Pioneer 10 & 11 Anomaly

Newton, Einstein Lost in Space? Hotz

Let me describe what happen here and how it is explained by this model. These two spacecraft hit the dense dark matter barrier. This is the edge of the baryonic radiation bubble.

Being that the spacecraft are baryonic in nature, they are experiencing resistance from the pressurized dark matter. They have a small magnetic field caused by the baryons that make up the spacecraft. That field creates a bubble in the dark matter. But that dark matter is pressurized by the baryonic radiation emitted from the Sun. This pressurization is what reduced the velocity and changed the trajectory. Their trajectories will continue to change and they will return to the solar system. The dense dark matter is the primary influence in this interaction.

In one of the previous postings I describe a Dark Matter engine that will provide thrust to exit the solar system.

Plasma in interstellar space?

I have several issues with Dark Matter having any electrons, ionized He or not. If dark matter turns out to be only protons (ionized H), then I guess I can be ok with that. But I don't think that is what is occurring here.

I need the photon wavefront to move unimpeded from galaxy to galaxy. With the exception of gravitational lensing. but even here we don't lose photons. They are bent or in the case of the Bullet Nebula they prove Reiter's point. They are split (4 times). But we don't lose them to electrons. If the interstellar media is charged particles other than protons (He-, He3, or He4), any electrons would absorb our photons. This is why we see ionized gas when excited by photons. We don't see the original memes here. We see the interaction of the secondary information, the ion releasing a new photon wave.

I agree with almost everything in the first paper
http://www.electric-cosmos.org/electricplasma.htm

but, Pioneer 11 lost velocity while exiting the solar system.

In my model, I see solar systems like bubbles in the ocean. Bubbles can coalesce, bubbles can separate, but there is a difference between inside the bubble and outside the bubble. These are two disparate systems trying to maintain some equilibrium. Its the pressure outside the bubble pressing on the pressure inside the bubble. Solar system are not bubble shapes they are modified torus.

In the case of the solar system as a bubble, the two systems are (inside) Baryonic in nature and Non-Baryonic in nature (outside). Non-Baryonic particles (photons, free electrons, neutrinos and others) can flow between these two systems. Its the baryons that cannot leave the bubble.


Photo by enoeske on Picasa

We know that the interstellar media cannot be void.

Now for the missing matter, lets look at our friend Oort and his cloud. I think there is more matter here than previously described. Stellar Nucleosysthesis occurs here. Protons collide here and attract electrons. 3 Alphas can easily form a carbon ion. It starts sliding back towards the sun on the bent dark matter. In stellar lightning speed (a couple of million years) our carbon ion is now a small comet. This process reduces the need for Dark Matter to be heavily massive.

This above model only requires E/M and baryonic density, sprinkle some thermodynamic and others and it works. As arrogant as it sounds. I think my model is better than Newton, Einstein, and Hawkins put together (MOND). They require attraction through mass. G has never been found. I think CERN is starting to accept this.

Oh, the reason we don't find He3 on earth, at all, ever, is because of the magnetosphere. The magnetosphere forces the He3 around the earth and deposits it on the moon. Dr Schmitt of Apollo 17 found this ion in ~abundance on the moon. He3 when excited produces tremendous amounts of electricity. With no deuterium.

Thanks to Curt Youngs

Density gradient : Vibration

Density gradient vibration

E = emitter
O = atom preloaded photon
-p = photon vibration heading left
p+ = photon vibration heading right
-p+ = one photon vibration heading left one right

B = atom accepting/releasing vibration photon
( = extreme change in atom shape due to 2 photon vibration
| = reflective wall

1) |O O O O E
2) |O O O O -pE
3) |O O O O-p E
4) |O O O-pB -pE
5) |O O-pB O-p E
6) |O-pB O-pB -pE
7) |Bp+O-pB O-p E
8) |O-p(p+O-pB -pE
9) |Bp+O-p(p+O-p E
10)|O-p(p+O-p(p+-pE

I still like calling the process a photon, although it is obvious it is not a particle. I think it will cause less confusion if we change the process not the name.

Eric Reiter is responsible for this change with his experiment. This vibration allows for more information to be passed through the bandwidth in this process.

It should have been obvious to me in this chart by PBS Nova and Fermilab,


A photon has no mass.
It is only a vibration.

E ≠ mc^2

I have problems with Einstein's equations. It is saying that the only main variables in Energy are mass and the speed of light. No time, temp, freq, wave length... Not even x,y,z.

Mass is a zero dimension point. Mass does not exist in 4 dimensions. Density exists in 4 dimensions.

And the speed of light. Where did he get this stuff? What about electromagnetism, thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, radiation... He had to be aware of these. How could these systems be dismissed? Why do we have to have pretty equations? The universe is a violent and inhospitable place. Yet, we need simple pretty equations. e=mc^2, f=ma. f=gm1m2/r^2. These are too simple to explain complex interactions.

There is a major difference between symmetry and equilibrium. Simply, equilibrium occurs at the boundaries of two disparate systems, symmetry occurs in the mind.

There are so many variables in how the universe operates. Planck's black body spectral emissions. Maxwell's, Navier & Stokes, Peter Duffett-Smith... These are much better examples of thinking.

Density gradient

Density gradient simple

E = emitter
O = atom preloaded photon
-p = photon heading left
p+ = photon heading right
-p+ = one photon heading left one right

B = atom accepting/releasing photon
( = extreme change in atom shape due to 2 photon exchange
| = reflective wall

1) |O O O O E
2) |O O O O -pE
3) |O O O O-p E
4) |O O O-pB -pE
5) |O O-pB O-p E
6) |O-pB O-pB -pE
7) |Bp+O-pB O-p E
8) |O-p(p+O-pB -pE
9) |Bp+O-p(p+O-p E
10)|O-p(p+O-p(p+-pE

What I understood from the CERN video is that the moment a photon hits an electron it accepts the photon and fires a photon. Loading Theory is needed for this model. Eric Reiter

This does not show the effect of magnetism. It just shows how information directly affects the shape of the atom. Also this is only a linear example.

Exact center of the Earth and it motion

Lets talks about how I see the exact center of the Earth and it motion.

Most excellent questions from Curt Youngs.

Does your theory explain why the plumb bob normally points to the center of the earth? (some times it is off a little bit, regardless of whose it is.) There seems to be a relation between gravity and inertia. Nobody has explained that very well, except in their own mind, well, maybe some that are not well known. Do you have some ideas about this?

Yes, I have thought on this. I think the plumb bob is pointing to where the center of the Earth was. I just ran out and got my plumb bob. I tied the bob in our moving car.

My wife drove us to McDonald's to get milkshakes(helps the tongue after a seizure). When the car was accelerating ~consistently it would point to where the center of the Earth was plus the car's acceleration as theta. The only severe changes occurred during gear shifts and bumps.

Does your theory explain why the plumb bob normally points to the center of the earth?

I think this effect is caused by the spin of the earth.

'some times it is off a little bit, regardless of whose it is.'

I think this relationship is the changing velocity of the Earth around the Sun. The longer the string the more accurate the measure. The change in theta is the velocity. The reason for the sometimes is the position in its orbit. Angular Velocity of the Earth is different at each clock point around the sun.

There even will be a slight error because of the Sun's velocity around the galaxy.

The Earth is spinning on its axis. The Earth is in Orbit around the Sun. The Sun is in orbit around the galaxy.

So. Lets change the plumb bob to a pulse laser. The laser is pointing to the center of the earth. There is this amazing vacuum tube that has been inserted to the center of the earth from my house. It won't crush, bend or melt. The tube is 1 meter in diameter. At the top of the tube the pulse laser is placed exactly in the center of the tube. There is a exact detector at the other end. The detector shows us the exact amount the laser is off the center of the earth.

When the laser pulses it travels 6,375 km and hits the detector. It does not hit the center of the detector. This error is caused by the motion of the earth around the sun. Where the earth was. It may take less than a sec to get to the center of the earth but the earth has moved around the sun in that time. The motion of the spin of the earth is removed by the vacuum tube.

This is another major issue I have with the n-body problem. Euler transformation kind of solves this issue but it doesn't. We always have an issue with where things were vs where they are now. Its a clock problem. Gravity, not well thought out.

I wrote this first on GSJ

Added 9/18/08
Ok. Lets forget about the laser. I just think it was a more stable example of the motion of the earth. The plumb bob is affected by gear changes, bumps and atmosphere. Just trying to remove a few variables.

Lets build a 1000m stand holding the plumb bob. The stand is held in a vacuum tube so the atmosphere is not relevant here. The spin of the Earth stabilized the bob to always point down. Let the bob hang there for several years. The bob would only show the error Curt is referring to.

If we were to do this experiment on Eros(an irregular shape strange spin) the bob would take time to stabilize. By adding the bob it would move the barycenter of Eros. The pattern drawn by the bob would be irregular but different than the original pattern when the bob was first added.

Its the spin of the earth that causes the stability.

The error is caused by the earth's position about the sun. The angular velocity of the earth changes for every position. This change is the error.

(Addendum:9/25/08) Curt Youngs - Mascons also affect the plumb bobs on Earth.

Magnetism and information

The nature of the Boson is to transport information. This transference of information is done in waves. The W and Z carry; induced current, voltage, and magnetism as information (meme). Whereas; temp, wavelength and freq are the domain of the photon. The electron and gluon convert the Meme into W and Z boson magnetism.
The W and Z transport; induced current, voltage, and magnetism as meme information. One of the bosons(Z?) is responsible for writing to the gluon. The others W+ and W- are responsible for broadcasting magnetism.


--------------------
my attempt at GSJ

I want to say that the photon carries more information that just time counter. A photon is vibrated by the electron so it has no charge and no mass. This way it can pass though interstellar space almost unimpeded (gravitational lensing: explained at the blog). A photon (sum of its wiggles and forward motion) moves at the speed of C. The photon only imparts its energy/memes when it vibrates another electron. This is where it converts information into Freq, temp and wave length. The electron converts this info into current, voltage, and magnetism and passed to the W and Z bosons where it now has mass. From the Z boson the current, voltage and magnetism are converted into color by the gluon and passed to the Quarks. The W bosons broadcast the meme as magnetism.

The process reverses. Quark to Gluon to W & Z bosons to electron to photon.

All forces travel in waves. The vibration may impart mass depending on the type of boson.

Its like a .txt file. the file can be read as a document or transmitted as a wave.

The hidden Higgs Boson

So, the LHC is looking for the Higg's Boson. Good luck. I am convinced that you will never find it on Earth.

In my previous writing I describe Dark Matter as a Massive particle that has an anti-spin and is charge repugnant. This particle find Baryons repugnant. The earth has a massive magnetic field. So we will only find Dark Matter in interstellar space. These particle will be massive.

The other reason I don't want to call this a Boson is that, in my opinion, bosons transport information. Information require a charge to impart energy. Dark matter reacts poorly to charge. It may be more like a mix between a lepton and a quark, but it is definitely not a boson.

The Higg's Boson is not necessary.

a

Don't ask the epileptic for the time

For disclosure purposes, I am the epileptic. This is my experience of time. I also ask everyone who is unfortunate enough to be around me when I have one, what they experience? This is the usual response.

The purpose of a Neural Network is to process more memes than the basic memes of baryonic information. The brain is an optimized information system.

A seizure occurs when the brain no longer processes information in its usual optimal network. It only processes the baryonic information to the density of organic compounds. The difference between the normal memes information processing when I am functioning and the amount of information being processed when my neural network is not processing, is the information called me. The is no difference in the amount of baryons involved, those baryons are no longer processing optimally( above the normal amount for a baryon).

When I have a seizure. I have asymptotes in time. Time ends at T0 and starts again in the next available moment. That can be 30 seconds later. So for me T0 and T0+30 occur one after another. For me the experience of time accelerates during the event or 30 seconds occurred while I was not processing complex information. At this time my body is only processing information about the baryons that compose my body.

When I have a seizure and there is a unfortunate person to witness the event. They will always report to me that the experience of time for them slowed down. What took 30 seconds according to the clock, to them lasted several minutes. It is as if they are processing more information during that same 30 seconds. Since the Speed of Light may or may not be constant, The information system needs to slow down time to process the larger load in the same time frame.

When I have a seizure and there is a person in another building completely unaware of the event will experience time on their norm.

This is not the only observation that helps me show the relationship between time and information. It just is the most obvious.

Time is independent of baryonic matter. Time is independent of information. Both information and baryonic matter interact within time as a clock.

A clock (trying to remove the metaphysical time and be discrete) is different at different distances from baryons. A clock on the earth, a clock in heliocentric orbit between earth and mars, and a clock in heliocentric orbit between the Earth an Venus. The clock on the earth will be the fastest, followed by the one closest to the sun. The further away from baryons the slower the clock. The clock approaches zero the further away from baryonic matter.

UNFORTUNATELY this is not testable to zero. It is not possible to have a detector and an absence of memes. This should tell the mathematicians that the density of memes(change - baryon, it is really the information) is in the divisor of their equations.

I want to thank Harry H. Ricker III. You can find his amazing papers at
http://www.wbabin.net/index.htm

He has a draft paper on time that I am enjoying now. Just amazing.

The clock in me is different by baryonic structure than the clock in you, or the dog, or the cookoo clock. They are all clocks. They all express/experience time just different based on density of baryons and the density of memes.

Taking a Hammer to Symmetry

Symmetry

“Consistency is the enemy of enterprise, just as symmetry is the enemy of art.”
George Bernard Shaw

Symmetry is akin to religion in science. 'The Universe is perfect, God is perfect, God made a perfect intellect in man, Thus God made a symmetrical universe.'

Where do we find symmetry? Let's look to the atom. "Three quarks for Muster Mark! "(Joyce). When you have 3 of anything you have stability not symmetry. Now there can be 1 of 8 gluons for any 2 of Muster Mark's quarks. Now we have enormous combination of differences in gluon/quark pairing. Add to that gluon length, color changes and the amount of different expressions a baryon can have is chemistry and everything defined by chemistry.

Just a note, on this blog I will be referring to T quark as Truth and the B quark as Beauty. I feel top and bottom are too close in wording with up and down and may cause confusion in descriptions. Their expressions will be referred to as Truthiness and Beautiness.

So I don't find symmetry in atoms. If I were to hire a crew to drop a billion bags of sand. Each bag of sand has exactly the same number of grains of sand in them. 1 billion counted by a computer(ha ha). Each bag is dropped from the same height. Every bag would have a different disbursement. This asymmetry stems from the asymmetrical baryon.

I would love to see an example of symmetry in the universe.

Memes Definition

I strongly disagree with memes.org definition of a meme. I do not think they are looking at the fundamental interactions of information. I think there are great sets of complexities that rise between basic information transformation in the atom and complex neural networks, but they use the same process and particles. A complex neural network is just a group of information efficient atoms.

Attempt at a definition of Memes
A meme is a fundamental vibration of information that describes the Quark it represents.
All of the Boson forces transmit meme information. All of the Quarks express memes information. A Meme is a dataset.
A single meme wavefront exists as 4 dimensions
Photon meme wave hold Temperature, Frequency, and Wave Length. plus the number of spins since creation.
Magnetic meme wave hold Induced current, Voltage, and Charge. plus the number of spins since creation.
A meme does manipulate baryonic matter during it life cycle. A meme attempts to manipulate baryonic matter more efficiently.
The density of the meme wavefront within the space causes distortions in time and spacial space.

Gravity is based on density and magnetism

Improved Gravity Field of the Moon from Lunar Prospector
A. S. Konopliv, A. B. Binder, L. L. Hood, A. B. Kucinskas, W. L. Sjogren, J. G. Williams

This is evidence of my argument. Here is a picture of the topography (top) and gravitational field (bottom) as shown from orbital error correction.

Although I would state we are seeing an increase of gravity in this area due to the change in density of baryonic material and it's magnetic field. This magnetic field change pushes against the dark matter in this area causing the changes in orbit.

Fun with He: Logic Problem

So I had some fun with Pb. Now that it is in the center of the Earth, the magnetosphere is just a touch stronger.

Lets look at that He balloon. We are going to use the large rubber red balloon and fill it with 5kg of He. Naturally it also has some natural air gasses in the balloon before we filled it. Those sink to the bottom. We let them out and tie off the balloon.

Now I let go of the balloon. As it rises, more radiation from the Sun hits the balloon. This allows He to escape and continue its ascent. When the helium inside the balloon has less mass then the rubber balloon, the balloon will sink. But the He continues to rise to the level of its density.

If we change the material of the balloon to Mylar it would be months or years before the Helium could escape. I know, there is a birthday balloon around here that is older than some of my birds.

This floating Mylar balloon should not occur. It has a mass of 5kg + the mass of the balloon. Yet it rises. It can only rise the average of the densities.

This should not happen with gravity. The balloon has mass. Its mass is less than the earth. So it should drop to the ground at Gm1m2/r^2. This is not what the data shows. The balloon rises. Sorry guys. There is no Graviton.

Fun with Pb: Logic Problem

Pb (Lead)
Melting point 327.46 °C
Boiling point 1749 °C
Density 11.34  g/cm^3
Density of magma ~3.33 g/cm^3
Temp of Magma 700C - 1600C

If I dropped a 50 kg lead weight into the mouth of an active volcano like Mt. Kilauea. It would rapidly turn into a liquid and sink. It is not sinking, the Pb is equalizing to its density. It will continue to displace other molecules until it is surrounded by molecules of similar density.

Dark Energy: a second try

Each bit of Dark Energy is rigid and consistent along with its neighbor as per Carroll. Every bit of Dark Energy is mass less, has no spin, and no charge. It only has state.

That state is always on. This proves existence. If this bit is off then no existence.

When the Dark Energy state is on, then the bit can store information as vibrations.

The Dark Energy has at least 4 dimensions within it's state. There are 3 spacial dimensions and 1 time dimension.

The other really interesting thing about Dark Energy is that it communicates information to its neighbor. This this the transfer of force information. This happens regardless of time or space.

The Dark Energy can have information on multiple vibrations in its domain or entering and leaving its domain. Though it follows the Pauli exclusion principle, no two identical fermions can occupy the domain.

Dark Energy is analog.

The purpose of the Dark Energy is to store, process, and communicate information onto and about the vibrations within it.

Dark Energy : Vacuum Energy

In the posting 'Introduction to new classifications of particles', I incorrectly described the Void as a particle. It does not have mass, just energy.

What I had described as the Void Particle was better described by Carroll as Dark Energy. He describes this as Vacuum Energy. Vacuum energy is Smoothly Distributed through the universe. It has Constant Density, being that it is not diluted by expansion in space/time. He also describes it as invisible to ordinary matter.

I would like to describe Dark/Vacuum Energy as above and to have no mass, no charge, no spin; just state. The Dark Energy reacts to all particles and energies through the state property which HOLDS information on the vibrations in the position at the time and the forces acting upon the vibration.

Dark Matter Impulse Engine : SciFi

So, if I had the opportunity to build this I would.

A space craft that could under thrust pierce the dark matter, could use magnetism to work like an impulse. A magnetic field could trap dark matter in a conic shape. It could be forced through a chamber by changing the magnetic field and exit as thrust. Dark matter has mass so this could work???

Maybe???

The balloon and the lead ball: logic problem

Two objects of the same mass (1 kg), a lead ball and a helium balloon, released at the same time will not hit the earth at the same time. Gravity is based on density.

The lead weight is falling to its density level. If left alone it would over billions of years fall to the center of the earth.

The balloon is rising to its density level.

Interesting.

Specific strange Gravity

I have never setup a problem like this before. I want to show the pressure on the water from the gas bubble.

I was thinking of lava tubes in the ocean at shallow depths. When C and S gasses are released from the surface their temperature instantly raises the temp of the H₂O to several thousand degrees. So all particles inside the bubble are gasses; our carbon is >3550°C. Specific gravity within the bubble causes the particles to layer and cool according to density. When the Carbon temp drops below 3550°C it exits the gas bubble and floats in the ocean. Likewise when the Sulfur temp drops below 115.21°C it exits the gas bubble and falls. The sulfur falls because it is more dense than the H₂O or Carbon. Some of our H₂O bubble manages to cool to 105°C at the surface causing bubbles. The H₂O is still a gas when entering the atmosphere and instantly cools to the air temperature. The H₂O condenses to a liquid drop eight feet above sea level and is hit by a wave.

This is an example of temperature assisted density driven specific gravity. But here the particles are not falling to meet the more massive earth. They are rising to their level of density.

The face of the moon

Pic link

Why does the one face of the moon always point to the earth? I think it is because that side of the moon is more dense and is falling faster than the back side.

I am going to think about that!!!

Sun's effect called Gravity

Everything in the solar system falls towards the sun. Baryonic radiation from the sun causes the dark matter to be pushed back. All the baryonic matter that is maintaining a correct angular momentum will maintain its current solar orbit minus the minor friction caused by the dark matter. This is like a marble in a bowl with the system in space.

Even on the earth. The baryonic effect of the earth does cause a deep run into the dark matter. The earth spins. This effect at the bottom of the earth's baryonic bowl effect on the dark matter will cause everything around the earth to fall towards the earth. If I move 3km/h I will still fall towards the earth. If I move 11.186 km/s then I have achieved enough angular momentum to fall away from the earth but now towards the sun.

This includes the moon. The moon is in equilibrium between falling towards the earth and falling towards the sun. The tides show this.

If a marble was shot from the earth, it would need to increase momentum to 42.1 km/sec to pierce the denser dark matter at 1au. If the marble were to try to escape the sun's baryonic effect on dark matter at a distance of ~10au, I would need to increase momentum to >~10 km/sec to pierce the dark matter. This shows that there is a distinct pressure field on the dark matter from the baryonic radiation.

This general shape of the effect of baryonic matter on dark matter as a squashed spheroid/torus shows a physical reason for different angular momentum at different points in the elliptical orbit.

Another Lunar Issue

I have been thinking about how Density(gravity) affects the Earth. We know that the tides are caused by the moon's Density(gravitational) effect on the Earth. The tidal period is 12h 25.2m, 1/2 of a tidal day.

An intuitive knowledge of physics, states that if the moon is closest to the Earth every other 12h 25.2m then we would see a high tide at those intervals. This means that the moon falls towards the sun every other 12h 25.2m also.

I think the sun and the earth are interacting on the moon. This can only occur if the moon is trailing the earth. With the earth moving around the sun, the earth's magnetic field creates a teardrop shape in the dark matter. As the dark matter is returning to equilibrium against the sun's alpha particles, the moon would be trailing in the tail of this teardrop. This 12h 25.2m period is the time it takes to move from one side of the tail to the other.

The moon does not actually orbit the cross-section of the teardrop tail in a elliptical orbit. It never goes above the focus that is on the plane with the sun.(well it goes slightly above the focus). There are 2 focii that account for this behavior. One is on the sun side of the tail furthest from the earth. The other is on the opposite side of the sun but is closest to the earth. This path is the lunar tidal period.

The moon moves kinda like a snowboarder in a 1/2 pipe run. This is inline with Peter Duffett-Smith's description of the lunar orbit of the sun.

"A celestial observer viewing the solar system from a great distance would not, however see the Moon making loops in space about the Earth. Rather, he would describe the situation by saying that the Moon is in orbit around the Sun, as is the Earth, and that the effect of the Earth's influence is to make the Moon's orbit wiggle a little as the relative positions of the Earth and Moon change. This is because the Sun's Gravitation force on the Moon is much greater than that of the Earth, even though the latter is nearer. "

Addendum: 4/29/09 : Predictions. I have been asked to make some predictions in my model. But this is a big one. The Moon follows the Earth as described above.

Symmetric form: Logic problem

Symmetry is not natural in the universe. There are always differences.

For example a star has a great solar flare at T(n). A tremendous amount of energy has been released at one point on the star. Symmetry demands that a solar flare of equal strength and opposite direction is required at T(n). This is not natural.

Symmetry is a construct used to simplify multi-variable systems. Einstein and others only had their intuition to create these great thories, symmerty made these intuitions almost explainable. We barely know now how orbits function and they are not exactly as Newton, Einstein and others suggest. But, if it was not for their work we would still be living in caves. Symmetry is necessary to make the intuitive jump from 'the particles want to be together', to 'there is an observable process in particle dynamics'.

Symmetry has no physical evidence.

These are systems where certain variables do not induce a massive change to the overall system, yet do affect small variances to the system.

We know the earth does not have a symmetrical curvature of space/time. It is squashed and some areas have more pertubations than others. These variations occur when the density directly under the spacecraft changes. Traveling over an ocean has one curvature of space/time, whereas a massive mountain range has more density, thus a different curvature of space/time. These variations need to be incorperated in orbit design, else you lose the satellite.

Asymmetry occurs from the inablity to predict electron position. Nature is asymmertical.

The removal of symmetry allows discussuion on the effect of the shape of the earth at rest and at motion on the curvature of space/time.

Curvature of Space/Time

The curvature of space is a function of the density of baryons, the magnetic field, and radioactive particles emitted from the baryonic object. Really it is just the pressurization of dark matter against the baryonic matter's magnetism.

The magnetic field planets/planetoids:
Many of the planets have a magnetic field. This field is called the magnetosphere. Any of the spinning massive bodies has magnetism if it has a warm metalic core. These magnetic fields repel dark matter at a much greater rate than the baryons alone.


The non-magnetic field planet/planetoids:
The general density of an object's baryons has magnetism. This inherit magnetism causes dark matter to repel. But not nearly as much as the magnetic field. The lunar surface shows differentials in gravity to the topology [Cite:A. S. Konopliv].

The massive gas giants have cores that are magnetic. The magnetic field has been examined by NASA and others. The curvature of the space/time around Jupiter is far greater than the mass of the planet alone.

A day in the life of an Alpha Particle.

Here I am going to describe the importance Alpha Particles play in the interaction between dark matter and baryonic matter. We will theoretically follow a few particles from when they are emitted from the star to their end of life.

Our star has been burning for a few years now since it winked into existence. Nothing has really changed.

An Alpha particle is emitted from 15 degrees off the south pole of the star. It travels with all the other particles in a straight line to just past .1 au and it starts hitting resistance from the other alpha particles that have previously encountered the dark matter. These particles form a river of alpha particles that includes all the particles from 0>n>15deg. This river goes in a straight line until it again hits resistance from dark matter.

Alpha particle triptych
Degree from pole Theta:: Distance traveled before hitting resistance from dark matter
0>θ>15:: >.1 au
θ = 55:: ~.4 au
θ = 75:: ~.75 au
θ = 80:: ~1 au
θ = 85:: ~2 au
θ = 87:: ~3 au
θ = 88:: ~40 au
θ = 88.1:: ~100 au
θ = 89:: ~20000 au
θ = 89.5:: ~50000 au

This data is for explanation purposes only.
Testing is required for validation.
This torus shape surrounds the star. This is not a standard torus. It looks like M104. This galaxy has a bulbous core, but the galaxy extends along the equator. Our star exhibits similar properties. Our star is bulbous in the inner planetary core, which extends to just past 3 au. Its equatorial region extends past the ice clouds 50000+ au.




Particles emitted closer to the poles encounter dark matter resistance earlier and start changing direction to the outline of the torus towards the equator. This causes a river effect of charge particles along the baryonic side of the barrier between the dark matter and the baryonic matter.

An Alpha particle emitted from near the pole of the star (<~1 degree) will almost immediately encounter dark matter. There is an asymptotic behavior to the star’s emission of baryonic radiation. The star exhausts high energy non-baryonic sub-atomic particles from the other side of the asymptote closest to the pole.

Our alpha particles die when they crash into hydrogen or helium gas between 20000 and 50000+ au. The interesting thing here is, there is a possibility of Neucleosynthesis here in the outer region of our solar system. As Alpha particles collide with H or He they become heavier elements. For example three Alpha particles can fuse together to form a nucleus of a Carbon-12 ion(Stellar Nucleosynthesis). Free electrons would be attracted to complete the atom. These heavier particles fall again back towards the sun based on their density and angular momentum.

Other particles; Beta, Gamma, photons, are all examples of non-baryonic matter and pierce through the dark matter.

(7/30/08)addendum:: This pattern of alpha distribution will also account for mercury's orbit. Mercury will never fall into the sun because alphas push dark matter down away from the sun, at the asymptote. Thus the planet cannot fall up into the sun.