Friday, April 9, 2010

The BigParadox Binary Counter

Most excellent. Again I am encouraging you to do more.

Sunday, April 4, 2010

Again I caught that on my unshielded CRT

It was upgraded to 7.2.

Credit NASA
Great pictures of the solar flare that caused that earthquake.

This theory show that earthquakes originate from the sun. NASA can now predict earthquakes. It will take some time to match previous data to earthquakes. This matching of datasets will show magnitude. NASA just cannot predict the location of the event, yet. The tools already exist. Congratulations to NASA for their work and results.

Earthquakes are a result of solar flares. The intense Z Boson flares from the sun and strikes the earth. This causes a discharge in the magnetosphere that strikes the earth in the most vulnerable fault. This theory shows that earthquakes are the result of coronal mass ejections.

A simple solar radiation detector. 
Take a CRT TV attached to a cable line. Remove some of the shielding on the antenna. Leave the TV power on. I had company over and was able to show him the solar radiation intensity as it was happening. It was so intense that I shut down my computer.
04/06/10 Extreme changes from black to blue from 7:00 am est.

It is my speculation that every earthquake has a corresponding solar event. 

Atlas : Jet Events

Congratulations on the work all of you have done to build these detectors.

This is the main paper with data. Although I had some difficulty in downloading it.
This paper is huge. 1100+ pages. This paper does not download correctly using any web browser.
This paper is far more manageable. It is only 29 pages.

I have questions: On pages 8 and 10 of the smaller doc. MC is that Mass*C or is it Muon Candidate? Do those lines going through the data point show the min/max of the run? How many runs were put together to create those maps?

On page 8, why are there data points outside the line? Is the line what you expect and the data point is what you get?

Are these all simulations and what you EXPECT to see, or are these based on real data? That is what I understood from the conclusions. That these maps are simulations. The conclusion says you expect to see the Higg's at these points. Not that you did. Am I correct in that statement?

Why are the maps in 2d and not the expected 3d? I would expect to see the energy, distance, and time to be the factors of any broken vibrations. The general questions are: How did the energy transform over time? Was there a general direction these broken energies transformed over time? When did the baryon transform into heat, electricity, or magnetism?