Strong magnetic fields in normal galaxies at high redshifts

This is another email I received from a reader.

Strong Magnetic Fields in Normal Galaxies at High Redshift

This is an excellent paper with interesting conclusions.

Electron beam's magnetic field is not the result of electron motion

This paper comes from Jean de Climont.

Dear Sir,

In the current theoretical approach, there are two potential causes of magnetic fields: the translation of electrons of Maxwell's equations and the magnetic moment of electrons used in the explanation of magnetism of materials. This situation is not in conformity with the principle of causal specific uniqueness applicable to elementary phenomena, and with the Ockham's simplicity principle as well.

I am pleased to send you a report presenting an experience that should settle the question.

Electron beams magnetic field is not the result of electron motion but the result of the intrinsic magnetic moment.

 Yours very sincerely,

Cathode Tube.pdf

Thank you for your paper. I apologize for not seeing it sooner. This is an important experiment the author has produced. Thanks for taking the time to send it to me.

Aaron Guerami

The Magnetic Nature of the Solar System

It is important to understand magnetism. Here is a letter I received. 

Aaron

“The Magnetic Nature of the Solar System” 14/9/14

Hi Aaron,

During the September school holidays last year I spent a lot of time on the internet researching Einstein's theory of General Relativity in particular his ideas about space-time.

As I have become more interested I've researched more and more. I came across the following Youtube clip which explains an unusual magnetic phenomena.

When I saw this clip I became aware of a possible mechanism which may explain why the moon orbits the earth.

Using this mechanism I have built up a model for the Earth and the Sun based on my observations regarding the magnets. I have developed the following hypotheses from these observations.

The reason the moon orbits the Earth is not due to a gravitational attraction between the two and no it's not due to a curvature in space-time.

Hypothesis 1: The moon orbits the Earth due to a magnetic attraction.

This magnetic attraction is demonstrated in the Youtube clip.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LyvfDzRLsiU ( 3 mins )

( or Google search: Amazing discovery with magnets Youtube )

I believe the Earth is acting like an inverter magnet. The movement of molten rock/iron/nickel inside the Earth and its solid iron core act like the large central magnet.

Fig 1 A typical representation of the Earth’s magnetic field.

In Fig 1 The centre of the Earth is presented as acting like a bar magnet. No allowance has been given to the magnetic material (magnetite) in the Earth’s crust or ocean floors.

I believe the magnetic field lines of the sun and planets should produce a shape very similar to concentric circles or ellipses.

These magnetic field lines produce the pushing force which we call ‘gravity’.

On Earth ‘gravity’ I believe is created by the Earth’s magnetic field pushing on our atmosphere.

Objects accelerate towards the surface of the earth due to this ‘pushing force’ produced by the Earth’s magnetic field on the atmosphere.

HYPOTHESIS 2: I would also suggest that the strength of the Earth’s magnetic field steadily increases to a maximum level corresponding to the moon’s orbit around the Earth then decreases in strength as the distance from the moon increases.

Near the surface of the Earth the Earth’s magnetic field is relatively weak due to its interaction with the air of Earth’s atmosphere.

I predict the Earth’s magnetic field increases significantly outside the Earth’s atmosphere.

As the Earth rotates on its axis it produces a rotating magnetic field.

HYPOTHESIS 3: The Earth’s magnetic field ( magnetosphere ) and the moon’s magnetosphere couple as explained in the Youtube clip.

From my research I realize the moon does not (anymore) have a global magnetic field but does have a magnetosphere on its far side.

The moon has essentially ‘clipped’ onto the Earth’s magnetic field.

The reason why on Earth we only see one side of the moon is not because it rotates on its axis in synchrony with the Earth’s rotation on its axis.

We only see one side of the moon due to this coupling effect as shown in the Youtube clip.

Similarly this explains why all the other Planets have moons which also show only one face to their respective planet.

Tidal locking or synchronous rotation is an erroneous explanation of this observable phenomena.

Deposits of iron oxide (magnetite) under the Earth's surface (continents) and on the world’s seafloors ( due to seafloor spreading from mid-ocean ridges) are acting like the small satellite magnets in the clip.

Fig 2: Location of large deposits of iron oxide on the continents of Earth.

I read on the NASA website that the Earth's magnetic field has been weakening since 1850.

The strength of Earth's magnetic field varies as well; it has been decreasing slightly ever since around 1850. ( NASA Internet Article )

I have also read that the moon is actually moving away from Earth at a rate of

3.8 cm per year over the past 40 years.

I wonder if that is due to mining of iron ore over the last 164 years which is causing the Earth’s magnetic field to decrease in strength ?

HYPOTHESIS 4: Also suggests that the sun acts like a gigantic inverter magnet as well, which the planets are magnetically attracted to. The sun’s sun spots are acting like the satellite magnets in the clip.

Fig 3 Sunspot in photosphere 

Fig 4 The suns internal magnet- inner magnet satellite magnets in clip. in clip.

Maunder’s Butterfly Diagram

One noteworthy observation is the absence of sunspots above 40 degrees in either hemisphere. However, the most important piece of information is that at a beginning of a cycle the sunspots are mostly in the 20 to 40 degree ranges in both hemispheres. As the cycle comes to an end the sunspots mainly occur close to the sun's equator. This means that over time there is a plasma flow going on beneath the sun's surface from the outer portions of both hemispheres towards the equator. This is a very important point in understanding the flow and magnetic activity of the Convective Zone. All solar events are strongly influenced by the solar magnetic cycle, since the magnetic cycle serves as the "energy engine" for all solar activities. The sun's dynamic magnetic field defines the Photosphere's features, the Chromosphere, the Corona, Solar Prominences and CMEs, the Solar Wind and eventually the shape of the Heliosphere. It is noteworthy that the sun's magnetic field and cycle effects our whole solar system.

( Reference: http://www.solarsystemcentral.com/sunspot_cycles_page.html )

Inclination of the Planets to the Sun’s equator

	Name	Inclination to Sun's equator
Terrestrials	Mercury	3.38°
	Venus	3.86°
	Earth	7.155°
	Mars	5.65°
Gas giants	Jupiter	6.09°
	Saturn	5.51°
	Uranus	6.48°
	Neptune	6.43°

There seems to be a relationship between the location of sunspots and the inclination of the planets to the sun’s equator.

Planet Densities

The planets are ordered by density. It helps show that mass is not the interaction that is involved in planetary motion.

Mercury 5.427 g/cm³

Venus 5.204 g/cm³

Earth 5.515 g/cm³

Mars 3.934 g/cm³

Jupiter 1.326 g/cm³

Saturn 0.687 g/cm³

Uranus 1.27 g/cm³

Neptune 1.638 g/cm³

Pluto (dwarf) 2.03 +0.006 g/cm³

The densities of the planets show order. There are 3 main categories of the order.

Solids Gas Ice

( Reference Aaron Guerami: Aaron’s Reality blog)

I believe that the planets, all the moons of the solar system and the materials of the rings of Saturn all orbit their associated planet/sun due to two factors

1. inverter magnet effect 2. rotating magnetic fields

These masses are all following the rotating magnetic field lines produced.

Venus has no moons as it does not generate a large magnetic field of its own, thus has been unable to capture any matter.

Venus still follows a magnetic field line produced by the sun.

HYPOTHESIS 5: I believe our solar system operates on a magnetic basis or alternatively an electro-magnetic basis.

The sun’s rotation on its axis generates a rotating magnetic field (Parker Spiral) that results in planetary motion around the sun.

My hypotheses do not require the existence of a ‘cosmological constant’ as suggested by Einstein to counteract the effects of gravity.

HYPOTHESIS 6: The Precession of Perihelion of Mercury

is caused by random variations in sunspot activity over the century.

After doing some research I have discovered that Einstein knew that the orbit of Mercury varied by 43 arc seconds per century so he fudged his equation to take this into account with his value of pi. I think they call this ‘cheating’ at school.

Fig 5 Mercury’s Precession of Perihelion

In essence my hypotheses do not require the force of gravity.

Gravity I believe is a fictitious force which has for centuries dominated our collective psyches to allay humanities unconscious fears of the unexplainable effects of magnetism and its associated occult links.

The phenomena known as Gravitational lensing should be actually termed Magnetic lensing.

Gravitational red-shift should be termed Magnetic red-shift.

Einstein’s space-time fabric may actually be the magnetic field produced by the sun that permeates like an ‘ether’ throughout our solar system.

I predict that the planets bend the magnetic field emanating from the sun and consequently couple their magnetic fields with the sun’s magnetic field.

I predict that the internal structure (composition) of the planets and stars

(suns) are responsible for the magnetic or alternatively electro-magnetic force of attraction between these heavenly bodies.

My ideas I believe would be consistent with the Quantum Mechanical Model.

I would also suggest that in our universe there exists only 3 dimensions.

Einstein would not have known that our moon has a magnetic nature as he died in 1955. When moon rocks were bought back by the Apollo 11 mission in 1969 and analyzed, it is my understanding that scientists were shocked to find out they all were magnetic.

Thanks for reading,

F.D.

Increasing the power of the Earth's Magnetic Field

I agree that the rotating magnetic metal core of the Earth is slowing.

We need to have access to the rotational abilities of the core. We need to influence and moderate the field generated. We can monitor solar flares and use Tesla coils to increase or decrease the rotational speed of the core.

There needs to be a discussion of this in universities worldwide

How the Higg's Boson Must work in The SVM

Dark Energy Rulesets:  Reasons, Functions and Rules.

Let's say I am wrong and there is a Higg's Boson.Of which there is a Higg's Boson and I am wrong, This posting will describe the Higg's Boson and its effects and interactions. What would the purpose of this effect (Boson)? When does this Boson interact with the Dark Energy Ruleset?

The simple version creates the basis of the Coriolis Effect.

The other version forms crystals

This problem has two solutions in this model. The simple (integer) version that will always show chaos, and the complex (irrational) that will solve these issues. Please read the paper "The Structure of Dark Energy" a basic abstract.

The Dark Energy Ruleset:
The space created by Dark Energy is not defined by any previous space; Hilbert, Einstein, or
others. Previously defined space requires a flat universe, a vacuum and single point mass.

A discrete single Dark Energy unit is called a Ruleset. A Ruleset domain is exactly the width of
one bit of information of a boson.
• A Ruleset is the medium in which vibrations transverse.
• A Ruleset is a 3 dimensional structure.
• A Ruleset is not aware of which vibration it holds or if it is void of vibrations.
• A Ruleset domain is the width of a bit of information of a boson.

A Ruleset is where the interactions of boson information occurs. In the simple solution I will describe these interactions over time using familiar equations. I will use this model to describe simple baryonic motion, boson to boson interaction and boson to baryon interaction. This model must displais changes in elemental variables ( Gluons ,W+/- Bosons, Z Bosons and Photons). This model must result in producing chemistry examples.

The Higg's Boson transmits information to the Ruleset at .  On 4 July 2012, it was announced that a previously unknown particle with a mass between 125 and 127 GeV/c² (134.2 and 136.3 amu) had been detected; physicists suspected at the time that it was the Higgs boson.^[14][9][15].

 In my mind this means that three bits of information is the Coriolis solution begins.  Neutrinos transmitted the temperature information, frequency, and the wavelength to the next ruleset at those voltages. Information about two touching baryons are compared at these points on the ruleset.

^{These are the three strands of information I described in the paper about photons. The information travelling down the Higg's is the inverse of the information held in the photon. It tells the ruleset it is entering the information required. The ruleset compares the new information to current information then makes changes to the bosons involved.}

This is how small information traveling over small distances can have a great impact on other baryons.

Aaron 

Letters of Curiosity

I received this letter.
Thanks for reading my work.

6/11/13

Dear Aaron,

         My name is Fenton Doolan, I've been teaching Science for the past twenty years in Australia and overseas. I have a BSc in Biochemistry but lately have been more interested in Physics. I have been researching Einstein's theory of relativity in particular his ideas about space-time. To me his theory seems more like science fiction than a plausible scientific theory. As I have become more interested I've researched more and more. I came across the following Youtube clip which explains an unusual magnetic phenomena. When I saw this clip I came up with the following theory concerning what causes the moon to orbit the earth. No it's not due to a gravitational attraction between the two and no it's not due to a curvature in space-time. The moon orbits the Earth due to a magnetic attraction. This magnetic attraction is explained in the Youtube clip.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LyvfDzRLsiU  

I believe the Earth is acting as an inverter magnet. The movement of molten rock inside the Earth and its iron core act like the large central magnet and deposits of iron ore (magnetite) under the Earth's surface are acting like the small satellite magnets in the clip. I read on the NASA website that the Earth's magnetic field has been weakening since 1850. I wonder if that is due to mining of iron ore over the last 163 years ? My theory would also suggest that the sun acts like a gigantic inverter magnet which the planets are magnetically attracted to. At school we learn about Our Solar System maybe we should be learning about Our Magnetic Solar System. I am not a physicist or an expert in magnetism. I am just a high school science teacher interested in understanding the universe.  What do you think about my theory? I know it’s a very simple concept but I think that often in science we often disregard the obvious and try to over-complicate ideas and theories.

Thanks,

Fenton Doolan ( High School Science Teacher )

Dear Fenton,

Thanks again for reading this model. I agree, we should be searching for magnetic anomalies within our area of influence. What we are learning about magnetism is improving. Within the "Standard Vibration Model" this phenomena is not dismissed. The magnets are aligning themselves. With molys that alteration is small. So +1/-1 charge is opposite to the one above it. Each disk magnet produces a torus. In this case the top magnet's torus is squashed against the bottom magnet's torus. With an asymptote at 0 it is not possible for the two sets (Ring and disk) to meet or exceed a certain distance, unless the direction of fields changes. You have to bend one magnet out of the other

The Sun has a molten Iron surface. We can see Iron tsunamis on the Sun's surface. Then the planets are ordered by density, not mass. Irons, (Iron, rock, Nickel...), Gasses, Ices...

This is by far one of the most important new (to me) observation. Thank you

Aaron Guerami

Chandra shows ejects young stars

NASA's Chandra Observatory Catches Giant Black Hole Rejecting Material

ScienceDaily

Here is more observational proof that black holes eject material. This article shows with observations over time that black holes do not gravitationally attract. They eject material. They eject stars. Stars that are large enough to produce X-rays. The black hole is a massive star. I have described this in various postings through out the blog.  

This is really the death nail for current models of gravity.

SVM Physical Pressure

In the Standard Vibration Model, physical pressure is the result of two or more non bonding Baryon's electron shells impact one another deforming the shell. The greater the impact the greater the deformity in the shell. This causes electrons to move across the shell in a non-uniform manner. This deformation also affects the rotation of the Baryon.

Gluon length is vital in pressure. The greater the pressure on the Baryon, the smaller the Gluons become to increase rotation speed. The less pressure on the Baryon, the Gluons grow in length slowing rotation. 

Why are we still talking about the Higg`s Boson?

You have found a result that lies on the E/M scale. If it is found on the E/M scale then it must be Electricity or Magnetic. Your rules define this.

The rules of gravity create the problems that point out that gravity as a concept cannot exist.

1) Hydrogen and Helium are not affected by gravity. Thus their masses push against larger masses.

2) Data about mass exceeds the speed of light. The speed of gravity must be instantaneous to exist.

3) Gravity has no provisions for E/M. Equations of gravity do not involve E/M.

About the process. Something happens at 7tv that may support an anomalous event. But it is important to note that this event does not occur on all tests at 7tv. The hunt for the glue that bind mass to gravity would be everywhere since it is the most important concept of current physics. Every result would show events at 7tv.

Peer Review. People. If the model does not change it is either correct or being funded.

Superwifi

Just a thought. Let's use the existing 120v system as the basis of the superwifi system. I think IBM owns the patent on that technology. By expanding our Wifi we will build our economy. Also an AC routing system would require fewer routers. The last 100 feet problem is resolved by just plugging the inexpensive Wifi device into the wall socket. 

Large Quasar Group

The discovery in the deep Universe was made by a team led by Roger Clowes at the Jeremiah Horrocks Institute at Britain's University of Central Lancashire.

This object is 4 billion ly across. 

Amazing pictures that push physics beyond what we believe.
I wonder how close it is to the center of the known universe? If this thing took 4bly to get to this point. What was it before the explosion?

It also looks like a torus.

Aaron

-------------------------------
Addendum: 1//22/2013

This is a huge magnetic field. I wonder if we can see any rotation on this because of its magnetic field needs tremendous rotation. They might be able to compare this to the next series of pictures. 

New thought on universe expansion

The theory that the universe is expanding is based on SR and GR.

A more simple thought is that our tools and methods are improving allowing scientist to see more and further. First there was the solar system. Then the Milkyway galaxy. Then other galaxies were found. After that the galactic super clusters.

I am of the notion that our scientist are getting better at seeing great distances. When we send telescopes outside the solar system where photons are collected before hitting the solar winds and the heliosphere, we will have a far better picture of the universe. Also array telescopes seperated on an orbit between Earth and Mars will bring greater focus and reduce error.

CME Video

CME VIDEO

I like this video because the author starts the mass to density transition.

A

Android tools for space weather and earthquakes

I have two android tools that have made understanding the basics of the relationship of space weather and earthquakes.

By using the NASA Space Weather app and the Earthquake Alert app one can observe CMEs leave the sun and impact the earth. From flares to the impact of the magnetosphere, more data is being added all the time.

The Earthquake Alert app also tells the depth of the impact of the electrical discharge rupturing the tectonic plate. 

I use these tools along with Google Alerts "Coronal Mass Ejections", to give myself about 2 days lead time to a major seizure. I have written before that these major seizure occur at the same time +/- speed and distance from the impact.

Thankyou for building these tools.
Aaron

Immediate education solution

All the education needs can be resolved using mobile devices and Youtube. Teachers would develope plans and share them with each other. This way students would be learning the same information each day. Portable structures can house the students during the day. This way we are not relying on damaged books and destroyed infrastructure to get the education system up and running by Monday.

Another Excellent paper on the Sun and Heilo sciences

Propagation of Coronal Mass Ejections in the inner Heilosphere.

Gravity is an easy way to dismiss chemistry

To a physist, the dust surrounding the sun coalesed through gravity a little heat and poof a planet is formed. Simple right.

But what happened to chemistry; Bonding of molecules, magnetoelectrodynamics, plasma and so many other issues. Physist rarely incorperate known chemical interactions into their models. Chemistry introduces too many problems into physics models. So it has its own field.

Gravity dismissed Electromagnetism in much the same manner. It is said by mainstream physists that solar weather has little effect on the earth or its inhabitants.

This model describes the interaction of gluon density and how baryons produce bosons to interact with other baryons. This model describes all the interactions required for a baryon to affect the baryons around it.

The rules of this model show a net attempt to attain symmetry but through baryonic interaction symmetry is never attained.

A baryon expresses information about itself by using bosons. The Z Boson transfers electric information to and from electrons.

The W+/- Boson is magnetism. The W+/- has one other interaction with photons. This is called the Zeeman Effect. This effect stops a photon if the W+/- is powerful enough and pulls the photon to the Electron.

The photon expresses information about temperature and spectra. It uses wavelength, frequency and rotation to produce this information. Spectra is everything on the frequency except what the emittor is not and the magnetic fields the photon passed through.

A new problem. CMEs travel through space creating a MACH speed. So much for the vacuum of space!

Do thinkers and scientist need to flee Italy?

So seven scientist were convicted of not predicting an earthquake.

What does that mean? Is is the engineer fault if a driver dives his car off a cliff and destroys a village. Is it the engineer's fault? No. But according to the italian legal system a scientist is liable for the earth's motion. To the point that these scientist were charged with the manslaughter of ~300 people.

It is time to flee italy!

Aaron Guerami

Non-relativistic gluon motion

Medium Induced Gluon Branching

This is a powerful paper that describes gluon motion using non-relativistic tools. It describes this process using many equations with explanations of those equations.

A

Dark Energy Camera

The Dark Energy Camera (DECam) is a beautiful large format array Near Infrared and visual telescope. The intention of this camera in my opinion is to look for redshift, amongst many other things. It is hoped that observations of this expansion and curvature dynamics of space can prove Dark Energy and its role in physics.

The Standard Vibration Model holds that Dark Energy is the place where the math is done to support the physics. This will be impossible to see since Dark Energy cannot support electrons. What this model shows is the expansion/contraction observations are densitiy differentials between Baryonic Matter and Dark Matter.

The pictures will be beautiful and it will collect incredible new data.

Aaron

Baryon Halo around Milkyway

These are some important articles about a halo of baryons found around the milkyway.

Lee Rannals at RedOrbit.com

Phys.org

ALICE shows difficulty with gravity at the subatomic level.

Image: CERN
This comes from an article at Symmetry.

What I want to show is that pictures like these show no evidence of gravity. The massive particles arc in all directions. If gravity was a force, then there would be more consistant arcing towards the earth.

This has been a known problem since QM and again found in the Standard Model. It shows the need for a Grand Unification Theory. This need for a unification shows there are errors of logic in gravity models.

Aaron

Frame of Reference Issues

This is a paper on frame reference system. It describes in detail some of the major issues in SR and GR.

A Logical Analysis of Albert Einstein's Mirror-Light-Clock Gedankin

Congratulations to Curt Youngs. And keep up the good work.

Addendum to the higgs

In the previous posting I listed several math and logic examples of the disproof of mass. But here is something everyone who saw the collision pattern of all the results of CERN or other supercolliders. This should be obvious.

Why is it that 'massive' particles like Quarks do not arc towards the earth? They don't.

If 100% of your data shows this issue, then a 5 sigma deviation about higgs is useless.

Aaron Guerami

So you found the Higgs???

Nobel prizes for everyone! Congratulations you managed to see the the entire magnetic field from 1 volt to 300+ Teravolts.

Have you solved the Basic Dimensional Analysis problem for mass? Mass is a one dimentional measure of an object's weight. Gravity is a two dimensional data structure that holds mass and distance. A Matrix cannot ever equal a vector * a vector, or a vector * a scalar. So I have serious problems with the concept of mass.

Let's evaluate a real object and what mathematically occurs when you reduce the natural three dimensional traits to the one dimensional concept of mass. When reducing the object from three dimensions to two, you lose x,y,z, size of the object. You lose I,j,k position of the object. You lose temperature data. You lose E/M data. You lose spectral identification data. You have effectively disregarded vital information about the object just to have mass. More importantly you have no manner of retaining that information or using it.

I know some recent reports proved that gold travelling through the particle accellators pass through the double slit test as waves not particles. I believe that was done at the LHC. I could be wrong as to where the test was done. But that alone kills the particle concept.

Now let's again look at that funny concept of gravity. The larger mass will always attract the less massive object at a rate of... So if an apple hits the ground something more massive then the earth is the only thing that can reverse the apple's direction.

Marketing in physics. I know we all need to get paid. Do the math. Don't just say we found the "GOD" particle. Show me the math that proves you found many particles in the Higg's range and how the attach.

Another thing. Particle accellerators are showing what happens after traumatic collisions of proton beams. This is a decay model. It does nothing to show interactions of bosons prior to the collision.

Archemedes disproved gravity by running naked yelling Eureka. It was not gravity that he discovered it was density!!! Using density you get to keep all your amazing data about an object. So good luck with the god thing. One more thing. Gravity requires omnisence,omnipresence, and omnipotence. Gravity requires that distance data travel instantanously from object to object. That exceeds the speed of light.

The Standard Vibration Model as described here is an expression model. There is a vital difference in those two concepts.