Wednesday, May 5, 2010

The sun is not as described.

The Surface of the Sun

Huge questions.

The current model of the sun is that it is hydrogen and metallic helium. This is wrong.

We are seeing very dense materials in the sun. The sun has a liquid surface of iron. That is the surface. That means the solid/plasma core is even more dense. Could it be a heavy radioactive material like Uranium is the core of the sun?

This would not surprise me. This model has pointed me in this direction.

This brings forth many questions.

2 comments:

chiccoreal said...

Dear Aaron: Not all stars are the same as the sun. As the sun is aging it may be solidifying. Is this possible? At the very centre of the sun; that's the most important part; the actual atomic dance that is happening there. My opinion is that the at the core of the sun there is an energy which is all and nothing. Everything and nothing. Before that? One Cell Soul Universe. Or the great "I am". At this point it is conjecture. Oh course! But what if...and...what about the other stars like the sun (medium star, phase level what?). What solar phase are we going through before the nova? This sloughing off of solar ejection material may be seen somewhere else in the Universe. Should have been. So what phase are we in? I'd really like to know. We have, apparently a variable star. This is not too good. Is it? ty~

Unknown said...

Hi,

All stars are variable. This model requires asymmetry. Each and every star is in a state of change of information.

It is the model of the expressive baryon. The baryon is constantly expressing 'This is who I am.' These are my fields; electric, magnetic, density and temperature as my bosons; Z Boson, W+/- Boson, Gluon and Photon.

I am going to respond in phases.

Belief is not relevant to the system. It is not relevant to the system that the rules are even understood by the data.

Thanks again
Aaron