Monday, September 22, 2014
It is important to understand magnetism. Here is a letter I received.
“The Magnetic Nature of the Solar System” 14/9/14
During the September school holidays last year I spent a lot of time on the internet researching Einstein's theory of General Relativity in particular his ideas about space-time.
As I have become more interested I've researched more and more. I came across the following Youtube clip which explains an unusual magnetic phenomena.
When I saw this clip I became aware of a possible mechanism which may explain why the moon orbits the earth.
Using this mechanism I have built up a model for the Earth and the Sun based on my observations regarding the magnets. I have developed the following hypotheses from these observations.
The reason the moon orbits the Earth is not due to a gravitational attraction between the two and no it's not due to a curvature in space-time.
Hypothesis 1: The moon orbits the Earth due to a magnetic attraction.
This magnetic attraction is demonstrated in the Youtube clip.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LyvfDzRLsiU ( 3 mins )
( or Google search: Amazing discovery with magnets Youtube )
I believe the Earth is acting like an inverter magnet. The movement of molten rock/iron/nickel inside the Earth and its solid iron core act like the large central magnet.
Fig 1 A typical representation of the Earth’s magnetic field.
In Fig 1 The centre of the Earth is presented as acting like a bar magnet. No allowance has been given to the magnetic material (magnetite) in the Earth’s crust or ocean floors.
I believe the magnetic field lines of the sun and planets should produce a shape very similar to concentric circles or ellipses.
These magnetic field lines produce the pushing force which we call ‘gravity’.
On Earth ‘gravity’ I believe is created by the Earth’s magnetic field pushing on our atmosphere.
Objects accelerate towards the surface of the earth due to this ‘pushing force’ produced by the Earth’s magnetic field on the atmosphere.
HYPOTHESIS 2: I would also suggest that the strength of the Earth’s magnetic field steadily increases to a maximum level corresponding to the moon’s orbit around the Earth then decreases in strength as the distance from the moon increases.
Near the surface of the Earth the Earth’s magnetic field is relatively weak due to its interaction with the air of Earth’s atmosphere.
I predict the Earth’s magnetic field increases significantly outside the Earth’s atmosphere.
As the Earth rotates on its axis it produces a rotating magnetic field.
HYPOTHESIS 3: The Earth’s magnetic field ( magnetosphere ) and the moon’s magnetosphere couple as explained in the Youtube clip.
From my research I realize the moon does not (anymore) have a global magnetic field but does have a magnetosphere on its far side.
The moon has essentially ‘clipped’ onto the Earth’s magnetic field.
The reason why on Earth we only see one side of the moon is not because it rotates on its axis in synchrony with the Earth’s rotation on its axis.
We only see one side of the moon due to this coupling effect as shown in the Youtube clip.
Similarly this explains why all the other Planets have moons which also show only one face to their respective planet.
Tidal locking or synchronous rotation is an erroneous explanation of this observable phenomena.
Deposits of iron oxide (magnetite) under the Earth's surface (continents) and on the world’s seafloors ( due to seafloor spreading from mid-ocean ridges) are acting like the small satellite magnets in the clip.
Fig 2: Location of large deposits of iron oxide on the continents of Earth.
I read on the NASA website that the Earth's magnetic field has been weakening since 1850.
The strength of Earth's magnetic field varies as well; it has been decreasing slightly ever since around 1850. ( NASA Internet Article )
I have also read that the moon is actually moving away from Earth at a rate of
3.8 cm per year over the past 40 years.
I wonder if that is due to mining of iron ore over the last 164 years which is causing the Earth’s magnetic field to decrease in strength ?
HYPOTHESIS 4: Also suggests that the sun acts like a gigantic inverter magnet as well, which the planets are magnetically attracted to. The sun’s sun spots are acting like the satellite magnets in the clip.
Fig 3 Sunspot in photosphere
Fig 4 The suns internal magnet- inner magnet satellite magnets in clip. in clip.
Maunder’s Butterfly Diagram
One noteworthy observation is the absence of sunspots above 40 degrees in either hemisphere. However, the most important piece of information is that at a beginning of a cycle the sunspots are mostly in the 20 to 40 degree ranges in both hemispheres. As the cycle comes to an end the sunspots mainly occur close to the sun's equator. This means that over time there is a plasma flow going on beneath the sun's surface from the outer portions of both hemispheres towards the equator. This is a very important point in understanding the flow and magnetic activity of the Convective Zone. All solar events are strongly influenced by the solar magnetic cycle, since the magnetic cycle serves as the "energy engine" for all solar activities. The sun's dynamic magnetic field defines the Photosphere's features, the Chromosphere, the Corona, Solar Prominences and CMEs, the Solar Wind and eventually the shape of the Heliosphere. It is noteworthy that the sun's magnetic field and cycle effects our whole solar system.
( Reference: http://www.solarsystemcentral.com/sunspot_cycles_page.html )
Inclination of the Planets to the Sun’s equator
There seems to be a relationship between the location of sunspots and the inclination of the planets to the sun’s equator.
The planets are ordered by density. It helps show that mass is not the interaction that is involved in planetary motion.
Mercury 5.427 g/cm3
Venus 5.204 g/cm3
Earth 5.515 g/cm3
Mars 3.934 g/cm3
Jupiter 1.326 g/cm3
Saturn 0.687 g/cm3
Uranus 1.27 g/cm3
Neptune 1.638 g/cm3
Pluto (dwarf) 2.03 +0.006 g/cm3
The densities of the planets show order. There are 3 main categories of the order.
Solids Gas Ice
( Reference Aaron Guerami: Aaron’s Reality blog)
I believe that the planets, all the moons of the solar system and the materials of the rings of Saturn all orbit their associated planet/sun due to two factors
1. inverter magnet effect 2. rotating magnetic fields
These masses are all following the rotating magnetic field lines produced.
Venus has no moons as it does not generate a large magnetic field of its own, thus has been unable to capture any matter.
Venus still follows a magnetic field line produced by the sun.
HYPOTHESIS 5: I believe our solar system operates on a magnetic basis or alternatively an electro-magnetic basis.
The sun’s rotation on its axis generates a rotating magnetic field (Parker Spiral) that results in planetary motion around the sun.
My hypotheses do not require the existence of a ‘cosmological constant’ as suggested by Einstein to counteract the effects of gravity.
HYPOTHESIS 6: The Precession of Perihelion of Mercury
is caused by random variations in sunspot activity over the century.
After doing some research I have discovered that Einstein knew that the orbit of Mercury varied by 43 arc seconds per century so he fudged his equation to take this into account with his value of pi. I think they call this ‘cheating’ at school.
Fig 5 Mercury’s Precession of Perihelion
In essence my hypotheses do not require the force of gravity.
Gravity I believe is a fictitious force which has for centuries dominated our collective psyches to allay humanities unconscious fears of the unexplainable effects of magnetism and its associated occult links.
The phenomena known as Gravitational lensing should be actually termed Magnetic lensing.
Gravitational red-shift should be termed Magnetic red-shift.
Einstein’s space-time fabric may actually be the magnetic field produced by the sun that permeates like an ‘ether’ throughout our solar system.
I predict that the planets bend the magnetic field emanating from the sun and consequently couple their magnetic fields with the sun’s magnetic field.
I predict that the internal structure (composition) of the planets and stars
(suns) are responsible for the magnetic or alternatively electro-magnetic force of attraction between these heavenly bodies.
My ideas I believe would be consistent with the Quantum Mechanical Model.
I would also suggest that in our universe there exists only 3 dimensions.
Einstein would not have known that our moon has a magnetic nature as he died in 1955. When moon rocks were bought back by the Apollo 11 mission in 1969 and analyzed, it is my understanding that scientists were shocked to find out they all were magnetic.