## Saturday, February 27, 2010

### Chile Earthquake

USGS information.
USGS Centroid Moment Tensor Solution
10/02/27 06:34:09.75
BIO-BIO, CHILE
Epicenter: -35.988  -72.782
MW 8.6

USGS CENTROID MOMENT TENSOR
10/02/27 06:35:27.29
Centroid:  -35.757  -72.389
Depth  36         No. of sta:189
Moment Tensor;   Scale 10**21 Nm
Mrr= 7.40       Mtt=-0.53
Mpp=-6.87       Mrt= 0.06
Mrp=-5.95       Mtp=-0.76
Principal axes:
T  Val=  9.57  Plg=69  Azm= 84
N       -0.48       3      183
P       -9.08      19      274

Best Double Couple:Mo=9.3*10**21
NP1:Strike= 11 Dip=25 Slip=  98
NP2:       182     65        86

----###
--------######---
---------#########---
----------############---
-----------##############----
------------###############----
-----------################----
--   -------#################----
-- P -------#######   #######----
--   -------####### T #######----
------------#######   #######----
------------################-----
-----------###############-----
-----------###############-----
-----------#############-----
---------###########-----
--------########-----
-------####------
###----             


Global CMT Project Moment Tensor SolutionFebruary 27, 2010, OFFSHORE MAULE, CHILE, MW=8.8

Goran Ekstrom
Meredith Nettles

CENTROID-MOMENT-TENSOR  SOLUTION
GCMT EVENT:     C201002270634A
DATA: II IU CU IC G  GE
L.P.BODY WAVES: 90S, 224C, T= 50
MANTLE WAVES:  108S, 296C, T=200
SURFACE WAVES:  75S, 166C, T= 50
TIMESTAMP:      Q-20100227072327
CENTROID LOCATION:
ORIGIN TIME:      06:35:15.4 0.1
LAT:35.95S 0.01;LON: 73.15W 0.01
DEP: 24.1  0.4;TRIANG HDUR: 60.5
MOMENT TENSOR: SCALE 10**29 D-CM
RR= 1.040 0.004; TT=-0.030 0.002
PP=-1.010 0.003; RT= 0.227 0.022
RP=-1.510 0.032; TP=-0.120 0.002
PRINCIPAL AXES:
1.(T) VAL=  1.875;PLG=61;AZM= 74
2.(N)      -0.064;     7;    176
3.(P)      -1.810;    28;    270
BEST DBLE.COUPLE:M0= 1.84*10**29
NP1: STRIKE= 18;DIP=18;SLIP= 112
NP2: STRIKE=174;DIP=73;SLIP=  83

----#######
-------##########--
--------#############--
----------###############--
-----------################--
------------################---
------------#################--
-------------########   ######---
---   -------######## T ######---
--- P -------########   ######---
---   -------#################---
-------------###############---
-------------###############---
-------------#############---
------------###########----
-----------########----
----------#####----
------#----

USGS WPhase Moment Tensor Solution10/02/27  6:34:17
OFFSHORE MAULE, CHILE
Epicenter: -35.826  -72.668
MW 8.8

USGS/WPHASE CENTROID MOMENT TENSOR
10/02/27 06:34:17.00
Centroid:  -35.826  -72.668
Depth  35         No. of sta: 28
Moment Tensor;   Scale 10**24 Nm
Mrr= 0.93       Mtt= 0.01
Mpp=-0.94       Mrt=-0.01
Mrp=-1.72       Mtp=-0.15
Principal axes:
T  Val=  1.96  Plg=59  Azm= 86
N        0.02       3      182
P       -1.97      30      274

Best Double Couple:Mo=2.0*10**22
NP1:Strike= 16 Dip=14 Slip= 104
NP2:       181     75        86

----###
--------########-
----------##########-
-----------############--
-------------##############--
-------------################--
-------------################--
--------------#################--
----   -------#######   #######--
---- P -------####### T #######--
----   -------#######   #######--
--------------################---
-------------################--
-------------###############---
------------##############---
-----------###########---
---------#########---
-------######----
###----

Historic USGS Moment Tensor SolutionsMagnitude 8.8 OFFSHORE MAULE, CHILE
Saturday, February 27, 2010 at 06:34:14 UTC---------------------I have some basic questions of USGS. Why is the duration of the earthquake not listed? Why is the duration to different magnitudes not listed? Why is the wavelength and frequency not listed. Why are the raw seismographic waveforms not shown? It is frustrating to not have this data. ------MagnetosphereCoronal Mass Ejection before the earthquakeI will try and find data on this prediction and the coronal mass ejection associated.I have not found data on the magnetosphere yet. I need to go for now. I will place the data here. STEREO BEHIND 7-DAY SOLAR WIND DATAThere is an asymptote on Feb 24 2010.STEREO BEHIND 3-DAY SOLAR WIND DATA------------------Coronal Mass Ejection video Credit University of Michigan



## Thursday, February 25, 2010

### The Poincaré Conjecture

The Poincaré Conjecture is incorrect. Here is why. The Poincaré Conjecture states that the sphere is the simplest shape in 3+ dimensions. A sphere requires that every point related to the surface of the sphere is exactly the same distance from the local origin of the sphere. This shape has never been found in nature. The simplest shape in nature is the wavefront or vibration. The simplest complex shape is the bubble or teardrop (bubble in motion through a medium).

There are 4 types of wavefronts found in the Baryonic nature. They are the Bosons; Photon, W+/- Boson, Z Boson and Gluon. Each Boson is a composite of 3 bits of information plus the rotation or spin of the wave. I explain this in the paper Structure of Baryons. We see this shape at both the microscopic and macroscopic levels. This is found as the magnetosphere around planets and in single baryon collisions.

The simplest  and only shape in Dark Matter nature is the 3 dimensional lattice of Anti-Gluons. The conjunction of anti-gluons is the anti-quark. Pressurization by baryonic magnetism against dark matter causes curves in the shape of the dark matter lattice. This interaction forms baryonic bubbles in dark matter.

### The Z Boson charge.

How does the Z Boson deal with charge?

Just before it is directly connected from the electron to the associated baryon then it is negative.

Just before it is connected from an electron to an electron, then it is positive.

The actual connection is neutral.

This explains lightning and plasma, where there is a charge just before the electrocution.

## Wednesday, February 24, 2010

### Asymptotes in 3 dimensions

I have an idea why this is so difficult. It has to do with asymptotes. More specifically asymptotes in 3 dimensions. I have hypothesized that the electron is an an asymptote between the three bosons. An asymptote in 3 dimensions has different behaviors than in 2 dimensions. It produces a shape that is like a funnel around zero.

This is how I picture the lepton electron.

There are 9 bits of information associated with this model of the electron. 3 bits for each Boson. This shows that the lepton electron is a result of the interaction of these 9 bits of information. Also this would be a 4 dimensional problem, but I am examining an instant.

My idea about the wave-particle problem is an asymptote to a vibration in 4 dimensions is a manifestation.

Great paper on asymptotes:

# Nikolay NOSKOV

1940...2008
The engineer of control of the nuclear reactor, Institute of nuclear Physics, National Nuclear Center, Republic of Kazakhstan
----------

This is amazing. Thanks again to Curt Youngs for directing me to this man's work.

I am reading his work and it is difficult at best. He understood something very important. I am going to be evaluating his work for some time. I am starting with "The phenomenon of retarded potentials"

His work affirms what I have been discussing. He understood longitudinal waves.

This is a piece of that paper. Near the end.
"Simulating the process of retarded potential on a moving test body [24] with the help of three variables: the velocity of the body, the force of interaction and the distance between the bodies, I have determined that the retarded potential occurs non-uniformly, in an undulatory fashion. It means, that the motion of bodies under the influence of a force (electrical or gravitational fields, atmospheric or liquid pressure differentials or others) occurs with longitudinal oscillations. The average velocity of a body driving with oscillations is a phase velocity.
The logical goal is finding out the direct or inverse proportionality of length of the oscillations for all three variables that lead to the expression:
Where:
length of oscillations;
H = Factor of proportionality
R= Distance between test and central bodies
F(R) = the law of interaction"
And that is just the beginning.

## Tuesday, February 23, 2010

### The difference between Aether and ether.

Aether is the medium in which things exist. Dark Energy

Ether is a class of organic compounds that contain an ether group — an oxygen atom connected to two alkyl or aryl groups — of general formula R–O–R. Wiki. An example is that stuff you drink.

### Asymmetry is not broken symmetry

This is from the Brookhaven National Lab.

Physicists have predicted an increasing probability of finding such bubbles, or local regions, of “broken” symmetry at extreme temperatures near transitions from one phase of matter to another. According to the predictions, the matter inside these bubbles would exhibit different symmetries — or behavior under certain simple transformations of space, time, and particle types — than the surrounding matter. In addition to the symmetry violations probed at RHIC, scientists have postulated that analogous symmetry-altering bubbles created at an even earlier time in the universe helped to establish the preference for matter over antimatter in our world. http://www.bnl.gov/bnlweb/pubaf/pr/PR_display.asp?prID=1073

------------

Ok, The concept of symmetry is not shown by any data. Never is there a symmetrical interaction. Broken symmetry requires symmetry to exist.

It is easy to disprove symmetry through logic. Each atom has a lepton, electron, expressing information about the atom. Never is this lepton in the same position nor does it express the same bits of information at any different time. QED.

Symmetry as a concept stems from the need to protect an omnipotent perfect god, thus is not logical nor evidenced in the collected data.

## Sunday, February 21, 2010

### Tesla transverse and longitudinal electric waves

Please see http://www.borderlands.com for the biggest collection of old, rare and hard to find groundbreaking alternative energy and medical material. Tesla transverse and longitudinal electric waves another a lab demonstration with Eric Dollard, Tom Brown and Peter Lindemann. Specially focusing on Tesla's longitudinal electricity. This is a great practical demonstration on forgotten Tesla longitudinal electricity technologies.

Youtube has some great videos also. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6BnCUBKgnnc

------------------------

This is important. In the Standard Vibration Model, this is the interaction between the W+/-Boson and the Z Boson which forms the lepton, electron. This vibration lepton electron causes the oscillation photon. Since the information of the Z Boson is the inverse of that of the W+/-Boson the asymptote where the inversion occurs is the vibration lepton electron.

The tri-oscillation photon vibrates the lepton electron providing information to the baryon about another baryon conductivity and capacitance. Oops, this should say the photon provides information on temperature and pressure not conductivity and capacitance. It is the Z and W+/- Bosons that provide information on conductivity and capacitance.

-----
Thanks to Curt Youngs for sending it to me. Who says 'They are saying that in the longitude waves, the magnetic and dielectric fields are parallel. The frequency goes up because the speed of the waves are faster than c. They are emitted radially, which means that from the spherical  point of view there is a contraction and expansion of the expanding sphere wave front.

This is very similar to the far field, where the electric and magnetic fields are parallel. '