## Tuesday, December 29, 2009

### Regions of Earth's Magnetosphere

Tour of Earth's Magnetosphere

This linked page was created by Randy Russell at

It is an amazing 3d description of the magnetic field around the Earth. It is fun to play with. Good Job.

## Monday, December 28, 2009

### Zeeman Effect Equations

I finally found a reasonable description of the Zeeman effect.

b = zB cos θ , where z is the Zeeman splitting factor (Hz mG−1), B is the
magnetic field, and θ is the angle of the magnetic field to the line of sight (Crutcher et al.
1993).

This came from the paper "Detection of the Zeeman Effect in the 36 GHz Class I CH3OH maser line with the EVLA" by A. P. Sarma, E. Momjian
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0910/0910.1081v1.pdf

## Sunday, December 27, 2009

### Galactic Magnetic Field

Science 11 May 2007:
Vol. 316. no. 5826, pp. 875 - 878
DOI: 10.1126/science.1139480

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/316/5826/875

The Orientation of the Local Interstellar Magnetic Field
M. Opher,1* E. C. Stone,2 T. I. Gombosi3

Fig. 1. (A and B) Radio source location as a function of the interstellar magnetic field (BISM) direction in (A) the HDP plane and (B) the GAL plane (with  = 45°). The surface of the heliopause is shown from upwind with respect to the interstellar wind. The isocontours show the strength of the radial component of the interstellar magnetic field, Br, on the heliopause. The green band is the location of the radio sources (at Br = 0). The red arrows show the direction of BISM. (C and D) Same as (A) and (B) but converted to ecliptic coordinates for BISM in (C) the PPG (with  = 30°) and (D) the GAL (with  = 45°). The direction of the nose of the heliosphere (diamond) and the GAL (black line) are indicated for reference. The radio sources detected by V1 and V2 are shown as solid circles. Note that the colors are inverted from (C) to (D) because the interstellar magnetic direction was inverted from (A) to (B) (see red vectors in the insets).

=============

This is vital to the understanding of how stars travel through the galaxy. We only have a few spacecraft that can return data about the interaction between the Sun and the interstellar medium. Voyager 2, Cassini, IBEX and a new one that I don't remember. Dr. Opher; et al, did a great job in mapping the trajectory of the sun through the Milky Way using few datasets.
http://physics.gmu.edu/~mopher/

We are just beginning to understand star motion and it looks to have more to do with Magnetism then gravity. As shown by my published papers, star motion has nothing to do with gravity.

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0910/0910.1081v1.pdf

## Thursday, December 24, 2009

### Spiral Periodic Table

Timmothy Stowe's physicists periodic table. I would like to learn more about this. What I would like to know is what differences are required to produce these different shapes.

http://www.wou.edu/las/physci/ch412/alttable.htm

## Wednesday, December 23, 2009

### Magnetic fields and time.

From The General Science Journal

"The Pound-Rebka experiment confirms Newton's emission theory of light if:
1) photons accelerate in a gravitational field as cannonballs do.
2) there is no gravitational time dilation.

The Pound-Rebka experiment confirms a fragment (not other fragments) of Einstein's inconsistent theory of relativity if:
1) photons do not accelerate in a gravitational field.
2) there is gravitational time dilation:

http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~djmorin/book.html
Chapter 14: "The equivalence principle has a striking consequence concerning the behavior of clocks in a gravitational field. It implies that higher clocks run faster than lower clocks. If you put a watch on top of a tower, and then stand on the ground, you will see the watch on the tower tick faster than an identical watch on your wrist. When you take the watch down and compare it to the one on your wrist, it will show more time elapsed."

Pentcho Valev

===============
I would like to examine this phenomena from the perspective of the Standard Vibration Model.

The Zeeman effect has shown a magnetic field spreads a photon wave into its component information. The photon wave returns to its changed vector after exiting the field. I also have shown it stops spinning during this transition.

Picture credit NOAO
This would account for the change in time. The clock at the beginning of the magnetic field does change at a normal rate. While the photon is travelling through the magnetic field separates and does not spin. The clock at the bottom of the magnetic field will be slower because the photon is not spinning.

So as photons pass though the different strengths of the magnetosphere, the photons spin and separate depending on the strength of the magnetic field.

I would like to thank Pentcho Valev for the amount of reading he does. He reads in many languages and is a great presence on the General Science Journal.

## Thursday, December 17, 2009

### The Baryonic Bubble

A star is a Baryonic Bubble in a Dark Matter solution.

The core of the star generates W bosons (Magnetism) with such high current that it pushes back the Dark Matter to form a Baryonic Bubble.

In a previous posting I showed a picture from the Max Planck's Institute that was taken over 116 minutes. It showed, what we thought was a black hole at the center of the galaxy was ejecting flares.

What?

That means the center of the galaxy is ejecting material for star formation, much like a star ejects material.

## Friday, December 11, 2009

### Spiral over Norway

This is an amazing phenomena.

This was described by 'them' on CNN as a failed Russian ICBM test. Why can't 'they' say, 'I don't know'? Nobody has any idea what this is. This is not a failed missile test, this was an electric event. It shows similarities to an analog Mandelbrot set.

We can learn things from these pictures. I would like to know how long this remained in the sky.  Did pilots see this? Were there any electrical disturbances on the ground? Was this seen by other people and where were they? How many people saw this? Did the plume change position based on the observer? Did compasses or GPS systems work? Was the internet slow in the affected area? How long did it take for Google searches to return in the affected area? Did the event affect broadcast signals? Are there pictures over time of the event? What was the barometric pressure? Humidity? Did the magnetic probes around the earth pick up anything strange? What did the interstellar medium look like at this time? Were there other magnetic events occurring on other planets at this time? Was there a solar storm at this time?

One thing I noticed in the second picture is the lack of symmetry. I also noticed that the plume is changing position based on the spiral.

There are many more questions to be asked before any answers are developed.

Thanks to those who took the pictures and to Curt Youngs for the conversation.

This is the description of what happened.
http://wwwppd.nrl.navy.mil/whatsnew/haarp/

This is a cool site.
http://truedeity.wordpress.com/

## Wednesday, December 9, 2009

### Standard Vibration Model Predictions

I was once asked what predictions could be made from this model, or something to that effect. At the time I wondered if this model could make a prediction of a new idea in physics. It can. This is more of an explanation of an existing problem.

A change in the magnetic field around a rocket will increase the altitude of the orbit. This magnetic field will create pressure against the dark matter. This is shown at this description of the Vanguard and Explorer spacecraft and the spinning ball experiment. http://www.enterprisemission.com/Von_Braun2.htm

The equations shown in the published papers show a change in the magnetic field will change the shape of the dark/baryonic matter bubble.

Or the change in the magnetic field changes the density of the baryons. This change in density changes the altitude of density equilibrium.

They are actually the same statement, just different sides of the equation. You optimize the altitude of the satellite by changing the magnetic field surrounding the spacecraft during launch.

These changes in the magnetic field will require a great level of stability and understanding of the geometry of dark matter bubbles.

Prior to this model there was no explanation for this problem.

## Saturday, December 5, 2009

### First attempt at thought

This is an excellent question. What constitutes consciousness? Consciousness is a collection of vibrations created and emitted by the organic neural structure.

I now define a single vibration of meme as the interaction of organic chemistry and Z Bosons. I have defined memes as any information, but there is a specific vibration created by organic chemistry. I need to redefine memes to the common definition. From there I can evaluate the dynamics of neural networks.

The model that I have presented here allows for descriptions of different information types and their interactions. Thought produces a different type of vibration. Culture is the difference of this vibration between many organisms or nodes, the changes between equilibrium.

With this addition to the model, thought/organic chemistry has a specifically different vibration. This vibration is not a photon, gluon, or W+/- Boson. It could be that memes are enhanced Z Bosons. This is why we see data from EEG or PET. Z Bosons are capable of transmitting data structures, and analog information.

Seismic vibrations are the change in position of baryons. This vibration is not any of the Bosons, but the intense change in position of these baryons in relation to other baryons. This causes intensity changes in the emitting baryons. The receiving baryon change based on the information contained in the changed bosons emitted by the change in baryon's position.

Positron emission tomography shows intensity of organic chemistry. We have not ever used an accelerator to propel organics. So we cannot see the fundamental vibrations found in organics.

The above post comes from the General Science Journal.

### Here comes the medium

I have been watching the words that come from people about the interstellar medium. I really hate poorly thought out media releases.

“This is the first detection of chromium and manganese from a cluster. Previously, these metals were detected only from stars in the Milky Way or from other galaxies. This is the first detection in intergalactic space,” JAXA astrophysicist and Perseus study leader Takayuki Tamura says.

You are aware that stars are always part of galaxies. When I talk about the interstellar medium, I am referring to non-baryonic matter between baryonic bubbles.

## Sunday, November 29, 2009

### Pasta Universe - Geometry of State

The pasta structure in the hadron-quark phase transition and the effects on magnetized compact stars

This is important. They are showing the different geometries of state. Geometry of State. The bubble is natural. It shows up in soap bubbles. The bubble is an analog to this vibratory model.

This bubble is the interaction between 2 anti-gluon Dark Matter fabric solids and 3 gluon baryonic bubble matter. The mechanism for this interaction is the W+/- Boson or magnetism. Every boson is expressing information about the originating baryon. Every baryon is constantly going through a process of read/write phases. This allows for transmission of data about itself. It also receives data about other baryons. There is a third calculation phase.

Dark Matter, as is described in this model, is charge repugnant. They are not electrically neutral. The rule is : a dark matter, 2 anti-gluon vibration cannot occupy the same space as a 3 gluon, charged baryon. Dark Matter cannot form the lepton, electron. Thus Dark Matter is pushed aside by baryons producing the ball in the ribbon effect.

Magnetism is the rotation of the 3 gluons in a cone shape. The spinning magnet. Density is the compression of the length of the gluon. These interactions cause the bubble shape that spins and vibrates in a bubble shape.

Dark Matter is only the gluon forces of density. Dark Matter does not spin. Dark Matter exhibits density pressure force and reacts to magnetism. This interaction is the breaking of the bonds in the Dark Matter by magnetism or the W+/- Boson. The magnetic pressures of the baryons against the Dark Matter cause this interaction. There are areas of void of information in the Dark Energy that are neither Dark Matter or Baryonic Matter.

Disharmonic vibrations are not transmitted by Dark Energy from Ruleset to Ruleset. Disharmonic vibrations are absorbed by Dark Energy Rulesets.

The pictures from IBEX and other Magnetism Sensors show intense interactions at the boundries of Dark Matter and Baryonic Matter.
Credit IBEX

This model explains the pictures taken by IBEX.

## Friday, November 20, 2009

### Numerous Contrails today

Today over West Palm Beach there were more than the usual number of contrails in the sky. They were at extreme distance to each other. Rarely do I ever see contrails here in West Palm Beach. Planes usually fly over or under the altitude at which water freezes.

The temperature according to the Weather Channel was
Clear of clouds
80F
30.00 pressure and stable
Humidity 64
Dew point 67
Heat Index 82F
Ceiling 2300 feet
visibility 10 miles

My question is this. Was this a solar event that caused the extreme difference in altitude of the contrails? It appeared to extend the altitude at which contrails to more than usual. The trails were blowing at a rapid speed and perpendicular to the direction. I could see several trails spreading apart but never actually interacting with each other. They were at very different altitudes.

It was as if the area in which contrails expanded quickly and stayed expanded for only a few minutes. During that time 7 contrails existed from different planes going in different directions including one that was perpendicular to the other 6. The contrails started to blow away, dissipate. No new contrails in the sky, though planes are obviously flying over. The one trail that was going in the direction of the winds did not dissipate in the same manner as the other 6.

The event ended when a cloud expanded from low altitude on the horizon and met with the bottom area where the contrails formed. This singular cloud formed a discharge event, allowing the electrical energy to dissipate.

hypothesis: After the singular cloud extended from the ceiling at 2300 ft to the bottom of the contrail altitude, the energy in the contrail level discharged. The contrail area returned to its normal area. After this discharge the sky started producing lots of low level clouds across all of the sky. Within 15 minutes of the discharge the sky was full of low level clouds. I wish I had a camera with me. I should always carry my phone.

I think this was a magnetic event that pushed the altitude for contrails down to a low altitude. when the singular cloud met the altitude for contrails, it provided an area of conductivity that discharged the electricity in the magnetic event.

I also wish I had access to better local weather data. I really wish we could put cameras at schools with full weather labs. The kids can control the local cameras and weather gathering data systems. We should have these at all the schools.

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/wxwise/class/contrail.html

## Monday, November 16, 2009

### The Electric Universe Theory

The Electric Universe

I don't think it is a good idea to embed this video. It is large. It is a superb video. The Electric Universe theory can be found at http://www.holoscience.com/

For cosmologist, ignore it at your own peril. If the model you are working on does not identify and solve these problems then the model is incorrect.

What is being described in this model is the interaction between the Z Boson and the W+/- Boson. At the point of interaction between the Z and W+/- Bosons creates a unstable oscillating lepton called Electron. This lepton not only produces electricity, but it is responsible for the emission of the Photon Boson. This lepton is the point of read/write of memes or information from one Baryon to another.

Z Bosons connect to the nearest and strongest W+/-Boson. It does not necessarily connect to its own W+/- Boson. This process is ionization.

The unstable lepton vibrates in two ways. They are the same vibration. The continuum of vibration is asymptotic at the neutral or zero. The attractive vibration of the lepton is a positive charge. The opposite or negative charge vibration is expressive.

Ill add to this later. I have to think more on it.

## Wednesday, November 11, 2009

### GOCE thoughts

Some thoughts on GOCE

GOCE is a great spacecraft that is measuring density. There are some great videos of findings and the satellite itself. It only measures the change in altitude to the density of material below.

I noticed a couple of things here.

1)It is only measuring material directly below the satellite.
2)There are vast changes in density in small areas. If there were gravity waves this change would be gradual.
3) The satellite is only affected by densities below the craft. It is not pulled towards areas of greater density, which is required by gravity.

## Wednesday, November 4, 2009

### Parton Distribution Function

Yes, scientist. If you spend multi-billion dollars/euros on a project then you better expect people to evaluate the work. I have seen the reason for building a particle accelerator change over time. We have gone from the 'God particle', Higgs Boson, to mini black holes. Now we have Parton Distribution Function. It seems marketing has failed and we have returned to good old fashioned science.

Parton Distribution Function is the experimental data that shows the position and momentum for each destroyed particle. It seems we don't get a small black hole during collisions. We get what anyone would expect, pieces flying off in different directions. This shattering of vibration is Parton Distribution Function.

As usual anyone reading about the topic will instantly become confused with jargon. This site has helped in cracking the Parton code. This person asks great questions.
http://www.finestructure.com/2008/09/parton-distribution-functions/

Code and algorithms
http://durpdg.dur.ac.uk/hepdata/pdf.html

## Wednesday, October 28, 2009

### Protecting the ISS

The most important goal of the next few years in space science must be protecting the International Space Station. Robotic devices must be allowed to be tested to remove orbital debris.

Small Business grants must be given to innovate space science. Our entire culture is based on space science. Reward removal of orbital debris to protect existing systems. It is cheaper to remove orbital debris than it is to replace GPS or communication satellites.

Space junk storm will up mission costs: experts

## Tuesday, October 13, 2009

### Discrepencies in symmetry

This post is in response to US/LHC Blog.

"A particle is a particle is a particle!" This is not true.
1)The electron is not in the same place at any different time.
2)The fields emanating from a vibration is always different.
3) the Baryon's spin causes differences at each time.
Thus a particle is not a particle is not a particle!
This idea stems from the religion of the Higg's Boson. Marketed as the God particle with this belief The universe is perfect and perfect requires god. God makes particles using the Higg's Boson. Here is an example of belief in cosmology.

It is not possible for any object to be symmetrical. Let me repeat that, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR ANY OBJECT TO BE SYMMETRICAL!!! No object can be a sphere. Circles are two dimensional, thus cannot exist in nature. Most importantly, no object can be a sphere.

GOCE has produced data that shows the southern half of the Earth is concave in the Atlantic, Indian and Arctic oceans. This area is not convex which is required for a sphere.
This is the link to ESA/GOCE. This has a video showing the Earth's density in specific detail. This video shows the spinning planet is not a sphere. It has different densities at different latitudes and longitudes. The spinning Earth is so deformed it changes the spacecraft orbit.

I will continue this thought later. I have had a seizure and need to sleep. 12:30p

During my recovery today I had visualizations that will help add to this evaluation of symmetry.

Not only does the planet suffer from asymmetry, but our brains use asymmetry. A neural network is an error correction system. It optimizes information through error correction.

It is not possible for sub atomic vibrations to show symmetry. Asymmetry is a requirement for a baryon's existence. It has proven difficult for scientist to produce symmetrical molecules. The reason for this difficulty is a baryon is composed of three vibrating Gluons.

Two gluons meet to form a quark. This intertwining of gluons allow for storage of information. Kind of like RAM.

Although I will not quit using 8π in calculations this is only because we don't have a suitable replacement yet. An example is the photon radiation of the Sun. If evaluated by wavelength then U(λ,T)= (8πhc/λ^5)*(1/e^(hc/λT)-1) cannot account for changes on the surface of the Sun; Sun spots, solar flares...

This article shows Neutrino oscillation. This oscillation shows vibration in sub atomic particles. Oscillation is by default not symmetrical.

## Saturday, October 10, 2009

### Data

This is where I am going to put links to Datasets from spacecraft and satellites. I am going to analyse the data in reference to the Standard Vibration Model described here.

The first project will be to analyze Mercury's orbit using all available data. I would like help in this project. I would also like to show the analyzed data here in an application for blogger in 3d.

MERCURY ORBITAL DATA EXPLORER

## Wednesday, October 7, 2009

### Ummmm, Plasma

VASIMR (Variable Specific Impulse Magnetoplasma Rocket)

## Tuesday, October 6, 2009

### Detecting Gravity

The detection of gravity should have been one of the simplest things scientists to detect. It should have been detected by the large particle accelerators. It should have needed to be accounted for in other findings.

Scientist have yet to find any evidence of gravity! Let me restate that. THERE IS NO GRAVITY!

Gravity should have messed up any experiment using a laser trying to define atomic measurements standards. These laser detection systems that measure changes in atoms should have had errors created by the distance function of the earth and sun gravitation. Every day there should be a modifier to account for the gravity of the sun in relation to the position of the earth. When you get down to this level of accuracy, minor changes mess things up. And Gravity should have messed up these experiments.

So, more anecdotal evidence showing the failure to detect gravity.

## Sunday, September 20, 2009

### Thermodynamics is broken by logic

The first law/hypothesis of thermodynamics is conservation of energy.

The second law/hypothesis of thermodynamics is entropy.

These two are antithetical to each other. One cannot exist with the other.

Any "yeah, but." breaks the concept of a law.

Examples:
Shifting entropy

## Wednesday, September 16, 2009

### Magnetosphere and Solar Winds

There is a lot of interesting work being done on magnetospheres, solar winds, and solar flares. I am just going to put all the papers I find on this topic here. I will break them up into topics.

Space Mission Analysis and Design Pg 198 Second Edition.
"The Earth's magnetic field is roughly dipolar;","$B(R,\lambda)=\frac{(1+sin^{2}\lambda)^{\frac{1}{2}}B_{O}}{R^{3}}$"

Where:
$B=$ Local Magnetic Field Intensity
$R=$ Radial Distance in Earth radii $(R_{E})$
$B_{O}$= Magnetic Field intensity at the equator
$\lambda =$ Magnetic Latitude.
$B_{O}=B(R=R_{E},\lambda =0)=0.30 gauss$

The authors are explicit in saying that this is a basic model and to examine further more complex models.
-------------

-------------
Solar Winds:
-------------
Sun Spots:
NSF Special Report
-------------
Solar Flares:
-------------
Solar Magnetosphere:
-------------
Interplanetary Magnetosphere:
Well IBEX is the spacecraft that could. These people did some great work. All hail IBEX. They have published their data publicly. I will put links to their data.

"The Sun moves through the local interstellar medium,
continuously emitting ionized, supersonic solar wind
plasma and carving out a cavity in interstellar space,
called the heliosphere." IBEX
-------------
Mercury's Magnetosphere:
MERCURY: MAGNETIC FIELD AND MAGNETOSPHERE

-------------
Venus' Magnetosphere:
VENUS: MAGNETIC FIELD AND MAGNETOSPHERE

-------------
Earth's Magnetosphere:

Extended Michelson-Morley Interferometer experiment. English version. I think this is the Zeeman effect. The vertical shows the dynamic changes in the Earth's magnetic field.
This is interesting. I wonder what would happen at different altitudes. It certainly would be a good project to put on the space station. This is cool!

Scientists Discover Surprise in Earth's Upper Atmosphere

-------------
Mars' Magnetosphere:
MARS: MAGNETIC FIELD AND MAGNETOSPHERE

-------------
Asteroid Belt Magnetic Anomalies:
-------------
Jupiter's Magnetosphere:
Ganymede
Properties of Ganymede's magnetosphere inferred from improved three-dimensional MHD simulations
Wiki
Ganymede's magnetosphere makes a big impression on Jupiter's auroral lightshows

Io
-------------
Saturn's Magnetosphere:
SATURN: MAGNETIC FIELD AND MAGNETOSPHERE

http://nasaimages.org/luna/servlet/detail/NVA2~1~1~2206~102356:Behold-Saturn-s-Magnetosphere!

New transient radiation belt discovered at Saturn

Science Centric (14 Sep 2009 00:02 GMT) - Scientists using the Cassini spacecraft's Magnetospheric Imaging instrument (MIMI) have detected a new, temporary radiation belt at Saturn, located around the orbit of its moon Dione at about 377 000 km from the centre of the planet. The discovery will be presented at the European Planetary Science Congress in Potsdam by Dr Elias Roussos on Monday 14 September... [full story]

-------------
Uranus' Magnetosphere:
URANUS: MAGNETIC FIELD AND MAGNETOSPHERE

-------------
Neptune's Magnetosphere:
NEPTUNE: MAGNETIC FIELD AND MAGNETOSPHERE

-------------
Pluto,Charon Magnetosphere:
-------------
Comets
-------------
Ice Belts
-------------
Magnetostatics
Biot–Savart

$\mathbf{B}= \int \frac{\mu _{0}}{4\pi }\frac{Id\mathbf{I}\times \hat{\mathbf{r}}}{r^{2}}$

Where: $I$ = current [1]
$d\mathbf{I}$ is a vector, whose magnitude is the length of the differential element of the wire, and whose direction is the direction of conventional current [1]
B is the net magnetic field [1]
$\mu_{0}$ is the magnetic constant. (A confusion sometimes encountered is to think that μ0 is a physical constant that describes some physical property. This notion is not true: μ0 is a measurement-system constant introduced and defined as a result of international agreement) [2]
$\mathbf{\hat{r}}$ is the displacement unit vector in the direction pointing from the wire element towards the point at which the field is being computed. [1]
$\mathbf{r}=r \mathbf{\hat{r}}$ is the full displacement vector from the wire element to the point at which the field is being computed. [1]

-------------
Maxwell's
I am reading A treatise on electricity and magnetism, Volume 1 By James Clerk Maxwell, Joseph John Thompson

Maxwell describes "The Three Fundamental Units".
They are:
Length[L]l
Time[T]t
Mass[M]m.
So the dimensions of mass at rest is m=l^3t^-2. This is inline with Newton's Law.

The Derived Units.
Velocity = [LT^-1]
Acceleration = [LT^-2]
Density = [ML^3]
Momentum [MLT^-1]
Force = [MLT^-2]
Work = [ML^2T^-2]
Energy = [ML^3T^-2]

These derived units are well defined by Maxwell and others.

Now Einstein comes along an changes this. Energy = [MC^2]. I don't know how or why he made this change. Nor does it make sense nor does it match the Derived Units.

-------------
-------------
Gauss' law
-------------
Ampère's law
-------------
Other Laws
-------------
Coulomb's Law [1] [2]

$F=k\frac{q_{a}q_{b}}{r^{2}}$
-------------
Interesting Videos

Interesting Papers
The pasta structure in the hadron-quark phase transition and the effects on magnetized compact stars

## Tuesday, September 8, 2009

### Buoyancy and density

Chemists understand density. They understand why a tree floats on water. They use density in their equations. Specific gravity is the relationship between objects of differing densities. Then again it should be called specific density. They can even evaluate differing densities at changing temperatures or pressures.

Physicists do not understand this. It seems to me that physicists missed chemistry class in school. It is obvious from their equations. Every equation I have evaluated shows the physicist ignorance on this topic. F=ma, E=mc^2... Mass does not exist in the natural world. Mass is a zero dimensional measurement. To a physicist, an object falls because of this magical field called gravity. Gravity has never been proven and has never been observed. Gravity is the only concept/contruct that the Standard Model cannot produce.

The physicists' equations do not integrate temperature, pressure, electric or magnetic fields in their solutions. Yet those variables are all necessary to evaluate changes in position. Each variable is associated with a boson; Photon - Temperature, Gluon - Density, W+/- Boson - Magnetism, Z Boson - Electricity.

Why should a physicist care about density? First the planets are ordered by density. The planets closer to the sun are solids, next are the gas giants, then the ice planets.
• Mercury - 5.427 g/cm³
• Venus - 5.204 g/cm³
• Earth - 5.515 g/cm³
• Mars - 3.934 g/cm³
• Jupiter - 1.326 g/cm³
• Saturn - 0.687 g/cm³
• Uranus - 1.27 g/cm³
• Neptune - 1.638 g/cm³
• Pluto - 2.03 ± 0.06 g/cm³

Motion can only be determined by evaluating the Bosons involved. This series of pictures shows what happens to a floating piece of wood when photons excite the water below.

water
steam
wood
the data is from © 1998 - 2008 roger walker
The pictures are mine

## Saturday, August 15, 2009

### Mining the moon for He3

Helium 3 is the best nuclear fuel. It is not radioactive and produces tremendous amounts of electricity. It has already been found on the moon by Dr Schmitt Link.

We need to take manned exploration of the solar system in stages. We need to learn to build in space. We must have refueling stations placed in the flight path for emergencies.

To not put a base on the moon is ludicrous.

## Tuesday, August 11, 2009

### Newton, Quantum Mechanics and Vibrations

THE PRINCIPIA. BOOK III
PROPOSITION IV. THEOREM IV.
That the moon gravitates towards the earth, and by the force of gravity is continually drawn off from a rectilinear motion, and retained in its orbit.

The mean distance of the moon from the earth in the syzygies in semidiameters of the earth, is, according to Ptolemy and most astronomers, 59 : according to Vendelin and Huygens, 60 ; to Copernicus, 60 1/3 ; to Street, 60 2/5 ; and to Tycho, 56 1/2. But Tycho, and all that follow his tables of refraction, making the refractions of the sun and moon (altogether against the nature of light) to exceed the refractions of the fixed stars, and that by four or five minutes near the horizon, did thereby increase the moon s horizontal parallax by a like number of minutes, that is, by a twelfth or fifteenth part of the whole parallax. Correct this error, and the distance will become about 60 1/2 semi-diameters of the earth, near to what others have assigned.

===========
Newton's calculations of the distance are close. But yet, so are all the listed astronomer. All within a few thousand kilometers.

I understand what you find so compelling about Newton's work. It is geometric. It is decidally understandable through drawings and averages. I see the importance of this work. It broke man out of the middle ages. It brought understandable science to a God ordered world. It maintained that order.

But the universe is based on chaos. This is determined by 3 gluons. Quantum Mechanics shows us it is impossible to determine the exact position of any sub-atomic particle. This is shown through the experiments of the giant accelerators.

Newton's work will bring an answer that is close, but understandable. Quantum Mechanics understands that it is probably not correct with a margin of error. My understanding is about the error or the change in fields and the effect that has on the baryon.
===========
This is from the General Science Journal Forums under 'theory of everything'

Aaron: Yes, they did a great job. All of them. At getting closer and closer to a more accurate system. It has been an amazing time.

But the Standard Particle Model shows that there is no gravity. It is easy to see the 4 forces and what they do. It is also glaringly apparent that gravity is not relevant. The same process of densities moving shows not an attractive unit to motion but a repulsive/expressive one. And I say expressive, because this is all about information. The forces are nothing but information in motion.

There is no chaos if one has control of the polarity, direction of charge,rate of spin of the baryon. Really all the information describing the baryon.

Chaos results when the model breaks down. Chaos occurs when the model can not finish, because it does not describe the relation to the other forces. Chaos is what we don't expect. And in this case all we have to do to bridge that line of thinking is reverse the direction of gravity, extend the 3 dimensional nature of density of the baryon. You have essentially the same result, but now you have finer control. You know the fields involved to remove the chaos.

No need for a flat universe. No need to explain a big bang as all the universe in a bang. Space is no longer relevant to matter. Matter expresses itself as information that passes through dark energy. Dark energy does not care if it Dark or Baryonic matter. It is the medium in which information vibrates.
=====
A baryon is repulsive and hot. It also has a charge, direction of charge and a spin. A baryon can bond to other baryons creating different results in vibrations. A baryon, a collection of gluons, expresses itself with/as forces.

The Z Boson is precise. The logic behind this vibration is to express the baryon's heat and electricity. It does this by creating a lepton which creates a boson. The lepton is the electron and the boson is the photon. It is required that the photon is emitted by the electron. It is also required that the electron read the photon.

The photon says my baryon is precisely this spectra, it was this hot when I left it, and I traveled this far to get you receiving lepton. (Frequency, Wave Length, Temperature, counter) The receiving baryon can now calculate heat, pressure from heat, direction of heat.

The electron also transmits information on the baryon's electrical information. This is my current, charge, voltage and spin. The spin is resistance.

The analogy to music is strong.

## Sunday, August 9, 2009

### Memes Definition

Memes have been described as ideas that perpetuate through culture.

The definition at WIKI for a meme is "A meme (pronounced /ˈmiːm/, rhyming with "cream") is a postulated unit or element of cultural ideas, symbols or practices, and is transmitted from one mind to another through speech, gestures, rituals, or other imitable phenomena."

I will endeavor to redefine meme to a subatomic level, then show how these bits of information form physics, chemistry and culture. That all ideas have their basis in subatomic particles. Ideas are only collections forces from subatomic particles.

It is impossible for memes to have their basis in anything but baryonic matter. All cultural ideas must come from organic chemistry and some areas of inorganic chemistry, thus all ideas must come from collections of baryonic matter.

Memes are the bits of information needed to make bosons. Bosons are the analog forces of information used by baryons to communicate to other baryons and dark matter. For this topic dark matter is not needed since it is not part of organic chemistry.

Organic chemistry is the special rules needed for carbon based chains to communicate information to create more efficient carbon chains. DNA and RNA are the two easiest examples of this process. From WIKI Link "Organic chemistry is a discipline within chemistry which involves the scientific study of the structure, properties, composition, reactions, and preparation (by synthesis or by other means) of chemical compounds that contain carbon. These compounds may contain any number of other elements, including hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, the halogens as well as phosphorus, silicon and sulfur".

RNA is needed by the DNA to effect amino acid production in a DNA cell. All the baryons that form a chain communicate to each other in series to produce amino acids.

Baryons store information about their previous state in gluon structures call quarks. This previous state information is required to communicate current information. This structure of the baryon is formed by gluons using the strong nuclear force. The baryon communicates to other baryons using the other three emitting forces; W+/- Boson, Z Boson and the Photon. The chemical process used to create amino acids use only the information created by the baryons and expressed by the 3 emitting bosons.

This simple process is how all information is received, processed and emitted. It extends to collections of neurons. Thus extending to collections of organisms. From collections of organisms it extends to culture.

## Saturday, August 8, 2009

### The universe is not expanding

The universe is not expanding. The material within the universe is expanding. Doppler shift shows the material in the universe is moving.

Dark Energy is the medium in which dark matter and baryonic matter exist. Baryonic matter produces magnetism. This applies pressure to the dark matter producing baryonic bubbles.

## Sunday, August 2, 2009

### Near Space Security of Assets

Asset assurance needs to be top priority for near space security. Major manned and unmanned platforms are vulnerable to even the smallest bits of debris. Space debris is a matter of cleaning the environment for current and future usage of orbits. There are some major problems in cleaning orbits. First is identification, second is to deorbit the debris, third is protection of platforms.

Identification of debris:
There are several methods of debris identification. Some are more effective than others.
Radar is discussed as an option. There are several issues with radar that cannot be currently resolved in near space.
1. Range. The range of naval radar is no more then 100 miles. Debris travelling at 20,000 miles per hour will traverse 333 miles in a second. Any bit of debris would hit a platform before it could be identified.
2. Size of debris. Most space debris is very small. Most debris would never even show up on radar in optimal conditions.
3. Power requirements. The average power consumption of an Aegis ship based radar platform is 485 kwm^2. This would require putting a nuclear power plant in near earth orbit.
4. Effective platform. The platform required to utilize and maintain a radar platform along with its power supply would be as large as a naval frigate. This would take years to develop and deploy. It would be a project in the magnitude of deploying another International Space Station just to protect the current space station.
Ladar has similar problems as Radar. Reflectivity is the main issue. The debris must reflect the laser. This will not occur with small or poorly reflective debris.
Infrared Radhard CMOS camera would be the most effective tool currently available for detection of debris. CMOS cameras use <100 mW of power. These cameras can be placed on the current space station with little change to existing systems. They can take pictures of the sky above the space station identifying debris as it passes overhead. This can give exceptional lead time to controllers allowing for shielding or collection of debris.

Shielding: There are several methods that must be used in tandem to protect assets. These are physical protection, magnetic fields, collection, and changing orbits of larger pieces of debris.
1. Physical protection. The use of Kevlar needs to be developed by nations to protect near space assets. Kevlar encased aerogel should be used to shroud manned platforms. This provides layered protection to several hazards in space. By wrapping the spacecraft and by using shields on shock absorbing positional arms will provide excellent protection.
a. Debris
b. Thermal

2. Magnetic fields. The use of magnetic fields has not been evaluated by nations as an effective form of protection. Using simple magnetic fields several thousand miles away from the platform will push most debris out of their current orbit. If done correctly, debris can be pushed into the Earth’s atmosphere. If used with identification tools, magnetic fields can be altered to match the debris’ size and speed. Small spacecraft can be deployed around the station as an effective barrier.
3. Collection vehicles. It is imperative that nations develop collection vehicles to be deployed from the station to recover debris and place it in a safe orbit.
4. Similar to collection vehicles. To remove large pieces of debris, vehicles would attach themselves to large garbage and use thrust to deorbit the junk.

In conclusion: It is imperative that nations protect space based assets. All these systems must be used in combination to provide effective protection.

I was asked to write this paper by Near Space Security for possible inclusion in March 24-25th 2010 conference in Amsterdam.

## Thursday, July 30, 2009

### Flat Universe - Another silly result from relativity

I was reading an article in the NewScientist by Pedro Ferreira
"Dark energy may be bending the universe out of shape"

"WE LIVE in a special time. For the past two decades, most of my colleagues and I have been working under the assumption that we can know everything about the universe. We know the amount of matter and energy it contains. We know its shape is flat. We can trace its history from the earliest moments after the big bang and we can even predict its fate. Or at least we thought we could."

The article continues, "Together with later measurements from NASA's WMAP satellite, the results nailed down the geometry of the universe to within a few per cent."

And, "But it was only after a few years of whittling away at the signals in early 2000 that we saw our own clear evidence of hot and cold spots with a typical size of 1 degree."
==============

It is absolutely ridiculous to state the universe is flat. There are Gamma Ray Bursts occurring all over the celestial sphere. Many of them have a red shift that would put them at >10 billion light years away. These are enormous explosion that create GRBs. These GRBs are probably galactic clusters exploding. If the universe was flat then these GRBs would be in the universe's elliptic or that 1 degree. This is not occurring.

In this Standard Vibration Model, Dark Energy is the aether that fills the universe. 100% of the universe is Dark Energy. Dark Energy is the medium in which all vibrations occur. Only 4% of the known universe is Baryonic in nature and the other 96% is Dark Matter.

## Saturday, July 25, 2009

### Baryon Volume

If a baryon's volume = 0 this violates the strong nuclear force. This would cause an explosion. I think if any of the gluons touch then this will occur.

3 Gluons form a triangle by intertwining their endpoints forming quarks. This triangle has an area. Since the baryon spins then the triangle's area forms a volume.

I was asked about this and after much discussion about mass having no volume I remembered this result. This comes from the 'Gravity' discussion at General Science Journal

Most of the baryon structure is explained further down the blog of in the paper 'Structure of Baryons'.

From the 'Theory of Everything' thread at GSJ

A baryon becomes more dense with a lack of space between its gluons. A baryon becomes less dense with an increase of space between its gluons. It has to do with the area of a spinning triangle. The larger the area the less dense the baryon.

Bobs: "Saying, "Or density is the space between gluons." is not the same as saying "Or density is the [lack of] space between gluons.". Different wording has different meaning."

These two statement do not have different meanings. They are different phases of the same system. This is like saying when water is below 0c, it becomes ice and reduces volume. When the temp of the water exceeds 100c, the water turns to vapor and expands its volume.

They are the same.

## Wednesday, July 22, 2009

### The Zeeman Effect

Credit: NOAO

This is called the Zeeman Effect. It is caused by a strong magnetic field effecting the information of the photon. I also notice that when the strong magnetic field dissipates the photon information returns to itself and continues on in a slightly changed direction. This slight change can account for Non-Gravitational Lensing of light in galactic clusters.

I will read more about this interaction called the Zeeman Effect from WIKI and from HyperPhysics Hyperphysics is a cool site. I just found it.

Detection of the Zeeman Effect in the
36 GHz Class I CH3OH maser line with the EVLA

## Tuesday, July 21, 2009

### Moon's motion through the Earth's Magnetosphere

I hold two models of the moon's motion. Both models require the Earth's Magnetosphere. I am moving from model one to model two because of the phases of the moon and the solar eclipses.

1) The moon is in the tail of the magnetosphere. As the Earth moves around the sun the magnetosphere pushes back the dark matter creating a bubble and ending in a tail. The denser side of the moon which always faces the earth is moving within this tail. This is like drafting in car racing. As the dark matter returns to its normal shape as the earth passes.

But this model has some issues and solves some issues.

Issues it solves. Tides. the tides occur every 12.5 hours. This would account for a small wobble in the moon's motion that causes this tidal force. Every 12.5 hours the moon is closer to the earth causing a high tide and every 12.5 hours the moon is further away causing a low tide.

Issues it creates. This model cannot allow for solar eclipses or phases of the moon.

I now think this is more like what is happening.
2) The moon is moving around the earth in its magnetosphere. Much like what is already known. But the face of the moon is always facing the earth. This would be caused if the moon is acting like a top. The more dense face points to the earth and the moon slightly rotates around the axis. This would allow for a small magnetic field for the moon. Other moons in the solar system follow this model. The moons of mars and the inner 4 moons of Jupiter do not rotate in relation to the observer on the planet. But they do rotate like a top.

Issues this model solves: The phases and eclipses.
Issues this model creates: It leave open how the tide work. This will still need to be examined.

I think the moon uses the second model in motion. This changes my original model of how the moon moves.

-------------

As I find citations to ideas I have had I will add them to the blog. If there are disproofs of ideas I have had I will also add them to the topic.

As the solar wind flows from the sun, it carves out a bubble in the interstellar medium.

## Thursday, July 16, 2009

### Density of the gluon

This is the axiom of the density of a Gluon:
Even a gluon occupies space so it also has a density. An energy measured over a volume. But it is measured as the strong nuclear force. The gluon has 3 bits of information: Color,Voltage,length. These three bits of information spin/oscillate about each other. Those bits of information occupy space. Gluons have volume through oscillation. The oscillation is the distance between the three bits of data. That creates density in the gluon. Much like the picture of the pulled photon.

This is a description of color:
Color is a variable that describes the data. It is an abstraction now. I think it is all the data involved in Temperature, Magnetism, and Electricity. Color is the data, voltage is the action, length is the reaction/response to external data/information.

## Wednesday, July 15, 2009

### Abstract of the Baryonic Model

Dark Energy is the media in which all vibrations transverse. The Ruleset is one bit of dark energy. Dark energy is rigid and 3 dimensional.

Baryonic matter: All baryonic matter consists of 3 gluons. These 3 gluons always form a triangle. At the connection points of 2 gluons a quark is formed by the intertwining of the gluons. Baryons have two of one type of quark and one of another. The two similar quarks spin around the axis of the other type of quark. This forms a cone in shape.

The gluon transmits information using the photon(heat), Z boson(electricity), and W+/- boson(magnetism). Each boson transmits information.

The Z boson is electricity. The dissimilar quark provides the direction of charge. The Z boson provides information to the lepton electron. This information is photon data, electron data and current. If the current of the Z boson is too strong it ejects the electron causing electricity. If the current of the Z boson is much more intense the Z boson extends to another baryon. This is plasma.

The W boson results from the two similar quarks spinning about the axis of the direction of charge. The more intense the spin of the baryon the more intense the W boson.

The photon is generated by the lepton electron. It is preloaded by the Z Boson. The electron emits the photon using Planck's Spectral Black Body Equations.
Frequency = u(v,T) = (8πhv^3/C^3)(1/e^(hv/kT)-1)
Wave length = u(λ,T) = ((8πhc)/λ^5)*(1/e^(hc/λkT)-1)

The receiving baryon's electron calculates the frequency and wave length. By evaluating the number of spins the photon has taken since emission, the receiving baryon get this information, spectra(what the emitting baryon is), Temperature of the emitting baryon, Distance traveled by the photon and direction. With this information the receiving baryon can calculate directed pressure on it, changes in temperature. Baryonic density is calculated by:

where
where M is the magnetic field
where E is the electric field
where T is the temperature field
where a,b,c are the lengths of the gluons
where A,B,C are the angles between gluons

Dark matter is made of 2 anti-gluons. These anti-gluons form anti-quarks. These vibrations spin in the opposite direction. These dark matter anti-gluon systems form threads. Many threads form fabrics. Dark matter is repelled by charge. Any W+/- boson pressurizes dark matter. This provides a bubble in the dark matter where baryons can exist.

Aaron Guerami

## Saturday, July 11, 2009

### More on Disproof of Gravity

I still cannot get past the Scalar * a dimensionless object = a field. That breaks laws of addition. Commutative.

I say a dimensionless object because mass has no volume. It does not matter if the mass is a shell, a point or a complex composite of material of masses. Each bit has no volume.

If we are to use mass then we cannot determine the volume. If we cannot determine volume we cannot determine position. If we cannot determine position then we cannot determine motion. If we cannot determine motion we cannot determine speed. If we cannot determine speed then we cannot determine vector accelleration. If we cannot determine vector accelleration then we cannot determine direction. This is from GSJ , my posting in the gravity thread.

This is a simple problem for those who Know Newton's Gravity is correct. Please If you can solve this simple problem.

Lets do a bit of math. 28 days worth. An hour by hour evaluation of the Sun-Earth-Moon relationship.

Lets use Newtonian Mechanics. f=gM1M2/r^2

Lets use the Wiki data for Mass, Distance and the sort. And everything in Metric

Sun Mass = 1.9891×10^30 kg
Earth Mass = 5.9736 × 10^24 kg
Moon Mass = 7.347 7 × 10^22 kg

Earth Aphelion = 152,097,701 km :Starting point
Moon Aphelion = 405,696 km :Starting/End point
Moon Perigee = 363,104 km :Mid point

Lets do one orbit and see what we get. Lets see if gravity can manage the lunar orbit. Sometimes we in physics need to evaluate the data.

This is a simple Newtonian Mechanics problem. All of the Gravity people should have solved this problem before accepting attraction between massive bodies as a Fact. Oh Yeah, Show your work. There should be 1344 calculations over 672 iterations for 28 days.

==========
This is an impossible problem. Even Newton could not solve this problem. Scientist have tried to evaluate this problem but have done nothing but produce confusing math. There is no solution.

The reason this does not work is because of the Zero Dimensional Mass. As I have described in this blog, mass does not have volume.

## Thursday, July 9, 2009

### Disproof of Gravity - the paper

Disproof of Gravity

By Aaron Guerami
aguerami@gmail.com

The standard particle model has yet to find any evidence of Gravity. This is most concerning since gravity is used by most modern equations. Great particle accelerators have hunted for any signs of gravity. None found!

There are several ways to disprove gravity.

1) Experimentally
One simple experiment shows there is no gravity. The Helium Balloon. It rises. How is this possible? Classical Mechanics shows that Force equals the Constant of Gravity multiplied by the Mass of Object 1 multiplied by the Mass of Object 2 divided by the Distance between the two masses raised to the second power.

F=GM1M2/r^2

With this logic, the mass of the Earth is so great that the helium balloon would have no choice but to be attracted to the Earth. We have mass 1 pulling on mass 2 and mass 2 pulling on mass 1. F1 = F2. This is just wrong. The force of the balloon that pulls the Earth is not equal to the force that the Earth pulls on the balloon. It would not rise. What we see in the experiment that the helium is rising to meet its level of density.

2) Commutitive
The mathematics of gravity is a concept called Zero Point Mass. This is a mass without a volume. This is not found in the universe. The main problem here is the reduction of 3 dimensional densities to 0 dimensional masses. Once a density is reduces to a mass, the mass cannot be returned to the original shape of the density. So we cannot cube a zero and get anything but another zero. This breaks the commutative properties of addition.

Let’s look at some of the equations and how gravity fails at a fundamental level.
F=ma : Force equals mass times acceleration.

We have a zero dimensional mass * a 2 dimensional vector and that does not equal a 3 dimensional field. So the main axiom of gravity fails the commutative test.

This alone should disprove gravity.
F = G(M1*M2)/r^2 : Force = The constant of Gravity * (The zero dimensional mass 1 * The zero dimensional mass 2)/ The 3 dimensional length between them squared. So every object pulls every other object. The dimensional problem occurs again.

A constant is what is used to fill in the gaps. When things do not work the way we want them to, we just add a constant to fix the problem. When the equation no longer works, we change the constant’s value. Physicists know about this problem. They created gravity waves and shell modeling to compensate for the dimensionless mass. But gravity is still dimensionless. The dimensionless mass cannot create a 3 dimensional shape.

We all know that gravity collapses under the scrutiny of the tiny. Quantum level objects do not show any signs of gravity. The particle accelerators prove this. They have yet to find any force that works as gravity is described.

3) Gravity fails the multi-body test.
Gravity can only compute the force between 2 objects. Any equation that uses a sum of objects fails in this way. First the two objects force is computed then the third body is computed with the resultant of the first two bodies. Then that resultant is computed with the 4 body... That is how summation works. The problem is that the distance between object 1 and 2 is not evaluated in the next iteration.

4) Gravity and Complex Systems.
Let’s look at a hurricane that is traveling over the ocean. The spinning winds cause rotation in the ocean. The low pressure of the storm causes a bulge upward in the ocean. Heat and pressure are two of the main variables in this system. As the temp increases it decreases the pressure of the storm, causing an increase in intensity in the storm. The heated air is forced up the eye wall. This is an example of a temperature/pressure force on density. It is not possible for gravity to describe this system, with or without spheres.

5) Questions posed by others:
- the rain fall because of gravity.
- the rain occurs because of water vapor cooling (temperature going closer to the dew point).
- the rain formation in itself is a very complex phenomena.
- the dynamics of rain formation depends on the presence of aerosols and fine particles.
- the dynamics of rain formation also depends on complex collision and coalescence phenomena.
- the ascending motion of air is driven by gravity on all parts of the atmosphere.
- this ascending motion is also affected by the Coriolis force.
- this motion is affected also by the drag of rain.
- this motion is also affected by the detailed geometry of the hurricane.
- the fluid dynamics itself exhibits an incredible complexity, like turbulence and instabilities.
- the term "T" in the Navier-Stokes equation above hides a lot of complexities that often still need to be understood.
- heat exchange plays an important role, yet it is not simpler than the fluid dynamics.

- the rain fall because of gravity
Rain falls because as cold water it is more dense or less buoyant then the surrounding air.
- the rain occurs because of water vapor cooling (temperature going closer to the dew point).
Yes, that is one way of looking at density and Buoyancy
- the rain formation in itself is a very complex phenomena.
Yes
- the dynamics of rain formation depends on the presence of aerosols and fine particles
Yes, the mixture of dirty water causes it to be a more dense mixture.
- the dynamics of rain formation also depends on complex collision and coalescence phenomena.
Yes again, as the less dense gas collides with other gases, their temperature reduces and the gas becomes liquid. This process occurs until the liquid water is heavier than the force of the updraft.
- the ascending motion of air is driven by gravity on all parts of the atmosphere .
No. The ascending motion of air is due to the changes in temperature. The air heats at the ground and rises. As it rises it cools and becomes liquid again. The liquid water is more dense then the surrounding air.
- this ascending motion is also affected by the Coriolis force .
There are only 4 forces, Gluon - nuclear, W Boson - magnetism, Z Boson - electricity, and the Photon - heat. Those are the only forces that have been experimentally shown.
- this motion is affected also by the drag of rain
Of course, As rain falls it drags against the updraft. This is the friction that removes the heat from the air. Heat radiates to cold.
- this motion is also affected by the detailed geometry of the hurricane
The motion is the geometry of the cyclone. Geometry is a snapshot in time of an object.
- the fluid dynamics itself exhibits an incredible complexity, like turbulence and instabilities.
The whole system is buoyancy. Buoyancy is only fluid dynamics. As a matter of opinion, everything is fluid dynamics.
- the term "T" in the Navier-Stokes equation above hides a lot of complexities that often still need to be understood.
Like G, they change T frequently. These changes of G try to mimic the evidence. Just change the constant and you will get what you want to see.
- heat exchange plays an important role, yet it is not simpler than the fluid dynamics.
Heat exchange is intrinsic to fluid dynamics. You cannot remove heat from the fluid dynamics problem.
- yet, suppress gravity and there are no hurricanes anymore
One cannot suppress gravity. Gravity is not real. It’s an old model of how objects move. Evidence has forced major changes in gravity. There is no supporting evidence of a graviton. It is like the Higg’s boson. Something that was built to try to explain interactions, but it does not.

6) Silly paradoxes created by gravity.
a. Black Holes are easily disproven by Crothers at sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com
b. Worm holes/Time travel
c. Parallel Universes
d. Relativity
e. Flat universe
f. Graviton decay
g. Higg’s Boson

Kepler's 3 laws are more in line with how planets orbit the sun. This is because of the Sun’s motion around the galaxy. This causes the elliptical shape of the orbit. Not gravity. Gravity cannot explain 3 body interactions. If the equation has a G in it then it is a Zero Point Mass system and that does not exist in the universe.

The rules of the universe are simple. An atoms position in a system is based upon its density in relation to the surrounding densities and the changes in magnetism, electricity and temperature. Density is the most important function in determining the position of an object. Density is the vibration intensity within a volume in relation to the density of the surrounding medium.

## Monday, July 6, 2009

### Five Problems in Physics

FIVE PROBLEMS IN PHYSICS WITHOUT THE DEFINITE ARTICLE
By Paul Fendley

1. Explain the dark matter and energy in the universe
2. Explain high-temperature super-conductivity
3. Explain the “Higgs” phenomenon in the standard model
4. Figure out how to make a quantum computer

==========

I think this Standard Vibration Model explains (1),(2),(3) and does this in line with (5).

I don't think I have the equipment to create a Quantum Computer. I have described the bosons that vibrate through Dark Energy as a Quantum Computational system(4).

I would like to add these problems that must be explained in physics. I think this model explains these difficult problems.
1) Gravitational lensing
2) Multi-body density motion with thermodynamics, magnetism, and electricity.
3) The pathway to Organic Chemistry
4) Gamma ray bursts over the celestial sphere.
5) Information carried by Bosons.
6) Time

## Sunday, June 28, 2009

### Non-existence of Neutrinos

There is a great paper for dissidents of modern cosmology.

http://www.worldnpa.org/pdf/events/FriendlyLetter.pdf
by David de Hilster

Neutrino & Balancing Equations
• Subatomic physics cannot balance energy without the neutrino –
FALSE
• Relativistic kinematic equations used in particle accelerators prove
the neutrino exists – FALSE
• The neutrino must be there to take away the magic energy
introduced in mainstream physics – TRUE
• Use non-relativistic equations, no neutrino is needed (see Carezani
et. al)
• Not simple without the neutrino but then again, we have little idea of
what really is happening at the end of particle accelerators so a
massive overhaul is needed
• Smashing particles
– Is that the correct way to find parts?
– If you smash enough parts, you can find anything
• Neutrinos have NEVER been detected directly

==========

Now I have always had an issue with vibrations called neutrinos. For all the reasons above and more listed in the .pdf. They seem to me to be pieces of existing vibrations. Broken gluons are my favorite possibility for this vibration. But like all dis-harmonic vibrations they must be absorbed into the dark energy.

They exist because someone's math needed to fit the experiment. Since we don't know what these are, scientist made them up to fit the experiment.

This paper goes into great detail describing nuclear without neutrinos. It is an easy read.

===========
Neutrino Evidence Research
http://neutrinos.autodynamics.org
• Extensive research on neutrino non-existence
including examples of nuclear-nuclear collisions
described without the neutrino
• Neutrino evidence research is almost nonexistent
• Dissidents do not know the origin, history, or
evidence for the neutrino
• Why do they accept the neutrino without
knowing these things?

============

There are several other papers referenced in the pdf that help define this.

Another cosomological concept trashed.
cool.

## Sunday, June 14, 2009

### The fallacies of gravity

This comes from my posting at GSJ
Gravity is the bane of physics. It is the center most axiom in matter physics. The whole concept needs to be abandon if we are to advance science. A theory of motion must work at all levels; quantum, itty-bitty, tiny, normal, massive, supermassive, and ultramassive.

The first major fallacy of gravity is a concept called Zero Point Mass. This is a mass without a volume. This is not found in the universe. The main problem here is the reduction of 3 dimensional densities to 0 dimension masses. Once you reduce the density to mass you cannot return a mass to the shape of the density. So you cannot cube a zero and get anything but another zero. This breaks the commutative properties of addition.

Lets look at some of the equations and how gravity fails at a fundamental level.
1) F=ma : Force equals mass times accelleration.
We have a zero dimensional mass * a 2 dimensional vector and that does not equal a 3 dimensional field. So the main axiom of gravity fails the commutative test.

This alone should disprove gravity.

But wait there is more.

F = G(M1*M2)/r^2 : Force = (The constant of Gravity * The zero dimensional mass 1 * The zero dimensional mass 2)/ The 3 dimensional length between them squared.
So every object pulls every other object.

We have mass 1 pulling on mass 2 and mass 2 pulling on mass 1. F1 = F2. This is just wrong. The force that the moon pulls the earth is not equal to the force that the earth pulls on the moon.

A constant is what is used to fill in the gaps. When things do not work the way we want them to we just add a constant to fix the problem.

Physicist know about this problem. They created gravity waves and sphere modeling to compensate for the dimensionless mass. But gravity is still dimensionless. The dimensionless mass now creates a 3 dimensional wave. I'll get back to this.

Objects are not spherical. The Earth is not a sphere, the Sun is not a sphere. The galaxy is not a sphere.

We all know that gravity collapses under the scrutiny of the tiny. Quantum level objects do not show any signs of gravity.

Gravity fails the multi-body test. You can only compute the Force between 2 objects. Any equation that uses a sum of objects fails in this way. First the two objects force is computed then the third body is computed with the resultant of the first two bodies. Then that resultant is computed with the 4 body... That is how summation works. The problem is that the distance between object 1 and 2 is not evaluated in the next iteration.

The gravity sphere model was designed to add volume to the problem. This analogy of the spheres is still does not match evidence. Lets look at the spheres as the different layers of the atmosphere.

http://www.williamsclass.com

Lets look at a hurricane that is traveling over the ocean. The spinning winds cause rotation in the ocean. The low pressure of the storm causes a bulge upward in the ocean. Heat and pressure are two of the main variables in this system. As the temp increases it decreases the pressure of the storm, causing an increase in intensity in the storm.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_(cyclone)

The heated air is forced up the eye wall. This is an example of a temperature/pressure force on density.

There is no way that gravity can describe this system, with or without spheres.

This this person with no name that I call bnon wrote.

As I asked you: "Who said rain and heat exchange is explained by gravity? "

- the rain fall because of gravity
- the rain occurs because of water vapor cooling (temperature going closer to the dew point)
- the rain formation in itself is a very complex phenomena
- the dynamics of rain formation depends on the presence of aerosols and fine particles
- the dynamics of rain formation also depends on complex collision and coelescence phenomena
- the ascending motion of air is driven by gravity on all parts of the atmosphere
- this ascending motion is also affected by the Coriolis force
- this motion is affected also by the drag of rain
- this motion is also affected by the detailled geometry of the hurricane
- the fluid dynamics itselfs exhibits an incredible complexity, like turbulence and instabilities
- the term "T" in the Navier-Stokes equation above hides a lot of complexities that often still need to be understood
- heat exchange plays an important role, yet it is not simpler than the fluid dynamics

- yet, suppress gravity and there are no hurricanes anymore

Therefore Aaron, if you don't understand my reaction to your stupid comments, I don't care.
just show that you can do better than this:

So, I wrote

Let's examine your points one at a time.

- the rain fall because of gravity
Rain falls because as cold water it is more dense or less buoyant then the surrounding air. Remember Buoyancy

- the rain occurs because of water vapor cooling (temperature going closer to the dew point) Yes, that is one way of looking at density and Buoyancy

- the rain formation in itself is a very complex phenomena
Yes

- the dynamics of rain formation depends on the presence of aerosols and fine particles
Yes, the mixture of dirty water causes it to be a more dense mixture.

- the dynamics of rain formation also depends on complex collision and coelescence phenomena
Yes again, as the less dense gas collides with other gases, their temperature reduces and the gas becomes liquid. This process occurs until the liquid water is heavier than the force of the updraft.

- the ascending motion of air is driven by gravity on all parts of the atmosphere
No. The ascending motion of air is due to the changes in temperature. The air heats at the ground and rises. As it rises it cools and becomes liquid again. The liquid water is more dense then the surrounding air.

- this ascending motion is also affected by the Coriolis force
There are only 4 forces, Gluon - nuclear, W Boson - magnetism, Z Boson - electricity, and the Photon - heat. Those are the only forces that have been experimentally shown.

- this motion is affected also by the drag of rain
Of course, As rain falls it drags against the updraft. This is the friction that removes the heat from the air. Heat radiates to cold.

- this motion is also affected by the detailled geometry of the hurricane
The motion is the geometry of the cyclone. Geometry is a snapshot in time of an object.

- the fluid dynamics itselfs exhibits an incredible complexity, like turbulence and instabilities
The whole system is buoyancy. Buoyancy is only fluid dynamics. As a matter of opinion, everything is fluid dynamics.

- the term "T" in the Navier-Stokes equation above hides a lot of complexities that often still need to be understood
Like G. They change that frequently. These changes of G try to mimic the evidence. Just change the constant and you will get what you want to see.

- heat exchange plays an important role, yet it is not simpler than the fluid dynamics
Heat exchange is intrinsic to fluid dynamics. You cannot remove heat from the fluid dynamics problem.

- yet, suppress gravity and there are no hurricanes anymore
One cannot suppress gravity. Gravity is not real. Its an old model of how objects move. Evidence has force major changes in gravity. There is no supporting evidence of a graviton. Its like the higgs boson. Something that was built to try to explain interactions. But it does not.

Kepler's ellipse motion is more in line with how planets orbit the sun. This is because of the motion of the sun around the galaxy. This causes the elliptical shape of the orbit. Not gravity. Gravity cannot explain 3 body interaction. You can put up all the equations you want. If they have a G in them then they are a Zero Point Mass system and that does not exist in the universe.

The rules of the universe are simple. An atoms position in a system is based upon its density in relation to the surrounding densities and the changes in magnetism, electricity and temperature. This occurs inside a non-baryonic dark matter bubble as explained in this blog.