Saturday, May 23, 2015

The Artists Who Explains Known Physics

With that I found an artist that explains Quantum Wave better than most teachers.




Credit youtube user nickharvey7
He is a prolific producer of physics video that are based in QM and E/M.
His theory is not The Standard Vibration Model. He does a very good job of explaining aspects of Standard Vibrations and Quantum Mechanics.

But remember Imagination Fakes Knowledge.

Progressive Physics.


  1. Under no circumstances can Physics be described as a simile  or  a metaphor.
  2. End of statement.

Vibes of the Universe

So we are finally discussing asymerty.

The Left Hand of Darkness

https://briankoberlein.com/2015/05/20/the-left-hand-of-darkness/

I am havin a seizure so I posted this as a cleanup of this weeks ideas and news.

Progress in Physics Journal

Tuesday, May 19, 2015

A foundation of magnetism

As it has been pointed out so well there is a foundational idea in induction magnetism. Grand Illusions at Youtube and

Www.grand-illusions.com 

Grand Illusions

This Is the nicest man in magnets!!!

Grand Illusions


By the way Tim calls this an inverted magnet. Others who have contacted me ha also pointed out the relationship of this type of inverted magnet and the motion of the moon.

I called like a lawn dart flying towards Earth.

But the Inverted magnet shows the minima and maxima distances of the magnetic field. And using "Practical astronomy with your computer", this will give all the other positions.


Friday, May 15, 2015

More Evidence Galactic Cores PRODUCE Stars

http://www.astrowatch.net/2015/05/magnetar-near-supermassive-black-hole.html

This is another picture of a Galactic Core ejecting a star.


Credit Chandra.harvard.edu

Sorry gravity.

Chemical Evolution

The bridge between chemical and organic chemistry.

http://statedclearly.com/videos/what-is-chemical-evolution/

This video clearly states how to go from inorganic chem to organic chem.

NASA's Dark Matter Engine

The idea of a nuclear electromagnet propelling a craft through space will work if, the craft exits the solar system to take advantage of a greater density of Dark Matter. The trajectory of the craft must be perpendicular to the direction of the sun's rotation around the galactic core.

But there is a more efficient way.

Monday, May 11, 2015

Ceres the Asteroid.

JPL has a spacecraft orbiting Ceres the asteroid.

Credit JPL, Dawn Mission

Obvious questions start. Are we viewing a pole n/s? We see all of those very large nearly circular craters.

Then there are the high reflectivity gouges. Those are impact craters. They are not circular. Like the moon they are elliptical. The only way a impact crater could have circular edges is if it hits at a near direct impact. Theta has got to be close to 0 else you get an elliptical gouge like the moon in the equatorial region. On the Moon impact craters are white and elliptical.

The round craters with pillars are electrical impacts. Like the moon the show they show the same features. Large round craters with a central pillar.

Credit Tom Ruen

 Moon

Credit Clementine


Sunday, May 10, 2015

More on Pluto

Yes, Pluto is a chunk of ice(we think). I'm not going to judge before the data is in.

Another fantastic picture of Pluto from New Horizons.


Credit New Horizon, 
http:/www.zivilisationen.de

Nice.

Saturday, May 9, 2015

More on Entropy

Its even harder to have an Equal and Opposite Reaction when Entropy is involved in the reaction.

Thus the first law of the universe is entropy. Without interference, every Boson and Baryon reduces by the energy of the Higgs Boson per rotation.

Friday, May 8, 2015

Paradoxes of Energy

Conservation of Energy and Entropy cannot exist in the same universe.

Out of the two, entropy always works. 

Thursday, May 7, 2015

X2.7 Solar Flare


Credit: NASA/GSFC/SDO



Credit NASA/GSFC/SDO

I can expect seizures between 6pm and 12am may 7th. Look for large earthquakes. This is going to be a big one if it is direct or glancing in its impact on the magnetosphere.


Addendum: a 7.1 earthquake occurred in Papa New Guinea. On may 7 2015, 15:46 UTC

Sounds of the Solar System


Credit NASA, Electric Universe

Lets discuss that vacuum.  Kinda hard to have sound in a vacuum. Another foundation of physics falls, along with canals on Mars and gravity. We need to rethink a few things. Especially the foundations.

Sunday, May 3, 2015

Magnetic Fields at Galactic Core

A strong magnetic field found in the jet base of a supermassive blackhole

In this model black holes are referred to as Galactic Cores. We will find magnetism, because of the rapid rotation of a dense Baryonic matter object. This occurs in mostly spiral and barred spiral galaxies. Elliptical galaxies cores explode from more thermonuclear events.

Solar Magnetic fields show signs of Multifractal Mathematics

This is a cool article and easily explains constant change in field lines.

Multifractals

I think the difficult part will be to examine every arc spectra. We need many spacecraft in polar orbit around the sun. 

Saturday, May 2, 2015

Motion of Jupiter's Moons

Credit : K Prajapati

Friday, May 1, 2015

Wednesday, April 29, 2015

Understanting the Geometry of the W+/- Boson (Magnetism)


Today we are going to look at magnetic anomalies as Planetary Nebula.

Wikipedia is the best. Please support our online encyclopedia!

In order to study magnetism we need to examine the torus.

There are three types of tori along with a sphere. Meaning a Ring torus can degenerate to a Horn torus to a Spindle torus then to a sphere.

We see all 4 types of torus in nature.

With this picture we see several magnetic tori. We see two half tori in the Horn shape. The center is a Ring torus. The center is the Baryon core in high rotation. With these magnetic fields we can now examine them. How much energy is this generating?
This is M27:The Dumbbell Nebula
Credit ESO
This is M57: The Ring Nebula Credit Hubble

Lets look at the parametric equations of a torus. A torus is a circle revolving around a coplaner circle.


Again Wiki
I am going to post this before I lose it.

Looking at a spiral galactic core will show a similar shape in all E/M wavelengths.

Friday, April 24, 2015

Quasars in the Standard Vibration Model

Using Wiki Definition from 04/24/2015

Quasars (/ˈkwzɑr/) or quasi-stellar radio sources are the most energetic and distant members of a class of objects called active galactic nuclei (AGN). Quasars are extremely luminous and were first identified as being high redshift sources of electromagnetic energy, including radio waves and visible light, that appeared to be similar to stars, rather than extended sources similar to galaxies. Their spectra contain very broad emission lines, unlike any known from stars, hence the name "quasi-stellar". Their luminosity can be 100 times greater than that of the Milky Way.[2]While the nature of these objects was controversial until the early 1980s, there is now a scientific consensus that a quasar is a compact region in the center of a massive galaxy surrounding a central supermassive black hole.[3] Its size is 10–10,000 times the Schwarzschild radius of the black hole. The energy emitted by a quasar derives from mass falling onto the accretion disc around the black hole.
--------------

From there we get great artist rendering of their concepts. Lovely artwork.
Credit ESO/M. Kornmesser
-------------------
In the Standard Vibration Model all Cores act the same. This is why Arp saw this shape everywhere in space. This is high energy magnetism at work in the same way at the galactic, quasars, even atoms have this same shape as described in the papers on the right of the blog. The size is not relevant. What is relevant is a very dense Baryonic object rotating at high speeds.  

The nuclear bonds of the Gluons in a Baryon will rotate at a high enough speed to expand their W+/- Boson field. The Z Boson transmits information from Photons and converts the information. This information tell the Baryon how far the nearest element was, how hot it was, and what magnetic fields the photon had to pass through to arrive at the receiving Baryon's electron.  

Monday, April 20, 2015

Coral Castle

I have lived 10 miles away from this site for 15 years and I never knew it existed. I am going to check it out.

The Coral Castle 

Sunday, April 19, 2015

Pluto Has 5 Moons

Hay that is more that Earth. Should Pluto be a Planet? Based on moons???? Just Asking.

Credit Wiki

Poor Pluto, Kicked around by people who make label before all the data is in.

OOPS, Magnetism, Baby and Bath Water?


According to this article the comet landings by the Rosetta probe and the Philae lander did not find magnetism at the level expected for Electromagnetic only theories. And the QUESTION became how? "You need to defend this", a friend said. 


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3038292/Comet-landers-measurements-weaken-space-magnetism-theory.html

This is true for all Electromagnetic/Plasma ONLY theories. They tend not to examine Density of the Baryon, or in the worst case the dismiss the Baryon for an existential object (Comet,Planet,Star). 

But as David LaPoint has shown the electromagnetism of high energy objects. The Rosetta probe shows low energy electromagnetic objects. That comet is not rotating fast enough.


Neptune's atmosphere is 80% hydrogen and 19% helium. Wiki
So an object of almost all hydrogen and helium in high rotation will convert to a superfluid. 

If it had been rotating fast enough, they could not land the Philae lander. So you cannot dismiss other observations based on this. You the Scientist At ROSETTA AND PHILAE must release and open data on the comet if this is to be accepted. You are attempting to dismiss magnetism with your headlines and not the data. The DATA show this object is MAGNETIC. You actually state it in the article but it is easy to miss between the flashing adds. It is just not as magnetic as you demand for a displacement of magnetism for gravity. Again BOTH SIDE of the argument are missing the actual Baryon and its properties.

Friday, April 10, 2015

David LaPoint's Primer Fields

Credit: David Allen LaPoint

This is amazing. Enjoy. We are beginning to see reality for what it is. Not what we want it to be. This is part one of three. In a very simple description. He shows us the geometry of magnetism as shown with real observation not just conjecture. This is the most difficult thing I have had to deal with. Plank's and Weber's equations really explain do not explain everything to the point that I am comfortable with. I would work with their understandings and logic until someone explained magnetism in the universe better. That is why this is a model. When one explanation is replaced by another, it is easy to do so within the confines of the model.

He talks about free electricity. That is not what I find remarkable in this video. I would really like to see some math about those bowl magnets.

Wow, Part one is amazing. I can agree with everything, even his disproof of within current accepted models that dark matter, dark energy and black holes don't exist. The problem then becomes

Dark Energy is where the math is done. Can't forget that important part of the equation. The actual EQUAL sign means math is done here.

Dark Matter still are gluons that are not excited by magnetism into rotation. Like a null instantiation of an undeclared variable.

The galaxy will always have a core. A Galactic Core is a dense baryonic object capable of ejecting stars like solar flares. Better then Black Hole.

Everything in this video works within the Standard Vibration Model as the W+/- Boson.

Now not to get involved in someone else s argument.
__________________________
After some research on this topic 
I found this on  Thunderbolt Forum

Re: The Primer Fields? by nick c » Sat Jan 12, 2013 10:02 pm


All magnetic fields have their origins in an electric current. From where did the "two ceramic magnets" get their magnetic field? answer: from an electric current. Permanent magnets are not 'permanent' but are rather a remnant magnetic field which has it's origin in an electric current.
See:
This paper, which seems to be only available as an abstract on line, shows that lodestones (natural permanent magnets) are created by lightning, aka electrical discharges.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1 ... 6/abstract

These lodestones have Hc between 10 and 30 mT, SIRM between 8 and 18 Am²kg¹ and RI between 0.10 and 0.26. Magnetite, titanomagnetite and metals have REM values (ratio of NRM to SIRM) < 0.05. Samples (called fulgarites) obtained from the Smithsonian Institution have REM values ranging from 0.45 to 0.92. The REM value serves as a witness parameter to the magnetic fields associated with the lightning bolt. If a high REM value (say ≫ 0.1) can be verified as not to be due to contamination by man and does not contain MD hematite then the rock has LRM (lightning remanent magnetization). The magnetic field associated with lightning can be revealed from an isothermal remanent acquisition (RA) curve.

also:
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/3 ... ode77.html
also:
http://lep694.gsfc.nasa.gov/archive/obs2001rep.pdf

Mother Nature essentially processes the magnetite
ore to impart magnet properties and then charges the ore
with a lightning bolt. This process was verified with triggered
lightning experiments at the Langmuir lab (New
Mexico Tech) at South Baldy mountain.

Permanent magnets obtain their magnetic field from exposure to the strong magnetic field which accompanies an electric current. The permanent magnet's magnetic field has its' origin in an electric current
----------------------------------------------

Understanding that the Electron communicates information collected from the W+/- Boson to the Z Boson. From there it is communicated to the Gluons of the Baryon.


La Point provides us with a fantastic new view of what we are looking at. We need to adapt his observations into our models and create the mathematical algorithms to prove them,

Monday, April 6, 2015

Elliptical Galaxies

If we look at the types of galaxies the most obvious difference are the magnetic and the thermonuclear.

The current model of Elliptical Galaxy Taxonomy and Growth is shown in this chart.

Wiki

In the Standard Vibration Model, the Elliptical Galaxies are similar to Thermonuclear explosions in space where there is little pressure against them from external densities, magnetism or Dark Matter. The more pressure against them the stranger the shape. Stars in Ellipticals are starved not of material to form stars, but they lack the strong magnetic core to cause rotation. This lack of a strong magnetic core in the Galaxy causes its stars to loose energy. Over time the Baryon no longer has information to transmit and becomes Dark Matter.

Monday, March 30, 2015

Thursday, March 19, 2015

The Power of Magnetism

Wow, I am just amazed at this. Not only did the iron rod hover. It melted. Then the less dense elements floated to the top. This is density. More dense objects sink while less dense objects float, Only when he/she shut the power it went splat like a bug on a windshield. When compared to the density of the surrounding air blob, it fell like a blob of iron. Cool


Magnetic Galaxies Part 2

Milky Way galaxy within a supercluster. That Supercluster is named Laniakea, Hawaiian for "immeasurable heaven."



Credit Nature

Thursday, March 12, 2015

Spiral Galaxy Arms a Result of Magnetic Bursts from Galaxy: Part 1

     Spiral Galaxies are some of the most beautiful objects in the sky. This model will examine galaxies and some of their properties and show how and why these observations fit into this model. It will open the door to explaining why galaxies look similar and different. We will examine the life of galaxies from beginning to death. To do this this model will refer to the middle of galaxies as Galactic Cores because in different types of galaxies the cores are doing different things. Other than that the reader can refer to the Webb Society Deep Sky Observer Handbook v4.

 Galaxy Morphology can be studied at several places including galaxyzoo.org and Wikipedia. The basic chart defining galaxy morphology started with Hubble.
  From Wiki

The Tuning Fork of the Hubble Sequence. From this model we get the basics. He was missing a few types, but overall he showed the relation of one type to another on a chart. Fantastic for 1936. This is still the main concept used in Modern Astronomy. There is a more modern version of galaxy taxonomy which includes a mapping of individual stars within the galaxy. The MK or Morgan Keenan system evaluates spectra. It is vital that we understand these systems and expand upon them as needed.

To understand the differences between galaxies we need to understand their Galactic Core. Galactic Cores are not Black Holes. They are incredible densities of Baryonic matter that EMIT magnetism and densities. Here we see a Galactic Core emit a star like a CME (Coronal Mass Ejection) or a Solar Flare.

Credit Max Planck's Institute

Credit Discovery News

The above shows the plane of the Milky Way Galaxy. It has a Northern Ridge and a Southern Ridge coming from a core. This means its a highly dense Baryonic matter object rotating at high speed and is so hot that it emits stars in great quantity. It is also obvious that the Magnetosphere of the Milky Way Galaxy is on the left of this chart and the bending towards the right. This shows leftward motion of the galaxy in the Galactic Supercluster. The right side of this chart shows a magnetic event that is similar to the petite tail of the Earth's Magnetosphere.


Credit Physics.org

This article The Corrugated Galaxy shows the plane of the galaxy is not flat but corrugated. This comes from the nature of the magnetic Galactic Core. We know the flare that occur on the sun occur when a magnetic line snaps, dragging material with the snap. The sun cycles solar activity. The most intense activity occurs on the equatorial region. This is the chart for the Sunspots over the last 400 years.


Credit Wiki

Spiral Galaxies being a very large stars ejects material in its active phases just like the sun. When I look a the pic for the Milky Way Galaxy, I count 7 to 8 arms. There are probably billions of stars in each arm of the galaxy. This material ejected over time reaches the area where the magnetic influence of the core rotation reduces. Then we see the reduction of speed of all the stars in the arm. There is also the interaction of Dark Matter against the arms. When every period of activity ends for the galaxy, Dark Matter rapidly fills in between the arms.  

Thursday, February 26, 2015

Black holes are Blackbody Radiators

I am glad this idea is finally entering scientific publications.


This model has shown this from its inception. Black Holes must form all the stars in a spiral galaxy. Their massive rotation causes an immense magnetic field causing stars to orbit the Black Hole. 


Above we see a Black Hole emit a star. Credit Max Plank's Institute. 

Elliptical galaxies from explosions.

Friday, February 6, 2015

Densities in Motion

Within a rotating body of many (global) densities, local densities will move towards the center of rotation to their own density at a rate determined by the strength of the global magnetic field and the rotation of the global body of densities within the magnetic field. Localized interactions of densities; temperature, magnetism, electricity, pressure also influence the density in its motion.

Friday, January 23, 2015

Interview with Immanuel Velikovski


A Youtube video of the man who wrote the paper in the previous posting. This man's work was completely rejected by the scientific community, until his predictions on some topics proved correct. Venus is a hot planet. This man had profound ideas. It is well worth watching.

Interview with Immanuel Velikovski


Wednesday, January 14, 2015

"Cosmos Without Gravitation"

Hi Aaron,
              I found this interesting information written by Immanuel Velokosky 70 years ago. The EU is based on his ideas.


That was an an amazing paper. I am glad to read papers on these topics, It really deepens my knowledge. I am also astonished to find his other papers. More importantly how they are impacting society.

Thanks.
Aaron Guerami

Wednesday, December 3, 2014

Quick Abstract


This is a quick Abstract to the Details that form the Standard Vibration Model.

So,
I am going to point some basics we all know and that you have shown in your tests. A single baryon is either a hydrogen atom, a proton, or a neutron. I have not fully modeled beyond this. I have a good design for He, but I don't feel it is not ready for integration into this model. Modeling in my mind and on paper the O and the NaOH and KOH are the next step. I have to solve problems like yours before I can move forward.
  1. Everything about baryons is in thirds. 
    1. This means every calculation must have one dimensional information.
    2. Two dimensional data storage.
    3. Three dimensional trigonometric interactions. 
  2. Every baryon is effected by received bosons.
    1. Photons
      1. Photons transmit information about baryons/elements/molecules externally.   
      2. Emitted and absorbed by electron
      3. W+/- stops all functions of the boson photon until it exits the magnetic field.
      4. Transmits vibration informational to the receiving baryon on wavelength, temp, freq, spectra, distance traveled, history of effects upon the photon.
    2. W+/-
      1. The primary purpose of the W+/- is to trap photons and direct them to the baryon's closest electron.
      2. Magnetism.
    3. Z Boson
      1. Z Boson transmits information from the electron to the baryon or from electron to electron.
      2. Electricity.
    4. Gluon
      1. This is the physical structure of the baryon.
      2. In almost all cases a baryon must have 2 of one flavor of gluon and 1 of another in spinning rotation.
      3. This rotation forms a cone.
      4. Quarks are the unused strings (err:not tori) of the gluon.
      5. A Gluon's information is managed by Neutrinos. 
    5. Neutrino
      1. Neutrinos manage and maintain baryons structure and information of the baryon
      2. There are 3 types of neutrinos
      3. Electron
        1. Connects the Z boson to the baryon.
        2. Input/Output functions of the information of the baryon
      4. Muon
        1. The purpose of the Muon is to connect each gluon's torus.
      5. Tau
        1. Allows W+/- boson to exit the baryon from the midpoint of the opposite gluon.
So, Those neutrinos are delicate and can deflagulate, rupture or stretch beyond capacity. When that occurs, we see implosion or explosion. Any exotic pressure, temperature, E/M..., can and will cause this. even solar flare will affect the magnetic fields around your test. So check spaceweather.com

I think this basic model shows how the flame out occurs. Some of the tests will explode at 2/3 rate because of of the conic rotation of the baryon crushes them to a volume of 0. 1/3 rate melts/extends/flames the baryons volume; depending on the boson affecting the baryon. At the small distances traveled after the explosion the baryonic chunks of flame and affect other baryons. 

Does your photon radiation detector emit radiation through the test? Or are they just receiving data from the test? 

Currently everything written above is written or derived in the blog. What I am missing is the actual testing of the ideas. Data.

I hope this is a helpful description of how I plan on modeling this issue. I realize I have not answered any of your questions, I am trying to form the problem into this model.

Addendum 12/7/2014
In this model Dark Matter are gluons without information. But because they are empty data structures, they form densities. These densities can rip apart galaxies. This density is the Plank's Constant. The amount of Dark Matter pressing against here right now. That number is very small but now it is accounted for in the model.

Dark Energy is where the math of the universe gets done. Please read the simple paper on Dark Energy.

Aaron Guerami

Monday, November 17, 2014

Lightning in space

Lightning in space.

Strong Magnetic Field Shaped Early Solar System

Thanks to readers for sending me these links.

I have described how Electricity created most of the craters on the moon.

So it only goes to show that the spinning ball of Iron and other liquid metals is an electromagnet we call the Sun. Other posts explain the logic in detail.

Gravity is a failed model. Electromagnetism through a medium describes all energy forces.

Science will come to the logical conclusion that blackholes are expressors of materials. 

Wednesday, November 12, 2014

Sen. Cruz and Net Neutrality

I seriously think that Sen. Cruz is speaking on a topic that he has no idea. He should get informed or his handlers should shut him up.

This would seriously collapse the system instantly. It would not know who or how to send packets of information efficiently. Eventually the internet would send packets to the lowest cost systems. This would do the opposite that the politicians want. It would destroy their buddies at Comcast and Verizon.

Then multiple protocols would arise. The NSA would not be able to do its job at all.

tcp/ip is not the only way to connect a network. 

Friday, October 3, 2014

Strong magnetic fields in normal galaxies at high redshifts

This is another email I received from a reader.

Strong Magnetic Fields in Normal Galaxies at High Redshift

This is an excellent paper with interesting conclusions.

Wednesday, October 1, 2014

Electron beam's magnetic field is not the result of electron motion

This paper comes from Jean de Climont.

Dear Sir,

In the current theoretical approach, there are two potential causes of magnetic fields: the translation of electrons of Maxwell's equations and the magnetic moment of electrons used in the explanation of magnetism of materials. This situation is not in conformity with the principle of causal specific uniqueness applicable to elementary phenomena, and with the Ockham's simplicity principle as well.
I am pleased to send you a report presenting an experience that should settle the question.

Electron beams magnetic field is not the result of electron motion but the result of the intrinsic magnetic moment.


 Yours very sincerely,


Thank you for your paper. I apologize for not seeing it sooner. This is an important experiment the author has produced. Thanks for taking the time to send it to me.

Aaron Guerami


Monday, September 22, 2014

The Magnetic Nature of the Solar System

It is important to understand magnetism. Here is a letter I received. 
Aaron

The Magnetic Nature of the Solar System” 14/9/14

Hi Aaron,

During the September school holidays last year I spent a lot of time on the internet researching Einstein's theory of General Relativity in particular his ideas about space-time.

As I have become more interested I've researched more and more. I came across the following Youtube clip which explains an unusual magnetic phenomena.

When I saw this clip I became aware of a possible mechanism which may explain why the moon orbits the earth.

Using this mechanism I have built up a model for the Earth and the Sun based on my observations regarding the magnets. I have developed the following hypotheses from these observations.

The reason the moon orbits the Earth is not due to a gravitational attraction between the two and no it's not due to a curvature in space-time.

Hypothesis 1: The moon orbits the Earth due to a magnetic attraction.

This magnetic attraction is demonstrated in the Youtube clip.

( or Google search: Amazing discovery with magnets Youtube )

I believe the Earth is acting like an inverter magnet. The movement of molten rock/iron/nickel inside the Earth and its solid iron core act like the large central magnet.


Fig 1 A typical representation of the Earth’s magnetic field.

In Fig 1 The centre of the Earth is presented as acting like a bar magnet. No allowance has been given to the magnetic material (magnetite) in the Earth’s crust or ocean floors.

I believe the magnetic field lines of the sun and planets should produce a shape very similar to concentric circles or ellipses.

These magnetic field lines produce the pushing force which we call ‘gravity’.

On Earth ‘gravity’ I believe is created by the Earth’s magnetic field pushing on our atmosphere.

Objects accelerate towards the surface of the earth due to this ‘pushing force’ produced by the Earth’s magnetic field on the atmosphere.

HYPOTHESIS 2: I would also suggest that the strength of the Earth’s magnetic field steadily increases to a maximum level corresponding to the moon’s orbit around the Earth then decreases in strength as the distance from the moon increases.

Near the surface of the Earth the Earth’s magnetic field is relatively weak due to its interaction with the air of Earth’s atmosphere.

I predict the Earth’s magnetic field increases significantly outside the Earth’s atmosphere.

As the Earth rotates on its axis it produces a rotating magnetic field.

HYPOTHESIS 3: The Earth’s magnetic field ( magnetosphere ) and the moon’s magnetosphere couple as explained in the Youtube clip.

From my research I realize the moon does not (anymore) have a global magnetic field but does have a magnetosphere on its far side.

The moon has essentially ‘clipped’ onto the Earth’s magnetic field.

The reason why on Earth we only see one side of the moon is not because it rotates on its axis in synchrony with the Earth’s rotation on its axis.

We only see one side of the moon due to this coupling effect as shown in the Youtube clip.

Similarly this explains why all the other Planets have moons which also show only one face to their respective planet.

Tidal locking or synchronous rotation is an erroneous explanation of this observable phenomena.

Deposits of iron oxide (magnetite) under the Earth's surface (continents) and on the world’s seafloors ( due to seafloor spreading from mid-ocean ridges) are acting like the small satellite magnets in the clip.

Fig 2: Location of large deposits of iron oxide on the continents of Earth.

I read on the NASA website that the Earth's magnetic field has been weakening since 1850.

The strength of Earth's magnetic field varies as well; it has been decreasing slightly ever since around 1850. ( NASA Internet Article )

I have also read that the moon is actually moving away from Earth at a rate of
3.8 cm per year over the past 40 years.

I wonder if that is due to mining of iron ore over the last 164 years which is causing the Earth’s magnetic field to decrease in strength ?

HYPOTHESIS 4: Also suggests that the sun acts like a gigantic inverter magnet as well, which the planets are magnetically attracted to. The sun’s sun spots are acting like the satellite magnets in the clip.

Fig 3 Sunspot in photosphere 

Fig 4 The suns internal magnet- inner magnet satellite magnets in clip. in clip.


Maunder’s Butterfly Diagram

One noteworthy observation is the absence of sunspots above 40 degrees in either hemisphere. However, the most important piece of information is that at a beginning of a cycle the sunspots are mostly in the 20 to 40 degree ranges in both hemispheres. As the cycle comes to an end the sunspots mainly occur close to the sun's equator. This means that over time there is a plasma flow going on beneath the sun's surface from the outer portions of both hemispheres towards the equator. This is a very important point in understanding the flow and magnetic activity of the Convective Zone. All solar events are strongly influenced by the solar magnetic cycle, since the magnetic cycle serves as the "energy engine" for all solar activities. The sun's dynamic magnetic field defines the Photosphere's features, the Chromosphere, the Corona, Solar Prominences and CMEs, the Solar Wind and eventually the shape of the Heliosphere. It is noteworthy that the sun's magnetic field and cycle effects our whole solar system.

Inclination of the Planets to the Sun’s equator


Name
Mercury
3.38°
Venus
3.86°
Earth
7.155°
Mars
5.65°
Jupiter
6.09°
Saturn
5.51°
Uranus
6.48°
Neptune
6.43°



There seems to be a relationship between the location of sunspots and the inclination of the planets to the sun’s equator.
Planet Densities
The planets are ordered by density. It helps show that mass is not the interaction that is involved in planetary motion.
Mercury 5.427 g/cm3
Venus 5.204 g/cm3
Earth 5.515 g/cm3
Mars 3.934 g/cm3
Jupiter 1.326 g/cm3
Saturn 0.687 g/cm3
Uranus 1.27 g/cm3
Neptune 1.638 g/cm3
Pluto (dwarf) 2.03 +0.006 g/cm3
The densities of the planets show order. There are 3 main categories of the order.
Solids Gas Ice
( Reference Aaron Guerami: Aaron’s Reality blog)
I believe that the planets, all the moons of the solar system and the materials of the rings of Saturn all orbit their associated planet/sun due to two factors
1. inverter magnet effect 2. rotating magnetic fields

These masses are all following the rotating magnetic field lines produced.

Venus has no moons as it does not generate a large magnetic field of its own, thus has been unable to capture any matter.

Venus still follows a magnetic field line produced by the sun.

HYPOTHESIS 5: I believe our solar system operates on a magnetic basis or alternatively an electro-magnetic basis.

The sun’s rotation on its axis generates a rotating magnetic field (Parker Spiral) that results in planetary motion around the sun.

My hypotheses do not require the existence of a ‘cosmological constant’ as suggested by Einstein to counteract the effects of gravity.
HYPOTHESIS 6: The Precession of Perihelion of Mercury
is caused by random variations in sunspot activity over the century.

After doing some research I have discovered that Einstein knew that the orbit of Mercury varied by 43 arc seconds per century so he fudged his equation to take this into account with his value of pi. I think they call this ‘cheating’ at school.


Fig 5 Mercury’s Precession of Perihelion

In essence my hypotheses do not require the force of gravity.

Gravity I believe is a fictitious force which has for centuries dominated our collective psyches to allay humanities unconscious fears of the unexplainable effects of magnetism and its associated occult links.

The phenomena known as Gravitational lensing should be actually termed Magnetic lensing.

Gravitational red-shift should be termed Magnetic red-shift.

Einstein’s space-time fabric may actually be the magnetic field produced by the sun that permeates like an ‘ether’ throughout our solar system.

I predict that the planets bend the magnetic field emanating from the sun and consequently couple their magnetic fields with the sun’s magnetic field.

I predict that the internal structure (composition) of the planets and stars
(suns) are responsible for the magnetic or alternatively electro-magnetic force of attraction between these heavenly bodies.

My ideas I believe would be consistent with the Quantum Mechanical Model.

I would also suggest that in our universe there exists only 3 dimensions.

Einstein would not have known that our moon has a magnetic nature as he died in 1955. When moon rocks were bought back by the Apollo 11 mission in 1969 and analyzed, it is my understanding that scientists were shocked to find out they all were magnetic.

Thanks for reading,
F.D.