Friday, September 19, 2008

E ≠ mc^2

I have problems with Einstein's equations. It is saying that the only main variables in Energy are mass and the speed of light. No time, temp, freq, wave length... Not even x,y,z.

Mass is a zero dimension point. Mass does not exist in 4 dimensions. Density exists in 4 dimensions.

And the speed of light. Where did he get this stuff? What about electromagnetism, thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, radiation... He had to be aware of these. How could these systems be dismissed? Why do we have to have pretty equations? The universe is a violent and inhospitable place. Yet, we need simple pretty equations. e=mc^2, f=ma. f=gm1m2/r^2. These are too simple to explain complex interactions.

There is a major difference between symmetry and equilibrium. Simply, equilibrium occurs at the boundaries of two disparate systems, symmetry occurs in the mind.

There are so many variables in how the universe operates. Planck's black body spectral emissions. Maxwell's, Navier & Stokes, Peter Duffett-Smith... These are much better examples of thinking.

2 comments:

Curt said...

Aaron: I'm sure you are aware that the fractal process usually takes a very simple math formula to produce. It fantastic ramifications arise from using the output of the last cycle of the operation of the formula for the input of the next cycle of the formula. It is a feedback system. A little thought will reveal that that is how reality works. Everything that happens anywhere is a result of everything that just happened an instant before. This is where MAX over on the GSJ forum is screwed up. He thinks the past is something that can be revisited in the present. Sure, pictures of it are available, that's what a picture is. No picture of the future can be had, because the future is not worked out yet. The present is the result of what just happened, the next present is the result of what happened right now.

What are the ramifications of density gravity for antigravity?

Unknown said...

Yeah, I am aware of the simplicity of fractals. The difficulty, I think, will be found in trying to use fractal equations inside existing systems, thermodynamics, density,...

As for Antigravity, I think Specific Gravity in chemistry describes motion; with influnces from Thermodynamic, Hydrodynamics plasmadynamics, Magnetism, and any other system that influnces baryons. Specific Gravity explains the helium balloon. I would like to rename it Specific Density though.

a