besides. Really. Do you think we would allow this?

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Assassination is Illegal, Immoral, and Just Aweful.

You do have the right to ever use assassination as a tool. We are a civilization. If some country or person breakes the laws. They should be delt with according to law. Through arrest and judicial proceedure!

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Dimensional requirments and solutions forming the Standard Vibration Model

Every model has its basis proof. It is the basis in which the medium in which it operates.

Dark Energy Dimenaional Analysis:
1) In the first dimension there is only information.
1a) All Real Numbers from -1 to 1
1b) Includung all Rational, Irrational, Zero, and Null.
2) The second dimension is derived.
2a) Functions
2aa)There are only two root functions. All other functions are a manipulation of these two functions.
2aaa) addition
2aab) inverse
2b) Structures : The inverse of the concept of a number is a structure.
2ba) An individual strcucture is a boson.
2baa) Energy is transformed by boson to boson interaction.
2bab) Structures that loose their form, dissipate their information quickly.
3) The 3rd dimension is derived from the rules of the second dimension : Energy.
3a) Transform of information : Time
3aa) Interesting feature is that this concept removes uncertainty issues. Now a location in space can sum all the functions affecting a Dark Energy Ruleset at that point.
3b) Location Information : A location in space
3c) Result

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Hydrogen and Helium

Hydrogen looks like elliptical galaxies. Helium looks like a spiral galaxies. Lithium looks like and reacts like an open cluster. Berylilium is similar to a closed cluster.

I know that is not scientific, nor poetic. But heah, I can be allowed some fuzzy logic poetic license in seeing the macro universe.

Monday, October 24, 2011

Dark Matter holds no information

We have seen fantastic pictures of magnetic(gravitational) lensing.

My wonder would be to compare each pic from spacecraft at 10au in a polar orbit of the sun. What effects would the spacecraft position have on the information received over time?

In this model Dark Matter are gluons with null information. When Dark Matter interacts with W+/- bosons it starts to rotate, attract, and repel. Starting the process of Baryonic Density Matter.

It would also show how the Heliosphere interacts with Dark Matter, showing different views of interesting objects.

In thinking about replacing NASA jobs factories can be set through out the states. The requirements for the mission are being finalized.

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

I am watching these videos.

This is here to remind myself where I am in the process.
I want to thank Rein Reinkort from Estonia. He has posed a problem that has helped extend my ideas on the purpose of neutrinos.

New Revolutions in Particle Physics: Basic Concepts

Friday, September 23, 2011

CERN webcast shows the speed of light is not a barrier

The OPERA experiment, which observes a neutrino beam from CERN 730 km away at Italy's INFN Gran Sasso Laboratory, will present new results in a seminar at CERN this afternoon at 16:00 CEST. The seminar will be webcast. Journalists wishing to ask questions may do so via twitter using the hash tag #nuquestions, or via the usual CERN communication channels.

This supports the Standard Vibration Model by showing that sub-atomic vibrations can and must vibrate past C. By showing different vibrations have a directional rate of x, we must consider the type of vibration, the information stored, the medium the vibration is travelling through and the impact of other vibrations upon the vibration.

This model needs the neutrino to exceed the speed of light to maintian the strength and integrity of the baryon and its relevent bosons. ------- Other articles of interest on this. Success or failure, for Einstein its all relative.

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Farewell

http://www.gutenberg.org/

The loss of Michael Hart is very personal. The project he started really was the only real library I had available to me.

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

The path a Z Boson takes through a Baryon

The baryon needs to communicate a bit of information to itself that it received from it's electron. Then it needs to change itself based on that information. Then it needs to express its new self.

That is the simple logic.

A gluon is a string of tori. Each torus is connected to the next by a neutrino. I know, I have belittled the poor neutrino. Now I need three different types. The neutrino is the glue of the gluon. I will explain this later.

Again, a gluon is a string of tori.
A torus is a doughnut shape. A string of tori has a tube down the center. This is where the Z Boson continues throughout the baryon. It changes each torus and receives information from each torus.

"R and r are also known as the "major radius" and "minor radius"[1]

Back to those Neutrinos. In an UUD Baryon the Electron Neutrino wraps the two Up gluons like a ring. If the length of the gluons change, the Electron Neutrino maintains that only one torus of each gluon exits at a time. The Electron Neutrino is the gate between the Z boson and the gluon. Now the Z Boson is inside the Gluon. It probably travels in through one Up Gluon and through the down Gluon and out the other Up Gluon. From there the Z Boson travels to the Electron.

Now for the Tau Neutrino. This is where the W+/- Boson exits the Down Gluon at it's midpoint.

The Muon Neutrino connects each torus together.

This provides the conduit for information to transfer and change itself. The baryon will change its density, conductivity, capacitance, and rotation. Then it will express that information.

Friday, August 26, 2011

End of Higgs strengthens my resolve.

Posted on the Nature website.
"Higgs signal sinks from view."

This requires the model to maintain the observations and discoveries made at the labs. In my view there needs to be a reexamination of what is known and how they interact.

Thursday, August 25, 2011

Errors, friction, three dimensions count in physics.

This article was written by Brian Palmer

I will add to this when I feel better.

Friday, August 19, 2011

Fine structure in solar weather

NASA & ESA

This article was posted on Red Orbit

I am glad to see detail to yours and my models. Nice image.

This video shows the spiral nature of the solar weather.

This process is called the Parker Spiral

Credit Wikipedia

Thanks

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

Object oriented physics.

I know it sounds a bit weird. But the general structure of the universe described by the Standard Vibration model is that of an object oriented programming language like C++.

The Bosons are 3d data structures of differing types. Proceedures and functions are how Bosons interact. Chemistry shows inheritance and parent-child relationships.

I describe information interaction in the posting draft problem 2

This model has to have a computational feel since it does use electro-magnetism to transmit and manipulate information.

Enjoy

Sunday, August 7, 2011

Curosity, Hawkins

I have always been intrigued by the models generated by Professor Hawkins. Be it his genius or his overcoming his disability. Whenever I see him or hear the voice systhesis, I stop everything.

But this latest program called "Curosity", really does nothing to improve curosity and really just clutters the models.

1) The universe is not symmetrical or equal.
2) dividing by zero causes an asymptote.
3) Trigonometry is the basis of matter.
4) Gravity is a failure... Why, Helium balloons.

Many more are listed throughout this blog.

It almost feel as if you took Pope John Paul II advise.

Aaron Guerami

Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Perception of a dimension is not REAL

This came to me from a Fermilab Today Newsletter. Dated 07-22-2011.
"Stricter bounds on extra dimensions


What looks like a one-dimensional world to a large creature might actually be two-dimensional at smaller scales.
One of the goals of the LHC is to search for evidence of extra dimensions— spatial directions such as length, breadth and height, but curled or curved in a way that hides their existence in everyday life. In a recent paper, CMS scientists presented new bounds on such a scenario.

Extra dimensions could hide from our perception by curling into tiny loops. A particle that drifts a microscopic distance in this new direction would circumnavigate the loop and arrive at its starting point almost immediately. The universe might have several microscopic dimensions in addition to the three large dimensions that we know well.

Collisions in the LHC could reveal new dimensions by creating particles that are small enough to fit inside them. High-energy colliders are often called microscopes because the energetic particles they make fill less space than low-energy particles, which allows them to probe the smallest structures in nature. If extra dimensions exist, then some energy would seem to disappear from view as particles traverse the tiny loops. In the CMS detector, this would look like an energy imbalance in the highest-energy collisions.

In this analysis, the scientists studied collisions resulting in a large energy imbalance. Their observations are consistent with the conventional three dimensions, so if a fourth, fifth or sixth dimension does exist, then it must be curled up even smaller than previously hypothesized. For example, if there are six new dimensions, then they can be no larger than about 20 femtometers, which is as small as an atomic nucleus. This is two times smaller than what was previously considered.

In a nice feat of recycling, the same experimental measurement applies to a completely different theory. Hypothetical particles without a well-defined mass, called unparticles, would produce similar patterns in the collision debris. Wasting not, the authors tightened the world's knowledge about unparticles as well."

—XXX Xxxxxxxx
-----------------
Response:

In the Standard Vibration Model, there are only 3 dimensions. Time is managed by the individual Bosons using counters, be it waves or rotations. This time counter for each boson shows change when interacting with other bosons

Let's look at the anaology presented above. The chameleon obviously lives in 3d. It can move in x,y,z directions. It can jump, duck, go right or left, and forward and back; x,y,z.

Let's look at the ant. The ant in this model lives in a 2d world; x,y. This is absurd! I have seen ants crawl up my leg to bite me. So even the ant lives in 3d. A smart and lucky ant would see the predator and try to flee.

Even at the microscopic level animals that are on a slide move in 3d. Why? Because there is enough water between the two plates of glass to provide a space to move.

Monday, July 25, 2011

Students can participate in real time solar weather study

NASA and The Stanford Solar Center have produced a inexpensive tool for people to watch solar weather.

http://sas.ivv.nasa.gov/audience/foreducators/9-12/features/students-track-space-weather.html

Enjoy

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Star Forming Density

This is an interesting article by Jon Voisey called Star Forming Density - How Low Can You Go?

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Very Large cracks found around the earth.

The earth is cracking
In the Standard Vibration Model, this effect is caused by the magnetosphere compression by CMEs.

These crack occur outside the earthquake epicenter, but they occur at the same time in different locations on the planet. Although most of the discharge of Z Bosons occurs at the epicenter, these cracks form when the magnetosphere releases the compression on the earth.

Friday, June 10, 2011

NASA finds magnetic bubbles at the edge of our solar system

Yeah, Vouager.

I could never praise the Voyager teams enough. The pictures from these marvels of technology made me want to see more. I wanted to understand.

Thanks for keeping those spacecraft going. They are responsible for ever more and more discoveries.

I have some questions, but I need some time to formulate them.

Wednesday, June 8, 2011

Transverse and longitudinal Zeeman Effect

These are some short Youtube videos on the Zeeman Effect.

Longitudional
That was interesting. This group shows their equipment and their longitudinal line split.
Video

Now the transverse observations of the Zeeman effect.
Video 1
Video 2 With polarization.

These videos verify the rotational aspect of the photon and its interactions predicted and described in this Standard Vibration Model.

Monday, June 6, 2011

New Thinking in Treatment of Epilepsy

External stimulation treatment.

I found this on the MIT daily newsletter. It is nice to see neurologist across the nation using E/M externally to start new theories of treatment.

I would also think a Faraday Cage helmet where the magnetic field variations are pushed around the head, allowing for a more controlled enviornment. Yet far enough away from the treatment electrodes to allow a shielding around the mobile patient.

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Distribution of Spiral galaxies

How typical are the satellites of the Milky Way? from Risa Wechsler on Vimeo.


Galaxies in Real and Simulated Universes from Risa Wechsler on Vimeo.


Formation of the Milky Way and its Neighbors from Risa Wechsler on Vimeo.


Credit NSF, SDSS

Excellent work in modeling then comparing to real data.

I need to add that ^CDM is a model of cosmology that stands on its own. Its use of gravity is a major difference. But I am glad to see major work on dark matter densities.

Sunday, May 22, 2011

Gamma Ray Bursts

This story comes from universetoday.com

The author Steve Nerlich states,
"Gamma ray bursts an artifact of the mathematics of General Relativity".

This is a direct failure of GR. It cannot understand or account for energy being released from what it deems the basis of it's model. GR ans SR are a derivitive of Gravity in two dimensions. With this issue GR and SR are not capable of describing energy as expressed as spectra, electricity, magnetism, or density. So the need to create theoretical nonsense to fix the math. If a model of physics includes; time travel, white holes, Black holes... then it needs to be reexamined.

The Einsteinians need to know that it is the elecrodynamics world which can account for these Gamma Rays. Thay are created in many labs throught the world.

It is from these labs that observation is destroying known theory.

The Standard Vibration Model expresses information from one baryon to another. This is the major difference between most models and this one. This model uses known observation to explain even minute issues like

Thursday, May 19, 2011

On CME effects on tectonic plates

When The STEREO and other spacecraft evlauating solar flares and other properties of the sun. We see the CMEs rupture and eject charged bits of information about the Sun's local inormation. It is known that these charged bits of information take several days to reach the Earth's Magnetosphere. It is known these impacts deform the magnetosphere during these events.

I was watching the Science Channel (Predicting Monster Earthquakes). A show on earthquakes. What was of great interest to me was the Dr. Freedom and Dr. Frund placed stone under extreme pressure was capable of storing large amounts of current under load.

Another thing I notice is the USGS always reports a depth of the earthquake. I evaluate this depth as the point current exceeds capacitance. The depth point of grounding is the electric discharge. Since the grounding current exceeds the capacitance a rupture occurs.

The Standard Vibration Model describes this event as a Z boson loop fracture. Charged bits of information is hurled perpendicular from the ex-loop towards the Earth. More exacting: towards the position the Earth will be in, during the time of impact. Those bits of information hit the magnetosphere. The Earth grounds the over-capactance of the magnetosphere to an appropriate capacitator and ruptures.

Jupiter sized planets floating in space without a star

NSF

Most interesting

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Plasma bubbles feeds Coronal Mass Ejections.

This is another amazing picture of the Sun.

I found it at space.com


Credit: Japan's Hinode Spacecraft, Lockheed Martin

Thursday, May 12, 2011

PME Porous Equation Model

The Porous Equation Model is a great read.

I am easily enjoying the standards of mathematical rigor and the simplicity in which the concepts are layed out and described. This will prove quite useful in this model. Thanks to the author and all the people who developed the concepts and applications found in this book.

Many thanks
Aaron Guerami

Thursday, May 5, 2011

So NASA proves Einstein was correct, hpppppt

Credit NASA

NASA PROVES EINSTEIN CORRECT

WHAT?

So the 3-d field cannot equal ever a vector * a scalar did not disturb you.
-----------------------

Let's Quote the press release.
"The experiment, launched in 2004, used four ultra-precise gyroscopes to measure the hypothesized geodetic effect, the warping of space and time around a gravitational body, and frame-dragging, the amount a spinning object pulls space and time with it as it rotates.

GP-B determined both effects with unprecedented precision by pointing at a single star, IM Pegasi, while in a polar orbit around Earth. If gravity did not affect space and time, GP-B's gyroscopes would point in the same direction forever while in orbit. But in confirmation of Einstein's theories, the gyroscopes experienced measurable, minute changes in the direction of their spin, while Earth's gravity pulled at them.

[Let's start here. A gyroscope will feel any effect from any boson. So if a star is near by and rotating. Then you will have a minute changes. The W+/- boson has attractive properties and repulsive properties. This would allow for minute change in angular velocity. The light changes notices can be attreibuted to the Zeeman Effect.]

The findings are online in the journal Physical Review Letters.

"Imagine the Earth as if it were immersed in honey. [ Really Honey, the earth has a rotating ionic atmosphere.] As the planet rotates, the honey around it would swirl, and it's the same with space and time," said Francis Everitt, GP-B principal investigator at Stanford University. "GP-B confirmed two of the most profound predictions of Einstein's universe, having far-reaching implications across astrophysics research. Likewise, the decades of technological innovation behind the mission will have a lasting legacy on Earth and in space." GP-B is one of the longest running projects in NASA history, with agency involvement starting in the fall of 1963 with initial funding to develop a relativity gyroscope experiment. Subsequent decades of development led to groundbreaking technologies to control environmental disturbances on spacecraft, such as aerodynamic drag, magnetic fields and thermal variations. The mission's star tracker and gyroscopes were the most precise ever designed and produced. GP-B completed its data collection operations and was decommissioned in December 2010. "The mission results will have a long-term impact on the work of theoretical physicists," said Bill Danchi, senior astrophysicist and program scientist at NASA Headquarters in Washington. "Every future challenge to Einstein's theories of general relativity will have to seek more precise measurements than the remarkable work GP-B accomplished." Innovations enabled by GP-B have been used in GPS technologies that allow airplanes to land unaided. Additional GP-B technologies were applied to NASA's Cosmic Background Explorer mission, which accurately determined the universe's background radiation. That measurement is the underpinning of the big-bang theory, and led to the Nobel Prize for NASA physicist John Mather. The drag-free satellite concept pioneered by GP-B made a number of Earth-observing satellites possible, including NASA's Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment and the European Space Agency's Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer. These satellites provide the most precise measurements of the shape of the Earth, critical for precise navigation on land and sea, and understanding the relationship between ocean circulation and climate patterns. GP-B also advanced the frontiers of knowledge and provided a practical training ground for 100 doctoral students.

[I am not dismissing the experimental physics. I am pissed that the theorist did not extend their data to other models. Is this failure the last thing NASA wants to be known for?

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Tesla's radioactive decay.

This is a great article on the sun's effect on radioactive decay. Credit:ZPenergy

This model falls under the third model of aether described in that article.

Oh yeah, That Tesla guy keeps getting proved correct.

Aaron

changes in density?

Great article from Cosmos.

Aaron,
It is going to take some time to recover from the last set. I will continue my writting of mathematics of bosons within dark energy rulesets. Future postings will try to keep me on that tract for you and me.

Must be hard to read about observational reality throught rose colored glasses.

Saturday, April 30, 2011

Large charge in atmosphere?

Over the last couple of days I have been experiensing general pressure/ charge throughout my body. This associated with a very light blue to white unshielded CRT. This makes me think I am going to have a massive seizure today. I have had them all week. I think we are building in charge. I think we are building to another large earthquake.

I need to check space weather for CMEs. But right now I am exhausted. This need not happen. I also need to start measuring the duration of my seizures.
Aaron

Seizure
0625 est
0628 end

Goinh to sleep.

Panama 08:19 loc 6.1

Monday, April 25, 2011

Theories of everything

On top of all the natural physics. The requirements of a 'Theory of Everything' should be its ability to predict and explain how thought can manipulate bosons from large observed, manmade structures, to natural pheonemea? Why is math needed. How is information manipulated.
You think. That exists.

This very long blog does that.

Aaron Guerami

So that means from boson to thought. Boson to fields...
This model needs to include dark matter and dark energy. But not in an Einstein solution. Flat universe. What a joke.

Earthquake?

At 7:03est I was thrown from my bed
At 14:00est I was capable of communication. At a resturant.
I think there was an earthquake.
It was a bad day.
6.2 Sulawesi.

~20:00 est seizure. Tonga maybe. It was not as strong and I went to bed.

A

Thursday, April 21, 2011

Star Formation Linked to Sonic Booms

credit ESA :


Great picture of densities crashing into each other creating stronger heat, magnetism, electricity, and density fields in the process.

Star Formation through known processes

Friday, April 15, 2011

Heliosphere points towards Scorpius

National Geographic reports heliosphere points towards Scorpius

the people at IBEX did a great job in creating that map. Cheers

The clarity of time

In the Standard Vibration Model time is local to the individual boson.

This means there is no Universal Clock. This also means all functions, interactions, and equations are under the domain of bounded series and order of operations. This is Leibnetz Calculus not Newtonian.

With Newtonian calculus you are plotting the next discrete point. Digital
With Bounded seried you are adding/manipulating the series. Analog

Add to this, in reality, All numbers are Real. Integers only exist in the minds of men.

I want to thank Clayton Allen for the discussion on series.

Aaron Guerami

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Gluon length state

In a previous posting I show detonation occurs when Gluon Length <= 0. Deflagration occurs when the length and temperature information ->

Flame occurs when two of the three gluons untangle. This disassociation of information causes flame plasma and the release of temperature at the distance of the frequency. The information released from the gluon disperses as plasma until it tangles with an ion from the colder medium. CO

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Solar Weather effects Earth's tectonics

It has been difficult to focus on one topic when so many catastrophic issues facing us. I have been writting on the effect of CMEs on planets. We see a direct effect on the Earth's Magnetosphere and Tectonic effects caused by solar events.


Credit: NASA

---
This is the CME that caused the 9.0 Japan earthquake and tsuanmi. This video shows the event three times and then shows a bar graph. It is also interesting that an object is in orbit infront of the Sun. As the final CME explodes the object is moved drastically out of orbit.



The CME is a charged electric field, a large composite of Z bosons. This event travels at the speed of Charge (electricity) in the medium of the space. We see these events 2-3 days before the charge event hits the magnetosphere. Thus it is not possible for electricty or charge to travel at C.

The CMEC travels until it hits a W+/- boson field that is capable of storing capacitance and intensiy of the Z boson field. This process is described in the papers and postings through out this blog.

When these CMEs hit the Earth's Magnetosphere, it deforms the longitudinal field of the W+/- boson magnetosphere. The intensity absorbsion is affected by the angle of impact and charge of the object.

Credit:ESA

Another interesting thing is that Japan was not facing the Sun during the CME impact. The epicenter is the point where tension is released. This means more tension was added to the plate system in different areas to cause this release of tension where the epicenter occured.

Sunday, March 13, 2011

Precious People

Om mani padme hum

Thursday, March 10, 2011

Participate in Particle Physics Research

Interactions.org

Reminds me of how powerful BOINC is. Dristributed computing is far more interesting than cloud computing.

The two concepts are inverse of each other. Distributed computing encourages competition in processing power and collaboration in programming efficiencies. Many people and resources working on a standardized solution to the complicated problem.

Whereas Cloud Computing is opaque and monitored. It just seems the cloud is the ideology we have been trying to avoid while building networks. Each cloud can have its own rules behind the firewall. This reduces the chance data will be usable from one cloud to another.

Friday, February 25, 2011

Order of operations, 1st iteration

Dark Energy shows an order of operations in Boson mechanics, energy, and information systems.

I have had a back of napkin, epiphany. There is an order of operations involved in physics interactions.

Gluon -> Gluon = density
Gluon -> Z Boson = electrodynamics
Z Boson -> electron = plasmadynamics
Electron -> photon = photo-electric effect
Electron -> W+/- Boson = magnetodynamics
W+/- boson -> photon = Zeeman Effect
Photon -> electron = thermodynamics, the Compton Effect
W+/- boson -> electron = magnetodynamics

It is the effects caused by asymptotes that show this logical behavior. This allows for the effect to occur. The inverse of a vortex is a torus. This shows a relation in the model to describe the inverse nature of magnetism and electricity.

I found a nice site with definitions. The Laws List

Monday, January 31, 2011

Le Sage's Theory of Gravitation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LeSage_gravity

Had I known about Le Sage and Fatio's work, I would have attempted to support their idea. Their model is great for pre-modern physics experiments. I am surprised that this model is not the basic model taught and expounded upon in later studies. I doubt I would have ever studied the Zeeman effect and from there Bosons, if I had read this paper. I would have never come to understand the relationship between information, expressive bosons and baryons. I would have never understood the medium for mathematics involved during interactions in Dark Energy. I started with the pictures from CERN and Gravitational Lensing.

The Standard Vibration Model is not an expounding of Le Sage's gravitation model. It is an information model. It explains how that information is translated into existence and energy fields.

Enjoy,
Aaron

Thursday, January 27, 2011

Solar Observatories





This is another important video, it shows an object hitting the sun and the effects.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snf9Pqimlpg&NR=1

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Arctowski Medal of the National Academy of Sciences

Congratulations to Jack Harvey at the National Solar Observatory for being awarded the Arctowski Medal.

http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Solar_Physicist_Wins_NAS_Award_999.html

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Data showing connections between magnetosphere and earthquakes

Good data blog

Magnetosphere Simulation Images and Earthquakes (26): 2011/1/16T01:02 to 2011/1/18T13:00
They did a wonderful job showing the relationship of how earthquakes occur as described in this model.

http://poleshift.ning.com/profiles/blogs/magnetosphere-simulation-487?xg_source=activity

Scroll down there are a lot of pictures corresponding to earthquake data.
There is a lot of data on the site/
http://poleshift.ning.com/profiles/blog/list?user=1dx062nxh9sxp
Good job.

Monday, January 10, 2011

ESA Solar winds

Credit: ESA

Nice. I think it a great depiction of interaction between planets of differing magnetic fields.

In this model Z Boson are emitted from the Sun as a lightning strike. The Earth's rotating magnetic field compresses and is altered by Z Boson strike. If the Z Boson strike is intense enough it will cause an earthquake. The earthquake occurs at the Earth's weakest crust at the intensity depth of the Z Boson strike.

Sunday, January 9, 2011

Solar inner Corona

Thursday, January 6, 2011

Repost of Draft problem 2

There are many relevant comments listed on the original posting. 
I hope this helps those who were having issues with the display of original posting.
Aaron Guerami
------------------------------

To do this I need to build the description of the photon,

The photon is an analog of information about the emitting baryon. This data structure called the photon holds information on the emitting baryon's nature.

The information contained in a photon transmits the temperature of the emitting baryon.

A bit of information is called a meme. Fractals are used to reduce the complex information to smaller, more discrete variables. Three memes rotating, producing 4 bits of information.

Level of information.
Lever 4 data is raw information. All higher level dataset is a derivative of the level 4 data.
Level 4 data is 4 bit
Level 3 dataset is 16 bits
Level 2 dataset is 64 bits
Level 1 dataset is 256 bits

3 Level 4 datasets + rotation = 1 Level 3 rotating dataset.
3 Level 3 datasets + rotation = 1 Level 2 rotating dataset
3 Level 2 datasets + rotation = 1 Level 1 rotating dataset
3 Level 1 datasets + rotation = 1 photon.

4 dimensions of information in 4 dimensions of space.

Wave Length: u(λ,T) = ((8(pi)hc)/λ^5)*(1/e^(hc/λkT)-1)
Planck's Equations are quite useful. The reason they work so well is they are not influenced by gravity. By using Max Planck wave length equations, we can derive the temperature and frequency of the wave length.
The wavelength of a photon is the information about the photon.

The memes of the (L1)wave length are;
(L2) the wave length

(L2)the radius of the wave length to the midpoint of rotation at the largest area of the cone.

(L2) the velocity of the spin
(L2)previous position ((L3)x,y,z).

Frequency: u(v,T) = ((8(pi)hv^3)/(c^3))*(1/(e^(hv/kT)-1)
The frequency of the photon is the intensity of the emitting baryon.
The memes of the (L1) Frequency are
(L2) angular momentum of each meme.
(L2) The frequency or vibration of each meme.
(L2) Spin Velocity (speed and direction) of each meme.
(L2) Previous Spin Velocity.


Spectra:
The Spectra of the photon is the identification of the emitting baryon. By evaluating what is missing in the spectra, the receiving baryon can identify the part the molecule the emitting baryon was. Spectra also describes the identity and intensity from the emitting baryon of every magnetic field the photon passes through.

u = spectra. The emitting Baryon leaves its identification on the spectra. Along the spectral line, where the temperature = 0, identifies the emitting baryon and the history of photon and W+/- Boson interactions. Spectra is the temperature.


Spin:
The spin of the photon is the counter of the photon.


----------------------



Lets look at this through a filter. What happens to the photons when I place a filter on my telescope?


The filter absorbs or reflects photons. It also allows some photons to pass through, but altered.


The Spectra of a photon is the identification of the emitting baryon and the history of what magnetic fields the photon has passed through.


--------------
Polishing a mirror. The interaction of the photon and electron.

Polishing a mirror is smoothing the glass molecules and moving almost all the electrons on one side of the glass to the next layers of the glass. The uncharged mirror then can reflect the photon.


It is important to understand that a photon must be absorbed and created by an electron. The electron is the interaction of the Z Boson and the W+/- Boson.




----------
Move to new posting


Photons in motion through Dark Energy.
1) the photons motion in general
2) Dark Energy
3) Interactions
a) W+/- Boson
b) baryons without electrons
4) Electron emission
5) Electron absorption


Problem 2
2) The perception of it being slower when passing through a non-vacuum is due to the time lost to photons being absorbed and re-emitted by the matter it is passing through.

------------
Comments
Anonymous said...

So... lots of questions, but I'll withhold them all until you complete your write-up.

But one aspect in particular is bugging me... why the discretization via fixed sized values? It seems so arbitrary and limiting. For example, you define the "previous position" as a set of 3 16-bit spacial values... that's incredibly limiting. You're saying that each dimension of space only contains 65536 possible positions, and that there are only 281 trillion total positions in space a photon can be in at any point in time? Why? And in what way does that aid your theory in producing results?

And what about time? What does "previous" mean in your context? When exactly did the "previous position" apply? A second ago? A half second ago? A quarter second ago? One "counter" interval ago?

I don't understand how you can use the word "analog" so often, but have a theory that represents everything digitally.
--------------
Hi, Thanks for the comment.

I am going to start backwards and work towards the first point.

Yes, the data is digital. But the motion of the data is very analog. Electronics requires an Analog to Digital converter to convert real data to digital data.

Analog is a 3+1 dimensional set of data in motion. Whereas digital data is very 2 dimensional. Even 3 dimensional digital data is a series of sets of 2 dimensional digital datasets which are converted into 3 dimensions. Then usually displayed in 2 dimensions.

The previous position is the last Dark Energy position the photon traveled through. Dark Energy in this theory is where the math is done in each and every position. I call these discrete Dark Energy positions 'Rulesets'.

Since the speed of light is variable, we can see that there are many possible partial and complete + partial rotations a photon can have while travelling though a ruleset.

Time is local to the photon travelling. A baryon rotates, so its time is local to the baryon.

It is not necessary for bosons and baryons to run on an Universal Timeclock.

Yes, the sizes of the datasets are arbitrary. It is limiting. But this is the first theory that even attempts to describe data in this manner.

I have never hear the number of positions a photon can have in space at any point in time. I realize my data sets are small compared to the actual data involved. 4^16 might be more realistic to explain a 4th level data point.

Since this is only the second iteration of this model I expect these minor issues can be easily managed. In the first iteration of this model (most of the blog), I don't actually try and describe the information in detail. For the photon I describe the information as only temperature, wave length, frequency and counter.

Please ask as many questions as you want. This kind of conversation helps me recover. The quicker I recover the quicker I can add new issues to this model.

Many Thanks
Aaron Guerami
----------------------

Anonymous said...

It wouldn't matter if you're data size was hyper-exponential, it's still finite, and don't see anything to suggest, in the standard model or in yours, that space has any finite aspect, but is instead nonenumerably infinite in all dimensions, in which case, any attempt to discretize it is flawed from the start.

Digital is NOT a model of reality to begin with. Digital models are inherently abstract, and say nothing whatsoever about the universe around us. They come about from purely mathematicaly manipulation in the form of numerical constructs, which themselves are universal abstractions, independent of and unyielding to any aspect of our physical universe.

And as an abstract model of information, "digital" can be of any (finite) number of (finite) dimensions. The digital representation of a 3D cube is 3 dimensional, period. Yes, the 2D rendering of a 3D cube is 2D, but you don't have to render it. You could just calculate with it, or convert it to a data file for transmission, or use it to model cubic routing calculations through a distributed network, or what have you. The cube is abstract, and genuinely 3D. And likewise, other digital constructs can be genuinely N dimensional in their construction.

Although I would accept the argument that all digital data is 1 dimensional, owing to the fact that any N dimensional digital data set can be represented by a single number. But inherently 2D? Don't think so.

Coming back to the point, to ascribe to a particle a digital packet of information is making (what seems to me anyway) an unexplained leap.

Also, I went and read some of your material on Dark Matter... some things are a little clearer now. But another point there, somewhat relating back to this conversation: you break up the universe into cube-structured regions, and base the counter interaction with these regions. Again, you've discretized the universe.

(Just to check my assumptions, it seems rulesets are fixed regions of space through which vibrations traverse, and in doing so, their local clock, in the form of the counter, is incremented. Ignore the following if that's not true.)

As a consequence, the "counter" will increment at different rates based soley on the direction of travel of a "vibration", and independent of it's velocity, which is unintuitive.

Just for giggles, let's define each ruleset's region as a 1 unit by 1 unit by 1 unit space (where "unit" is arbitrary... I think you have it as a boson width).

So when traveling exactly parallel one of the axes at a velocity of, say, 1 unit per second, for, say, 10 seconds, you'll travel 10 units.

But let's say you travel at a 45 degree angle through a plane (which itself is perpendicular to one of the axes), now, the cubic regions are longer than they were before, since the diagonal of a square is longer than the width (by a ratio of Sqrt[2]). So now, at the same velocity of 1 unit per second, and over the same duration of 10 seconds, you'll only traverse 10/(1*Sqrt[2]) units total, or ~7.07 units. Similar logic if you travel diagonal to all three axes.

So at the same velocity and for the same duration, your counter increments 10 times in one direction, but only 7 in another, and still less in others.

Of course, the alternate explanation is that vibrations "jump" from cube to cube, rather than continuously flow through space defined by their union. In which case, you now have a new problem. At the same velocity and for the same duration, your counter will now stay the same, but you will have actually traveled different distances dependent on the direction of travel, since moving along the diagonals will allow you to jump farther in a single unit than moving along the axes.

Either way, the basic equation "velocity = distance / time" doesn't hold, and the discretization still seems arbitrary and in conflict with the physical universe.
------------------
Hi, Thanks for the comment. I want to take the time to read your postings then formulate some solutions or re-evaluate some problems.

I know the dark energy solution is the most difficult part of all this.

I think there are many current solutions in physics that are ridiculous at best. This is an attempt to evaluate a better solution to these problems. Really, I hear about time travel more then I hear about charge.

If the model used can be solved with a byproduct of time travel or an infinite number of dimensions or multiverse, well then the solution is not correct.

I chose the discrete data model with the analog movement because that is what we see in reality. In order for discrete data to transmit/receive it must involve DAC and ADC conversions. The model of physics must include these processes as the foundation of the manner in which it operates.

I am going to think about the motion. Being that cube have their own problems and spheres have theirs,,, well I have some thinking to do.

Thanks again for reading my work.
Aaron Guerami
----------------------
Hi,

I spend some time reading and thinking about your comment.

Every model has some form of arbitrary unit. SR and GR use the Cosmological Constant. Gravity changes frequently. The absolute constant of the speed of light changes constantly.

Einstein's Space-Time is 2 dimensional. It is a plane, flat. The third dimension is the effect of 1 dimensional mass on the plane.

Dark Energy in this model does not have a clock. Time is local to the boson travelling though the ruleset. So the boson may rotate partially or in positive real numbers through the ruleset. The ruleset does not impact the boson's rotation.

The distance from the origin of a ruleset to X(n),Y(n),Z(n) is always farther then X(0),Y(0),Z(n). But that is the reason this model is set in this manner. This really shows that space is really not relevant to the boson. It is the interaction of bosons that create the change in bosons. Not the space in which they travel.

Digital data is 2 dimensional. The requirement of digital data is the construct and the data. The construct must exist before holding data. The data can be null, but the construct still exists.

I have shown in the previous posting a photon that is not rotating. By that picture we can toss the equation Velocity = distance/time. There are many models that we currently use that need reexamination.

Jumping from ruleset to ruleset is a problem that I will continue to evaluate. At this point I find the storage of the current position as the previous position through out the ruleset does hold some merit.

Thanks again.
Aaron
-----------------

Anonymous said...

No problem, I'll give you time to digest.

I think my main problem (with respect to the discretization stuff) is well summarized by your last comment: "I chose the discrete data model with the analog movement because that is what we see in reality."

My mind is somewhat willing to bend on discretization to some degree, what with quanta being well established. But on fixed-bit-width finite values? Eh...

And regarding time, you previously mentioned "Time is local to the photon traveling.", so it seems like you may be subject to the same relativistic effects of clock locality that SR is subject to, so I'm not so sure you've avoided the time travel issue, but I'd have to hear more.

And regarding square vs cube, that's not really the whole issue. With spheres, you'd have the sphere packing issue (dead space). And with either, you also have the issue of the vibration traveling off center or at odd angles, such that it may experience more or less counter changes... imagine a vibration traveling diagonally through a 2d grid through the square centerpoints, vs one also traveling diagonally, but offset from the center points. The latter would experience twice as many counters as the former. In fact the one traveling through the center points is a degenerate case, with the vast majority experiencing double time. Same problem with any manner of shapes, provided they're aligned along some vector.

I'm picking at these little model issues because they're foundational, and thus impact the rest of your work if they're not sensible. But stepping back, where are the results? For instance, you dig up Planck's equation... he established his black-body law while trying to theoretically model the results of experiment, and once completed, had an equation that was able to do so. And altough perhaps his explanation was lacking, the work was picked up and extended into a complete theory.

But I don't see that here.

Not trying to be condescending, by the way. You're probably familiar with much of this, and you obviously have given it a lot of though that I haven't had the luxury of, but I just want to make sure I state things clearly and don't assume too much.
---------------------

Anonymous said...

RE arbitary units: That constant is a correction factor to make up for what seems to be an ever present energy level, and introducing it enabled theoretical results to match experiment. It was brought in to the theory for a reason, and as such isn't quite arbitrary. Your reduction of all parameters to finite domain doesn't seem to have been introduced to achieve any positive effect or to increase the accuracy of any calculations.

RE distance: Yes, X(n),Y(n),Z(n) is farther from the origin in a flat geometry than X(0),Y(0),Z(n), but that wasn't the point. My point was simply that the number of rulesets the particle will pass through is the same, even though one is further away, which seemed an inconsistency worth mentioning. 0,0,0->1,1,1->2,2,2->3,3,3 is the same number of rulesets as 0,0,0->0,0,1->0,0,2->0,0,3, yet the first is 4.24 units long in space, while the latter only 3. Is that desirable?

RE digital data: Interesting viewpoint. First, I could argue that analog data is also 2D in that sense. Simple waves are given structure by saying they are all solutions to a sin(b x + c), and the content would be all real-valued 3-tuples (a, b, c) represented in physicality as actual waves, which isn't much different to representing digital waves as finite n-bit 3-tuples (a, b, c) to be interpreted as having the same structure, and represented in physicality as a sequence of 3n bits. Both the analong and digital version would be called 3-D, interpreting each to have 3 free independent variables. I don't see the difference.

RE photon rotating: I've been purposefully not referring to the constancy of C issue yet :) But I would be curious to see how you would redefine velocity...

And it looks like my previous post is missing... strange.
-----------------
Hi Thanks again for the great conversation.

I don't really like the discrete data model with analog movement, but that is what we have to work with.

I through out the notion of spheres a long time ago (many rotations). For all the reasons you mention.

Personally I don't think Plank's equation is entirely correct. It just does not use gravity. In my main set of equations I wrote in the papers 'Structure of a baryon' and 'Variables involved in Baryonic motion' allow for existing equations and work to be used until something better is established. the black body equation is based on a sphere. But he needed to have some arbitrary shape. I understand.

Lets look at the photon and time again. A photon is 3 dependent data structures rotating around a midpoint. The direction of the midpoint is the direction of the photon.

The wavelength is composed of 3 data structures rotating around a midpoint.

I am changing the second statement in this. The original statement did not communicate the idea correctly.

The memes of the (L1)wave length are;
(L2) the wave length
(L2)the midpoint of the wave length
(L2) the velocity of the spin
(L2)previous position ((L3)x,y,z).

To:

The memes of the (L1)wave length are;
(L2) the wave length
(L2)the radius of the wave length to the midpoint of rotation at the largest area of the cone.
(L2) the velocity of the spin
(L2)previous position ((L3)x,y,z).

Wave lengths are not straight lines, they are vibrating also. This is frequency. It is closely related to wavelength. Temp is also calculated from these two data sets.

I just had a minor seizure so I will need to rest.

Again,
It is the magnetic field that affects the photon's time not dark energy. Dark eneergy is just a place to do the math. time is local to the boson. one boson does not care about another boson's time.

let say one high energy gamma ray and a radio wave hit the ruleset at the point in the observers quasi understanding of local time.

Sorry, lost the idea. need to go.
Aaron
------------------------------

Other comments are on the original posting but are not necessary to move to this. If you wish to read those comments http://aaronsreality.blogspot.com/2010/07/draft-problem-2.html 

I hope that is more helpful then trying to solve the possible pointer error.