Asymmetry is not broken symmetry

This is from the Brookhaven National Lab.

Physicists have predicted an increasing probability of finding such bubbles, or local regions, of “broken” symmetry at extreme temperatures near transitions from one phase of matter to another. According to the predictions, the matter inside these bubbles would exhibit different symmetries — or behavior under certain simple transformations of space, time, and particle types — than the surrounding matter. In addition to the symmetry violations probed at RHIC, scientists have postulated that analogous symmetry-altering bubbles created at an even earlier time in the universe helped to establish the preference for matter over antimatter in our world. http://www.bnl.gov/bnlweb/pubaf/pr/PR_display.asp?prID=1073





------------


Ok, The concept of symmetry is not shown by any data. Never is there a symmetrical interaction. Broken symmetry requires symmetry to exist. 


It is easy to disprove symmetry through logic. Each atom has a lepton, electron, expressing information about the atom. Never is this lepton in the same position nor does it express the same bits of information at any different time. QED.


Symmetry as a concept stems from the need to protect an omnipotent perfect god, thus is not logical nor evidenced in the collected data.   

Discrepencies in symmetry

This post is in response to US/LHC Blog.

"A particle is a particle is a particle!" This is not true.
1)The electron is not in the same place at any different time.
2)The fields emanating from a vibration is always different.
3) the Baryon's spin causes differences at each time.
Thus a particle is not a particle is not a particle!
This idea stems from the religion of the Higg's Boson. Marketed as the God particle with this belief The universe is perfect and perfect requires god. God makes particles using the Higg's Boson. Here is an example of belief in cosmology.

It is not possible for any object to be symmetrical. Let me repeat that, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR ANY OBJECT TO BE SYMMETRICAL!!! No object can be a sphere. Circles are two dimensional, thus cannot exist in nature. Most importantly, no object can be a sphere.

GOCE has produced data that shows the southern half of the Earth is concave in the Atlantic, Indian and Arctic oceans. This area is not convex which is required for a sphere.
This is the link to ESA/GOCE. This has a video showing the Earth's density in specific detail. This video shows the spinning planet is not a sphere. It has different densities at different latitudes and longitudes. The spinning Earth is so deformed it changes the spacecraft orbit.

I will continue this thought later. I have had a seizure and need to sleep. 12:30p

During my recovery today I had visualizations that will help add to this evaluation of symmetry.

Not only does the planet suffer from asymmetry, but our brains use asymmetry. A neural network is an error correction system. It optimizes information through error correction.

It is not possible for sub atomic vibrations to show symmetry. Asymmetry is a requirement for a baryon's existence. It has proven difficult for scientist to produce symmetrical molecules. The reason for this difficulty is a baryon is composed of three vibrating Gluons.

Two gluons meet to form a quark. This intertwining of gluons allow for storage of information. Kind of like RAM.

Although I will not quit using 8π in calculations this is only because we don't have a suitable replacement yet. An example is the photon radiation of the Sun. If evaluated by wavelength then U(λ,T)= (8πhc/λ^5)*(1/e^(hc/λT)-1) cannot account for changes on the surface of the Sun; Sun spots, solar flares...

This article shows Neutrino oscillation. This oscillation shows vibration in sub atomic particles. Oscillation is by default not symmetrical.

Death to Symmetry

The two rods problem is often brought up to explain time or relativity.

Einstein's basic assumption was symmetry. This is not shown in nature. This has nothing to do with belief or frame reference. The basis of Einstein's work is wrong in this, symmetry.

The basis of my model is that these two rods can not be equal in any regards. Here is why.

Even two gold atoms, in the middle of nowhere, with no outside influences can not be equal. Their electrons are not in the same positions, their quarks are at different lengths because of gluon interaction. The quarks express different color based on the interactions of each gold atom on each other.

This stems from Asymmetry.

Asymmetry stems from the interactions between the Strong Nuclear Force, The Weak Nuclear Force, Electromagnetism, Memes information, and the undefined position of electrons, protons, and neutrons. All of these interactions make it not possible for two identical atoms. Let alone two identical rods. Even the density of two gold atoms will be different, because they occupy different volumes based on strong nuclear forces.

addendum: 10/7/08
The Nobel prizes were awarded to 3 Asymmetrists. Yoichiro Nambu was a discover of Quantum Chromodynamics and considered a founder of string theory. Makoto Kobayashi's and Toshihide Maskawa's work is about violation and renormalization of weak nuclear force in gluons.

If you listen softly you can hear the crash of the religion of Einstein, Newton and Hawkins. Gravity is done for. So are those irrelevant equations that they teach as gospel.

http://nobelprize.org

addendum 4/27/09 : A high symmetry state is NOT symmetric.

Taking a Hammer to Symmetry

Symmetry

“Consistency is the enemy of enterprise, just as symmetry is the enemy of art.”
George Bernard Shaw

Symmetry is akin to religion in science. 'The Universe is perfect, God is perfect, God made a perfect intellect in man, Thus God made a symmetrical universe.'

Where do we find symmetry? Let's look to the atom. "Three quarks for Muster Mark! "(Joyce). When you have 3 of anything you have stability not symmetry. Now there can be 1 of 8 gluons for any 2 of Muster Mark's quarks. Now we have enormous combination of differences in gluon/quark pairing. Add to that gluon length, color changes and the amount of different expressions a baryon can have is chemistry and everything defined by chemistry.

Just a note, on this blog I will be referring to T quark as Truth and the B quark as Beauty. I feel top and bottom are too close in wording with up and down and may cause confusion in descriptions. Their expressions will be referred to as Truthiness and Beautiness.

So I don't find symmetry in atoms. If I were to hire a crew to drop a billion bags of sand. Each bag of sand has exactly the same number of grains of sand in them. 1 billion counted by a computer(ha ha). Each bag is dropped from the same height. Every bag would have a different disbursement. This asymmetry stems from the asymmetrical baryon.

I would love to see an example of symmetry in the universe.

Symmetric form: Logic problem

Symmetry is not natural in the universe. There are always differences.

For example a star has a great solar flare at T(n). A tremendous amount of energy has been released at one point on the star. Symmetry demands that a solar flare of equal strength and opposite direction is required at T(n). This is not natural.

Symmetry is a construct used to simplify multi-variable systems. Einstein and others only had their intuition to create these great thories, symmerty made these intuitions almost explainable. We barely know now how orbits function and they are not exactly as Newton, Einstein and others suggest. But, if it was not for their work we would still be living in caves. Symmetry is necessary to make the intuitive jump from 'the particles want to be together', to 'there is an observable process in particle dynamics'.

Symmetry has no physical evidence.

These are systems where certain variables do not induce a massive change to the overall system, yet do affect small variances to the system.

We know the earth does not have a symmetrical curvature of space/time. It is squashed and some areas have more pertubations than others. These variations occur when the density directly under the spacecraft changes. Traveling over an ocean has one curvature of space/time, whereas a massive mountain range has more density, thus a different curvature of space/time. These variations need to be incorperated in orbit design, else you lose the satellite.

Asymmetry occurs from the inablity to predict electron position. Nature is asymmertical.

The removal of symmetry allows discussuion on the effect of the shape of the earth at rest and at motion on the curvature of space/time.