Hannes Alfve'n and the Electromagnetic Universe

Electromagnetic Universe

Credit: soupdragon42

Twinkle, Twinkle Electric Star

Credit https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/

Disproof of Graviity :New LHC results suggest there's a flaw in the standard model of physics

This is a great article.
By Fiona MacDonald.

http://www.sciencealert.com/the-latest-lhc-findings-hint-at-strange-physics-beyond-the-standard-model

"Right now, the standard model is the best explanation we have for how the Universe works and how it's held together. But there are big gaps - most noticeably, the fact that the model doesn't actually account for gravity"

It goes on to explain other errors that physics cannot account for. This model does account for these issues. Why things are organized in threes. Density instead of gravity. How to manage motion without gravity.

It is nice to see type LHC working on these problems.

Disproof of Mass

Objects require certain rules that must be obeyed.

First the object must exist.
Second mass is defined as the result of force / acceleration.
Third mass is defined as a 1 dimensional point in space. It is a scalar.
With that there is observational proof that mass does not exist. The Gravitons does not exist. It has never been found. It would have been one of the first forces discovered.

Credit: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauge_boson
This 4 minute video shows that an object with weight that exists has no acceleration when forces are applied.

This video shows extreme force being placed upon the iron rod yet there are many points in the video where the acceleration is zero. Since dividing by zero is undefined, all the points in time where the force on the object creates no movement in the object.

This means mass can be undefined. Mass that is undefined does not exist.

Objects move according to density. Here we see a badmittion shuttlecock in motion in a vacuum. Notice it changes direction over time.

It is not possible to have a result that is undefined, or does not exist in the vibrations found at the supercolliders. Thus all equations using mass fail.

Why Mass is Useless

Mass as defined is a one dimensional point measuring weight.

That tells the user nothing useful. Is it 3 oz of Iron or 3 oz of lithium. You give up everything useful about a substance for it weight. That is like basing your health on weight. Dr. note patient is 184 lbs. That is all the doctor wants to know. Yep it is a healthy 184 lbs human. Useless.

Now those genisus have used a mirror trick to say it still is mass but it is only measured in eV. That is electron voltage people. That is saying it weighs 30 volts. Bananas. These people get trillions of dollars measured in volts to prove its voltage. Read any paper in the last 5 years and every mass reference is in eV.

So what is it weight or voltage. It can't be both of them cause mass is 1 dimensional. But then there are the real nutjobs who point to an object point and say it massless. That means no point. What is the point of that.

When you can corner one of these physicists and ask them these simple questions their response is "We do this to keep it simple", or "Ask Newton". He is dead. Ne is not the point. If you are a physicist and you want to KISS "Keep It Simple Stupid" then go into plumbing or ditch digging. They make more money than you and they make sense when they talk.

When you dismiss all the variables of an object for just one you loose the point of physics. Electricity uses 3 variables. Magnetism inverts those three variables. Photons use the variables to transmit heat. Phonon use 3 variables to oscillate density. Magnons use 3 variables to oscillate longitudinal magnetic waves. And gluons use all the variables to determine density.

That is why mass should never be used in physics. It needs to be dismissed like the flat earth, or the earthcentric universe. It is pointless to discuss an element by its weight. That is nonsensical.

Magnetic Levitation

These a fun toys. Beware those large magnets can crush small fingers. So be careful.
But have fun.

A Person Describing my Paper 'A Disproof of Gravity'

I want to thank the person in this video for taking the time to read the paper and finding the meaning I was trying to describe.

Thanks Aaron

This guy is fun

Detecting Gravity

The detection of gravity should have been one of the simplest things scientists to detect. It should have been detected by the large particle accelerators. It should have needed to be accounted for in other findings.

Scientist have yet to find any evidence of gravity! Let me restate that. THERE IS NO GRAVITY!

Gravity should have messed up any experiment using a laser trying to define atomic measurements standards. These laser detection systems that measure changes in atoms should have had errors created by the distance function of the earth and sun gravitation. Every day there should be a modifier to account for the gravity of the sun in relation to the position of the earth. When you get down to this level of accuracy, minor changes mess things up. And Gravity should have messed up these experiments.

So, more anecdotal evidence showing the failure to detect gravity.