The Variability of Constants in a Bosonic Relationship

Variability of Constants, what exactly does that mean?

We all know there is a relationship required for an interaction of bosons to occur. The Zeeman effect shows one of these relationship. As the intensity of magnetism increases the rotation of the photon decreases.

The one that shows its ugly head out is the distance, direction and shape of peak intensity of a magnetic field. That would mean that the shape of a density with a high intensity magnetic field can change rapidly. When the high intensity magnetic field enters an area of low intensity magnetic fields. Spectacular changes in the Sun show this.

The concept of Dark Energy helps stabilize the mathematics needed for computing these relationships. Dark Energy is the medium. Dark Energy is the place to do the math for relationships of boson.

Capacitance and conductivity is another relationship which is based on temperature and density.
Temperature and current

Shapes required for this system. Each shape is 3 dimensional and moves to create a 4 dimension.
The Cone : The spinning triangle. The spinning Baryon. Three Gluons spinning. This is density
The Torus : The magnetic field. The W+/- Boson
The Vortex: The inverted torus. The Z Boson. This connects the W+/- Boson to the Baryon. This is electricity.
The Twine: The Photon. Three bits of information spinning around each other.
The Lattice: Non spinning antigluons. This is Dark Matter. This provides resistance to Baryonic information.
The Spiral: The Lepton Electron. Its rotation is the asymptote of three bosons; W+/-, Z, and Photon. Its direction and connection provide charge.

Although these are the perfect shapes, They are never found in their perfect shape in nature. This is due to the constant change in information.

----------
chiccoreal comment "Could there be an immediate effect on other bozons throughout the galaxy"
----------

Aaron
We know that photons have a speed. This speed is variable based on the medium the photon travels through.

There is a maximum speed a photon can travel. This speed is based on the intensity of the magnetic field, the electric field, and the baryonic density through which it travels.

It takes approximately 2.5 days for CMEs to travel from the Sun to the Earth. The speed of magnetism is based on the electric field, the temperature and the baryonic density through which it travels.

The speed of photons is far greater than the speed of W+/- Bosons.

The Sun is made of Iron

http://www.thesurfaceofthesun.com/

This is an amazing site. It finalizes the description I made that the planets are ordered by density by showing the sun is made of very dense materials. It also shows plasma. There is a lot here. I am going to take some time to read this.

http://www.plasma-universe.com/Plasma-Universe.com

2010-04-20 Addendum
Solar Tsunami
Credit: The Surface Of The Sun
Michael Mozina

Amazing work. This certainly clears things up. Wow!!!

Solar radiation and volcano?

This morning a volcano erupted in Iceland. I also noticed there was a significant solar radiation event. This morning my detector was bright blue almost white for many minutes. Then it turned to black over the next 30 minutes. I am not sure what time the volcano erupted and its duration. I would like to post the magnetosphere information here to see if there is any correlation between solar events and this volcano.

**********


In my opinion Europe North Africa and the Middle East should ground airspace until this plume is better analyzed. This kind of dust will destroy jet engines, not may, but will. You don't want many planes falling from the sky.

The BigParadox Binary Counter

Most excellent. Again I am encouraging you to do more.

Again I caught that on my unshielded CRT

It was upgraded to 7.2.

Credit NASA
Great pictures of the solar flare that caused that earthquake.
http://stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov/browse/2010/04/04/index.shtml

This theory show that earthquakes originate from the sun. NASA can now predict earthquakes. It will take some time to match previous data to earthquakes. This matching of datasets will show magnitude. NASA just cannot predict the location of the event, yet. The tools already exist. Congratulations to NASA for their work and results.

Earthquakes are a result of solar flares. The intense Z Boson flares from the sun and strikes the earth. This causes a discharge in the magnetosphere that strikes the earth in the most vulnerable fault. This theory shows that earthquakes are the result of coronal mass ejections.

A simple solar radiation detector. 

Take a CRT TV attached to a cable line. Remove some of the shielding on the antenna. Leave the TV power on. I had company over and was able to show him the solar radiation intensity as it was happening. It was so intense that I shut down my computer.
-----------
04/06/10 Extreme changes from black to blue from 7:00 am est.

It is my speculation that every earthquake has a corresponding solar event. 

Atlas : Jet Events

Congratulations on the work all of you have done to build these detectors.

This is the main paper with data. Although I had some difficulty in downloading it.


http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0901/0901.0512.pdf
This paper is huge. 1100+ pages. This paper does not download correctly using any web browser.


http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1254503/files/ATL-PHYS-SLIDE-2010-036.pdf
This paper is far more manageable. It is only 29 pages.

I have questions: On pages 8 and 10 of the smaller doc. MC is that Mass*C or is it Muon Candidate? Do those lines going through the data point show the min/max of the run? How many runs were put together to create those maps?

On page 8, why are there data points outside the line? Is the line what you expect and the data point is what you get?

Are these all simulations and what you EXPECT to see, or are these based on real data? That is what I understood from the conclusions. That these maps are simulations. The conclusion says you expect to see the Higg's at these points. Not that you did. Am I correct in that statement?

Why are the maps in 2d and not the expected 3d? I would expect to see the energy, distance, and time to be the factors of any broken vibrations. The general questions are: How did the energy transform over time? Was there a general direction these broken energies transformed over time? When did the baryon transform into heat, electricity, or magnetism?

Investigating the driving mechanisms of coronal mass ejections

Investigating the driving mechanisms of coronal mass ejections
Chia-Hsien Lin, Peter T. Gallagher, and Claire L. Raftery

I am going to spend some time reading this. I will comment on it at a later time here.

Important book

An Experimental Approach To Nonlinear Dynamics And Chaos

This is an excellent book that I have used to help describe the interactions of bosons. It is inexpensive on Amazon.com.

I am blown away by the expansion of my understanding on this topic. I should now be able to explain those asymptotes I see in bosonic interaction.

Comets crash into sun

This video comes to me from ahrcanum.

Thanks for the comment. I agree, I hope we spend more money on understanding these solar events instead of making our rivers green. Our priorities need re-examination. Excellent article.
Magnetic Storm Prediction for St. Patrick’s Day, CME Approaching Earth
Thanks.


This is an amazing video of comets crashing into the sun causing a HUGE CME. I noticed that the second comet did not eject material out the edges. I suggest this flare may be directed more towards the earth.

Look at those asymptotes. Thanks to the people who built and operate these spacecraft. That is a pretty amazing piece of work you have done for us. 

SOHO

STEREO

This can induce a large earthquake or power grid failure from 3/16/2010 to 3/18/2010. This will also cause more solar radiation. The only example I can suggest that is like these CME's is, popcorn in a microwave oven. These are dangerous!!! Those are 5 minute data points so these events last for hours.

Preparing for a solar storm

From my analog television I see solar radiation is picking up.
From NASA
http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/stereo/

:Data_list: stb_plastic_1m.txt
:Created: 2010 Mar 03 23:45
# Prepared by the U.S. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Space Weather Prediction Center
# Please send comments and suggestions to SWPC.Webmaster@noaa.gov
#
# Units: Proton density p/cc
# Units: Bulk speed km/s
# Units: Ion temperature degrees K
# Status(S): 0 = nominal data, 1 to 8 = bad data record, 9 = no data
# Missing data values: Density and Speed = -9999.9, Temp. = -1.00e+05
# Source: STEREO B Satellite - Plasma and Suprathermal Ion Composition Instrument
#
#   Real-time Bulk Paramters of the Solar Wind Plasma, sampled once per minute
#
# Modified Seconds   -------------  Solar Wind ------------
# UT Date   Time  Julian  of the    Proton   Bulk    Ion
# YR MO DA  HHMM    Day     Day  S  Density  Speed   Temp
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2010 03 03  2146   55258   78407 8     0.0    865.8 1.04e+05
2010 03 03  2147   55258   78467 0     0.2    355.7 1.23e+06
2010 03 03  2148   55258   78527 0     0.2    559.0 8.17e+04
2010 03 03  2149   55258   78587 0     0.3    603.4 4.85e+05
2010 03 03  2150   55258   78647 8     0.0    934.2 9.49e+05
2010 03 03  2151   55258   78707 0     1.1    412.7 6.82e+05
2010 03 03  2152   55258   78767 0     0.5    599.5 6.56e+05
2010 03 03  2153   55258   78827 0     0.6    523.3 1.18e+06
2010 03 03  2154   55258   78887 0     0.7    474.9 1.09e+06
2010 03 03  2155   55258   78947 0     0.7    576.5 4.33e+05
2010 03 03  2156   55258   79007 0     0.7    388.9 1.68e+06
2010 03 03  2157   55258   79067 0     0.7    561.3 6.12e+05
2010 03 03  2158   55258   79127 0     1.1    314.3 2.96e+05
2010 03 03  2159   55258   79142 9 -9999.9  -9999.9 -1.00e+05
2010 03 03  2200   55258   79202 9 -9999.9  -9999.9 -1.00e+05
2010 03 03  2201   55258   79262 9 -9999.9  -9999.9 -1.00e+05
2010 03 03  2202   55258   79322 9 -9999.9  -9999.9 -1.00e+05
2010 03 03  2203   55258   79382 9 -9999.9  -9999.9 -1.00e+05
2010 03 03  2204   55258   79442 9 -9999.9  -9999.9 -1.00e+05
2010 03 03  2205   55258   79502 9 -9999.9  -9999.9 -1.00e+05

---------------------------------------

03/03/2010 at 2159 the Asymptote starts.

This does not mean the solar storm will hit the Earth. We should be aware of the possibility of a major event with in 3+ days.

It will discharge on known faults. It is not possible to predict where on the Earth this will discharge. But HAARP could be prepared to move the discharge if possible. The calculation requires knowledge of the discharge fault and attraction/repulsive power necessary to move it a few hundred miles out of populated areas. Moving the discharge may reduce the discharge from one 7-9 magnitude earthquake to many 4 and 5s

--------------

For those of you who still think HAARP caused these earthquakes. The amount of energy discharged in the Chilean and Haitian earthquakes was larger than many Neutron bombs. Haiti was equivalent to 4+ neutron bombs and the Chile earthquake was equivalent to 8+ neutron bombs. 

That would be thousands of teravolts each. There is nothing man made that can generate that power. Currently all they can do is paint the aurora. But that may be very useful.

Now let the people at HAARP and other facilities work so they can test a possible defense against these naturally occurring events. They are not working on weapons of mass destruction. They are working on a possible shield.   

STEREO BEHIND 7-DAY SOLAR WIND DATA 
Location southwest of Sumatra, IndonesiaMarch 05, 2010 16:06:57 GMT Magnitude 6.5 This occurred from the asymptote on the 03/03/2010 There is another asymptote on 03/04/2010 Location southern East Pacific Rise March 07, 2010 07:05:24 GMT Magnitude 6.3 03/05/2010 asymptote 03/06/2010 asymptote Very large asymptote on 03/07/2010
--------------
Addendum 3/14/2010 
Magnetic Storm Prediction for St. Patrick’s Day, CME Approaching Earth  Excellent video of comets hitting the sun.

Chile Earthquake

USGS information.
USGS Centroid Moment Tensor Solution

10/02/27 06:34:09.75
 BIO-BIO, CHILE                  
 Epicenter: -35.988  -72.782
 MW 8.6

 USGS CENTROID MOMENT TENSOR
 10/02/27 06:35:27.29
 Centroid:  -35.757  -72.389
 Depth  36         No. of sta:189
 Moment Tensor;   Scale 10**21 Nm
   Mrr= 7.40       Mtt=-0.53
   Mpp=-6.87       Mrt= 0.06
   Mrp=-5.95       Mtp=-0.76
  Principal axes:
   T  Val=  9.57  Plg=69  Azm= 84
   N       -0.48       3      183
   P       -9.08      19      274

 Best Double Couple:Mo=9.3*10**21
  NP1:Strike= 11 Dip=25 Slip=  98
  NP2:       182     65        86
                                      
               ----###                
          --------######---           
        ---------#########---         
      ----------############---       
    -----------##############----     
   ------------###############----    
   -----------################----    
  --   -------#################----   
  -- P -------#######   #######----   
  --   -------####### T #######----   
  ------------#######   #######----   
  ------------################-----   
   -----------###############-----    
   -----------###############-----    
    -----------#############-----     
      ---------###########-----       
        --------########-----         
          -------####------           
               ###----             

Global CMT Project Moment Tensor Solution
February 27, 2010, OFFSHORE MAULE, CHILE, MW=8.8

Goran Ekstrom
Meredith Nettles

CENTROID-MOMENT-TENSOR  SOLUTION
GCMT EVENT:     C201002270634A  
DATA: II IU CU IC G  GE 
L.P.BODY WAVES: 90S, 224C, T= 50
MANTLE WAVES:  108S, 296C, T=200
SURFACE WAVES:  75S, 166C, T= 50
TIMESTAMP:      Q-20100227072327
CENTROID LOCATION:
ORIGIN TIME:      06:35:15.4 0.1
LAT:35.95S 0.01;LON: 73.15W 0.01
DEP: 24.1  0.4;TRIANG HDUR: 60.5
MOMENT TENSOR: SCALE 10**29 D-CM
RR= 1.040 0.004; TT=-0.030 0.002
PP=-1.010 0.003; RT= 0.227 0.022
RP=-1.510 0.032; TP=-0.120 0.002
PRINCIPAL AXES:
1.(T) VAL=  1.875;PLG=61;AZM= 74
2.(N)      -0.064;     7;    176
3.(P)      -1.810;    28;    270
BEST DBLE.COUPLE:M0= 1.84*10**29
NP1: STRIKE= 18;DIP=18;SLIP= 112
NP2: STRIKE=174;DIP=73;SLIP=  83

            ----#######           
        -------##########--       
      --------#############--     
    ----------###############--   
   -----------################--  
  ------------################--- 
  ------------#################-- 
 -------------########   ######---
 ---   -------######## T ######---
 --- P -------########   ######---
 ---   -------#################---
  -------------###############--- 
  -------------###############--- 
   -------------#############---  
    ------------###########----   
      -----------########----     
        ----------#####----       
            ------#----           






USGS WPhase Moment Tensor Solution
10/02/27  6:34:17   
 OFFSHORE MAULE, CHILE           
 Epicenter: -35.826  -72.668
 MW 8.8

 USGS/WPHASE CENTROID MOMENT TENSOR
 10/02/27 06:34:17.00
 Centroid:  -35.826  -72.668
 Depth  35         No. of sta: 28
 Moment Tensor;   Scale 10**24 Nm
   Mrr= 0.93       Mtt= 0.01
   Mpp=-0.94       Mrt=-0.01
   Mrp=-1.72       Mtp=-0.15
  Principal axes:
   T  Val=  1.96  Plg=59  Azm= 86
   N        0.02       3      182
   P       -1.97      30      274

 Best Double Couple:Mo=2.0*10**22
  NP1:Strike= 16 Dip=14 Slip= 104
  NP2:       181     75        86
                                      
               ----###                
          --------########-           
        ----------##########-         
      -----------############--       
    -------------##############--     
   -------------################--    
   -------------################--    
  --------------#################--   
  ----   -------#######   #######--   
  ---- P -------####### T #######--   
  ----   -------#######   #######--   
  --------------################---   
   -------------################--    
   -------------###############---    
    ------------##############---     
      -----------###########---       
        ---------#########---         
          -------######----           
               ###----       






Historic USGS Moment Tensor Solutions
Magnitude 8.8 OFFSHORE MAULE, CHILE 
Saturday, February 27, 2010 at 06:34:14 UTC
---------------------
I have some basic questions of USGS. Why is the duration of the earthquake not listed? Why is the duration to different magnitudes not listed? Why is the wavelength and frequency not listed. Why are the raw seismographic waveforms not shown? It is frustrating to not have this data. 
------
Magnetosphere
Coronal Mass Ejection before the earthquake
I will try and find data on this prediction and the coronal mass ejection associated.
I have not found data on the magnetosphere yet. I need to go for now. I will place the data here. 
STEREO BEHIND 7-DAY SOLAR WIND DATA
There is an asymptote on Feb 24 2010.
STEREO BEHIND 3-DAY SOLAR WIND DATA
------------------
Coronal Mass Ejection video Credit University of Michigan

The Poincaré Conjecture

The Poincaré Conjecture is incorrect. Here is why. The Poincaré Conjecture states that the sphere is the simplest shape in 3+ dimensions. A sphere requires that every point related to the surface of the sphere is exactly the same distance from the local origin of the sphere. This shape has never been found in nature. The simplest shape in nature is the wavefront or vibration. The simplest complex shape is the bubble or teardrop (bubble in motion through a medium).

There are 4 types of wavefronts found in the Baryonic nature. They are the Bosons; Photon, W+/- Boson, Z Boson and Gluon. Each Boson is a composite of 3 bits of information plus the rotation or spin of the wave. I explain this in the paper Structure of Baryons. We see this shape at both the microscopic and macroscopic levels. This is found as the magnetosphere around planets and in single baryon collisions.

The simplest  and only shape in Dark Matter nature is the 3 dimensional lattice of Anti-Gluons. The conjunction of anti-gluons is the anti-quark. Pressurization by baryonic magnetism against dark matter causes curves in the shape of the dark matter lattice. This interaction forms baryonic bubbles in dark matter.

The Z Boson charge.

How does the Z Boson deal with charge?

Just before it is directly connected from the electron to the associated baryon then it is negative.

Just before it is connected from an electron to an electron, then it is positive.

The actual connection is neutral.

This explains lightning and plasma, where there is a charge just before the electrocution.

Asymptotes in 3 dimensions

I have an idea why this is so difficult. It has to do with asymptotes. More specifically asymptotes in 3 dimensions. I have hypothesized that the electron is an an asymptote between the three bosons. An asymptote in 3 dimensions has different behaviors than in 2 dimensions. It produces a shape that is like a funnel around zero. 

This is how I picture the lepton electron.

There are 9 bits of information associated with this model of the electron. 3 bits for each Boson. This shows that the lepton electron is a result of the interaction of these 9 bits of information. Also this would be a 4 dimensional problem, but I am examining an instant.

My idea about the wave-particle problem is an asymptote to a vibration in 4 dimensions is a manifestation.

Great paper on asymptotes:

http://rowdy.mscd.edu/~talmanl/PDFs/APCalculus/OnAsymptotes.pdf

The phenomenon of retarded potentials

Nikolay NOSKOV

1940...2008

The engineer of control of the nuclear reactor, Institute of nuclear Physics, National Nuclear Center, Republic of Kazakhstan

----------

This is amazing. Thanks again to Curt Youngs for directing me to this man's work. 

I am reading his work and it is difficult at best. He understood something very important. I am going to be evaluating his work for some time. I am starting with "The phenomenon of retarded potentials"

His work affirms what I have been discussing. He understood longitudinal waves.   

This is a piece of that paper. Near the end. 

"Simulating the process of retarded potential on a moving test body [24] with the help of three variables: the velocity of the body, the force of interaction and the distance between the bodies, I have determined that the retarded potential occurs non-uniformly, in an undulatory fashion. It means, that the motion of bodies under the influence of a force (electrical or gravitational fields, atmospheric or liquid pressure differentials or others) occurs with longitudinal oscillations. The average velocity of a body driving with oscillations is a phase velocity.

The logical goal is finding out the direct or inverse proportionality of length of the oscillations for all three variables that lead to the expression: 

 

Where:

= length of oscillations;

H = Factor of proportionality

= phase velocity of a body

R= Distance between test and central bodies

F(R) = the law of interaction"

And that is just the beginning. 

The difference between Aether and ether.

Aether is the medium in which things exist. Dark Energy


Ether is a class of organic compounds that contain an ether group — an oxygen atom connected to two alkyl or aryl groups — of general formula R–O–R. Wiki. An example is that stuff you drink.

Asymmetry is not broken symmetry

This is from the Brookhaven National Lab.

Physicists have predicted an increasing probability of finding such bubbles, or local regions, of “broken” symmetry at extreme temperatures near transitions from one phase of matter to another. According to the predictions, the matter inside these bubbles would exhibit different symmetries — or behavior under certain simple transformations of space, time, and particle types — than the surrounding matter. In addition to the symmetry violations probed at RHIC, scientists have postulated that analogous symmetry-altering bubbles created at an even earlier time in the universe helped to establish the preference for matter over antimatter in our world. http://www.bnl.gov/bnlweb/pubaf/pr/PR_display.asp?prID=1073





------------


Ok, The concept of symmetry is not shown by any data. Never is there a symmetrical interaction. Broken symmetry requires symmetry to exist. 


It is easy to disprove symmetry through logic. Each atom has a lepton, electron, expressing information about the atom. Never is this lepton in the same position nor does it express the same bits of information at any different time. QED.


Symmetry as a concept stems from the need to protect an omnipotent perfect god, thus is not logical nor evidenced in the collected data.   

Tesla transverse and longitudinal electric waves

Please see http://www.borderlands.com for the biggest collection of old, rare and hard to find groundbreaking alternative energy and medical material. Tesla transverse and longitudinal electric waves another a lab demonstration with Eric Dollard, Tom Brown and Peter Lindemann. Specially focusing on Tesla's longitudinal electricity. This is a great practical demonstration on forgotten Tesla longitudinal electricity technologies.

Youtube has some great videos also. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6BnCUBKgnnc

------------------------


This is important. In the Standard Vibration Model, this is the interaction between the W+/-Boson and the Z Boson which forms the lepton, electron. This vibration lepton electron causes the oscillation photon. Since the information of the Z Boson is the inverse of that of the W+/-Boson the asymptote where the inversion occurs is the vibration lepton electron. 


The tri-oscillation photon vibrates the lepton electron providing information to the baryon about another baryon conductivity and capacitance. Oops, this should say the photon provides information on temperature and pressure not conductivity and capacitance. It is the Z and W+/- Bosons that provide information on conductivity and capacitance. 


-----  
Thanks to Curt Youngs for sending it to me. Who says 'They are saying that in the longitude waves, the magnetic and dielectric fields are parallel. The frequency goes up because the speed of the waves are faster than c. They are emitted radially, which means that from the spherical  point of view there is a contraction and expansion of the expanding sphere wave front.

This is very similar to the far field, where the electric and magnetic fields are parallel. '

Baryon Density - NCSA

Credit: NCSA (The National Center for Supercomputing Applications)


1.5 billion light year cube of baryon distribution


 Truly awesome.


But my critical mind says is there is no galaxy distribution. I don't see Galactic Clusters or similar distribution patterns. I would like to see the associated algorithms used to create this pic. I think this is a need to understand Dark Matter and its interaction with Baryonic Matter.


But it does look similar to this pic from the Spitzer Space Telescope.

Other Distribution movies and Pictures

------------------------------------------

http://irfu.cea.fr/Projets/coast_documents/movies/SDvision-heracles_MIS300.avi

http://irfu.cea.fr/Projets/COAST/movies_ISM.htm

Manned Interplanetary Space Travel

One of the main obstructions to organic interplanetary space travel is solar radiation. This is not a problem anymore. Listed in this blog are the concepts needed to protect organic material from solar radiation.

Variable magnetic fields can be placed around the outside spacecraft to push solar radiation around the vehicle. This shielding can also provide the thrust needed to travel long distances.

I am quite certain we can build a robotic dry dock at 10,000km. This above the space station. Many small robots would be sent to construct and supply the dry dock. These robots are now the dry dock. From this we can build and supply a small team to build the spacecraft. Some of the ten would go with the ship and some will build the next ship.

The Solar Wind Theory of Eugene Parker

The Solar Wind Theory of Eugene Parker http://www.princeton.edu/~lam/ME451C/SolarWind.pdf Parker's theory on solar winds met with anger and rejection in 1958. It wasn't until Neugebauer placed magnetic detectors upon spacecraft did we see that Parker was correct in idea. We now have enough tools in space to get an idea of the complexities involved in solar winds.

We don't know all the variables involved in a magnetic field, especially large complex magnetic fields.

Mythbusters - The Gods of Evaluation

I always watch Mythbusters with a sense of jealousy. They have always done an amazing job in seeing if ideas hold truths. I will always bow to Jamie, Adam, Kari, Tory and Grant. I look to see their work every weekend. This weekend the Discovery Channel showed episode 47 of Mythbusters. The Helium filled footballs, probably because of the Super Bowl. But I have never seen this episode.

Adam got a bunch of regulation footballs and a throwing machine. He filled half of the balls with helium at 15psi. He tested one of the balls to busting pressure at ~90psi. They expected the Helium filled balls to travel further than regulation balls. That was the myth.

The material of the balloon is far more dense then the change in the density of the air filling it. The material of the balloon is far more dense than the air surrounding the balloon. The shape and weight of the ball are the primary factors in the consistency in their results. Adam said this at the end of the show.

The most important thing Adam said was at the beginning of the show. A helium filled ball weighs less than an empty football!!!

The major density contributer in the football's flight characteristics is the material and shape of the ball. Not the gas filling it. This was shown by the experiment.

Questions

What would happen if both balls were filled to 50, 60, 70 psi of Helium? Would they float?
What would happen if the ball material was changed to mylar or some other lightweight material? Of course this would change the launch characteristics.
What would happen if the balls were filled with Hydrogen?
Would the ball burst at 90psi of Helium?
What would happen if a Hydrogen and Oxygen gas mixture were used and then tested against H20?
My final question is would a mylar balloon filled with 1 kg of helium hit the ground at the same time as a 1 kg steel ball?

Orbital Debris Identification and De-orbit systems

The Argos system is designed to deploy several argonaut debris de-orbit vehicles.

Argonauts are reusable vehicles that can change the vector of debris without touching the debris.

I am working on the design for these systems. I would like to submit these ideas/designs to further the protection of space based assets. I would like the opportunity to hire scientist and engineers to produce these.

Volcanic Lightning

http://www.physorg.com/news183883466.html

There is a nice picture at that link of lightning interacting with an active volcano. It is obvious that this kind of lightning is the increase of dust density in the atmosphere. The increase in temperature around the volcano increases the conductivity of the dust. The capacitance of the dust is high. This combination leads to Z Boson discharges.

In previous postings I have described the information transmitted by a Z Boson as photon data and electron data. At the time, I could not define the electron portion of the data. They are conductivity and capacitance.

Z Boson data is expressed as Electron data:(Conductivity, Capacitance), Photon data:(Temperature, Frequency), Current and (Spin or Charge) of the emitting baryon.

Marcia Neugebauer - Solar Winds

Congratulations and thanks to Marcia Neugebauer. She had a remarkable career. She is ultimately responsible for my understanding of the solar winds. I was often inspired to think about comet tails and their strange direction and the solar winds because of trips to JPL as a kid.    

http://uanews.org/node/29744
http://genesismission.jpl.nasa.gov/gm2/team/people/neugebauer/NeugebauerJOURNALArticle.PDF