What is it with the concept of aether, that is so repugnant? What are the rules that this breaking? I would think the concept of an aether would just be an extension of the atmosphere or any other media. These differences between baryonic magnetic material and the non baryonic dark matter allows for bubbles in the aether. This bubble would be where baryonic matter can interact with the rules of magnetism, e/m, density...
If there is to be an aether, it needs a mechanism in which the baryonic bubble is defined. In my opinion this is magnetism. Magnetism through the W+/- boson vibrates charge and force. I am beginning to think that this W boson is only read/written by the gluon. That the electron converts photons into z bosons to pass to the gluon.
This transfer of information tells the dark matter particle how much magnetic pressure is being applied and how much it needs to recoil. At its root, all force is information. Each force/boson holds information on itself, describing its originator. The Quark or Dark Matter equivalent expresses this information.
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Sunday, October 12, 2008
The Chain Nature of Dark Matter
In understanding the nature of memes(information) transmission in baryonic particles it becomes easier to understand the the nature of memes transmission between baryonic particles and dark matter. Memes needs to be transmitted from the baryonic atom to the dark matter particle through magnetism. Dark matter ignores photons because they lack charge. Dark matter reacts to charge, all charges +/- in the same manner. Dark matter is repulsed by charge.
There are 2 known particles that can convert magnetism into memes(information). The electron and the gluon. We can rule out the electron as a particle of dark matter because it has charge. Also if electrons were in interstellar space, photons would never make it through the medium and we would not see other galaxies. The gluon is a more promising particle that could be part of the dark matter chain.
We know that the gluon converts magnetism into color using quantum chromodynamics (QCD). When dark matter is in the presence of magnetism the dark matter is repelled. The interaction between dark matter sub-atomic particles is stronger than the magnetism applied to it. Magnetism is not strong enough to break the normal bond between the gluon and the dark matter particle attached to it. Magnetism bends this bond.
The chain nature of dark matter becomes obvious when gluons are inserted between dark matter particles. These chains form fabrics and the more dense they become the harder is becomes for baryonic particles and photons to move through them. Pioneer 10 and 11 show this in their attempts to exit the solar system.
There are 2 known particles that can convert magnetism into memes(information). The electron and the gluon. We can rule out the electron as a particle of dark matter because it has charge. Also if electrons were in interstellar space, photons would never make it through the medium and we would not see other galaxies. The gluon is a more promising particle that could be part of the dark matter chain.
We know that the gluon converts magnetism into color using quantum chromodynamics (QCD). When dark matter is in the presence of magnetism the dark matter is repelled. The interaction between dark matter sub-atomic particles is stronger than the magnetism applied to it. Magnetism is not strong enough to break the normal bond between the gluon and the dark matter particle attached to it. Magnetism bends this bond.
The chain nature of dark matter becomes obvious when gluons are inserted between dark matter particles. These chains form fabrics and the more dense they become the harder is becomes for baryonic particles and photons to move through them. Pioneer 10 and 11 show this in their attempts to exit the solar system.
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
Free falling bodies
So If I understand the problem correctly, would two objects of different density dropped in the ISS, fall at different rate?
The major force on the above problem is the angular velocities of the two objects are the same as the space station and all will maintain the same orbit around the Earth. These three objects are falling at different rates but the angular velocity is more significant in this setup of the problem. Density has little to do with orbital periods, velocity is more significant here.
I would like to change the feather to a ball of water. Each ball is 1 kg.
What we would need to do is reduce the angular velocity of the lead ball and the ice ball to 0 km/sec in relation to a point on the Earth's surface. When this occurs the two objects are now falling to maintain their density.
Here the lead ball would turn to liquid, pass through the atmosphere and splat in the ocean. There it would cool again to a solid and fall to the ocean floor. It would continue falling for many eons through the sand, mantle to the core of the Earth. This is where it would meet its level of disbursement.
Whereas the water would start as ice and become vapor quickly. As a vapor it would disperse/equalize with other water vapor at its density level. In the high level atmosphere is where it would meet its level of disbursement. As it cooled it would then rain. The water would never have an altitude less than the ocean floor.
I was reading a paper on multiple instruction multiple data computing systems. What I got from it was that this is a multiple force problem. These forces; density and thermodynamic work together to create the bounds of the problem. When is the object is at a level of disbursement?
We cannot remove one of the forces from the problem to simplify the problem, because we would no longer have a valid problem/solution. It needs both thermodynamics and density to do this.
Both balls would have other forces acting upon them. For example both would have hydrodynamic issues of turning into a teardrop shape during decent. But I don’t see this as a major force acting upon the problem. I could be wrong.
So I see a summation of forces acting upon an object to determine its altitude of disbursement. But I can definitively say there is no gravity in this problem.
Question: What about this video?
Answer: Cinci, again you bring up a good point. And something that is difficult to explain in my model, but I will give it a try. First, this video is not a empirical test of falling bodies. We don't know the time it took to fall. Nor can we tell if the two object did hit the ground at the same time. We would also need the distance traveled. This is a good example of two different objects traveling in a vacuum.
Here what we are seeing needs an explanation of the moon's forward velocity. Here the Astronauts are on the face of the moon. The face of the moon is like the front of a NASCAR car. The moons forward motion is so great that it hits the hammer and feather. Also the distances here are not great so we cannot see the difference in density of the two objects. If these objects were release at 1000km altitude from the moon, we would see a different result.
The equations for this are found in chemistry. It is called Specific Gravity. rather a misnomer, but we work with what we are given. It really is the density of the objects and the density of the medium that are the main forces here.
I know that is rather weak, but those density(specific gravity) solutions work in chemistry, why not in physics? We just need to evaluate the media. Not every media is water.
The major force on the above problem is the angular velocities of the two objects are the same as the space station and all will maintain the same orbit around the Earth. These three objects are falling at different rates but the angular velocity is more significant in this setup of the problem. Density has little to do with orbital periods, velocity is more significant here.
I would like to change the feather to a ball of water. Each ball is 1 kg.
What we would need to do is reduce the angular velocity of the lead ball and the ice ball to 0 km/sec in relation to a point on the Earth's surface. When this occurs the two objects are now falling to maintain their density.
Here the lead ball would turn to liquid, pass through the atmosphere and splat in the ocean. There it would cool again to a solid and fall to the ocean floor. It would continue falling for many eons through the sand, mantle to the core of the Earth. This is where it would meet its level of disbursement.
Whereas the water would start as ice and become vapor quickly. As a vapor it would disperse/equalize with other water vapor at its density level. In the high level atmosphere is where it would meet its level of disbursement. As it cooled it would then rain. The water would never have an altitude less than the ocean floor.
I was reading a paper on multiple instruction multiple data computing systems. What I got from it was that this is a multiple force problem. These forces; density and thermodynamic work together to create the bounds of the problem. When is the object is at a level of disbursement?
We cannot remove one of the forces from the problem to simplify the problem, because we would no longer have a valid problem/solution. It needs both thermodynamics and density to do this.
Both balls would have other forces acting upon them. For example both would have hydrodynamic issues of turning into a teardrop shape during decent. But I don’t see this as a major force acting upon the problem. I could be wrong.
So I see a summation of forces acting upon an object to determine its altitude of disbursement. But I can definitively say there is no gravity in this problem.
Question: What about this video?
Answer: Cinci, again you bring up a good point. And something that is difficult to explain in my model, but I will give it a try. First, this video is not a empirical test of falling bodies. We don't know the time it took to fall. Nor can we tell if the two object did hit the ground at the same time. We would also need the distance traveled. This is a good example of two different objects traveling in a vacuum.
Here what we are seeing needs an explanation of the moon's forward velocity. Here the Astronauts are on the face of the moon. The face of the moon is like the front of a NASCAR car. The moons forward motion is so great that it hits the hammer and feather. Also the distances here are not great so we cannot see the difference in density of the two objects. If these objects were release at 1000km altitude from the moon, we would see a different result.
The equations for this are found in chemistry. It is called Specific Gravity. rather a misnomer, but we work with what we are given. It really is the density of the objects and the density of the medium that are the main forces here.
I know that is rather weak, but those density(specific gravity) solutions work in chemistry, why not in physics? We just need to evaluate the media. Not every media is water.
Sunday, October 5, 2008
Black holes are Planck’s Black Body Radiators
Black holes are Planck’s Black Body Radiators
Planck’s Black Body Spectral Objects are all radiators. This includes the Black Hole.
A black hole is a spectral emitter just like any star, just the temperature is too high to emit photons, except through the asymptote at the poles. Photons ejected from the poles of the black hole are highly excited Gamma Rays.
Black holes rotate at high radial velocities. ~17 minutes. When a black hole reduces it’s radial velocity and it's temperature dips below 1013, it burps a baryonic star. When the black hole ejects the baryonic star, the black hole increases radial velocity and temp. Stars ejected from the black hole will orbit in a manner similar to Mercury’s orbit. Ejected baryonic matter cannot be reabsorbed by the black hole.
Here is the physical evidence of star motion around a black hole.
This link also shows material being ejected by a black hole over a 116 minute period.
A black hole ejects magnetism from every part of the sphere except the poles. This magnetism is so intense that it bends the dark matter to form the space for galaxies. With this notion, we can go from the sub-atomic level all the way to the Black hole with these equations. There are 4 equations; Frequency, Wave Length, Inducted Current, and Voltage. Frequency and Wave Length are listed below.
Video Max Planck's Institute
Planck’s Black Body Spectral Objects are all radiators. This includes the Black Hole.
A black hole is a spectral emitter just like any star, just the temperature is too high to emit photons, except through the asymptote at the poles. Photons ejected from the poles of the black hole are highly excited Gamma Rays.
Black holes rotate at high radial velocities. ~17 minutes. When a black hole reduces it’s radial velocity and it's temperature dips below 1013, it burps a baryonic star. When the black hole ejects the baryonic star, the black hole increases radial velocity and temp. Stars ejected from the black hole will orbit in a manner similar to Mercury’s orbit. Ejected baryonic matter cannot be reabsorbed by the black hole.
Here is the physical evidence of star motion around a black hole.
This link also shows material being ejected by a black hole over a 116 minute period.
A black hole ejects magnetism from every part of the sphere except the poles. This magnetism is so intense that it bends the dark matter to form the space for galaxies. With this notion, we can go from the sub-atomic level all the way to the Black hole with these equations. There are 4 equations; Frequency, Wave Length, Inducted Current, and Voltage. Frequency and Wave Length are listed below.
Video Max Planck's Institute
Saturday, October 4, 2008
The Relativity of Time
The Relativity of Time
This is where I would like to fully explain the time layer of my model.
Definitions:
Meme: a fundamental bit of information.
I have described in this forum and on my blog how memes transfers from one atom to another. The communication of forces(bosons: W+, W-, and photons) occur in waves. The electron is the only sub-atomic particle that can communicate with another atom. It does this by packaging memes into bosons.
Let examine a single gold atom and the forces that will interact upon it.
The simple model: a single photon wave
Our gold atom has 79 electrons. A single photon wave is absorbed by one of the electrons. The memes absorbed (read) by the electron is temperature ,frequency, wavelength and number of spins it has taken since it was created by another electron. This memes is converted (write) to a Z boson and communicated to a gluon. The gluon converts the Z boson to color and that memes is expressed by the different quarks.
The same thing occurs with magnetism. The W+/- bosons are expressed/absorbed by gluons. The information they express are induced current, voltage, charge and number of spins it has taken since it was created by another gluon. From there it is expressed by the quarks.
Now lets complicate things. Our little atom is unfortunate enough to have been hit by a super-nova event horizon. A billion photons and a billion W+/- bosons hit our gold atom at the same time. There are only 79 electrons to read the photons. Our atom needs to absorb all the information. Those 79 electrons need to read a billion photon-waves now. That is 12,658,227.8481 photons per electron at now. That is a lot of memes that needs to be read now. It has to be read now, because there are more memes in the next now.
Our electron reads/writes information at the speed of C. It cannot read/write faster than C. Something must give. This is time. Clocks have different rates at different altitudes. This has been proven. It is not the density of baryons that account for this change in time. It is the density of memes that bends time. The higher the altitude the less information.
This is where I would like to fully explain the time layer of my model.
Definitions:
Meme: a fundamental bit of information.
I have described in this forum and on my blog how memes transfers from one atom to another. The communication of forces(bosons: W+, W-, and photons) occur in waves. The electron is the only sub-atomic particle that can communicate with another atom. It does this by packaging memes into bosons.
Let examine a single gold atom and the forces that will interact upon it.
The simple model: a single photon wave
Our gold atom has 79 electrons. A single photon wave is absorbed by one of the electrons. The memes absorbed (read) by the electron is temperature ,frequency, wavelength and number of spins it has taken since it was created by another electron. This memes is converted (write) to a Z boson and communicated to a gluon. The gluon converts the Z boson to color and that memes is expressed by the different quarks.
The same thing occurs with magnetism. The W+/- bosons are expressed/absorbed by gluons. The information they express are induced current, voltage, charge and number of spins it has taken since it was created by another gluon. From there it is expressed by the quarks.
Now lets complicate things. Our little atom is unfortunate enough to have been hit by a super-nova event horizon. A billion photons and a billion W+/- bosons hit our gold atom at the same time. There are only 79 electrons to read the photons. Our atom needs to absorb all the information. Those 79 electrons need to read a billion photon-waves now. That is 12,658,227.8481 photons per electron at now. That is a lot of memes that needs to be read now. It has to be read now, because there are more memes in the next now.
Our electron reads/writes information at the speed of C. It cannot read/write faster than C. Something must give. This is time. Clocks have different rates at different altitudes. This has been proven. It is not the density of baryons that account for this change in time. It is the density of memes that bends time. The higher the altitude the less information.
Friday, October 3, 2008
Death to Symmetry
The two rods problem is often brought up to explain time or relativity.
Einstein's basic assumption was symmetry. This is not shown in nature. This has nothing to do with belief or frame reference. The basis of Einstein's work is wrong in this, symmetry.
The basis of my model is that these two rods can not be equal in any regards. Here is why.
Even two gold atoms, in the middle of nowhere, with no outside influences can not be equal. Their electrons are not in the same positions, their quarks are at different lengths because of gluon interaction. The quarks express different color based on the interactions of each gold atom on each other.
This stems from Asymmetry.
Asymmetry stems from the interactions between the Strong Nuclear Force, The Weak Nuclear Force, Electromagnetism, Memes information, and the undefined position of electrons, protons, and neutrons. All of these interactions make it not possible for two identical atoms. Let alone two identical rods. Even the density of two gold atoms will be different, because they occupy different volumes based on strong nuclear forces.
addendum: 10/7/08
The Nobel prizes were awarded to 3 Asymmetrists. Yoichiro Nambu was a discover of Quantum Chromodynamics and considered a founder of string theory. Makoto Kobayashi's and Toshihide Maskawa's work is about violation and renormalization of weak nuclear force in gluons.
If you listen softly you can hear the crash of the religion of Einstein, Newton and Hawkins. Gravity is done for. So are those irrelevant equations that they teach as gospel.
http://nobelprize.org
addendum 4/27/09 : A high symmetry state is NOT symmetric.
Einstein's basic assumption was symmetry. This is not shown in nature. This has nothing to do with belief or frame reference. The basis of Einstein's work is wrong in this, symmetry.
The basis of my model is that these two rods can not be equal in any regards. Here is why.
Even two gold atoms, in the middle of nowhere, with no outside influences can not be equal. Their electrons are not in the same positions, their quarks are at different lengths because of gluon interaction. The quarks express different color based on the interactions of each gold atom on each other.
This stems from Asymmetry.
Asymmetry stems from the interactions between the Strong Nuclear Force, The Weak Nuclear Force, Electromagnetism, Memes information, and the undefined position of electrons, protons, and neutrons. All of these interactions make it not possible for two identical atoms. Let alone two identical rods. Even the density of two gold atoms will be different, because they occupy different volumes based on strong nuclear forces.
addendum: 10/7/08
The Nobel prizes were awarded to 3 Asymmetrists. Yoichiro Nambu was a discover of Quantum Chromodynamics and considered a founder of string theory. Makoto Kobayashi's and Toshihide Maskawa's work is about violation and renormalization of weak nuclear force in gluons.
If you listen softly you can hear the crash of the religion of Einstein, Newton and Hawkins. Gravity is done for. So are those irrelevant equations that they teach as gospel.
http://nobelprize.org
addendum 4/27/09 : A high symmetry state is NOT symmetric.
Saturday, September 27, 2008
Newton/Einstein fail under data
http://www.mindfully.org/Heritage/2008/Pioneer-10-Einstein16may08.htm
This is the page describing how NASA failed to protect our data. The Planetary Society came to the rescue.
"We would expect the two spacecraft to follow Newton's law of gravity," Dr. Turyshev said, "but they in fact fail to confirm Newton's law. If Newton is wrong, Einstein is wrong too."
Then we have the orbital issues of the Lunar Prospector.
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/281/5382/1476
Both of these paper are data based descriptions of how Newton's Law of Gravity is wrong. Since Newton is wrong then all model that are based on Newton's Model of Gravity are wrong.
If this does not convince you, then there is no evidence of a Graviton. None has ever been found. In Newton's model it would be the most abundant particle.
In my model gravity is the effect caused by the interaction of magnetism on the background dark matter. This allows for density, thermodynamics, plasmadynamics, E/M and other systems to take effect in the bubble caused by the interaction of magnetism and dark matter.
In the end, we are going to have an ugly equation that is filled with fractals and is a sum of all the systems.
We really need to clear the table and start over.
Aaron Guerami
Addendum 7/6/2009
General Relativity Shown to be Newtonian Gravitational Theory by Roger Anderton
This is the page describing how NASA failed to protect our data. The Planetary Society came to the rescue.
"We would expect the two spacecraft to follow Newton's law of gravity," Dr. Turyshev said, "but they in fact fail to confirm Newton's law. If Newton is wrong, Einstein is wrong too."
Then we have the orbital issues of the Lunar Prospector.
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/281/5382/1476
Both of these paper are data based descriptions of how Newton's Law of Gravity is wrong. Since Newton is wrong then all model that are based on Newton's Model of Gravity are wrong.
If this does not convince you, then there is no evidence of a Graviton. None has ever been found. In Newton's model it would be the most abundant particle.
In my model gravity is the effect caused by the interaction of magnetism on the background dark matter. This allows for density, thermodynamics, plasmadynamics, E/M and other systems to take effect in the bubble caused by the interaction of magnetism and dark matter.
In the end, we are going to have an ugly equation that is filled with fractals and is a sum of all the systems.
We really need to clear the table and start over.
Aaron Guerami
Addendum 7/6/2009
General Relativity Shown to be Newtonian Gravitational Theory by Roger Anderton
Friday, September 26, 2008
Pioneer 10 & 11 Anomaly
Newton, Einstein Lost in Space? Hotz
Let me describe what happen here and how it is explained by this model. These two spacecraft hit the dense dark matter barrier. This is the edge of the baryonic radiation bubble.
Being that the spacecraft are baryonic in nature, they are experiencing resistance from the pressurized dark matter. They have a small magnetic field caused by the baryons that make up the spacecraft. That field creates a bubble in the dark matter. But that dark matter is pressurized by the baryonic radiation emitted from the Sun. This pressurization is what reduced the velocity and changed the trajectory. Their trajectories will continue to change and they will return to the solar system. The dense dark matter is the primary influence in this interaction.
In one of the previous postings I describe a Dark Matter engine that will provide thrust to exit the solar system.
Plasma in interstellar space?
I have several issues with Dark Matter having any electrons, ionized He or not. If dark matter turns out to be only protons (ionized H), then I guess I can be ok with that. But I don't think that is what is occurring here.
I need the photon wavefront to move unimpeded from galaxy to galaxy. With the exception of gravitational lensing. but even here we don't lose photons. They are bent or in the case of the Bullet Nebula they prove Reiter's point. They are split (4 times). But we don't lose them to electrons. If the interstellar media is charged particles other than protons (He-, He3, or He4), any electrons would absorb our photons. This is why we see ionized gas when excited by photons. We don't see the original memes here. We see the interaction of the secondary information, the ion releasing a new photon wave.
I agree with almost everything in the first paper
http://www.electric-cosmos.org/electricplasma.htm
but, Pioneer 11 lost velocity while exiting the solar system.
In my model, I see solar systems like bubbles in the ocean. Bubbles can coalesce, bubbles can separate, but there is a difference between inside the bubble and outside the bubble. These are two disparate systems trying to maintain some equilibrium. Its the pressure outside the bubble pressing on the pressure inside the bubble. Solar system are not bubble shapes they are modified torus.
In the case of the solar system as a bubble, the two systems are (inside) Baryonic in nature and Non-Baryonic in nature (outside). Non-Baryonic particles (photons, free electrons, neutrinos and others) can flow between these two systems. Its the baryons that cannot leave the bubble.
Photo by enoeske on Picasa
We know that the interstellar media cannot be void.
Now for the missing matter, lets look at our friend Oort and his cloud. I think there is more matter here than previously described. Stellar Nucleosysthesis occurs here. Protons collide here and attract electrons. 3 Alphas can easily form a carbon ion. It starts sliding back towards the sun on the bent dark matter. In stellar lightning speed (a couple of million years) our carbon ion is now a small comet. This process reduces the need for Dark Matter to be heavily massive.
This above model only requires E/M and baryonic density, sprinkle some thermodynamic and others and it works. As arrogant as it sounds. I think my model is better than Newton, Einstein, and Hawkins put together (MOND). They require attraction through mass. G has never been found. I think CERN is starting to accept this.
Oh, the reason we don't find He3 on earth, at all, ever, is because of the magnetosphere. The magnetosphere forces the He3 around the earth and deposits it on the moon. Dr Schmitt of Apollo 17 found this ion in ~abundance on the moon. He3 when excited produces tremendous amounts of electricity. With no deuterium.
Thanks to Curt Youngs
I need the photon wavefront to move unimpeded from galaxy to galaxy. With the exception of gravitational lensing. but even here we don't lose photons. They are bent or in the case of the Bullet Nebula they prove Reiter's point. They are split (4 times). But we don't lose them to electrons. If the interstellar media is charged particles other than protons (He-, He3, or He4), any electrons would absorb our photons. This is why we see ionized gas when excited by photons. We don't see the original memes here. We see the interaction of the secondary information, the ion releasing a new photon wave.
I agree with almost everything in the first paper
http://www.electric-cosmos.org/electricplasma.htm
but, Pioneer 11 lost velocity while exiting the solar system.
In my model, I see solar systems like bubbles in the ocean. Bubbles can coalesce, bubbles can separate, but there is a difference between inside the bubble and outside the bubble. These are two disparate systems trying to maintain some equilibrium. Its the pressure outside the bubble pressing on the pressure inside the bubble. Solar system are not bubble shapes they are modified torus.
In the case of the solar system as a bubble, the two systems are (inside) Baryonic in nature and Non-Baryonic in nature (outside). Non-Baryonic particles (photons, free electrons, neutrinos and others) can flow between these two systems. Its the baryons that cannot leave the bubble.
Photo by enoeske on Picasa
We know that the interstellar media cannot be void.
Now for the missing matter, lets look at our friend Oort and his cloud. I think there is more matter here than previously described. Stellar Nucleosysthesis occurs here. Protons collide here and attract electrons. 3 Alphas can easily form a carbon ion. It starts sliding back towards the sun on the bent dark matter. In stellar lightning speed (a couple of million years) our carbon ion is now a small comet. This process reduces the need for Dark Matter to be heavily massive.
This above model only requires E/M and baryonic density, sprinkle some thermodynamic and others and it works. As arrogant as it sounds. I think my model is better than Newton, Einstein, and Hawkins put together (MOND). They require attraction through mass. G has never been found. I think CERN is starting to accept this.
Oh, the reason we don't find He3 on earth, at all, ever, is because of the magnetosphere. The magnetosphere forces the He3 around the earth and deposits it on the moon. Dr Schmitt of Apollo 17 found this ion in ~abundance on the moon. He3 when excited produces tremendous amounts of electricity. With no deuterium.
Thanks to Curt Youngs
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
Density gradient : Vibration
Density gradient vibration
E = emitter
O = atom preloaded photon
-p = photon vibration heading left
p+ = photon vibration heading right
-p+ = one photon vibration heading left one right
B = atom accepting/releasing vibration photon
( = extreme change in atom shape due to 2 photon vibration
| = reflective wall
1) |O O O O E
2) |O O O O -pE
3) |O O O O-p E
4) |O O O-pB -pE
5) |O O-pB O-p E
6) |O-pB O-pB -pE
7) |Bp+O-pB O-p E
8) |O-p(p+O-pB -pE
9) |Bp+O-p(p+O-p E
10)|O-p(p+O-p(p+-pE
I still like calling the process a photon, although it is obvious it is not a particle. I think it will cause less confusion if we change the process not the name.
Eric Reiter is responsible for this change with his experiment. This vibration allows for more information to be passed through the bandwidth in this process.
It should have been obvious to me in this chart by PBS Nova and Fermilab,
A photon has no mass.
It is only a vibration.
E = emitter
O = atom preloaded photon
-p = photon vibration heading left
p+ = photon vibration heading right
-p+ = one photon vibration heading left one right
B = atom accepting/releasing vibration photon
( = extreme change in atom shape due to 2 photon vibration
| = reflective wall
1) |O O O O E
2) |O O O O -pE
3) |O O O O-p E
4) |O O O-pB -pE
5) |O O-pB O-p E
6) |O-pB O-pB -pE
7) |Bp+O-pB O-p E
8) |O-p(p+O-pB -pE
9) |Bp+O-p(p+O-p E
10)|O-p(p+O-p(p+-pE
I still like calling the process a photon, although it is obvious it is not a particle. I think it will cause less confusion if we change the process not the name.
Eric Reiter is responsible for this change with his experiment. This vibration allows for more information to be passed through the bandwidth in this process.
It should have been obvious to me in this chart by PBS Nova and Fermilab,
A photon has no mass.
It is only a vibration.
Friday, September 19, 2008
E ≠ mc^2
I have problems with Einstein's equations. It is saying that the only main variables in Energy are mass and the speed of light. No time, temp, freq, wave length... Not even x,y,z.
Mass is a zero dimension point. Mass does not exist in 4 dimensions. Density exists in 4 dimensions.
And the speed of light. Where did he get this stuff? What about electromagnetism, thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, radiation... He had to be aware of these. How could these systems be dismissed? Why do we have to have pretty equations? The universe is a violent and inhospitable place. Yet, we need simple pretty equations. e=mc^2, f=ma. f=gm1m2/r^2. These are too simple to explain complex interactions.
There is a major difference between symmetry and equilibrium. Simply, equilibrium occurs at the boundaries of two disparate systems, symmetry occurs in the mind.
There are so many variables in how the universe operates. Planck's black body spectral emissions. Maxwell's, Navier & Stokes, Peter Duffett-Smith... These are much better examples of thinking.
Mass is a zero dimension point. Mass does not exist in 4 dimensions. Density exists in 4 dimensions.
And the speed of light. Where did he get this stuff? What about electromagnetism, thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, radiation... He had to be aware of these. How could these systems be dismissed? Why do we have to have pretty equations? The universe is a violent and inhospitable place. Yet, we need simple pretty equations. e=mc^2, f=ma. f=gm1m2/r^2. These are too simple to explain complex interactions.
There is a major difference between symmetry and equilibrium. Simply, equilibrium occurs at the boundaries of two disparate systems, symmetry occurs in the mind.
There are so many variables in how the universe operates. Planck's black body spectral emissions. Maxwell's, Navier & Stokes, Peter Duffett-Smith... These are much better examples of thinking.
Thursday, September 18, 2008
Density gradient
Density gradient simple
E = emitter
O = atom preloaded photon
-p = photon heading left
p+ = photon heading right
-p+ = one photon heading left one right
B = atom accepting/releasing photon
( = extreme change in atom shape due to 2 photon exchange
| = reflective wall
1) |O O O O E
2) |O O O O -pE
3) |O O O O-p E
4) |O O O-pB -pE
5) |O O-pB O-p E
6) |O-pB O-pB -pE
7) |Bp+O-pB O-p E
8) |O-p(p+O-pB -pE
9) |Bp+O-p(p+O-p E
10)|O-p(p+O-p(p+-pE
What I understood from the CERN video is that the moment a photon hits an electron it accepts the photon and fires a photon. Loading Theory is needed for this model. Eric Reiter
This does not show the effect of magnetism. It just shows how information directly affects the shape of the atom. Also this is only a linear example.
E = emitter
O = atom preloaded photon
-p = photon heading left
p+ = photon heading right
-p+ = one photon heading left one right
B = atom accepting/releasing photon
( = extreme change in atom shape due to 2 photon exchange
| = reflective wall
1) |O O O O E
2) |O O O O -pE
3) |O O O O-p E
4) |O O O-pB -pE
5) |O O-pB O-p E
6) |O-pB O-pB -pE
7) |Bp+O-pB O-p E
8) |O-p(p+O-pB -pE
9) |Bp+O-p(p+O-p E
10)|O-p(p+O-p(p+-pE
What I understood from the CERN video is that the moment a photon hits an electron it accepts the photon and fires a photon. Loading Theory is needed for this model. Eric Reiter
This does not show the effect of magnetism. It just shows how information directly affects the shape of the atom. Also this is only a linear example.
Exact center of the Earth and it motion
Lets talks about how I see the exact center of the Earth and it motion.
Most excellent questions from Curt Youngs.
Does your theory explain why the plumb bob normally points to the center of the earth? (some times it is off a little bit, regardless of whose it is.) There seems to be a relation between gravity and inertia. Nobody has explained that very well, except in their own mind, well, maybe some that are not well known. Do you have some ideas about this?
Yes, I have thought on this. I think the plumb bob is pointing to where the center of the Earth was. I just ran out and got my plumb bob. I tied the bob in our moving car.
My wife drove us to McDonald's to get milkshakes(helps the tongue after a seizure). When the car was accelerating ~consistently it would point to where the center of the Earth was plus the car's acceleration as theta. The only severe changes occurred during gear shifts and bumps.
Does your theory explain why the plumb bob normally points to the center of the earth?I think this effect is caused by the spin of the earth.
'some times it is off a little bit, regardless of whose it is.'I think this relationship is the changing velocity of the Earth around the Sun. The longer the string the more accurate the measure. The change in theta is the velocity. The reason for the sometimes is the position in its orbit. Angular Velocity of the Earth is different at each clock point around the sun.
There even will be a slight error because of the Sun's velocity around the galaxy.
The Earth is spinning on its axis. The Earth is in Orbit around the Sun. The Sun is in orbit around the galaxy.
So. Lets change the plumb bob to a pulse laser. The laser is pointing to the center of the earth. There is this amazing vacuum tube that has been inserted to the center of the earth from my house. It won't crush, bend or melt. The tube is 1 meter in diameter. At the top of the tube the pulse laser is placed exactly in the center of the tube. There is a exact detector at the other end. The detector shows us the exact amount the laser is off the center of the earth.
When the laser pulses it travels 6,375 km and hits the detector. It does not hit the center of the detector. This error is caused by the motion of the earth around the sun. Where the earth was. It may take less than a sec to get to the center of the earth but the earth has moved around the sun in that time. The motion of the spin of the earth is removed by the vacuum tube.
This is another major issue I have with the n-body problem. Euler transformation kind of solves this issue but it doesn't. We always have an issue with where things were vs where they are now. Its a clock problem. Gravity, not well thought out.
I wrote this first on GSJ
Added 9/18/08
Ok. Lets forget about the laser. I just think it was a more stable example of the motion of the earth. The plumb bob is affected by gear changes, bumps and atmosphere. Just trying to remove a few variables.
Lets build a 1000m stand holding the plumb bob. The stand is held in a vacuum tube so the atmosphere is not relevant here. The spin of the Earth stabilized the bob to always point down. Let the bob hang there for several years. The bob would only show the error Curt is referring to.
If we were to do this experiment on Eros(an irregular shape strange spin) the bob would take time to stabilize. By adding the bob it would move the barycenter of Eros. The pattern drawn by the bob would be irregular but different than the original pattern when the bob was first added.
Its the spin of the earth that causes the stability.
The error is caused by the earth's position about the sun. The angular velocity of the earth changes for every position. This change is the error.
(Addendum:9/25/08) Curt Youngs - Mascons also affect the plumb bobs on Earth.
Tuesday, September 16, 2008
Magnetism and information
The nature of the Boson is to transport information. This transference of information is done in waves. The W and Z carry; induced current, voltage, and magnetism as information (meme). Whereas; temp, wavelength and freq are the domain of the photon. The electron and gluon convert the Meme into W and Z boson magnetism.
The W and Z transport; induced current, voltage, and magnetism as meme information. One of the bosons(Z?) is responsible for writing to the gluon. The others W+ and W- are responsible for broadcasting magnetism.
--------------------
my attempt at GSJ
I want to say that the photon carries more information that just time counter. A photon is vibrated by the electron so it has no charge and no mass. This way it can pass though interstellar space almost unimpeded (gravitational lensing: explained at the blog). A photon (sum of its wiggles and forward motion) moves at the speed of C. The photon only imparts its energy/memes when it vibrates another electron. This is where it converts information into Freq, temp and wave length. The electron converts this info into current, voltage, and magnetism and passed to the W and Z bosons where it now has mass. From the Z boson the current, voltage and magnetism are converted into color by the gluon and passed to the Quarks. The W bosons broadcast the meme as magnetism.
The process reverses. Quark to Gluon to W & Z bosons to electron to photon.
All forces travel in waves. The vibration may impart mass depending on the type of boson.
Its like a .txt file. the file can be read as a document or transmitted as a wave.
The W and Z transport; induced current, voltage, and magnetism as meme information. One of the bosons(Z?) is responsible for writing to the gluon. The others W+ and W- are responsible for broadcasting magnetism.
--------------------
my attempt at GSJ
I want to say that the photon carries more information that just time counter. A photon is vibrated by the electron so it has no charge and no mass. This way it can pass though interstellar space almost unimpeded (gravitational lensing: explained at the blog). A photon (sum of its wiggles and forward motion) moves at the speed of C. The photon only imparts its energy/memes when it vibrates another electron. This is where it converts information into Freq, temp and wave length. The electron converts this info into current, voltage, and magnetism and passed to the W and Z bosons where it now has mass. From the Z boson the current, voltage and magnetism are converted into color by the gluon and passed to the Quarks. The W bosons broadcast the meme as magnetism.
The process reverses. Quark to Gluon to W & Z bosons to electron to photon.
All forces travel in waves. The vibration may impart mass depending on the type of boson.
Its like a .txt file. the file can be read as a document or transmitted as a wave.
Monday, September 15, 2008
The hidden Higgs Boson
So, the LHC is looking for the Higg's Boson. Good luck. I am convinced that you will never find it on Earth.
In my previous writing I describe Dark Matter as a Massive particle that has an anti-spin and is charge repugnant. This particle find Baryons repugnant. The earth has a massive magnetic field. So we will only find Dark Matter in interstellar space. These particle will be massive.
The other reason I don't want to call this a Boson is that, in my opinion, bosons transport information. Information require a charge to impart energy. Dark matter reacts poorly to charge. It may be more like a mix between a lepton and a quark, but it is definitely not a boson.
The Higg's Boson is not necessary.
a
In my previous writing I describe Dark Matter as a Massive particle that has an anti-spin and is charge repugnant. This particle find Baryons repugnant. The earth has a massive magnetic field. So we will only find Dark Matter in interstellar space. These particle will be massive.
The other reason I don't want to call this a Boson is that, in my opinion, bosons transport information. Information require a charge to impart energy. Dark matter reacts poorly to charge. It may be more like a mix between a lepton and a quark, but it is definitely not a boson.
The Higg's Boson is not necessary.
a
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
Don't ask the epileptic for the time
For disclosure purposes, I am the epileptic. This is my experience of time. I also ask everyone who is unfortunate enough to be around me when I have one, what they experience? This is the usual response.
The purpose of a Neural Network is to process more memes than the basic memes of baryonic information. The brain is an optimized information system.
A seizure occurs when the brain no longer processes information in its usual optimal network. It only processes the baryonic information to the density of organic compounds. The difference between the normal memes information processing when I am functioning and the amount of information being processed when my neural network is not processing, is the information called me. The is no difference in the amount of baryons involved, those baryons are no longer processing optimally( above the normal amount for a baryon).
When I have a seizure. I have asymptotes in time. Time ends at T0 and starts again in the next available moment. That can be 30 seconds later. So for me T0 and T0+30 occur one after another. For me the experience of time accelerates during the event or 30 seconds occurred while I was not processing complex information. At this time my body is only processing information about the baryons that compose my body.
When I have a seizure and there is a unfortunate person to witness the event. They will always report to me that the experience of time for them slowed down. What took 30 seconds according to the clock, to them lasted several minutes. It is as if they are processing more information during that same 30 seconds. Since the Speed of Light may or may not be constant, The information system needs to slow down time to process the larger load in the same time frame.
When I have a seizure and there is a person in another building completely unaware of the event will experience time on their norm.
This is not the only observation that helps me show the relationship between time and information. It just is the most obvious.
Time is independent of baryonic matter. Time is independent of information. Both information and baryonic matter interact within time as a clock.
A clock (trying to remove the metaphysical time and be discrete) is different at different distances from baryons. A clock on the earth, a clock in heliocentric orbit between earth and mars, and a clock in heliocentric orbit between the Earth an Venus. The clock on the earth will be the fastest, followed by the one closest to the sun. The further away from baryons the slower the clock. The clock approaches zero the further away from baryonic matter.
UNFORTUNATELY this is not testable to zero. It is not possible to have a detector and an absence of memes. This should tell the mathematicians that the density of memes(change - baryon, it is really the information) is in the divisor of their equations.
I want to thank Harry H. Ricker III. You can find his amazing papers at
http://www.wbabin.net/index.htm
He has a draft paper on time that I am enjoying now. Just amazing.
The clock in me is different by baryonic structure than the clock in you, or the dog, or the cookoo clock. They are all clocks. They all express/experience time just different based on density of baryons and the density of memes.
The purpose of a Neural Network is to process more memes than the basic memes of baryonic information. The brain is an optimized information system.
A seizure occurs when the brain no longer processes information in its usual optimal network. It only processes the baryonic information to the density of organic compounds. The difference between the normal memes information processing when I am functioning and the amount of information being processed when my neural network is not processing, is the information called me. The is no difference in the amount of baryons involved, those baryons are no longer processing optimally( above the normal amount for a baryon).
When I have a seizure. I have asymptotes in time. Time ends at T0 and starts again in the next available moment. That can be 30 seconds later. So for me T0 and T0+30 occur one after another. For me the experience of time accelerates during the event or 30 seconds occurred while I was not processing complex information. At this time my body is only processing information about the baryons that compose my body.
When I have a seizure and there is a unfortunate person to witness the event. They will always report to me that the experience of time for them slowed down. What took 30 seconds according to the clock, to them lasted several minutes. It is as if they are processing more information during that same 30 seconds. Since the Speed of Light may or may not be constant, The information system needs to slow down time to process the larger load in the same time frame.
When I have a seizure and there is a person in another building completely unaware of the event will experience time on their norm.
This is not the only observation that helps me show the relationship between time and information. It just is the most obvious.
Time is independent of baryonic matter. Time is independent of information. Both information and baryonic matter interact within time as a clock.
A clock (trying to remove the metaphysical time and be discrete) is different at different distances from baryons. A clock on the earth, a clock in heliocentric orbit between earth and mars, and a clock in heliocentric orbit between the Earth an Venus. The clock on the earth will be the fastest, followed by the one closest to the sun. The further away from baryons the slower the clock. The clock approaches zero the further away from baryonic matter.
UNFORTUNATELY this is not testable to zero. It is not possible to have a detector and an absence of memes. This should tell the mathematicians that the density of memes(change - baryon, it is really the information) is in the divisor of their equations.
I want to thank Harry H. Ricker III. You can find his amazing papers at
http://www.wbabin.net/index.htm
He has a draft paper on time that I am enjoying now. Just amazing.
The clock in me is different by baryonic structure than the clock in you, or the dog, or the cookoo clock. They are all clocks. They all express/experience time just different based on density of baryons and the density of memes.
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
Taking a Hammer to Symmetry
Symmetry
“Consistency is the enemy of enterprise, just as symmetry is the enemy of art.”
George Bernard Shaw
Symmetry is akin to religion in science. 'The Universe is perfect, God is perfect, God made a perfect intellect in man, Thus God made a symmetrical universe.'
Where do we find symmetry? Let's look to the atom. "Three quarks for Muster Mark! "(Joyce). When you have 3 of anything you have stability not symmetry. Now there can be 1 of 8 gluons for any 2 of Muster Mark's quarks. Now we have enormous combination of differences in gluon/quark pairing. Add to that gluon length, color changes and the amount of different expressions a baryon can have is chemistry and everything defined by chemistry.
Just a note, on this blog I will be referring to T quark as Truth and the B quark as Beauty. I feel top and bottom are too close in wording with up and down and may cause confusion in descriptions. Their expressions will be referred to as Truthiness and Beautiness.
So I don't find symmetry in atoms. If I were to hire a crew to drop a billion bags of sand. Each bag of sand has exactly the same number of grains of sand in them. 1 billion counted by a computer(ha ha). Each bag is dropped from the same height. Every bag would have a different disbursement. This asymmetry stems from the asymmetrical baryon.
I would love to see an example of symmetry in the universe.
“Consistency is the enemy of enterprise, just as symmetry is the enemy of art.”
George Bernard Shaw
Symmetry is akin to religion in science. 'The Universe is perfect, God is perfect, God made a perfect intellect in man, Thus God made a symmetrical universe.'
Where do we find symmetry? Let's look to the atom. "Three quarks for Muster Mark! "(Joyce). When you have 3 of anything you have stability not symmetry. Now there can be 1 of 8 gluons for any 2 of Muster Mark's quarks. Now we have enormous combination of differences in gluon/quark pairing. Add to that gluon length, color changes and the amount of different expressions a baryon can have is chemistry and everything defined by chemistry.
Just a note, on this blog I will be referring to T quark as Truth and the B quark as Beauty. I feel top and bottom are too close in wording with up and down and may cause confusion in descriptions. Their expressions will be referred to as Truthiness and Beautiness.
So I don't find symmetry in atoms. If I were to hire a crew to drop a billion bags of sand. Each bag of sand has exactly the same number of grains of sand in them. 1 billion counted by a computer(ha ha). Each bag is dropped from the same height. Every bag would have a different disbursement. This asymmetry stems from the asymmetrical baryon.
I would love to see an example of symmetry in the universe.
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
Memes Definition
I strongly disagree with memes.org definition of a meme. I do not think they are looking at the fundamental interactions of information. I think there are great sets of complexities that rise between basic information transformation in the atom and complex neural networks, but they use the same process and particles. A complex neural network is just a group of information efficient atoms.
Attempt at a definition of Memes
A meme is a fundamental vibration of information that describes the Quark it represents.
All of the Boson forces transmit meme information. All of the Quarks express memes information. A Meme is a dataset.
A single meme wavefront exists as 4 dimensions
Photon meme wave hold Temperature, Frequency, and Wave Length. plus the number of spins since creation.
Magnetic meme wave hold Induced current, Voltage, and Charge. plus the number of spins since creation.
A meme does manipulate baryonic matter during it life cycle. A meme attempts to manipulate baryonic matter more efficiently.
The density of the meme wavefront within the space causes distortions in time and spacial space.
Attempt at a definition of Memes
A meme is a fundamental vibration of information that describes the Quark it represents.
All of the Boson forces transmit meme information. All of the Quarks express memes information. A Meme is a dataset.
A single meme wavefront exists as 4 dimensions
Photon meme wave hold Temperature, Frequency, and Wave Length. plus the number of spins since creation.
Magnetic meme wave hold Induced current, Voltage, and Charge. plus the number of spins since creation.
A meme does manipulate baryonic matter during it life cycle. A meme attempts to manipulate baryonic matter more efficiently.
The density of the meme wavefront within the space causes distortions in time and spacial space.
Thursday, August 14, 2008
Gravity is based on density and magnetism
Improved Gravity Field of the Moon from Lunar Prospector
A. S. Konopliv, A. B. Binder, L. L. Hood, A. B. Kucinskas, W. L. Sjogren, J. G. Williams
This is evidence of my argument. Here is a picture of the topography (top) and gravitational field (bottom) as shown from orbital error correction.
Although I would state we are seeing an increase of gravity in this area due to the change in density of baryonic material and it's magnetic field. This magnetic field change pushes against the dark matter in this area causing the changes in orbit.
Tuesday, August 5, 2008
Fun with He: Logic Problem
So I had some fun with Pb. Now that it is in the center of the Earth, the magnetosphere is just a touch stronger.
Lets look at that He balloon. We are going to use the large rubber red balloon and fill it with 5kg of He. Naturally it also has some natural air gasses in the balloon before we filled it. Those sink to the bottom. We let them out and tie off the balloon.
Now I let go of the balloon. As it rises, more radiation from the Sun hits the balloon. This allows He to escape and continue its ascent. When the helium inside the balloon has less mass then the rubber balloon, the balloon will sink. But the He continues to rise to the level of its density.
If we change the material of the balloon to Mylar it would be months or years before the Helium could escape. I know, there is a birthday balloon around here that is older than some of my birds.
This floating Mylar balloon should not occur. It has a mass of 5kg + the mass of the balloon. Yet it rises. It can only rise the average of the densities.
This should not happen with gravity. The balloon has mass. Its mass is less than the earth. So it should drop to the ground at Gm1m2/r^2. This is not what the data shows. The balloon rises. Sorry guys. There is no Graviton.
Lets look at that He balloon. We are going to use the large rubber red balloon and fill it with 5kg of He. Naturally it also has some natural air gasses in the balloon before we filled it. Those sink to the bottom. We let them out and tie off the balloon.
Now I let go of the balloon. As it rises, more radiation from the Sun hits the balloon. This allows He to escape and continue its ascent. When the helium inside the balloon has less mass then the rubber balloon, the balloon will sink. But the He continues to rise to the level of its density.
If we change the material of the balloon to Mylar it would be months or years before the Helium could escape. I know, there is a birthday balloon around here that is older than some of my birds.
This floating Mylar balloon should not occur. It has a mass of 5kg + the mass of the balloon. Yet it rises. It can only rise the average of the densities.
This should not happen with gravity. The balloon has mass. Its mass is less than the earth. So it should drop to the ground at Gm1m2/r^2. This is not what the data shows. The balloon rises. Sorry guys. There is no Graviton.
Saturday, August 2, 2008
Fun with Pb: Logic Problem
Pb (Lead)
Melting point 327.46 °C
Boiling point 1749 °C
Density 11.34 g/cm^3
Density of magma ~3.33 g/cm^3
Temp of Magma 700C - 1600C
If I dropped a 50 kg lead weight into the mouth of an active volcano like Mt. Kilauea. It would rapidly turn into a liquid and sink. It is not sinking, the Pb is equalizing to its density. It will continue to displace other molecules until it is surrounded by molecules of similar density.
Melting point 327.46 °C
Boiling point 1749 °C
Density 11.34 g/cm^3
Density of magma ~3.33 g/cm^3
Temp of Magma 700C - 1600C
If I dropped a 50 kg lead weight into the mouth of an active volcano like Mt. Kilauea. It would rapidly turn into a liquid and sink. It is not sinking, the Pb is equalizing to its density. It will continue to displace other molecules until it is surrounded by molecules of similar density.
Friday, July 25, 2008
Dark Energy: a second try
Each bit of Dark Energy is rigid and consistent along with its neighbor as per Carroll. Every bit of Dark Energy is mass less, has no spin, and no charge. It only has state.
That state is always on. This proves existence. If this bit is off then no existence.
When the Dark Energy state is on, then the bit can store information as vibrations.
The Dark Energy has at least 4 dimensions within it's state. There are 3 spacial dimensions and 1 time dimension.
The other really interesting thing about Dark Energy is that it communicates information to its neighbor. This this the transfer of force information. This happens regardless of time or space.
The Dark Energy can have information on multiple vibrations in its domain or entering and leaving its domain. Though it follows the Pauli exclusion principle, no two identical fermions can occupy the domain.
Dark Energy is analog.
The purpose of the Dark Energy is to store, process, and communicate information onto and about the vibrations within it.
That state is always on. This proves existence. If this bit is off then no existence.
When the Dark Energy state is on, then the bit can store information as vibrations.
The Dark Energy has at least 4 dimensions within it's state. There are 3 spacial dimensions and 1 time dimension.
The other really interesting thing about Dark Energy is that it communicates information to its neighbor. This this the transfer of force information. This happens regardless of time or space.
The Dark Energy can have information on multiple vibrations in its domain or entering and leaving its domain. Though it follows the Pauli exclusion principle, no two identical fermions can occupy the domain.
Dark Energy is analog.
The purpose of the Dark Energy is to store, process, and communicate information onto and about the vibrations within it.
Wednesday, July 23, 2008
Dark Energy : Vacuum Energy
In the posting 'Introduction to new classifications of particles', I incorrectly described the Void as a particle. It does not have mass, just energy.
What I had described as the Void Particle was better described by Carroll as Dark Energy. He describes this as Vacuum Energy. Vacuum energy is Smoothly Distributed through the universe. It has Constant Density, being that it is not diluted by expansion in space/time. He also describes it as invisible to ordinary matter.
I would like to describe Dark/Vacuum Energy as above and to have no mass, no charge, no spin; just state. The Dark Energy reacts to all particles and energies through the state property which HOLDS information on the vibrations in the position at the time and the forces acting upon the vibration.
What I had described as the Void Particle was better described by Carroll as Dark Energy. He describes this as Vacuum Energy. Vacuum energy is Smoothly Distributed through the universe. It has Constant Density, being that it is not diluted by expansion in space/time. He also describes it as invisible to ordinary matter.
I would like to describe Dark/Vacuum Energy as above and to have no mass, no charge, no spin; just state. The Dark Energy reacts to all particles and energies through the state property which HOLDS information on the vibrations in the position at the time and the forces acting upon the vibration.
Dark Matter Impulse Engine : SciFi
So, if I had the opportunity to build this I would.
A space craft that could under thrust pierce the dark matter, could use magnetism to work like an impulse. A magnetic field could trap dark matter in a conic shape. It could be forced through a chamber by changing the magnetic field and exit as thrust. Dark matter has mass so this could work???
Maybe???
A space craft that could under thrust pierce the dark matter, could use magnetism to work like an impulse. A magnetic field could trap dark matter in a conic shape. It could be forced through a chamber by changing the magnetic field and exit as thrust. Dark matter has mass so this could work???
Maybe???
Friday, July 18, 2008
The balloon and the lead ball: logic problem
Two objects of the same mass (1 kg), a lead ball and a helium balloon, released at the same time will not hit the earth at the same time. Gravity is based on density.
The lead weight is falling to its density level. If left alone it would over billions of years fall to the center of the earth.
The balloon is rising to its density level.
Interesting.
The lead weight is falling to its density level. If left alone it would over billions of years fall to the center of the earth.
The balloon is rising to its density level.
Interesting.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
