Saturday, September 27, 2008

Newton/Einstein fail under data
This is the page describing how NASA failed to protect our data. The Planetary Society came to the rescue.

"We would expect the two spacecraft to follow Newton's law of gravity," Dr. Turyshev said, "but they in fact fail to confirm Newton's law. If Newton is wrong, Einstein is wrong too."

Then we have the orbital issues of the Lunar Prospector.

Both of these paper are data based descriptions of how Newton's Law of Gravity is wrong. Since Newton is wrong then all model that are based on Newton's Model of Gravity are wrong.

If this does not convince you, then there is no evidence of a Graviton. None has ever been found. In Newton's model it would be the most abundant particle.

In my model gravity is the effect caused by the interaction of magnetism on the background dark matter. This allows for density, thermodynamics, plasmadynamics, E/M and other systems to take effect in the bubble caused by the interaction of magnetism and dark matter.

In the end, we are going to have an ugly equation that is filled with fractals and is a sum of all the systems.

We really need to clear the table and start over.
Aaron Guerami

Addendum 7/6/2009
General Relativity Shown to be Newtonian Gravitational Theory by Roger Anderton

Friday, September 26, 2008

Pioneer 10 & 11 Anomaly

Newton, Einstein Lost in Space? Hotz

Let me describe what happen here and how it is explained by this model. These two spacecraft hit the dense dark matter barrier. This is the edge of the baryonic radiation bubble.

Being that the spacecraft are baryonic in nature, they are experiencing resistance from the pressurized dark matter. They have a small magnetic field caused by the baryons that make up the spacecraft. That field creates a bubble in the dark matter. But that dark matter is pressurized by the baryonic radiation emitted from the Sun. This pressurization is what reduced the velocity and changed the trajectory. Their trajectories will continue to change and they will return to the solar system. The dense dark matter is the primary influence in this interaction.

In one of the previous postings I describe a Dark Matter engine that will provide thrust to exit the solar system.

Plasma in interstellar space?

I have several issues with Dark Matter having any electrons, ionized He or not. If dark matter turns out to be only protons (ionized H), then I guess I can be ok with that. But I don't think that is what is occurring here.

I need the photon wavefront to move unimpeded from galaxy to galaxy. With the exception of gravitational lensing. but even here we don't lose photons. They are bent or in the case of the Bullet Nebula they prove Reiter's point. They are split (4 times). But we don't lose them to electrons. If the interstellar media is charged particles other than protons (He-, He3, or He4), any electrons would absorb our photons. This is why we see ionized gas when excited by photons. We don't see the original memes here. We see the interaction of the secondary information, the ion releasing a new photon wave.

I agree with almost everything in the first paper

but, Pioneer 11 lost velocity while exiting the solar system.

In my model, I see solar systems like bubbles in the ocean. Bubbles can coalesce, bubbles can separate, but there is a difference between inside the bubble and outside the bubble. These are two disparate systems trying to maintain some equilibrium. Its the pressure outside the bubble pressing on the pressure inside the bubble. Solar system are not bubble shapes they are modified torus.

In the case of the solar system as a bubble, the two systems are (inside) Baryonic in nature and Non-Baryonic in nature (outside). Non-Baryonic particles (photons, free electrons, neutrinos and others) can flow between these two systems. Its the baryons that cannot leave the bubble.

Photo by enoeske on Picasa

We know that the interstellar media cannot be void.

Now for the missing matter, lets look at our friend Oort and his cloud. I think there is more matter here than previously described. Stellar Nucleosysthesis occurs here. Protons collide here and attract electrons. 3 Alphas can easily form a carbon ion. It starts sliding back towards the sun on the bent dark matter. In stellar lightning speed (a couple of million years) our carbon ion is now a small comet. This process reduces the need for Dark Matter to be heavily massive.

This above model only requires E/M and baryonic density, sprinkle some thermodynamic and others and it works. As arrogant as it sounds. I think my model is better than Newton, Einstein, and Hawkins put together (MOND). They require attraction through mass. G has never been found. I think CERN is starting to accept this.

Oh, the reason we don't find He3 on earth, at all, ever, is because of the magnetosphere. The magnetosphere forces the He3 around the earth and deposits it on the moon. Dr Schmitt of Apollo 17 found this ion in ~abundance on the moon. He3 when excited produces tremendous amounts of electricity. With no deuterium.

Thanks to Curt Youngs

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Density gradient : Vibration

Density gradient vibration

E = emitter
O = atom preloaded photon
-p = photon vibration heading left
p+ = photon vibration heading right
-p+ = one photon vibration heading left one right

B = atom accepting/releasing vibration photon
( = extreme change in atom shape due to 2 photon vibration
| = reflective wall

1) |O O O O E
2) |O O O O -pE
3) |O O O O-p E
4) |O O O-pB -pE
5) |O O-pB O-p E
6) |O-pB O-pB -pE
7) |Bp+O-pB O-p E
8) |O-p(p+O-pB -pE
9) |Bp+O-p(p+O-p E

I still like calling the process a photon, although it is obvious it is not a particle. I think it will cause less confusion if we change the process not the name.

Eric Reiter is responsible for this change with his experiment. This vibration allows for more information to be passed through the bandwidth in this process.

It should have been obvious to me in this chart by PBS Nova and Fermilab,

A photon has no mass.
It is only a vibration.