Quick Abstract

This is a quick Abstract to the Details that form the Standard Vibration Model.

So,

I am going to point some basics we all know and that you have shown in your tests. A single baryon is either a hydrogen atom, a proton, or a neutron. I have not fully modeled beyond this. I have a good design for He, but I don't feel it is not ready for integration into this model. Modeling in my mind and on paper the O and the NaOH and KOH are the next step. I have to solve problems like yours before I can move forward.

1. Everything about baryons is in thirds. 
1. This means every calculation must have one dimensional information.
2. Two dimensional data storage.
3. Three dimensional trigonometric interactions. 
2. Every baryon is effected by received bosons.
1. Photons
1. Photons transmit information about baryons/elements/molecules externally.   
2. Emitted and absorbed by electron
3. W+/- stops all functions of the boson photon until it exits the magnetic field.
4. Transmits vibration informational to the receiving baryon on wavelength, temp, freq, spectra, distance traveled, history of effects upon the photon.
2. W+/-
1. The primary purpose of the W+/- is to trap photons and direct them to the baryon's closest electron.
2. Magnetism.
3. Z Boson
1. Z Boson transmits information from the electron to the baryon or from electron to electron.
2. Electricity.
4. Gluon
1. This is the physical structure of the baryon.
2. In almost all cases a baryon must have 2 of one flavor of gluon and 1 of another in spinning rotation.
3. This rotation forms a cone.
4. Quarks are the unused strings (err:not tori) of the gluon.
5. A Gluon's information is managed by Neutrinos. 
5. Neutrino
1. Neutrinos manage and maintain baryons structure and information of the baryon
2. There are 3 types of neutrinos
3. Electron
1. Connects the Z boson to the baryon.
2. Input/Output functions of the information of the baryon
4. Muon
1. The purpose of the Muon is to connect each gluon's torus.
5. Tau
1. Allows W+/- boson to exit the baryon from the midpoint of the opposite gluon.

So, Those neutrinos are delicate and can deflagulate, rupture or stretch beyond capacity. When that occurs, we see implosion or explosion. Any exotic pressure, temperature, E/M..., can and will cause this. even solar flare will affect the magnetic fields around your test. So check spaceweather.com

I think this basic model shows how the flame out occurs. Some of the tests will explode at 2/3 rate because of of the conic rotation of the baryon crushes them to a volume of 0. 1/3 rate melts/extends/flames the baryons volume; depending on the boson affecting the baryon. At the small distances traveled after the explosion the baryonic chunks of flame and affect other baryons. 

Does your photon radiation detector emit radiation through the test? Or are they just receiving data from the test? 

Currently everything written above is written or derived in the blog. What I am missing is the actual testing of the ideas. Data.

I hope this is a helpful description of how I plan on modeling this issue. I realize I have not answered any of your questions, I am trying to form the problem into this model.

Addendum 12/7/2014
In this model Dark Matter are gluons without information. But because they are empty data structures, they form densities. These densities can rip apart galaxies. This density is the Plank's Constant. The amount of Dark Matter pressing against here right now. That number is very small but now it is accounted for in the model.

Dark Energy is where the math of the universe gets done. Please read the simple paper on Dark Energy.

Aaron Guerami

Lightning in space

Lightning in space.

Strong Magnetic Field Shaped Early Solar System

Thanks to readers for sending me these links.

I have described how Electricity created most of the craters on the moon.

So it only goes to show that the spinning ball of Iron and other liquid metals is an electromagnet we call the Sun. Other posts explain the logic in detail.

Gravity is a failed model. Electromagnetism through a medium describes all energy forces.

Science will come to the logical conclusion that blackholes are expressors of materials. 

Sen. Cruz and Net Neutrality

I seriously think that Sen. Cruz is speaking on a topic that he has no idea. He should get informed or his handlers should shut him up.

This would seriously collapse the system instantly. It would not know who or how to send packets of information efficiently. Eventually the internet would send packets to the lowest cost systems. This would do the opposite that the politicians want. It would destroy their buddies at Comcast and Verizon.

Then multiple protocols would arise. The NSA would not be able to do its job at all.

tcp/ip is not the only way to connect a network. 

Strong magnetic fields in normal galaxies at high redshifts

This is another email I received from a reader.

Strong Magnetic Fields in Normal Galaxies at High Redshift

This is an excellent paper with interesting conclusions.

Electron beam's magnetic field is not the result of electron motion

This paper comes from Jean de Climont.

Dear Sir,

In the current theoretical approach, there are two potential causes of magnetic fields: the translation of electrons of Maxwell's equations and the magnetic moment of electrons used in the explanation of magnetism of materials. This situation is not in conformity with the principle of causal specific uniqueness applicable to elementary phenomena, and with the Ockham's simplicity principle as well.

I am pleased to send you a report presenting an experience that should settle the question.

Electron beams magnetic field is not the result of electron motion but the result of the intrinsic magnetic moment.

 Yours very sincerely,

Cathode Tube.pdf

Thank you for your paper. I apologize for not seeing it sooner. This is an important experiment the author has produced. Thanks for taking the time to send it to me.

Aaron Guerami

The Magnetic Nature of the Solar System

It is important to understand magnetism. Here is a letter I received. 

Aaron

“The Magnetic Nature of the Solar System” 14/9/14

Hi Aaron,

During the September school holidays last year I spent a lot of time on the internet researching Einstein's theory of General Relativity in particular his ideas about space-time.

As I have become more interested I've researched more and more. I came across the following Youtube clip which explains an unusual magnetic phenomena.

When I saw this clip I became aware of a possible mechanism which may explain why the moon orbits the earth.

Using this mechanism I have built up a model for the Earth and the Sun based on my observations regarding the magnets. I have developed the following hypotheses from these observations.

The reason the moon orbits the Earth is not due to a gravitational attraction between the two and no it's not due to a curvature in space-time.

Hypothesis 1: The moon orbits the Earth due to a magnetic attraction.

This magnetic attraction is demonstrated in the Youtube clip.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LyvfDzRLsiU ( 3 mins )

( or Google search: Amazing discovery with magnets Youtube )

I believe the Earth is acting like an inverter magnet. The movement of molten rock/iron/nickel inside the Earth and its solid iron core act like the large central magnet.

Fig 1 A typical representation of the Earth’s magnetic field.

In Fig 1 The centre of the Earth is presented as acting like a bar magnet. No allowance has been given to the magnetic material (magnetite) in the Earth’s crust or ocean floors.

I believe the magnetic field lines of the sun and planets should produce a shape very similar to concentric circles or ellipses.

These magnetic field lines produce the pushing force which we call ‘gravity’.

On Earth ‘gravity’ I believe is created by the Earth’s magnetic field pushing on our atmosphere.

Objects accelerate towards the surface of the earth due to this ‘pushing force’ produced by the Earth’s magnetic field on the atmosphere.

HYPOTHESIS 2: I would also suggest that the strength of the Earth’s magnetic field steadily increases to a maximum level corresponding to the moon’s orbit around the Earth then decreases in strength as the distance from the moon increases.

Near the surface of the Earth the Earth’s magnetic field is relatively weak due to its interaction with the air of Earth’s atmosphere.

I predict the Earth’s magnetic field increases significantly outside the Earth’s atmosphere.

As the Earth rotates on its axis it produces a rotating magnetic field.

HYPOTHESIS 3: The Earth’s magnetic field ( magnetosphere ) and the moon’s magnetosphere couple as explained in the Youtube clip.

From my research I realize the moon does not (anymore) have a global magnetic field but does have a magnetosphere on its far side.

The moon has essentially ‘clipped’ onto the Earth’s magnetic field.

The reason why on Earth we only see one side of the moon is not because it rotates on its axis in synchrony with the Earth’s rotation on its axis.

We only see one side of the moon due to this coupling effect as shown in the Youtube clip.

Similarly this explains why all the other Planets have moons which also show only one face to their respective planet.

Tidal locking or synchronous rotation is an erroneous explanation of this observable phenomena.

Deposits of iron oxide (magnetite) under the Earth's surface (continents) and on the world’s seafloors ( due to seafloor spreading from mid-ocean ridges) are acting like the small satellite magnets in the clip.

Fig 2: Location of large deposits of iron oxide on the continents of Earth.

I read on the NASA website that the Earth's magnetic field has been weakening since 1850.

The strength of Earth's magnetic field varies as well; it has been decreasing slightly ever since around 1850. ( NASA Internet Article )

I have also read that the moon is actually moving away from Earth at a rate of

3.8 cm per year over the past 40 years.

I wonder if that is due to mining of iron ore over the last 164 years which is causing the Earth’s magnetic field to decrease in strength ?

HYPOTHESIS 4: Also suggests that the sun acts like a gigantic inverter magnet as well, which the planets are magnetically attracted to. The sun’s sun spots are acting like the satellite magnets in the clip.

Fig 3 Sunspot in photosphere 

Fig 4 The suns internal magnet- inner magnet satellite magnets in clip. in clip.

Maunder’s Butterfly Diagram

One noteworthy observation is the absence of sunspots above 40 degrees in either hemisphere. However, the most important piece of information is that at a beginning of a cycle the sunspots are mostly in the 20 to 40 degree ranges in both hemispheres. As the cycle comes to an end the sunspots mainly occur close to the sun's equator. This means that over time there is a plasma flow going on beneath the sun's surface from the outer portions of both hemispheres towards the equator. This is a very important point in understanding the flow and magnetic activity of the Convective Zone. All solar events are strongly influenced by the solar magnetic cycle, since the magnetic cycle serves as the "energy engine" for all solar activities. The sun's dynamic magnetic field defines the Photosphere's features, the Chromosphere, the Corona, Solar Prominences and CMEs, the Solar Wind and eventually the shape of the Heliosphere. It is noteworthy that the sun's magnetic field and cycle effects our whole solar system.

( Reference: http://www.solarsystemcentral.com/sunspot_cycles_page.html )

Inclination of the Planets to the Sun’s equator

	Name	Inclination to Sun's equator
Terrestrials	Mercury	3.38°
	Venus	3.86°
	Earth	7.155°
	Mars	5.65°
Gas giants	Jupiter	6.09°
	Saturn	5.51°
	Uranus	6.48°
	Neptune	6.43°

There seems to be a relationship between the location of sunspots and the inclination of the planets to the sun’s equator.

Planet Densities

The planets are ordered by density. It helps show that mass is not the interaction that is involved in planetary motion.

Mercury 5.427 g/cm³

Venus 5.204 g/cm³

Earth 5.515 g/cm³

Mars 3.934 g/cm³

Jupiter 1.326 g/cm³

Saturn 0.687 g/cm³

Uranus 1.27 g/cm³

Neptune 1.638 g/cm³

Pluto (dwarf) 2.03 +0.006 g/cm³

The densities of the planets show order. There are 3 main categories of the order.

Solids Gas Ice

( Reference Aaron Guerami: Aaron’s Reality blog)

I believe that the planets, all the moons of the solar system and the materials of the rings of Saturn all orbit their associated planet/sun due to two factors

1. inverter magnet effect 2. rotating magnetic fields

These masses are all following the rotating magnetic field lines produced.

Venus has no moons as it does not generate a large magnetic field of its own, thus has been unable to capture any matter.

Venus still follows a magnetic field line produced by the sun.

HYPOTHESIS 5: I believe our solar system operates on a magnetic basis or alternatively an electro-magnetic basis.

The sun’s rotation on its axis generates a rotating magnetic field (Parker Spiral) that results in planetary motion around the sun.

My hypotheses do not require the existence of a ‘cosmological constant’ as suggested by Einstein to counteract the effects of gravity.

HYPOTHESIS 6: The Precession of Perihelion of Mercury

is caused by random variations in sunspot activity over the century.

After doing some research I have discovered that Einstein knew that the orbit of Mercury varied by 43 arc seconds per century so he fudged his equation to take this into account with his value of pi. I think they call this ‘cheating’ at school.

Fig 5 Mercury’s Precession of Perihelion

In essence my hypotheses do not require the force of gravity.

Gravity I believe is a fictitious force which has for centuries dominated our collective psyches to allay humanities unconscious fears of the unexplainable effects of magnetism and its associated occult links.

The phenomena known as Gravitational lensing should be actually termed Magnetic lensing.

Gravitational red-shift should be termed Magnetic red-shift.

Einstein’s space-time fabric may actually be the magnetic field produced by the sun that permeates like an ‘ether’ throughout our solar system.

I predict that the planets bend the magnetic field emanating from the sun and consequently couple their magnetic fields with the sun’s magnetic field.

I predict that the internal structure (composition) of the planets and stars

(suns) are responsible for the magnetic or alternatively electro-magnetic force of attraction between these heavenly bodies.

My ideas I believe would be consistent with the Quantum Mechanical Model.

I would also suggest that in our universe there exists only 3 dimensions.

Einstein would not have known that our moon has a magnetic nature as he died in 1955. When moon rocks were bought back by the Apollo 11 mission in 1969 and analyzed, it is my understanding that scientists were shocked to find out they all were magnetic.

Thanks for reading,

F.D.

Increasing the power of the Earth's Magnetic Field

I agree that the rotating magnetic metal core of the Earth is slowing.

We need to have access to the rotational abilities of the core. We need to influence and moderate the field generated. We can monitor solar flares and use Tesla coils to increase or decrease the rotational speed of the core.

There needs to be a discussion of this in universities worldwide