Lunar Librations

Credit NASA

Credit Mesic,Astronomie.CZ

There are many of these on youtube.

Thanks for your work everyone.

a

Z Boson and mass

http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/217306/files/199103478.pdf?version=1

I know this is a preprint. I know this is your understanding of the motion of electricity. I have a few questions. I love the fact that this document is pictures instead of text so questions cannot be asked. You cannot copy an area of text and question it. So I will retype the information.

On page two, you have defined the mass of a Z-Boson to 

That is a very specific number to be a new constant. That is not the direct problem I have with this. You are measuring mass in voltage.

Since you are measuring the cross section of the Z-Boson as  of which we both agree.

Call me crazy, and I know you will, but intensity of electricity is always measured in Amperes. Thus the intensity of a Z-Boson can never be measured as mass.

Using Ohm's law we can determine the current(intensity) of a Z-Boson, which is variable not constant.


Why is it that you measure electricity as mass? At best that does not make sense with what is known.

NGC 3603 Interesting cluster

Link
http://esciencenews.com/articles/2010/06/02/hubble.catches.stars.move

Credit: NASA, ESA and Wolfgang Brandner (MPIA), Boyke Rochau (MPIA) and Andrea Stolte (University of Cologne)"The cluster, formally known as the NGC 3603 Young Cluster, is about 20 000 light-years from the Sun which makes these measurements extraordinarily difficult."
---------------------
This is 17 light-years across. This picture cast severe doubts on Newtonian mechanics and Kepler orbits. I need to think more about that distance and number of stars in the cluster.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2007/34/fastfacts/
-----------------------------
Another great paper on NGC 3603
Galactic Starburst NGC 3603 from XRay to Radio

A. F. J. Moffat ,¹ M. F. Corcoran ,^2,3 I. R. Stevens ,⁴ G. Skalkowski ,¹ S. V. Marchenko ,^1,5 A. Mücke ,^1,6 A. Ptak ,⁷B. S. Koribalski ,⁸ L. Brenneman ,³ R. Mushotzky ,³ J. M. Pittard ,⁹ A. M. T. Pollock ,¹⁰ and W. Brandner ¹¹

The Astrophysical Journal, 573:191-198, 2002 July 1
© 2002. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A.

Search Amazon.com for the astrophysical journal
-----------
This picture was taken on 

2007 October 5 

http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap071005.html

--------------------
There is a Zoomable picture from ESO at 

http://www.eso.org/public/images/eso1005a/

Credit ESO

Geo-magnetic induced current

I am glad to see more interest in this phenomena.  geo-magnatically induced current

Equality is highly overrated

Equality only exist in integer math. We use this integer equality to measure identity not equality. This is one quart of milk. This is another quart of milk. Together they are two quarts of milk.

All things are different. There is always a distinct variable that will show difference in objects that would normally pass an identity proof, symmetry proof. There is always some level of variability between two seemingly identical objects.

Seemingly identical objects measured as Real Numbers, will always show difference. Minutia is required in identifying objects measured in Real Numbers. One quart of milk will never equal another quart of milk. Quart (a) != Quart (b). Two quarts of milk cannot weigh the same. Two quarts of milk cannot occupy the same space. two quarts of milk will have different volumes because of rates of spoilage. The two quarts of milk will have different temperatures. The two quarts of milk will have different histories. The two quarts of milk have different values based on location.   

All of those variables are required to make a quart of milk. You cannot have a quart of milk without a rate of spoilage. Even frozen there is a point in time when the milk breaks down or is no longer functional as the abstraction milk. This is true for all real objects and their cumulative abstractions.

The problem with spheres.

Sherlock,

Thanks for reading and commenting on my work.
------------------
Sherlock said...
Aaron,

Yeh, and if the detection events are at the same time, they have to be equal distance from the main event.
-----------
You said: No, they will never be equal distance from the original event.
----------
Aaron, If the original event is at the center of a sphere, every observer on the surface of the sphere will see the event at the same time. The time the event is observed is determined by the distance from the event. The observers on the surface of the sphere are all equal distance from the event and therefore will see the event at the same time. It can't be any other way unless the speed of light varies within the volume of the sphere.

---------------

The above posting is a comment fromhttp://aaronsreality.blogspot.com/2010/01/motion-of-photon.html

There are several problems with perfect geometry shapes. The main and most obvious problem with a sphere is that it cannot exist in reality. There is no example of a perfect sphere in reality. The Earth is not a sphere. The Sun is not a sphere and galaxies are definitely not spheres. 

The requirement of a sphere is that every surface point is equidistant from the center of the sphere. This is not only unlikely but impossible.  The simple baryon is a rotating triangle with several boson emanating from the baryon. The Z Boson connects the baryon to the lepton electron. The Lepton electron expresses the W+/- Boson perpendicular to the Z Boson. The lepton electron expresses the photon opposite from the Z Boson. The area near the electron will look like this. 

This area around the electron is not symmetrical. This disproves the symmetry required for a sphere.

There are other problems with photons reaching the surface at the same time. So lets disregard the above disproof and say we found an object where all surface points are equidistant from the center event. The event occurs and photons emit outward from the center point towards the surface. Every point between the center and the surface is of a different density.

Photons are the force that transfers heat. Temperature travels through differing densities at different rates. The medium will have different magnetic fields for each point. These magnetic fields will change the speed and direction of each photon. This is shown by the Zeeman Effect.

In conclusion it is not possible for photons to travel from a center event to the surface detectors at the same rate.

Buoyancy

Buoyancy is the difference between two or more densities. The greater the difference the faster the motion.

NASA cannot charge citizens for papers

NASA Goddard is posting to IOP. Really, NASA cannot set up its own FTP server.

http://iopscience.iop.org/1402-4896/1987/T18/021/pdf/physscr7_T18_021.pdf

Study of Mathematics: Analog vs. Digital

I agree with what Prof. Benjamin is saying. It is not necessary for people to understand limits and functions, but it is necessary for people to understand probability and statistics.

It is necessary for scientist to understand that we live in an analog world. Our tools are functional. Thus they are digital and cannot describe nature.

The reason our Neural Networks work the way the they do is because our brain/culture are analog computers. The data they work with is analog. We use algorithms like Monte Carlo systems to convert analog information into digital data.

We know very little about analog systems. We know very little about converting analog information into digital systems. Yes, we can collect analog information on a digital CCD chip to create a picture. But we cannot reverse the process.

This is because of calculus. Sorry Newton. What is the probability an electron will change charge if the surrounding baryons forms a Copper atom? What is the probability an electron will change charge if the surrounding baryons forms a Carbon atom? These are analog questions.

To even setup an analog question, one needs 16 bits of information per baryon emission, minimum. To change a baryon, each affecting boson produces 4 bits of information. This is the many to one relationship. Thus the universe is analog not functional.

Universal instant

An instant is not viable in the universe.

The area of the universe we occupy is asymmetrical.

I want to look at this picture again.

Caption: This is a false color image of the central region of a galaxy group in X-rays. The jet of matter blown out of the central black hole can be clearly identified by its radio luminosity (overlaid, purple-blue).

Credit: Image: S. Giodini/A. Finoguenov/MPE
---
96% of the material of the visible universe is theoretical Dark Matter. We can actually see it through interactions with magnetism. A couple postings down there is a great picture of a spiral galaxy radiating large amounts of magnetism and electricity. But where there should be magnetism there is only dark. In this area Dark Matter is far more pressurized then the baryonic matter.

There is something big in the Dark Matter sense in that picture. We see the equilibrium of the W+/- Bosons against the Anti-Gluons. It is closer to the actual galaxy

Just because we can take pictures and save them does not mean the universe has a global clock.

For a photon, time is the number of rotations taken during the trip from emitter to receiver. Magnetic fields affect the rotation of photons. Thus all time is local (to the receiving baryon).

For a baryon the axial rotation is time. Three gluons form a triangle. That triangle spins on the opposite quark.

Time for a Baryon is not relevant to a photon. But for the receiving Baryon the time the photon existed is relevant to the temperature calculation.
------
Another thing about that picture. It is twice a ground based atomic explosion. Two mushroom clouds.

Crackpots who were correct

http://blog.vixra.org/category/crackpots-who-were-right/

This is a great blog. viXra log. http://blog.vixra.org/

Super-massive Black Holes in the Standard Vibration Model

The current model states there is a super-massive black hole in the center of the galaxy. This black hole sucks in surrounding objects along the 2d plane and ejects ultra high energy gamma rays out the poles. There is a possibility of being sucked through and ending up in a neighboring universe. This is what is being taught.

What we are seeing is not what is being taught.

1) The black holes in the center of all galaxies are Planck's black body radiator. They are ultra-dense stars.

2) The black hole is an ultra-dense fusion reactor. That means it is crushing together elements that we think are dense(Uranium, Plutonium,...) and producing more dense elements.    

3) Black holes emit enormous amounts of magnetism, W+/- Bosons. We see this magnetic field extend way beyond the limit of visible stars within in the galaxy.

4) Black holes emit Z boson discharges. electric discharges.

5) Each star has the same variables that a black hole has. The star is just less intense.

Microwaving a Tornado

http://www.eastlundscience.com/TORNADOES.html

Dr. Eastlund proposes a simple system to dissipate the equilibrium required for tornado stability.

Essentially he is proposing heating areas of the tornado with microwave dish on emergency vehicles. This proposal will increase the temperature of an area of the tornado by pointing many microwave emitters at one area of the cyclone. This rapid change in temperature will cause the cyclone's equilibrium to collapse.

This idea should be seriously be considered by States. These can be built by local emergency vehicle manufacturers.
 

---------
http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2005/arch05/050302electric-earth.htm

Thanks to Curt

Black holes eject material

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-05/m-bh-051110.php

Caption: This is a false color image of the central region of a galaxy group in X-rays. The jet of matter blown out of the central black hole can be clearly identified by its radio luminosity (overlaid, purple-blue).

Credit: Image: S. Giodini/A. Finoguenov/MPE
---
That is the center of that galaxy. That not so tiny visible galaxy is the center of that object.

The purple represents the Z Boson jets. I can also see a purple area Away from the jets. This is lightning, or a Z Boson discharge.

The red area represents the W +/- Boson. Magnetism. The W+/- Boson is perpendicular in shape to the Z Boson. One is the inverse of the other.

The radiation from the core of the galaxy extends way beyond the visual spectrum. 10^100 times or more. This is the set of shapes described. We can see the interactions changing the perfect model.

We also see asymmetric negative pressure dark matter is affecting the galaxy through magnetism. The right side of the magnetic field of this galaxy is being pressurized.

--------
I would like to know. What galaxy is this? Are their other pictures of this galaxy. Are there other galaxies that are imaged in this manner? Is the bar of that barred spiral galaxy in line or perpendicular to the Z Boson jets?

The Vortex

The shape that I previously described as the tube should be described as the Vortex. The Z Boson travels in a vortex pattern. This is why we see lightning in vortices.

The sun is not as described.

The Surface of the Sun

Huge questions.

The current model of the sun is that it is hydrogen and metallic helium. This is wrong.

We are seeing very dense materials in the sun. The sun has a liquid surface of iron. That is the surface. That means the solid/plasma core is even more dense. Could it be a heavy radioactive material like Uranium is the core of the sun?

This would not surprise me. This model has pointed me in this direction.

This brings forth many questions.

Basic Principles of Bosonic Relationships within Dark Energy

1) Any two or more Dark Energy Rulesets that have the exact same bosonic relationships will produce the exact same result. (Consistancy)

2) For every spectra there is a specifically different relationship of the bosons; Gluon, Photon, Z boson, and W +/- boson. Or (the same statement), For every spectra there is a specifically different relationship of pressure, temperature, electricity, and magnetism. (Functional Variation)

This is obvious from the periodic table of the elements.

The Variability of Constants in a Bosonic Relationship

Variability of Constants, what exactly does that mean?

We all know there is a relationship required for an interaction of bosons to occur. The Zeeman effect shows one of these relationship. As the intensity of magnetism increases the rotation of the photon decreases.

The one that shows its ugly head out is the distance, direction and shape of peak intensity of a magnetic field. That would mean that the shape of a density with a high intensity magnetic field can change rapidly. When the high intensity magnetic field enters an area of low intensity magnetic fields. Spectacular changes in the Sun show this.

The concept of Dark Energy helps stabilize the mathematics needed for computing these relationships. Dark Energy is the medium. Dark Energy is the place to do the math for relationships of boson.

Capacitance and conductivity is another relationship which is based on temperature and density.
Temperature and current

Shapes required for this system. Each shape is 3 dimensional and moves to create a 4 dimension.
The Cone : The spinning triangle. The spinning Baryon. Three Gluons spinning. This is density
The Torus : The magnetic field. The W+/- Boson
The Vortex: The inverted torus. The Z Boson. This connects the W+/- Boson to the Baryon. This is electricity.
The Twine: The Photon. Three bits of information spinning around each other.
The Lattice: Non spinning antigluons. This is Dark Matter. This provides resistance to Baryonic information.
The Spiral: The Lepton Electron. Its rotation is the asymptote of three bosons; W+/-, Z, and Photon. Its direction and connection provide charge.

Although these are the perfect shapes, They are never found in their perfect shape in nature. This is due to the constant change in information.

----------
chiccoreal comment "Could there be an immediate effect on other bozons throughout the galaxy"
----------

Aaron
We know that photons have a speed. This speed is variable based on the medium the photon travels through.

There is a maximum speed a photon can travel. This speed is based on the intensity of the magnetic field, the electric field, and the baryonic density through which it travels.

It takes approximately 2.5 days for CMEs to travel from the Sun to the Earth. The speed of magnetism is based on the electric field, the temperature and the baryonic density through which it travels.

The speed of photons is far greater than the speed of W+/- Bosons.

The Sun is made of Iron

http://www.thesurfaceofthesun.com/

This is an amazing site. It finalizes the description I made that the planets are ordered by density by showing the sun is made of very dense materials. It also shows plasma. There is a lot here. I am going to take some time to read this.

http://www.plasma-universe.com/Plasma-Universe.com

2010-04-20 Addendum
Solar Tsunami
Credit: The Surface Of The Sun
Michael Mozina

Amazing work. This certainly clears things up. Wow!!!

Solar radiation and volcano?

This morning a volcano erupted in Iceland. I also noticed there was a significant solar radiation event. This morning my detector was bright blue almost white for many minutes. Then it turned to black over the next 30 minutes. I am not sure what time the volcano erupted and its duration. I would like to post the magnetosphere information here to see if there is any correlation between solar events and this volcano.

**********


In my opinion Europe North Africa and the Middle East should ground airspace until this plume is better analyzed. This kind of dust will destroy jet engines, not may, but will. You don't want many planes falling from the sky.

The BigParadox Binary Counter

Most excellent. Again I am encouraging you to do more.

Again I caught that on my unshielded CRT

It was upgraded to 7.2.

Credit NASA
Great pictures of the solar flare that caused that earthquake.
http://stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov/browse/2010/04/04/index.shtml

This theory show that earthquakes originate from the sun. NASA can now predict earthquakes. It will take some time to match previous data to earthquakes. This matching of datasets will show magnitude. NASA just cannot predict the location of the event, yet. The tools already exist. Congratulations to NASA for their work and results.

Earthquakes are a result of solar flares. The intense Z Boson flares from the sun and strikes the earth. This causes a discharge in the magnetosphere that strikes the earth in the most vulnerable fault. This theory shows that earthquakes are the result of coronal mass ejections.

A simple solar radiation detector. 

Take a CRT TV attached to a cable line. Remove some of the shielding on the antenna. Leave the TV power on. I had company over and was able to show him the solar radiation intensity as it was happening. It was so intense that I shut down my computer.
-----------
04/06/10 Extreme changes from black to blue from 7:00 am est.

It is my speculation that every earthquake has a corresponding solar event. 

Atlas : Jet Events

Congratulations on the work all of you have done to build these detectors.

This is the main paper with data. Although I had some difficulty in downloading it.


http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0901/0901.0512.pdf
This paper is huge. 1100+ pages. This paper does not download correctly using any web browser.


http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1254503/files/ATL-PHYS-SLIDE-2010-036.pdf
This paper is far more manageable. It is only 29 pages.

I have questions: On pages 8 and 10 of the smaller doc. MC is that Mass*C or is it Muon Candidate? Do those lines going through the data point show the min/max of the run? How many runs were put together to create those maps?

On page 8, why are there data points outside the line? Is the line what you expect and the data point is what you get?

Are these all simulations and what you EXPECT to see, or are these based on real data? That is what I understood from the conclusions. That these maps are simulations. The conclusion says you expect to see the Higg's at these points. Not that you did. Am I correct in that statement?

Why are the maps in 2d and not the expected 3d? I would expect to see the energy, distance, and time to be the factors of any broken vibrations. The general questions are: How did the energy transform over time? Was there a general direction these broken energies transformed over time? When did the baryon transform into heat, electricity, or magnetism?

Investigating the driving mechanisms of coronal mass ejections

Investigating the driving mechanisms of coronal mass ejections
Chia-Hsien Lin, Peter T. Gallagher, and Claire L. Raftery

I am going to spend some time reading this. I will comment on it at a later time here.

Important book

An Experimental Approach To Nonlinear Dynamics And Chaos

This is an excellent book that I have used to help describe the interactions of bosons. It is inexpensive on Amazon.com.

I am blown away by the expansion of my understanding on this topic. I should now be able to explain those asymptotes I see in bosonic interaction.