Posted on the Nature website.
"Higgs signal sinks from view."
This requires the model to maintain the observations and discoveries made at the labs. In my view there needs to be a reexamination of what is known and how they interact.
Showing posts with label Higgs Boson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Higgs Boson. Show all posts
Friday, August 26, 2011
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Discrepencies in symmetry
This post is in response to US/LHC Blog.
"A particle is a particle is a particle!" This is not true.
1)The electron is not in the same place at any different time.
2)The fields emanating from a vibration is always different.
3) the Baryon's spin causes differences at each time.
Thus a particle is not a particle is not a particle!
This idea stems from the religion of the Higg's Boson. Marketed as the God particle with this belief The universe is perfect and perfect requires god. God makes particles using the Higg's Boson. Here is an example of belief in cosmology.
It is not possible for any object to be symmetrical. Let me repeat that, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR ANY OBJECT TO BE SYMMETRICAL!!! No object can be a sphere. Circles are two dimensional, thus cannot exist in nature. Most importantly, no object can be a sphere.
GOCE has produced data that shows the southern half of the Earth is concave in the Atlantic, Indian and Arctic oceans. This area is not convex which is required for a sphere.
This is the link to ESA/GOCE. This has a video showing the Earth's density in specific detail. This video shows the spinning planet is not a sphere. It has different densities at different latitudes and longitudes. The spinning Earth is so deformed it changes the spacecraft orbit.
I will continue this thought later. I have had a seizure and need to sleep. 12:30p
During my recovery today I had visualizations that will help add to this evaluation of symmetry.
Not only does the planet suffer from asymmetry, but our brains use asymmetry. A neural network is an error correction system. It optimizes information through error correction.
It is not possible for sub atomic vibrations to show symmetry. Asymmetry is a requirement for a baryon's existence. It has proven difficult for scientist to produce symmetrical molecules. The reason for this difficulty is a baryon is composed of three vibrating Gluons.
Two gluons meet to form a quark. This intertwining of gluons allow for storage of information. Kind of like RAM.
Although I will not quit using 8π in calculations this is only because we don't have a suitable replacement yet. An example is the photon radiation of the Sun. If evaluated by wavelength then U(λ,T)= (8πhc/λ^5)*(1/e^(hc/λT)-1) cannot account for changes on the surface of the Sun; Sun spots, solar flares...
This article shows Neutrino oscillation. This oscillation shows vibration in sub atomic particles. Oscillation is by default not symmetrical.
"A particle is a particle is a particle!" This is not true.
1)The electron is not in the same place at any different time.
2)The fields emanating from a vibration is always different.
3) the Baryon's spin causes differences at each time.
Thus a particle is not a particle is not a particle!
This idea stems from the religion of the Higg's Boson. Marketed as the God particle with this belief The universe is perfect and perfect requires god. God makes particles using the Higg's Boson. Here is an example of belief in cosmology.
It is not possible for any object to be symmetrical. Let me repeat that, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR ANY OBJECT TO BE SYMMETRICAL!!! No object can be a sphere. Circles are two dimensional, thus cannot exist in nature. Most importantly, no object can be a sphere.
GOCE has produced data that shows the southern half of the Earth is concave in the Atlantic, Indian and Arctic oceans. This area is not convex which is required for a sphere.
This is the link to ESA/GOCE. This has a video showing the Earth's density in specific detail. This video shows the spinning planet is not a sphere. It has different densities at different latitudes and longitudes. The spinning Earth is so deformed it changes the spacecraft orbit.
I will continue this thought later. I have had a seizure and need to sleep. 12:30p
During my recovery today I had visualizations that will help add to this evaluation of symmetry.
Not only does the planet suffer from asymmetry, but our brains use asymmetry. A neural network is an error correction system. It optimizes information through error correction.
It is not possible for sub atomic vibrations to show symmetry. Asymmetry is a requirement for a baryon's existence. It has proven difficult for scientist to produce symmetrical molecules. The reason for this difficulty is a baryon is composed of three vibrating Gluons.
Two gluons meet to form a quark. This intertwining of gluons allow for storage of information. Kind of like RAM.
Although I will not quit using 8π in calculations this is only because we don't have a suitable replacement yet. An example is the photon radiation of the Sun. If evaluated by wavelength then U(λ,T)= (8πhc/λ^5)*(1/e^(hc/λT)-1) cannot account for changes on the surface of the Sun; Sun spots, solar flares...
This article shows Neutrino oscillation. This oscillation shows vibration in sub atomic particles. Oscillation is by default not symmetrical.
Labels:
Asymmetry,
Higgs Boson,
Symmetry,
Vibration
Monday, February 2, 2009
The ridiculous Higgs Boson
This was a comment from Magnus. I thought it was humorous enough to make a posting of it. Magnus is known as TheBigParadox on Youtube. I would encourage you to make as many animations as you can about these paradoxes. There are many.
------
Many speculate about what this Higgs particle is, whether the Cern experiments are sensible etc.
I made a short animation, it could continue. Maybe I will make a continuation.
The Higgs Particle Adventure.
Best regards,
Magnus
I like the animation. It shows what ridiculous argument is necessary to even talk about the Higgs particle. The Higgs particle was developed when they tried to put what they saw together with what they believed.
Nothing works without gravity. That is what they believe. So there must be 4 forces ;Strong, weak, E/M and sometimes Gravity. Newton told us so.
But their work only shows 3 forces; strong, weak and E/M. They needed a system of reconciliation to keep gravity. In comes Higgs. If we had a new particle that does and does not exist when we need it to, then we can make the results that we think we are looking for. Thanks Higgs, we found the imaginary particle that produces the graviton on our chalk board. Newton proved that gravity exists, so there must be a graviton, thus there must be a Higgs Boson. Now that we have a Higgs Boson on the chalk board something magical happens here and look we now have a graviton. Tada. Newton is safe...
I explain in this blog how gravity has the appearance of working but is really density in action. Also it is not possible for CERN to produce a Black Hole in the sense that Newton/Einstein/Hawkins would describe. I have two articles on the topics of Black Holes that show evidence that these objects are Planck's Black Body radiators. The work at CERN is very important and cutting edge. I just disagree with the conclusions not their amazing work.
------
Many speculate about what this Higgs particle is, whether the Cern experiments are sensible etc.
I made a short animation, it could continue. Maybe I will make a continuation.
The Higgs Particle Adventure.
Best regards,
Magnus
I like the animation. It shows what ridiculous argument is necessary to even talk about the Higgs particle. The Higgs particle was developed when they tried to put what they saw together with what they believed.
Nothing works without gravity. That is what they believe. So there must be 4 forces ;Strong, weak, E/M and sometimes Gravity. Newton told us so.
But their work only shows 3 forces; strong, weak and E/M. They needed a system of reconciliation to keep gravity. In comes Higgs. If we had a new particle that does and does not exist when we need it to, then we can make the results that we think we are looking for. Thanks Higgs, we found the imaginary particle that produces the graviton on our chalk board. Newton proved that gravity exists, so there must be a graviton, thus there must be a Higgs Boson. Now that we have a Higgs Boson on the chalk board something magical happens here and look we now have a graviton. Tada. Newton is safe...
I explain in this blog how gravity has the appearance of working but is really density in action. Also it is not possible for CERN to produce a Black Hole in the sense that Newton/Einstein/Hawkins would describe. I have two articles on the topics of Black Holes that show evidence that these objects are Planck's Black Body radiators. The work at CERN is very important and cutting edge. I just disagree with the conclusions not their amazing work.
Labels:
Density,
Gravity,
Higgs Boson,
thebigparadox
Monday, September 15, 2008
The hidden Higgs Boson
So, the LHC is looking for the Higg's Boson. Good luck. I am convinced that you will never find it on Earth.
In my previous writing I describe Dark Matter as a Massive particle that has an anti-spin and is charge repugnant. This particle find Baryons repugnant. The earth has a massive magnetic field. So we will only find Dark Matter in interstellar space. These particle will be massive.
The other reason I don't want to call this a Boson is that, in my opinion, bosons transport information. Information require a charge to impart energy. Dark matter reacts poorly to charge. It may be more like a mix between a lepton and a quark, but it is definitely not a boson.
The Higg's Boson is not necessary.
a
In my previous writing I describe Dark Matter as a Massive particle that has an anti-spin and is charge repugnant. This particle find Baryons repugnant. The earth has a massive magnetic field. So we will only find Dark Matter in interstellar space. These particle will be massive.
The other reason I don't want to call this a Boson is that, in my opinion, bosons transport information. Information require a charge to impart energy. Dark matter reacts poorly to charge. It may be more like a mix between a lepton and a quark, but it is definitely not a boson.
The Higg's Boson is not necessary.
a
Labels:
Boson,
Dark Matter,
Higgs Boson,
Physics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

