## Sunday, June 14, 2009

### The fallacies of gravity

This comes from my posting at GSJ
Gravity is the bane of physics. It is the center most axiom in matter physics. The whole concept needs to be abandon if we are to advance science. A theory of motion must work at all levels; quantum, itty-bitty, tiny, normal, massive, supermassive, and ultramassive.

The first major fallacy of gravity is a concept called Zero Point Mass. This is a mass without a volume. This is not found in the universe. The main problem here is the reduction of 3 dimensional densities to 0 dimension masses. Once you reduce the density to mass you cannot return a mass to the shape of the density. So you cannot cube a zero and get anything but another zero. This breaks the commutative properties of addition.

Lets look at some of the equations and how gravity fails at a fundamental level.
1) F=ma : Force equals mass times accelleration.
We have a zero dimensional mass * a 2 dimensional vector and that does not equal a 3 dimensional field. So the main axiom of gravity fails the commutative test.

This alone should disprove gravity.

But wait there is more.

F = G(M1*M2)/r^2 : Force = (The constant of Gravity * The zero dimensional mass 1 * The zero dimensional mass 2)/ The 3 dimensional length between them squared.
So every object pulls every other object.

We have mass 1 pulling on mass 2 and mass 2 pulling on mass 1. F1 = F2. This is just wrong. The force that the moon pulls the earth is not equal to the force that the earth pulls on the moon.

A constant is what is used to fill in the gaps. When things do not work the way we want them to we just add a constant to fix the problem.

Physicist know about this problem. They created gravity waves and sphere modeling to compensate for the dimensionless mass. But gravity is still dimensionless. The dimensionless mass now creates a 3 dimensional wave. I'll get back to this.

Objects are not spherical. The Earth is not a sphere, the Sun is not a sphere. The galaxy is not a sphere.

We all know that gravity collapses under the scrutiny of the tiny. Quantum level objects do not show any signs of gravity.

Gravity fails the multi-body test. You can only compute the Force between 2 objects. Any equation that uses a sum of objects fails in this way. First the two objects force is computed then the third body is computed with the resultant of the first two bodies. Then that resultant is computed with the 4 body... That is how summation works. The problem is that the distance between object 1 and 2 is not evaluated in the next iteration.

The gravity sphere model was designed to add volume to the problem. This analogy of the spheres is still does not match evidence. Lets look at the spheres as the different layers of the atmosphere.

http://www.williamsclass.com

Lets look at a hurricane that is traveling over the ocean. The spinning winds cause rotation in the ocean. The low pressure of the storm causes a bulge upward in the ocean. Heat and pressure are two of the main variables in this system. As the temp increases it decreases the pressure of the storm, causing an increase in intensity in the storm.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_(cyclone)

The heated air is forced up the eye wall. This is an example of a temperature/pressure force on density.

There is no way that gravity can describe this system, with or without spheres.

This this person with no name that I call bnon wrote.

As I asked you: "Who said rain and heat exchange is explained by gravity? "

- the rain fall because of gravity
- the rain occurs because of water vapor cooling (temperature going closer to the dew point)
- the rain formation in itself is a very complex phenomena
- the dynamics of rain formation depends on the presence of aerosols and fine particles
- the dynamics of rain formation also depends on complex collision and coelescence phenomena
- the ascending motion of air is driven by gravity on all parts of the atmosphere
- this ascending motion is also affected by the Coriolis force
- this motion is affected also by the drag of rain
- this motion is also affected by the detailled geometry of the hurricane
- the fluid dynamics itselfs exhibits an incredible complexity, like turbulence and instabilities
- the term "T" in the Navier-Stokes equation above hides a lot of complexities that often still need to be understood
- heat exchange plays an important role, yet it is not simpler than the fluid dynamics

- yet, suppress gravity and there are no hurricanes anymore

Therefore Aaron, if you don't understand my reaction to your stupid comments, I don't care.
just show that you can do better than this:

So, I wrote

Let's examine your points one at a time.

- the rain fall because of gravity
Rain falls because as cold water it is more dense or less buoyant then the surrounding air. Remember Buoyancy

- the rain occurs because of water vapor cooling (temperature going closer to the dew point) Yes, that is one way of looking at density and Buoyancy

- the rain formation in itself is a very complex phenomena
Yes

- the dynamics of rain formation depends on the presence of aerosols and fine particles
Yes, the mixture of dirty water causes it to be a more dense mixture.

- the dynamics of rain formation also depends on complex collision and coelescence phenomena
Yes again, as the less dense gas collides with other gases, their temperature reduces and the gas becomes liquid. This process occurs until the liquid water is heavier than the force of the updraft.

- the ascending motion of air is driven by gravity on all parts of the atmosphere
No. The ascending motion of air is due to the changes in temperature. The air heats at the ground and rises. As it rises it cools and becomes liquid again. The liquid water is more dense then the surrounding air.

- this ascending motion is also affected by the Coriolis force
There are only 4 forces, Gluon - nuclear, W Boson - magnetism, Z Boson - electricity, and the Photon - heat. Those are the only forces that have been experimentally shown.

- this motion is affected also by the drag of rain
Of course, As rain falls it drags against the updraft. This is the friction that removes the heat from the air. Heat radiates to cold.

- this motion is also affected by the detailled geometry of the hurricane
The motion is the geometry of the cyclone. Geometry is a snapshot in time of an object.

- the fluid dynamics itselfs exhibits an incredible complexity, like turbulence and instabilities
The whole system is buoyancy. Buoyancy is only fluid dynamics. As a matter of opinion, everything is fluid dynamics.

- the term "T" in the Navier-Stokes equation above hides a lot of complexities that often still need to be understood
Like G. They change that frequently. These changes of G try to mimic the evidence. Just change the constant and you will get what you want to see.

- heat exchange plays an important role, yet it is not simpler than the fluid dynamics
Heat exchange is intrinsic to fluid dynamics. You cannot remove heat from the fluid dynamics problem.

- yet, suppress gravity and there are no hurricanes anymore
One cannot suppress gravity. Gravity is not real. Its an old model of how objects move. Evidence has force major changes in gravity. There is no supporting evidence of a graviton. Its like the higgs boson. Something that was built to try to explain interactions. But it does not.

Kepler's ellipse motion is more in line with how planets orbit the sun. This is because of the motion of the sun around the galaxy. This causes the elliptical shape of the orbit. Not gravity. Gravity cannot explain 3 body interaction. You can put up all the equations you want. If they have a G in them then they are a Zero Point Mass system and that does not exist in the universe.

The rules of the universe are simple. An atoms position in a system is based upon its density in relation to the surrounding densities and the changes in magnetism, electricity and temperature. This occurs inside a non-baryonic dark matter bubble as explained in this blog.