Thursday, June 3, 2010
Study of Mathematics: Analog vs. Digital
I agree with what Prof. Benjamin is saying. It is not necessary for people to understand limits and functions, but it is necessary for people to understand probability and statistics.
It is necessary for scientist to understand that we live in an analog world. Our tools are functional. Thus they are digital and cannot describe nature.
The reason our Neural Networks work the way the they do is because our brain/culture are analog computers. The data they work with is analog. We use algorithms like Monte Carlo systems to convert analog information into digital data.
We know very little about analog systems. We know very little about converting analog information into digital systems. Yes, we can collect analog information on a digital CCD chip to create a picture. But we cannot reverse the process.
This is because of calculus. Sorry Newton. What is the probability an electron will change charge if the surrounding baryons forms a Copper atom? What is the probability an electron will change charge if the surrounding baryons forms a Carbon atom? These are analog questions.
To even setup an analog question, one needs 16 bits of information per baryon emission, minimum. To change a baryon, each affecting boson produces 4 bits of information. This is the many to one relationship. Thus the universe is analog not functional.
Friday, May 28, 2010
Universal instant
An instant is not viable in the universe.
The area of the universe we occupy is asymmetrical.
I want to look at this picture again.
Caption: This is a false color image of the central region of a galaxy group in X-rays. The jet of matter blown out of the central black hole can be clearly identified by its radio luminosity (overlaid, purple-blue).
Credit: Image: S. Giodini/A. Finoguenov/MPE
---
96% of the material of the visible universe is theoretical Dark Matter. We can actually see it through interactions with magnetism. A couple postings down there is a great picture of a spiral galaxy radiating large amounts of magnetism and electricity. But where there should be magnetism there is only dark. In this area Dark Matter is far more pressurized then the baryonic matter.
There is something big in the Dark Matter sense in that picture. We see the equilibrium of the W+/- Bosons against the Anti-Gluons. It is closer to the actual galaxy
Just because we can take pictures and save them does not mean the universe has a global clock.
For a photon, time is the number of rotations taken during the trip from emitter to receiver. Magnetic fields affect the rotation of photons. Thus all time is local (to the receiving baryon).
For a baryon the axial rotation is time. Three gluons form a triangle. That triangle spins on the opposite quark.
Time for a Baryon is not relevant to a photon. But for the receiving Baryon the time the photon existed is relevant to the temperature calculation.
------
Another thing about that picture. It is twice a ground based atomic explosion. Two mushroom clouds.
The area of the universe we occupy is asymmetrical.
I want to look at this picture again.
Caption: This is a false color image of the central region of a galaxy group in X-rays. The jet of matter blown out of the central black hole can be clearly identified by its radio luminosity (overlaid, purple-blue).
Credit: Image: S. Giodini/A. Finoguenov/MPE
---
96% of the material of the visible universe is theoretical Dark Matter. We can actually see it through interactions with magnetism. A couple postings down there is a great picture of a spiral galaxy radiating large amounts of magnetism and electricity. But where there should be magnetism there is only dark. In this area Dark Matter is far more pressurized then the baryonic matter.
There is something big in the Dark Matter sense in that picture. We see the equilibrium of the W+/- Bosons against the Anti-Gluons. It is closer to the actual galaxy
Just because we can take pictures and save them does not mean the universe has a global clock.
For a photon, time is the number of rotations taken during the trip from emitter to receiver. Magnetic fields affect the rotation of photons. Thus all time is local (to the receiving baryon).
For a baryon the axial rotation is time. Three gluons form a triangle. That triangle spins on the opposite quark.
Time for a Baryon is not relevant to a photon. But for the receiving Baryon the time the photon existed is relevant to the temperature calculation.
------
Another thing about that picture. It is twice a ground based atomic explosion. Two mushroom clouds.
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
Crackpots who were correct
http://blog.vixra.org/category/crackpots-who-were-right/
This is a great blog. viXra log. http://blog.vixra.org/
This is a great blog. viXra log. http://blog.vixra.org/
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
Super-massive Black Holes in the Standard Vibration Model
The current model states there is a super-massive black hole in the center of the galaxy. This black hole sucks in surrounding objects along the 2d plane and ejects ultra high energy gamma rays out the poles. There is a possibility of being sucked through and ending up in a neighboring universe. This is what is being taught.
What we are seeing is not what is being taught.
1) The black holes in the center of all galaxies are Planck's black body radiator. They are ultra-dense stars.
2) The black hole is an ultra-dense fusion reactor. That means it is crushing together elements that we think are dense(Uranium, Plutonium,...) and producing more dense elements.
3) Black holes emit enormous amounts of magnetism, W+/- Bosons. We see this magnetic field extend way beyond the limit of visible stars within in the galaxy.
4) Black holes emit Z boson discharges. electric discharges.
5) Each star has the same variables that a black hole has. The star is just less intense.
What we are seeing is not what is being taught.
1) The black holes in the center of all galaxies are Planck's black body radiator. They are ultra-dense stars.
2) The black hole is an ultra-dense fusion reactor. That means it is crushing together elements that we think are dense(Uranium, Plutonium,...) and producing more dense elements.
3) Black holes emit enormous amounts of magnetism, W+/- Bosons. We see this magnetic field extend way beyond the limit of visible stars within in the galaxy.
4) Black holes emit Z boson discharges. electric discharges.
5) Each star has the same variables that a black hole has. The star is just less intense.
Microwaving a Tornado
http://www.eastlundscience.com/TORNADOES.html
Dr. Eastlund proposes a simple system to dissipate the equilibrium required for tornado stability.
Essentially he is proposing heating areas of the tornado with microwave dish on emergency vehicles. This proposal will increase the temperature of an area of the tornado by pointing many microwave emitters at one area of the cyclone. This rapid change in temperature will cause the cyclone's equilibrium to collapse.
This idea should be seriously be considered by States. These can be built by local emergency vehicle manufacturers.
---------
http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2005/arch05/050302electric-earth.htm
Thanks to Curt
Dr. Eastlund proposes a simple system to dissipate the equilibrium required for tornado stability.
Essentially he is proposing heating areas of the tornado with microwave dish on emergency vehicles. This proposal will increase the temperature of an area of the tornado by pointing many microwave emitters at one area of the cyclone. This rapid change in temperature will cause the cyclone's equilibrium to collapse.
This idea should be seriously be considered by States. These can be built by local emergency vehicle manufacturers.
---------
http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2005/arch05/050302electric-earth.htm
Thanks to Curt
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
Black holes eject material
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-05/m-bh-051110.php
Caption: This is a false color image of the central region of a galaxy group in X-rays. The jet of matter blown out of the central black hole can be clearly identified by its radio luminosity (overlaid, purple-blue).
Credit: Image: S. Giodini/A. Finoguenov/MPE
---
That is the center of that galaxy. That not so tiny visible galaxy is the center of that object.
The purple represents the Z Boson jets. I can also see a purple area Away from the jets. This is lightning, or a Z Boson discharge.
The red area represents the W +/- Boson. Magnetism. The W+/- Boson is perpendicular in shape to the Z Boson. One is the inverse of the other.
The radiation from the core of the galaxy extends way beyond the visual spectrum. 10^100 times or more. This is the set of shapes described. We can see the interactions changing the perfect model.
We also see asymmetric negative pressure dark matter is affecting the galaxy through magnetism. The right side of the magnetic field of this galaxy is being pressurized.
--------
I would like to know. What galaxy is this? Are their other pictures of this galaxy. Are there other galaxies that are imaged in this manner? Is the bar of that barred spiral galaxy in line or perpendicular to the Z Boson jets?
Caption: This is a false color image of the central region of a galaxy group in X-rays. The jet of matter blown out of the central black hole can be clearly identified by its radio luminosity (overlaid, purple-blue).
Credit: Image: S. Giodini/A. Finoguenov/MPE
---
That is the center of that galaxy. That not so tiny visible galaxy is the center of that object.
The purple represents the Z Boson jets. I can also see a purple area Away from the jets. This is lightning, or a Z Boson discharge.
The red area represents the W +/- Boson. Magnetism. The W+/- Boson is perpendicular in shape to the Z Boson. One is the inverse of the other.
The radiation from the core of the galaxy extends way beyond the visual spectrum. 10^100 times or more. This is the set of shapes described. We can see the interactions changing the perfect model.
We also see asymmetric negative pressure dark matter is affecting the galaxy through magnetism. The right side of the magnetic field of this galaxy is being pressurized.
--------
I would like to know. What galaxy is this? Are their other pictures of this galaxy. Are there other galaxies that are imaged in this manner? Is the bar of that barred spiral galaxy in line or perpendicular to the Z Boson jets?
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
The Vortex
The shape that I previously described as the tube should be described as the Vortex. The Z Boson travels in a vortex pattern. This is why we see lightning in vortices.
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
The sun is not as described.
The Surface of the Sun
Huge questions.
The current model of the sun is that it is hydrogen and metallic helium. This is wrong.
We are seeing very dense materials in the sun. The sun has a liquid surface of iron. That is the surface. That means the solid/plasma core is even more dense. Could it be a heavy radioactive material like Uranium is the core of the sun?
This would not surprise me. This model has pointed me in this direction.
This brings forth many questions.
Huge questions.
The current model of the sun is that it is hydrogen and metallic helium. This is wrong.
We are seeing very dense materials in the sun. The sun has a liquid surface of iron. That is the surface. That means the solid/plasma core is even more dense. Could it be a heavy radioactive material like Uranium is the core of the sun?
This would not surprise me. This model has pointed me in this direction.
This brings forth many questions.
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Basic Principles of Bosonic Relationships within Dark Energy
1) Any two or more Dark Energy Rulesets that have the exact same bosonic relationships will produce the exact same result. (Consistancy)
2) For every spectra there is a specifically different relationship of the bosons; Gluon, Photon, Z boson, and W +/- boson. Or (the same statement), For every spectra there is a specifically different relationship of pressure, temperature, electricity, and magnetism. (Functional Variation)
This is obvious from the periodic table of the elements.
2) For every spectra there is a specifically different relationship of the bosons; Gluon, Photon, Z boson, and W +/- boson. Or (the same statement), For every spectra there is a specifically different relationship of pressure, temperature, electricity, and magnetism. (Functional Variation)
This is obvious from the periodic table of the elements.
Friday, April 23, 2010
The Variability of Constants in a Bosonic Relationship
Variability of Constants, what exactly does that mean?
We all know there is a relationship required for an interaction of bosons to occur. The Zeeman effect shows one of these relationship. As the intensity of magnetism increases the rotation of the photon decreases.
The one that shows its ugly head out is the distance, direction and shape of peak intensity of a magnetic field. That would mean that the shape of a density with a high intensity magnetic field can change rapidly. When the high intensity magnetic field enters an area of low intensity magnetic fields. Spectacular changes in the Sun show this.
The concept of Dark Energy helps stabilize the mathematics needed for computing these relationships. Dark Energy is the medium. Dark Energy is the place to do the math for relationships of boson.
Capacitance and conductivity is another relationship which is based on temperature and density.
Temperature and current
Shapes required for this system. Each shape is 3 dimensional and moves to create a 4 dimension.
The Cone : The spinning triangle. The spinning Baryon. Three Gluons spinning. This is density
The Torus : The magnetic field. The W+/- Boson
The Vortex: The inverted torus. The Z Boson. This connects the W+/- Boson to the Baryon. This is electricity.
The Twine: The Photon. Three bits of information spinning around each other.
The Lattice: Non spinning antigluons. This is Dark Matter. This provides resistance to Baryonic information.
The Spiral: The Lepton Electron. Its rotation is the asymptote of three bosons; W+/-, Z, and Photon. Its direction and connection provide charge.
Although these are the perfect shapes, They are never found in their perfect shape in nature. This is due to the constant change in information.
----------
chiccoreal comment "Could there be an immediate effect on other bozons throughout the galaxy"
----------
Aaron
We know that photons have a speed. This speed is variable based on the medium the photon travels through.
There is a maximum speed a photon can travel. This speed is based on the intensity of the magnetic field, the electric field, and the baryonic density through which it travels.
It takes approximately 2.5 days for CMEs to travel from the Sun to the Earth. The speed of magnetism is based on the electric field, the temperature and the baryonic density through which it travels.
The speed of photons is far greater than the speed of W+/- Bosons.
We all know there is a relationship required for an interaction of bosons to occur. The Zeeman effect shows one of these relationship. As the intensity of magnetism increases the rotation of the photon decreases.
The one that shows its ugly head out is the distance, direction and shape of peak intensity of a magnetic field. That would mean that the shape of a density with a high intensity magnetic field can change rapidly. When the high intensity magnetic field enters an area of low intensity magnetic fields. Spectacular changes in the Sun show this.
The concept of Dark Energy helps stabilize the mathematics needed for computing these relationships. Dark Energy is the medium. Dark Energy is the place to do the math for relationships of boson.
Capacitance and conductivity is another relationship which is based on temperature and density.
Temperature and current
Shapes required for this system. Each shape is 3 dimensional and moves to create a 4 dimension.
The Cone : The spinning triangle. The spinning Baryon. Three Gluons spinning. This is density
The Torus : The magnetic field. The W+/- Boson
The Vortex: The inverted torus. The Z Boson. This connects the W+/- Boson to the Baryon. This is electricity.
The Twine: The Photon. Three bits of information spinning around each other.
The Lattice: Non spinning antigluons. This is Dark Matter. This provides resistance to Baryonic information.
The Spiral: The Lepton Electron. Its rotation is the asymptote of three bosons; W+/-, Z, and Photon. Its direction and connection provide charge.
Although these are the perfect shapes, They are never found in their perfect shape in nature. This is due to the constant change in information.
----------
chiccoreal comment "Could there be an immediate effect on other bozons throughout the galaxy"
----------
Aaron
We know that photons have a speed. This speed is variable based on the medium the photon travels through.
There is a maximum speed a photon can travel. This speed is based on the intensity of the magnetic field, the electric field, and the baryonic density through which it travels.
It takes approximately 2.5 days for CMEs to travel from the Sun to the Earth. The speed of magnetism is based on the electric field, the temperature and the baryonic density through which it travels.
The speed of photons is far greater than the speed of W+/- Bosons.
Sunday, April 18, 2010
The Sun is made of Iron
http://www.thesurfaceofthesun.com/
This is an amazing site. It finalizes the description I made that the planets are ordered by density by showing the sun is made of very dense materials. It also shows plasma. There is a lot here. I am going to take some time to read this.
http://www.plasma-universe.com/Plasma-Universe.com
2010-04-20 Addendum
Solar Tsunami
Credit: The Surface Of The Sun
Michael Mozina
Amazing work. This certainly clears things up. Wow!!!
This is an amazing site. It finalizes the description I made that the planets are ordered by density by showing the sun is made of very dense materials. It also shows plasma. There is a lot here. I am going to take some time to read this.
http://www.plasma-universe.com/Plasma-Universe.com
2010-04-20 Addendum
Solar Tsunami
Credit: The Surface Of The Sun
Michael Mozina
Amazing work. This certainly clears things up. Wow!!!
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Solar radiation and volcano?
This morning a volcano erupted in Iceland. I also noticed there was a significant solar radiation event. This morning my detector was bright blue almost white for many minutes. Then it turned to black over the next 30 minutes. I am not sure what time the volcano erupted and its duration. I would like to post the magnetosphere information here to see if there is any correlation between solar events and this volcano.
**********
In my opinion Europe North Africa and the Middle East should ground airspace until this plume is better analyzed. This kind of dust will destroy jet engines, not may, but will. You don't want many planes falling from the sky.
**********
In my opinion Europe North Africa and the Middle East should ground airspace until this plume is better analyzed. This kind of dust will destroy jet engines, not may, but will. You don't want many planes falling from the sky.
Friday, April 9, 2010
Sunday, April 4, 2010
Again I caught that on my unshielded CRT
It was upgraded to 7.2.
Credit NASA
Great pictures of the solar flare that caused that earthquake.
http://stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov/browse/2010/04/04/index.shtml
This theory show that earthquakes originate from the sun. NASA can now predict earthquakes. It will take some time to match previous data to earthquakes. This matching of datasets will show magnitude. NASA just cannot predict the location of the event, yet. The tools already exist. Congratulations to NASA for their work and results.
Earthquakes are a result of solar flares. The intense Z Boson flares from the sun and strikes the earth. This causes a discharge in the magnetosphere that strikes the earth in the most vulnerable fault. This theory shows that earthquakes are the result of coronal mass ejections.
A simple solar radiation detector.
Credit NASA
Great pictures of the solar flare that caused that earthquake.
http://stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov/browse/2010/04/04/index.shtml
This theory show that earthquakes originate from the sun. NASA can now predict earthquakes. It will take some time to match previous data to earthquakes. This matching of datasets will show magnitude. NASA just cannot predict the location of the event, yet. The tools already exist. Congratulations to NASA for their work and results.
Earthquakes are a result of solar flares. The intense Z Boson flares from the sun and strikes the earth. This causes a discharge in the magnetosphere that strikes the earth in the most vulnerable fault. This theory shows that earthquakes are the result of coronal mass ejections.
A simple solar radiation detector.
Take a CRT TV attached to a cable line. Remove some of the shielding on the antenna. Leave the TV power on. I had company over and was able to show him the solar radiation intensity as it was happening. It was so intense that I shut down my computer.
-----------
04/06/10 Extreme changes from black to blue from 7:00 am est.
It is my speculation that every earthquake has a corresponding solar event.
-----------
04/06/10 Extreme changes from black to blue from 7:00 am est.
It is my speculation that every earthquake has a corresponding solar event.
Atlas : Jet Events
Congratulations on the work all of you have done to build these detectors.
This is the main paper with data. Although I had some difficulty in downloading it.
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0901/0901.0512.pdf
This paper is huge. 1100+ pages. This paper does not download correctly using any web browser.
http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1254503/files/ATL-PHYS-SLIDE-2010-036.pdf
This paper is far more manageable. It is only 29 pages.
I have questions: On pages 8 and 10 of the smaller doc. MC is that Mass*C or is it Muon Candidate? Do those lines going through the data point show the min/max of the run? How many runs were put together to create those maps?
On page 8, why are there data points outside the line? Is the line what you expect and the data point is what you get?
Are these all simulations and what you EXPECT to see, or are these based on real data? That is what I understood from the conclusions. That these maps are simulations. The conclusion says you expect to see the Higg's at these points. Not that you did. Am I correct in that statement?
Why are the maps in 2d and not the expected 3d? I would expect to see the energy, distance, and time to be the factors of any broken vibrations. The general questions are: How did the energy transform over time? Was there a general direction these broken energies transformed over time? When did the baryon transform into heat, electricity, or magnetism?
This is the main paper with data. Although I had some difficulty in downloading it.
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0901/0901.0512.pdf
This paper is huge. 1100+ pages. This paper does not download correctly using any web browser.
http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1254503/files/ATL-PHYS-SLIDE-2010-036.pdf
This paper is far more manageable. It is only 29 pages.
I have questions: On pages 8 and 10 of the smaller doc. MC is that Mass*C or is it Muon Candidate? Do those lines going through the data point show the min/max of the run? How many runs were put together to create those maps?
On page 8, why are there data points outside the line? Is the line what you expect and the data point is what you get?
Are these all simulations and what you EXPECT to see, or are these based on real data? That is what I understood from the conclusions. That these maps are simulations. The conclusion says you expect to see the Higg's at these points. Not that you did. Am I correct in that statement?
Why are the maps in 2d and not the expected 3d? I would expect to see the energy, distance, and time to be the factors of any broken vibrations. The general questions are: How did the energy transform over time? Was there a general direction these broken energies transformed over time? When did the baryon transform into heat, electricity, or magnetism?
Friday, April 2, 2010
Investigating the driving mechanisms of coronal mass ejections
Investigating the driving mechanisms of coronal mass ejections
Chia-Hsien Lin, Peter T. Gallagher, and Claire L. Raftery
I am going to spend some time reading this. I will comment on it at a later time here.
Chia-Hsien Lin, Peter T. Gallagher, and Claire L. Raftery
I am going to spend some time reading this. I will comment on it at a later time here.
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Important book
An Experimental Approach To Nonlinear Dynamics And Chaos
This is an excellent book that I have used to help describe the interactions of bosons. It is inexpensive on Amazon.com.
I am blown away by the expansion of my understanding on this topic. I should now be able to explain those asymptotes I see in bosonic interaction.
This is an excellent book that I have used to help describe the interactions of bosons. It is inexpensive on Amazon.com.
I am blown away by the expansion of my understanding on this topic. I should now be able to explain those asymptotes I see in bosonic interaction.
Sunday, March 14, 2010
Comets crash into sun
This video comes to me from ahrcanum.
Thanks for the comment. I agree, I hope we spend more money on understanding these solar events instead of making our rivers green. Our priorities need re-examination. Excellent article.
Magnetic Storm Prediction for St. Patrick’s Day, CME Approaching Earth
Thanks.
This is an amazing video of comets crashing into the sun causing a HUGE CME. I noticed that the second comet did not eject material out the edges. I suggest this flare may be directed more towards the earth.
Thanks for the comment. I agree, I hope we spend more money on understanding these solar events instead of making our rivers green. Our priorities need re-examination. Excellent article.
Magnetic Storm Prediction for St. Patrick’s Day, CME Approaching Earth
Thanks.
This is an amazing video of comets crashing into the sun causing a HUGE CME. I noticed that the second comet did not eject material out the edges. I suggest this flare may be directed more towards the earth.
Look at those asymptotes. Thanks to the people who built and operate these spacecraft. That is a pretty amazing piece of work you have done for us.
This can induce a large earthquake or power grid failure from 3/16/2010 to 3/18/2010. This will also cause more solar radiation. The only example I can suggest that is like these CME's is, popcorn in a microwave oven. These are dangerous!!! Those are 5 minute data points so these events last for hours.
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Preparing for a solar storm
From my analog television I see solar radiation is picking up.
From NASA
http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/stereo/
From NASA
http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/stereo/
:Data_list: stb_plastic_1m.txt :Created: 2010 Mar 03 23:45 # Prepared by the U.S. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Space Weather Prediction Center # Please send comments and suggestions to SWPC.Webmaster@noaa.gov # # Units: Proton density p/cc # Units: Bulk speed km/s # Units: Ion temperature degrees K # Status(S): 0 = nominal data, 1 to 8 = bad data record, 9 = no data # Missing data values: Density and Speed = -9999.9, Temp. = -1.00e+05 # Source: STEREO B Satellite - Plasma and Suprathermal Ion Composition Instrument # # Real-time Bulk Paramters of the Solar Wind Plasma, sampled once per minute # # Modified Seconds ------------- Solar Wind ------------ # UT Date Time Julian of the Proton Bulk Ion # YR MO DA HHMM Day Day S Density Speed Temp #------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2010 03 03 2146 55258 78407 8 0.0 865.8 1.04e+05 2010 03 03 2147 55258 78467 0 0.2 355.7 1.23e+06 2010 03 03 2148 55258 78527 0 0.2 559.0 8.17e+04 2010 03 03 2149 55258 78587 0 0.3 603.4 4.85e+05 2010 03 03 2150 55258 78647 8 0.0 934.2 9.49e+05 2010 03 03 2151 55258 78707 0 1.1 412.7 6.82e+05 2010 03 03 2152 55258 78767 0 0.5 599.5 6.56e+05 2010 03 03 2153 55258 78827 0 0.6 523.3 1.18e+06 2010 03 03 2154 55258 78887 0 0.7 474.9 1.09e+06 2010 03 03 2155 55258 78947 0 0.7 576.5 4.33e+05 2010 03 03 2156 55258 79007 0 0.7 388.9 1.68e+06 2010 03 03 2157 55258 79067 0 0.7 561.3 6.12e+05 2010 03 03 2158 55258 79127 0 1.1 314.3 2.96e+05 2010 03 03 2159 55258 79142 9 -9999.9 -9999.9 -1.00e+05 2010 03 03 2200 55258 79202 9 -9999.9 -9999.9 -1.00e+05 2010 03 03 2201 55258 79262 9 -9999.9 -9999.9 -1.00e+05 2010 03 03 2202 55258 79322 9 -9999.9 -9999.9 -1.00e+05 2010 03 03 2203 55258 79382 9 -9999.9 -9999.9 -1.00e+05 2010 03 03 2204 55258 79442 9 -9999.9 -9999.9 -1.00e+05 2010 03 03 2205 55258 79502 9 -9999.9 -9999.9 -1.00e+05
---------------------------------------
03/03/2010 at 2159 the Asymptote starts.This does not mean the solar storm will hit the Earth. We should be aware of the possibility of a major event with in 3+ days.It will discharge on known faults. It is not possible to predict where on the Earth this will discharge. But HAARP could be prepared to move the discharge if possible. The calculation requires knowledge of the discharge fault and attraction/repulsive power necessary to move it a few hundred miles out of populated areas. Moving the discharge may reduce the discharge from one 7-9 magnitude earthquake to many 4 and 5s--------------For those of you who still think HAARP caused these earthquakes. The amount of energy discharged in the Chilean and Haitian earthquakes was larger than many Neutron bombs. Haiti was equivalent to 4+ neutron bombs and the Chile earthquake was equivalent to 8+ neutron bombs.
That would be thousands of teravolts each. There is nothing man made that can generate that power. Currently all they can do is paint the aurora. But that may be very useful.Now let the people at HAARP and other facilities work so they can test a possible defense against these naturally occurring events. They are not working on weapons of mass destruction. They are working on a possible shield.
STEREO BEHIND 7-DAY SOLAR WIND DATA
Location southwest of Sumatra, IndonesiaMarch 05, 2010 16:06:57 GMT Magnitude 6.5 This occurred from the asymptote on the 03/03/2010 There is another asymptote on 03/04/2010 Location southern East Pacific Rise March 07, 2010 07:05:24 GMT Magnitude 6.3 03/05/2010 asymptote 03/06/2010 asymptote Very large asymptote on 03/07/2010 -------------- Addendum 3/14/2010 Magnetic Storm Prediction for St. Patrick’s Day, CME Approaching Earth Excellent video of comets hitting the sun.
Saturday, February 27, 2010
Chile Earthquake
USGS information.
USGS Centroid Moment Tensor Solution
USGS Centroid Moment Tensor Solution
10/02/27 06:34:09.75
BIO-BIO, CHILE
Epicenter: -35.988 -72.782
MW 8.6
USGS CENTROID MOMENT TENSOR
10/02/27 06:35:27.29
Centroid: -35.757 -72.389
Depth 36 No. of sta:189
Moment Tensor; Scale 10**21 Nm
Mrr= 7.40 Mtt=-0.53
Mpp=-6.87 Mrt= 0.06
Mrp=-5.95 Mtp=-0.76
Principal axes:
T Val= 9.57 Plg=69 Azm= 84
N -0.48 3 183
P -9.08 19 274
Best Double Couple:Mo=9.3*10**21
NP1:Strike= 11 Dip=25 Slip= 98
NP2: 182 65 86
----###
--------######---
---------#########---
----------############---
-----------##############----
------------###############----
-----------################----
-- -------#################----
-- P -------####### #######----
-- -------####### T #######----
------------####### #######----
------------################-----
-----------###############-----
-----------###############-----
-----------#############-----
---------###########-----
--------########-----
-------####------
###----
Global CMT Project Moment Tensor Solution
February 27, 2010, OFFSHORE MAULE, CHILE, MW=8.8
Goran Ekstrom
Meredith Nettles
CENTROID-MOMENT-TENSOR SOLUTION
GCMT EVENT: C201002270634A
DATA: II IU CU IC G GE
L.P.BODY WAVES: 90S, 224C, T= 50
MANTLE WAVES: 108S, 296C, T=200
SURFACE WAVES: 75S, 166C, T= 50
TIMESTAMP: Q-20100227072327
CENTROID LOCATION:
ORIGIN TIME: 06:35:15.4 0.1
LAT:35.95S 0.01;LON: 73.15W 0.01
DEP: 24.1 0.4;TRIANG HDUR: 60.5
MOMENT TENSOR: SCALE 10**29 D-CM
RR= 1.040 0.004; TT=-0.030 0.002
PP=-1.010 0.003; RT= 0.227 0.022
RP=-1.510 0.032; TP=-0.120 0.002
PRINCIPAL AXES:
1.(T) VAL= 1.875;PLG=61;AZM= 74
2.(N) -0.064; 7; 176
3.(P) -1.810; 28; 270
BEST DBLE.COUPLE:M0= 1.84*10**29
NP1: STRIKE= 18;DIP=18;SLIP= 112
NP2: STRIKE=174;DIP=73;SLIP= 83
----#######
-------##########--
--------#############--
----------###############--
-----------################--
------------################---
------------#################--
-------------######## ######---
--- -------######## T ######---
--- P -------######## ######---
--- -------#################---
-------------###############---
-------------###############---
-------------#############---
------------###########----
-----------########----
----------#####----
------#----
USGS WPhase Moment Tensor Solution
10/02/27 6:34:17
OFFSHORE MAULE, CHILE
Epicenter: -35.826 -72.668
MW 8.8
USGS/WPHASE CENTROID MOMENT TENSOR
10/02/27 06:34:17.00
Centroid: -35.826 -72.668
Depth 35 No. of sta: 28
Moment Tensor; Scale 10**24 Nm
Mrr= 0.93 Mtt= 0.01
Mpp=-0.94 Mrt=-0.01
Mrp=-1.72 Mtp=-0.15
Principal axes:
T Val= 1.96 Plg=59 Azm= 86
N 0.02 3 182
P -1.97 30 274
Best Double Couple:Mo=2.0*10**22
NP1:Strike= 16 Dip=14 Slip= 104
NP2: 181 75 86
----###
--------########-
----------##########-
-----------############--
-------------##############--
-------------################--
-------------################--
--------------#################--
---- -------####### #######--
---- P -------####### T #######--
---- -------####### #######--
--------------################---
-------------################--
-------------###############---
------------##############---
-----------###########---
---------#########---
-------######----
###----
Historic USGS Moment Tensor Solutions
Magnitude 8.8 OFFSHORE MAULE, CHILE
Saturday, February 27, 2010 at 06:34:14 UTC
---------------------I have some basic questions of USGS. Why is the duration of the earthquake not listed? Why is the duration to different magnitudes not listed? Why is the wavelength and frequency not listed. Why are the raw seismographic waveforms not shown? It is frustrating to not have this data. ------MagnetosphereI will try and find data on this prediction and the coronal mass ejection associated.I have not found data on the magnetosphere yet. I need to go for now. I will place the data here. STEREO BEHIND 7-DAY SOLAR WIND DATA
There is an asymptote on Feb 24 2010.STEREO BEHIND 3-DAY SOLAR WIND DATA
------------------Coronal Mass Ejection video Credit University of Michigan
Thursday, February 25, 2010
The Poincaré Conjecture
The Poincaré Conjecture is incorrect. Here is why. The Poincaré Conjecture states that the sphere is the simplest shape in 3+ dimensions. A sphere requires that every point related to the surface of the sphere is exactly the same distance from the local origin of the sphere. This shape has never been found in nature. The simplest shape in nature is the wavefront or vibration. The simplest complex shape is the bubble or teardrop (bubble in motion through a medium).
There are 4 types of wavefronts found in the Baryonic nature. They are the Bosons; Photon, W+/- Boson, Z Boson and Gluon. Each Boson is a composite of 3 bits of information plus the rotation or spin of the wave. I explain this in the paper Structure of Baryons. We see this shape at both the microscopic and macroscopic levels. This is found as the magnetosphere around planets and in single baryon collisions.
The simplest and only shape in Dark Matter nature is the 3 dimensional lattice of Anti-Gluons. The conjunction of anti-gluons is the anti-quark. Pressurization by baryonic magnetism against dark matter causes curves in the shape of the dark matter lattice. This interaction forms baryonic bubbles in dark matter.
The Z Boson charge.
How does the Z Boson deal with charge?
Just before it is directly connected from the electron to the associated baryon then it is negative.
Just before it is connected from an electron to an electron, then it is positive.
The actual connection is neutral.
This explains lightning and plasma, where there is a charge just before the electrocution.
Just before it is directly connected from the electron to the associated baryon then it is negative.
Just before it is connected from an electron to an electron, then it is positive.
The actual connection is neutral.
This explains lightning and plasma, where there is a charge just before the electrocution.
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
Asymptotes in 3 dimensions
I have an idea why this is so difficult. It has to do with asymptotes. More specifically asymptotes in 3 dimensions. I have hypothesized that the electron is an an asymptote between the three bosons. An asymptote in 3 dimensions has different behaviors than in 2 dimensions. It produces a shape that is like a funnel around zero.
This is how I picture the lepton electron.
There are 9 bits of information associated with this model of the electron. 3 bits for each Boson. This shows that the lepton electron is a result of the interaction of these 9 bits of information. Also this would be a 4 dimensional problem, but I am examining an instant.
My idea about the wave-particle problem is an asymptote to a vibration in 4 dimensions is a manifestation.
Great paper on asymptotes:
The phenomenon of retarded potentials
Nikolay NOSKOV
1940...2008
The engineer of control of the nuclear reactor, Institute of nuclear Physics, National Nuclear Center, Republic of Kazakhstan
----------
This is amazing. Thanks again to Curt Youngs for directing me to this man's work.
I am reading his work and it is difficult at best. He understood something very important. I am going to be evaluating his work for some time. I am starting with "The phenomenon of retarded potentials"
His work affirms what I have been discussing. He understood longitudinal waves.
This is a piece of that paper. Near the end.
"Simulating the process of retarded potential on a moving test body [24] with the help of three variables: the velocity of the body, the force of interaction and the distance between the bodies, I have determined that the retarded potential occurs non-uniformly, in an undulatory fashion. It means, that the motion of bodies under the influence of a force (electrical or gravitational fields, atmospheric or liquid pressure differentials or others) occurs with longitudinal oscillations. The average velocity of a body driving with oscillations is a phase velocity.
The logical goal is finding out the direct or inverse proportionality of length of the oscillations for all three variables that lead to the expression:
Where:
= length of oscillations;H = Factor of proportionality
= phase velocity of a bodyR= Distance between test and central bodies
F(R) = the law of interaction"
And that is just the beginning.
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
The difference between Aether and ether.
Aether is the medium in which things exist. Dark Energy
Ether is a class of organic compounds that contain an ether group — an oxygen atom connected to two alkyl or aryl groups — of general formula R–O–R. Wiki. An example is that stuff you drink.
Ether is a class of organic compounds that contain an ether group — an oxygen atom connected to two alkyl or aryl groups — of general formula R–O–R. Wiki. An example is that stuff you drink.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
