Lava Lamps

This is a simple chemical lava lamp. Grownup supervision required.

Here is a density based one. One that is described in this model

A Person Describing my Paper 'A Disproof of Gravity'

I want to thank the person in this video for taking the time to read the paper and finding the meaning I was trying to describe.

Thanks Aaron

This guy is fun

How is matter created?

In this model I describe how baryonic matter is created from dark matter. I feel this is a topic that I have not fully described to the extent the model requires.

Definitions in this model: (described in published papers)
Dark Matter: non-rotating gluons compressing together.
Baryonic Matter: Three rotating gluons spin to form a baryon.

Model Requirements:
The requirements for baryogenesis is that baryons are easily created by interactions within dark matter, and/or between baryons and dark matter.

General Baryogenesis:
As baryonic matter plows through the dark matter medium, the magnetic field of the baryon causes motion/rotation in the non-rotating gluons. The dark matter gluons start rotating and coalescing into Baryons.

The greater the baryonic density, the more interactions that create baryons from dark matter. This rate is variable. The W+/- Boson (magnetism) -- Dark Matter interaction is the most common but Z Bosons and Gluons can interact with DM. DM does not create an electron so it cannot interact with the photon.

We see the result of this process in pictures like this from the Fermi space telescope. I originally found this at Q SPACE

Credit: NASA

This is the baryon's commutative/composite shape as described in this model. This is the shape of helium. This shape shows properties of helium.

• A noble gas. 
• Its electrons are away from the nucleus along a plane.
• This plane is perpendicular to the magnetic field.  
• This is a stable spiral galaxy. It is not effected by (severely) another galaxy's magnetic field. 
• They do not interact well with other atoms/galaxies.
• Closed loop
• High intensity core rotating.

Where as elliptical galaxies are more like hydrogen.

• Can be highly charged

The problem with spheres.

Sherlock,

Thanks for reading and commenting on my work.
------------------
Sherlock said...
Aaron,

Yeh, and if the detection events are at the same time, they have to be equal distance from the main event.
-----------
You said: No, they will never be equal distance from the original event.
----------
Aaron, If the original event is at the center of a sphere, every observer on the surface of the sphere will see the event at the same time. The time the event is observed is determined by the distance from the event. The observers on the surface of the sphere are all equal distance from the event and therefore will see the event at the same time. It can't be any other way unless the speed of light varies within the volume of the sphere.

---------------

The above posting is a comment fromhttp://aaronsreality.blogspot.com/2010/01/motion-of-photon.html

There are several problems with perfect geometry shapes. The main and most obvious problem with a sphere is that it cannot exist in reality. There is no example of a perfect sphere in reality. The Earth is not a sphere. The Sun is not a sphere and galaxies are definitely not spheres. 

The requirement of a sphere is that every surface point is equidistant from the center of the sphere. This is not only unlikely but impossible.  The simple baryon is a rotating triangle with several boson emanating from the baryon. The Z Boson connects the baryon to the lepton electron. The Lepton electron expresses the W+/- Boson perpendicular to the Z Boson. The lepton electron expresses the photon opposite from the Z Boson. The area near the electron will look like this. 

This area around the electron is not symmetrical. This disproves the symmetry required for a sphere.

There are other problems with photons reaching the surface at the same time. So lets disregard the above disproof and say we found an object where all surface points are equidistant from the center event. The event occurs and photons emit outward from the center point towards the surface. Every point between the center and the surface is of a different density.

Photons are the force that transfers heat. Temperature travels through differing densities at different rates. The medium will have different magnetic fields for each point. These magnetic fields will change the speed and direction of each photon. This is shown by the Zeeman Effect.

In conclusion it is not possible for photons to travel from a center event to the surface detectors at the same rate.

GOCE thoughts

Some thoughts on GOCE

GOCE is a great spacecraft that is measuring density. There are some great videos of findings and the satellite itself. It only measures the change in altitude to the density of material below.

I noticed a couple of things here.

1)It is only measuring material directly below the satellite.
2)There are vast changes in density in small areas. If there were gravity waves this change would be gradual.
3) The satellite is only affected by densities below the craft. It is not pulled towards areas of greater density, which is required by gravity.

Data

This is where I am going to put links to Datasets from spacecraft and satellites. I am going to analyse the data in reference to the Standard Vibration Model described here.

The first project will be to analyze Mercury's orbit using all available data. I would like help in this project. I would also like to show the analyzed data here in an application for blogger in 3d.

MERCURY ORBITAL DATA EXPLORER

Buoyancy and density

Chemists understand density. They understand why a tree floats on water. They use density in their equations. Specific gravity is the relationship between objects of differing densities. Then again it should be called specific density. They can even evaluate differing densities at changing temperatures or pressures.

Physicists do not understand this. It seems to me that physicists missed chemistry class in school. It is obvious from their equations. Every equation I have evaluated shows the physicist ignorance on this topic. F=ma, E=mc^2... Mass does not exist in the natural world. Mass is a zero dimensional measurement. To a physicist, an object falls because of this magical field called gravity. Gravity has never been proven and has never been observed. Gravity is the only concept/contruct that the Standard Model cannot produce.

The physicists' equations do not integrate temperature, pressure, electric or magnetic fields in their solutions. Yet those variables are all necessary to evaluate changes in position. Each variable is associated with a boson; Photon - Temperature, Gluon - Density, W+/- Boson - Magnetism, Z Boson - Electricity.

Why should a physicist care about density? First the planets are ordered by density. The planets closer to the sun are solids, next are the gas giants, then the ice planets.
• Mercury - 5.427 g/cm³
• Venus - 5.204 g/cm³
• Earth - 5.515 g/cm³
• Mars - 3.934 g/cm³
• Jupiter - 1.326 g/cm³
• Saturn - 0.687 g/cm³
• Uranus - 1.27 g/cm³
• Neptune - 1.638 g/cm³
• Pluto - 2.03 ± 0.06 g/cm³

Motion can only be determined by evaluating the Bosons involved. This series of pictures shows what happens to a floating piece of wood when photons excite the water below.







water
steam
wood
the data is from © 1998 - 2008 roger walker
The pictures are mine

Solar System is Ordered by Density

Each of the planets in the solar system are ordered by the density of the material they consist in the cores.

The very dense metal cores make up the inner planets.

The gas giants and ice giants have light metals and metallic hydrogen cores.

Outside that are the ice clouds.

Addendum 6/30/09

I have published a paper on this topic with data at General Science Journal

Variables Involved in Baryonic Motion

δ_Dn= δ_Dp+(Δδ_M+Δδ_E+Δδ_T)

Where:

δ_Dn = Baryonic density of object, not effected by dark matter boundaries.
where δ_Dp Previous baryonic density of object = (δ_M+δ_E+δ_T)/(1/2bcSin(A))
where a,b,c are the lengths of Gluons
where A,B,C are the angles between Gluons at the Quarks

δ_M = Magnetic field (W Boson) emitted from and read by Baryon. The W Boson is related to the rotational speed of the Baryon. In the case of uud, the 2 u quarks spin in a cone shape around the d Quark. The center of this cone is the rotational axis. The faster the spin the more intense the W Boson. The Voltage = the rotational speed.

δ_E = Electric field (Z Boson) emitted from and read by Baryon.
The uu rotational plane is perpendicular to the Z Boson field . The down quark lies on the rotational axis and is the direction of charge.

using Density Function Theory Introduction
ABCs of DFT
(DFT Wiki)

δ_T = Temperature field (Photon) emitted from and read by Leptons (Electrons) of the Baryon.
using Planck's spectral black body equations
u(v,T) = (8πhv^3/C^3)(1/e^(hv/kT)-1)
u(λ,T) = ((8πhc)/λ^5)*(1/e^(hc/λkT)-1)

This occurs during one spin of the object.
Equilibrium state:
t₀₁ = beginning of vibrations entrance to the Dark Energy Ruleset.
where
Work state:
t₁₁ = change period of Baryon. Application of work equations.
where δ_D= δ_Dp+(Δδ_M+Δδ_E+Δδ_T)
Equilibrium state:
t₀₂ = beginning of vibrations entrance to the Dark Energy Ruleset.
where δ_D = (δ_M+δ_E+δ_T)/(1/2bcSin(A))

ESA's GOCE

The E.S.A. has built a satellite called GOCE. This is one finely crafted vehicle. There is a great video on GOCE. I'm going to learn more about what they have built and learned.

GOCE Youtube video
GOCE Youtube video 1

ESA has a cool site

The ridiculous Higgs Boson

This was a comment from Magnus. I thought it was humorous enough to make a posting of it. Magnus is known as TheBigParadox on Youtube. I would encourage you to make as many animations as you can about these paradoxes. There are many.

------

Many speculate about what this Higgs particle is, whether the Cern experiments are sensible etc.

I made a short animation, it could continue. Maybe I will make a continuation.

The Higgs Particle Adventure.

Best regards,
Magnus



I like the animation. It shows what ridiculous argument is necessary to even talk about the Higgs particle. The Higgs particle was developed when they tried to put what they saw together with what they believed.

Nothing works without gravity. That is what they believe. So there must be 4 forces ;Strong, weak, E/M and sometimes Gravity. Newton told us so.

But their work only shows 3 forces; strong, weak and E/M. They needed a system of reconciliation to keep gravity. In comes Higgs. If we had a new particle that does and does not exist when we need it to, then we can make the results that we think we are looking for. Thanks Higgs, we found the imaginary particle that produces the graviton on our chalk board. Newton proved that gravity exists, so there must be a graviton, thus there must be a Higgs Boson. Now that we have a Higgs Boson on the chalk board something magical happens here and look we now have a graviton. Tada. Newton is safe...

I explain in this blog how gravity has the appearance of working but is really density in action. Also it is not possible for CERN to produce a Black Hole in the sense that Newton/Einstein/Hawkins would describe. I have two articles on the topics of Black Holes that show evidence that these objects are Planck's Black Body radiators. The work at CERN is very important and cutting edge. I just disagree with the conclusions not their amazing work.

Speed of light is a variable

Citation http://www.rpi.edu/dept/phys/Dept2/APPhys1/optics/optics/node4.html
Cite DJ Wagner at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

The speed of light has a maximum velocity of 2.99792458 x 10^8 m/s in a vacuum.

The index of refraction of some common materials are given below.

material	n	material	n
Vacuum	1	Crown Glass	1.52
Air	1.0003	Salt	1.54
Water	1.33	Asphalt	1.635
Ethyl Alcohol	1.36	Heavy Flint Glass	1.65
Fused Quartz	1.4585	Diamond	2.42
Whale Oil	1.460	Lead	2.6

Values of n come from the CRC Handbook
of Chemistry and Physics

v = c/n
Where
v = velocity of light through the medium
c = maximum speed of light in a vacuum
n = optical density or refractive index of media


--------------------------------------
v(lead) = c/n(lead)= (299792458 m/s) /(2.6) = 115304791.538 m/s through lead.

--------------------------------------
Dark Energy has a refractive index of ~<1. Though quite small Dark Energy still affects the speed, wavelength, frequency, and temperature of the photon-wave over great distances.

This is very important. I am beginning to think that the only constant is change.

Space is not a vacuum

The vacuum of (Solar System: added 8/22/09) space is a fallacy. Space is full of radiation, ions, baryonic matter, dark matter, W boson, and photons. In space the density of baryonic matter is low but not 0 per cm^3.

When the ISS is not in the shadow of the sun it is under constant bombardment from the sun. In this case density of photon-waves is quite high in the area close to the sun (150m km). The Photon-wave transmits the information on temperature, wave-length and frequency of the star at that distance. E=hv.

Since we have different classes of vibrations , they can have different densities in an area of space. The Earth is an area of space where baryonic matter density is quite high. Also the Earth emits photon-waves, and magnetism. Yet the space between Earth and Venus is mostly filled with photon-waves and magnetism emitted from the Sun.

Gravity Anomaly Map of the Moon

This comes from The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency JAXA

Congratulations on such an excellent density map of Mascons on the Moon.

*******************************************************************************
Gravity Anomaly detected by using 4-way Doppler observation data from the RSTAR (OKINA) (RSAT)-New finding in study on the Origin of Dichotomy for the Moon-
*******************************************************************************
April 16, 2008 (JST)
Kyushu University
National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA)

JAXA announced a new finding of a gravity anomaly for both the near side and far side of the Moon by using 4-way Doppler observation data from the RSTAR (OKINA) with the main orbiter, the KAGUYA.
1)Gravity Anomaly Map by the KAGUYA

2)Gravity Anomaly Map in prior to the KAGUYA

3)The Apollo basin(S36,W150)








Until now, the gravity anomaly of the far side of the Moon has not been understood well. The gravity anomaly, which was obscure before, has been clearly revealed through observations by the Kaguya mission. For instance, the gravity anomaly of a basin on the far side is found to be characterized by a negative anomaly in a ring like the Apollo basin. On the other hand, the gravity anomaly of the basin on the near side is uniformly positive over the region such as with the Mare Serenitatis. Thus, the clear difference in gravity anomaly on the near side and the far side has been newly discovered and this fact brings a different story about the structure of the underground and the history of the evolution of the far side and near side of the Moon.

The gravity anomaly map for many regions will be developed more precisely and show the difference of gravity anomaly between the near side and the far side by adding more observation data. The latest observation data by the Kaguya will play a key role to promote the study of the origin and the evolution of the Moon. In addition, highly accurate lunar gravity distribution data will be useful for future lunar explorers.

*Gravity anomaly: The lunar gravity field is not homogenous. Any region of the Moon with a higher than expected mass density will produce a gravity anomaly.

*Dichotomy of the Moon: Between the near side and the far side, clear asymmetry is called the "Dichotomy of the Moon" as in the thickness of the lunar crust and the distribution of the lunar Maria.
Gravity Anomaly Map at the Apollo basin

Gravity Anomaly Map at the Mare Serenitatis(N26,E19)









*RSAT/VRAD mission instrument team:
Kyushu University (RSAT Principle Investigator), NAOJ (VRAD: VLBI Satellite radio source Principle Investigator), Researchers from JAXA also participate as sub-PI or Co-I in the mission instrument team.

Current lunar gravity field models include large uncertainties on the far side of the Moon. For instance, the figure in the middle shows the current gravity distribution model for the Apollo basin by LP165P. The color of the figure shows strength of the gravity field in blue, green, yellow, and red, in that order. Red indicates a positive gravity anomaly related to either a topographic high or a dense material in the subsurface. In contrast, blue shows that a negative gravity anomaly related to a topographic low or less dense material. The gravity anomaly shown in the figure on the left hand side is processed by new data taken by the KAGUYA. The gravity anomaly in the Apollo basin is now identified as concentric rings of yellow, blue, and thin red from the center to outside.
*LP165P: Lunar gravity model developed by Konopliv et al.. incorporating tracking data from the Lunar Prospector spacecraft into a historical data set.

A new gravity anomaly map developed by the KAGUYA reveals that not only the Apollo basin, but many other basins on the far side of the Moon are characterized by a large negative gravity anomaly. Such a signature of far side gravity is distinguished from that on the near side. For example, the Mare Serenitatis, the representative basin on the near side, shows a strong positive (red color) gravity anomaly at the center of the basin (figure in the middle). The newly found difference of gravity anomaly on the near side and the far side gives us clues to important questions regarding the structure of the lunar interior and the formation of the far side and near side of the Moon. The gravity anomaly map will become more precise as more observation data is obtained by the KAGUYA. The latest observation data by the Kaguya will play a key role to promote a study of the origin and the evolution of the Moon. In addition, highly accurate lunar gravity distribution data will be used for future lunar explorations.

Four-way Doppler observation scheme









A schematic figure showing the principle of the four-way Doppler measurements of the Main Orbiter (KAGUYA) by using a relay satellite (OKINA). The uplink radio wave from the Usuda Deep Space Center (UDSC) is relayed to the Main Orbiter via the relay satellite (OKINA), which is returned to the UDSC via relay satellite (OKINA) again. Then the Doppler frequency is measured at the UDSC.

http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2008/04/20080416_kaguya_e.html
Copyright 2007 Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency
Thanks to Curt Youngs for showing me this.

Disproof of Gravity

The standard particle model has yet to find any sign of Gravity. This is most concerning since gravity is used by most modern equations. Great particle accelerators have hunted for any signs of gravity. None found!

But one simple experiment shows there is no gravity. The Helium Balloon. It rises. How is this possible? Classical Mechanics shows that Force equals the inverse of the Constant of Gravity multiplied by the Mass of Object 1 multiplied by the Mass of Object 2 divided by the Distance between the two masses raised to the second power. F=-GM1M2/r^2

In this equation the mass of the earth is so great that the helium balloon would have no choice but to be attracted to the earth. It would not rise.

We see in the experiment that the helium is rising to meet its level of density.

Density is the most important function in determining the position of an object. Density is the vibration intensity within a volume in relation to the density of the surrounding medium.

Addendum 5/27/09: From the General Science Journal forum

Anonymous, (who ever you are?)
In standard conditions of temperature and pressure (SCTP), 1 kg of He fills a volume of 5.6 m³.
This also means that the density of He in SCTP is 0.1786 kg/m³.

This is an elementary secondary school calculation based of the atomic mass of Helium (4.0026 gr/mol) and the volume occupied by a mole in SCTP (0.022414 m³/mol).

Air composition is roughly 20.9% O2 and 79.1% N2.
This implies a volume of 0.777 m³ for 1kg of air, and a density of 1.287 kg/m³.

+++++++++++

So what you are saying is that lifting force is the differential between differing densities. Why does the balloon accelerate? Is there a terminal velocity for the balloon in SCTP?

If we were to create a box 500m in the y, 10m in both the x and z in reference to the ground. This box has door with a 500m on one side. We can open the door to introduce our SCTP. But we don't want other influences on our experiment. So we close the door. At the bottom of the box we have a mechanical device that will release the helium balloon as described above but including the density of the mylar balloon in our calculations.

What set of equations would accurately describe the balloon's voyage? Gravity suggests that the massive Earth would pull the balloon or any mass towards it. The balloon would never leave the ground. So any equation based on the axiom of gravity would not work. Mass does not accurately describe anything. So any equations based on mass will not work. Only density equations will work.


The Disproof of Gravity

The Chain Nature of Dark Matter

In understanding the nature of memes(information) transmission in baryonic particles it becomes easier to understand the the nature of memes transmission between baryonic particles and dark matter. Memes needs to be transmitted from the baryonic atom to the dark matter particle through magnetism. Dark matter ignores photons because they lack charge. Dark matter reacts to charge, all charges +/- in the same manner. Dark matter is repulsed by charge.

There are 2 known particles that can convert magnetism into memes(information). The electron and the gluon. We can rule out the electron as a particle of dark matter because it has charge. Also if electrons were in interstellar space, photons would never make it through the medium and we would not see other galaxies. The gluon is a more promising particle that could be part of the dark matter chain.

We know that the gluon converts magnetism into color using quantum chromodynamics (QCD). When dark matter is in the presence of magnetism the dark matter is repelled. The interaction between dark matter sub-atomic particles is stronger than the magnetism applied to it. Magnetism is not strong enough to break the normal bond between the gluon and the dark matter particle attached to it. Magnetism bends this bond.

The chain nature of dark matter becomes obvious when gluons are inserted between dark matter particles. These chains form fabrics and the more dense they become the harder is becomes for baryonic particles and photons to move through them. Pioneer 10 and 11 show this in their attempts to exit the solar system.

Free falling bodies

So If I understand the problem correctly, would two objects of different density dropped in the ISS, fall at different rate?

The major force on the above problem is the angular velocities of the two objects are the same as the space station and all will maintain the same orbit around the Earth. These three objects are falling at different rates but the angular velocity is more significant in this setup of the problem. Density has little to do with orbital periods, velocity is more significant here.

I would like to change the feather to a ball of water. Each ball is 1 kg.

What we would need to do is reduce the angular velocity of the lead ball and the ice ball to 0 km/sec in relation to a point on the Earth's surface. When this occurs the two objects are now falling to maintain their density.

Here the lead ball would turn to liquid, pass through the atmosphere and splat in the ocean. There it would cool again to a solid and fall to the ocean floor. It would continue falling for many eons through the sand, mantle to the core of the Earth. This is where it would meet its level of disbursement.

Whereas the water would start as ice and become vapor quickly. As a vapor it would disperse/equalize with other water vapor at its density level. In the high level atmosphere is where it would meet its level of disbursement. As it cooled it would then rain. The water would never have an altitude less than the ocean floor.

I was reading a paper on multiple instruction multiple data computing systems. What I got from it was that this is a multiple force problem. These forces; density and thermodynamic work together to create the bounds of the problem. When is the object is at a level of disbursement?

We cannot remove one of the forces from the problem to simplify the problem, because we would no longer have a valid problem/solution. It needs both thermodynamics and density to do this.

Both balls would have other forces acting upon them. For example both would have hydrodynamic issues of turning into a teardrop shape during decent. But I don’t see this as a major force acting upon the problem. I could be wrong.

So I see a summation of forces acting upon an object to determine its altitude of disbursement. But I can definitively say there is no gravity in this problem.

Question: What about this video?

Answer: Cinci, again you bring up a good point. And something that is difficult to explain in my model, but I will give it a try. First, this video is not a empirical test of falling bodies. We don't know the time it took to fall. Nor can we tell if the two object did hit the ground at the same time. We would also need the distance traveled. This is a good example of two different objects traveling in a vacuum.

Here what we are seeing needs an explanation of the moon's forward velocity. Here the Astronauts are on the face of the moon. The face of the moon is like the front of a NASCAR car. The moons forward motion is so great that it hits the hammer and feather. Also the distances here are not great so we cannot see the difference in density of the two objects. If these objects were release at 1000km altitude from the moon, we would see a different result.

The equations for this are found in chemistry. It is called Specific Gravity. rather a misnomer, but we work with what we are given. It really is the density of the objects and the density of the medium that are the main forces here.

I know that is rather weak, but those density(specific gravity) solutions work in chemistry, why not in physics? We just need to evaluate the media. Not every media is water.

Density gradient

Density gradient simple

E = emitter
O = atom preloaded photon
-p = photon heading left
p+ = photon heading right
-p+ = one photon heading left one right

B = atom accepting/releasing photon
( = extreme change in atom shape due to 2 photon exchange
| = reflective wall

1) |O O O O E
2) |O O O O -pE
3) |O O O O-p E
4) |O O O-pB -pE
5) |O O-pB O-p E
6) |O-pB O-pB -pE
7) |Bp+O-pB O-p E
8) |O-p(p+O-pB -pE
9) |Bp+O-p(p+O-p E
10)|O-p(p+O-p(p+-pE

What I understood from the CERN video is that the moment a photon hits an electron it accepts the photon and fires a photon. Loading Theory is needed for this model. Eric Reiter

This does not show the effect of magnetism. It just shows how information directly affects the shape of the atom. Also this is only a linear example.

Fun with He: Logic Problem

So I had some fun with Pb. Now that it is in the center of the Earth, the magnetosphere is just a touch stronger.

Lets look at that He balloon. We are going to use the large rubber red balloon and fill it with 5kg of He. Naturally it also has some natural air gasses in the balloon before we filled it. Those sink to the bottom. We let them out and tie off the balloon.

Now I let go of the balloon. As it rises, more radiation from the Sun hits the balloon. This allows He to escape and continue its ascent. When the helium inside the balloon has less mass then the rubber balloon, the balloon will sink. But the He continues to rise to the level of its density.

If we change the material of the balloon to Mylar it would be months or years before the Helium could escape. I know, there is a birthday balloon around here that is older than some of my birds.

This floating Mylar balloon should not occur. It has a mass of 5kg + the mass of the balloon. Yet it rises. It can only rise the average of the densities.

This should not happen with gravity. The balloon has mass. Its mass is less than the earth. So it should drop to the ground at Gm1m2/r^2. This is not what the data shows. The balloon rises. Sorry guys. There is no Graviton.

Fun with Pb: Logic Problem

Pb (Lead)
Melting point 327.46 °C
Boiling point 1749 °C
Density 11.34  g/cm^3
Density of magma ~3.33 g/cm^3
Temp of Magma 700C - 1600C

If I dropped a 50 kg lead weight into the mouth of an active volcano like Mt. Kilauea. It would rapidly turn into a liquid and sink. It is not sinking, the Pb is equalizing to its density. It will continue to displace other molecules until it is surrounded by molecules of similar density.