Thursday, January 28, 2010

Volcanic Lightning

http://www.physorg.com/news183883466.html

There is a nice picture at that link of lightning interacting with an active volcano. It is obvious that this kind of lightning is the increase of dust density in the atmosphere. The increase in temperature around the volcano increases the conductivity of the dust. The capacitance of the dust is high. This combination leads to Z Boson discharges.

In previous postings I have described the information transmitted by a Z Boson as photon data and electron data. At the time, I could not define the electron portion of the data. They are conductivity and capacitance.

Z Boson data is expressed as Electron data:(Conductivity, Capacitance), Photon data:(Temperature, Frequency), Current and (Spin or Charge) of the emitting baryon.

Marcia Neugebauer - Solar Winds

Congratulations and thanks to Marcia Neugebauer. She had a remarkable career. She is ultimately responsible for my understanding of the solar winds. I was often inspired to think about comet tails and their strange direction and the solar winds because of trips to JPL as a kid.    

http://uanews.org/node/29744
http://genesismission.jpl.nasa.gov/gm2/team/people/neugebauer/NeugebauerJOURNALArticle.PDF

Friday, January 22, 2010

The importance of HAARP

There are people who are angry about the research involved in HAARP. They do not know how important this research will be in providing defensive strategies against natural events. I also think members of HAARP need to discuss how these projects will protect humans against gigantic natural electromagnetic events.

The importance is in defending humanity by dissipating electrical energy from space.

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

What electricity looks like in space.

Magnetosphere/Nebula from flight404 on Vimeo.

This is what I think electricity in a small nebula would look like. Kinda. I think it would be more wave like in its expansion and have plasma jets. But it is on the right tract.

There is no credit for this video. People, Sign your work!!!
I found the video on this site.

-----------------------------------

Credit NASA, MSFC
This picture shows lightning strikes and intensities. 

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

More Z Boson Evidence

In standard physics, electricity is not, the favorite child. This picture should change that.



This is Lunar Lightning.
Thanks to Curt Youngs for sending me this. This is from Clementine: Credit NASA. Those are high voltage AC discharges on the poles. I also notice the craters become less numerous towards the equator.

Experimental proof of the Standard Vibration Model

http://wwwppd.nrl.navy.mil/whatsnew/haarp/

This shows that the paper "Variables Involved in Baryonic Motion", is correct.

Sunday, January 17, 2010

Nebula

Nebula allow us to evaluate baryonic motion. 
Credit NASA
These are dynamic systems that change over time. We need to see the Messier or other catalog change over time. We will see the different types of motion.

A 3d view of this would be cool. 3d spectra view over time would rock!

I look at that picture and see clouds in a line.



M1 changes constantly. Credit NASA

Saturday, January 16, 2010

Now, Tesla is your teacher?

Quoting Tesla will not save your precious gravity. Up until now, Tesla's work has been the domain of the nutjob. Now he is your master? You are kidding right? If you had understood Tesla, we would have had this epiphany a long time ago.

And Tesla is only one part of the puzzle. You must understand Archimedes, Planck, Maxwell, and the Standard Model.

Thursday, January 14, 2010

That Earthquake

I don't think I am making myself clear kids, we were just hit by something electric and it caused that earthquake.

I think we were just struck by solar or galactic lightning. In this model of physics that was a massive Z Boson discharge. And it discharged in that spot because of AC grounding.

The more I think about this, We were just struck by galactic lightning. This earthquake was different! It was an unexpectedly wavy, long duration earthquake. This was not a slip/fault. I have heard reports of 'Earthquake weather'. Which is a charged feeling in the atmosphere. The duration lasted far too long and we can see it in the magnetosphere. It was extrasolar.

This would result in a large lightning strike crystal formation being created from sand around the discharge point.

We saw it and every one of the aftershocks in the magnetosphere. Something electric hit us!!! And it did not emanate from the Earth. It crossed the magnetosphere in the opposite direction the Earth is heading.

This brings up more questions then answers.

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Magnetosphere during the earthquake

This is what the magnetosphere looked like during the Haitian earthquakes.

I could not find the pedigree on the data. I want to see data from all the spacecraft available.

I need to know more information about the data and collection. 
This shows that the earthquake had a direct co-relation with solar activity.
I cannot find the reference to what spacecraft is providing the data. I may remove this until I get referenced data
The USGS has data on dates and times of earthquakes. I would like to put links to the earthquakes data with the video.
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/us2010rja6.php


Other Sites:
http://inter-intelligence-communications.com/?p=1328#comment-1324

Monday, January 11, 2010

Magnetosphere reversal youtube




This is a youtube video I found. I know nothing about it. I am looking for more information about it.

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Motion of a photon


This conversation comes from The General Science Journal
 http://www.network54.com/Forum/304711/thread/1260334597/last-1262796474/c+is+the+speed+of+the+ether,+not+light

I only posted my answers to questions. Please read the entire conversation at the above link.
--------------------
C and Dark Energy
December 10 2009, 11:22 PM

Vibrations propagate through the aether at different rates. For Photons this is based on density, magnetism, electricity and temperature. Photons travel through water at a much different rate then the atmosphere. Photons travel through lead. Photons are affected by fields created by other bosons.

http://aaronsreality.blogspot.com/2009/01/speed-of-light-is-not-constant.html


299792.458 is an exact number. The problem with such exact numbers is they tend to need changing more frequently. They also tend to collapse under scrutiny. I would like to see the exact process they used to determine this number.

Dark Energy does not need to move. It is not a requirement that the aether move. Vibrations are the result of bosonic information transversing the media.

http://www.wbabin.net/science/guerami5.pdf

Aaron Guerami
---------------
Light detectors
December 26 2009, 10:16 AM

The only light detector is the electron. The vibration electron receives the vibration photon and converts the wavelength, frequency temperature and distance counter into data the receiving baryon can use.

Addendum: The electron converts photon data (heat, frequency, wavelength and counter) into Z Boson data (Current, [ voltage, current, charge, counter], [heat, frequency, wavelength and counter], and counter).

Light is not instantaneous. we see this in this picture of the Zeeman Effect.




Credit NOAO

Magnetic fields affect the travel of the photon. Thus light is not instantaneous.

Aaron
--------------
Reflectivity
December 27 2009, 9:17 AM

97-98% of a mirror is reflective. That means 2-3% of the silver is absorbing photons and not reflecting them. This shows that even reflective polished silver absorbs some photons.

This has to do with the shape and texture of the silver atoms. This problem also occurs with glass. Some of the photons are absorbed. They are absorbed with a change in the information on counter. This change is very different then the counter at the emission of the photon. So all time is local to the receiving electron.

So this also shows that light is not instantaneous. In that photons reflect. This means they hit and were not absorbed and continued their spin.

Aaron
----------
Belief is not relevant to the universe
January 4 2010, 11:01 PM

"Aaron, do you truly believe that reversing a light beam on a distant reflector requires no time? It seems like the concept of light is exempt from Newtonian mechanics and real world mechanics. Ignore the locality and focus on the concept of speed. A certain object is going in one direction, at a certain speed, suddenly reverses direction while constantly maintaining the same speed. Is this the truth of light, that its physical attributes have nothing whatsoever to do with the mass with which it cooperates? Even though, the only time in which em beams become illuminated is when it interacts with mass? "
---------
Gogo, mass is a data structure created by Newton to explain his model. Mass as I wrote about in the "Disproof of Gravity" cannot hold enough data to explain natural events. So Newton's Mechanics is not how the universe works.
===========
"What also worries me:

Aaron says: 97-98% of a mirror is reflective. That means 2-3% of the silver is absorbing photons and not reflecting them. This shows that even reflective polished silver absorbs some photons.

Is this 97% or 98%? What is the exact percentage? Shouldn't we know this to a thousandths of a percentage point, or more?

Bobs says: If by "seen" you mean with the unaided eye, then I agree, the light will be seen instantaneously if, on the other hand, you mean "seen" with a detector apparatus of some sort then I disagree. The detector (that which responds to the light beam) requires time (albeit a short time) to register the light beam.

Albeit a short time- shouldn't we know this to a thousandth of a second or more?

Are these responses acceptable?"
---------------
These are all wonderful questions. We don't know the answer to them.

Light is fast. We can all agree to that. A mirror reflects photons by providing a non-electron face to the direction traveled. This means that the face of the mirror is polished in a way that most of the electrons are interacting with the mercury or other back side material. This kind of logic proves that electrons are the receptors of photons. The electron converts the photon data (Temp, Wavelength, Frequency, and counter) into electrical data (Z Boson) returning that data to the gluons. The gluons convert the electrical data (Z Boson) to density information.

The gluons convert that density and composition information into Z Bosons. The Z Boson converts that information into the lepton called electron. The electron vibrates and emits the photon.

That is part of the model I have created to explain this process. I called it the Standard Vibration Model. It is fundamentally different from the Standard Particle Model, but uses similar nomenclature for understandability.

The nice part about the Standard Vibration Model is that it can easily explain chemistry, organic chemistry and neural networks.

Almost all of physics is designed to support Newton's work. Under scrutiny Newton's model falls apart. That is not to say his work was not brilliant, it is just the beginning.

Yes photons are absorbed by the mirror. This causes changes in temperature across the air around the mirror. This is the distortion that many have worked so hard to reduce.

It is good to be home. It was also good to meditate for a week. I needed to unplug.

a
----------
Absorbsion time
January 4 2010, 11:03 PM

Yes, time is required to process the information as described in my previous posting.
--------------
Detection Events
January 6 2010, 12:47 PM

Wow,

This is correct,
-----------
anonymous said: "There can be one "original event," and several detection events."

Well, yes; but they (the detection events) have to be in different places.
-----------
This is incorrect. I hope these are two different Sherlocks.

Yeh, and if the detection events are at the same time, they have to be equal distance from the main event.
-----------

No, they will never be equal distance from the original event.

Our detector will be one Pb atom.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead
Our Pb atom has 82 leptons called electrons. Our atom has 82 detectors. These detectors are never in the same place, because we would have fewer electrons. These leptons called electrons are the vibrations that convert photons into Z Bosons. They are vibrations, meaning they are always in motion.

The fact that there are 82 detectors show that different photons from the original event will always hit the receiving atom in different places on the atom and in position in the Aether.

It is not possible for the Pb atom to remain in the exact same place at any different time. The atom is always in motion. There is no stasis.

That is just from the detector's perspective. The emitting atom is always in motion.

Aaron.

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Regions of Earth's Magnetosphere

Tour of Earth's Magnetosphere

This linked page was created by Randy Russell at University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR) 

It is an amazing 3d description of the magnetic field around the Earth. It is fun to play with. Good Job.

Monday, December 28, 2009

Zeeman Effect Equations

I finally found a reasonable description of the Zeeman effect.

b = zB cos θ , where z is the Zeeman splitting factor (Hz mG−1), B is the
magnetic field, and θ is the angle of the magnetic field to the line of sight (Crutcher et al.
1993).

This came from the paper "Detection of the Zeeman Effect in the 36 GHz Class I CH3OH maser line with the EVLA" by A. P. Sarma, E. Momjian
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0910/0910.1081v1.pdf

Sunday, December 27, 2009

Galactic Magnetic Field

Science 11 May 2007:
Vol. 316. no. 5826, pp. 875 - 878
DOI: 10.1126/science.1139480


http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/316/5826/875

The Orientation of the Local Interstellar Magnetic Field
M. Opher,1* E. C. Stone,2 T. I. Gombosi3


Figure 1




Fig. 1. (A and B) Radio source location as a function of the interstellar magnetic field (BISM) direction in (A) the HDP plane and (B) the GAL plane (with {alpha} = 45°). The surface of the heliopause is shown from upwind with respect to the interstellar wind. The isocontours show the strength of the radial component of the interstellar magnetic field, Br, on the heliopause. The green band is the location of the radio sources (at Br = 0). The red arrows show the direction of BISM. (C and D) Same as (A) and (B) but converted to ecliptic coordinates for BISM in (C) the PPG (with {alpha} = 30°) and (D) the GAL (with {alpha} = 45°). The direction of the nose of the heliosphere (diamond) and the GAL (black line) are indicated for reference. The radio sources detected by V1 and V2 are shown as solid circles. Note that the colors are inverted from (C) to (D) because the interstellar magnetic direction was inverted from (A) to (B) (see red vectors in the insets).

=============

This is vital to the understanding of how stars travel through the galaxy. We only have a few spacecraft that can return data about the interaction between the Sun and the interstellar medium. Voyager 2, Cassini, IBEX and a new one that I don't remember. Dr. Opher; et al, did a great job in mapping the trajectory of the sun through the Milky Way using few datasets.
http://physics.gmu.edu/~mopher/

We are just beginning to understand star motion and it looks to have more to do with Magnetism then gravity. As shown by my published papers, star motion has nothing to do with gravity.

More reading material:
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0910/0910.1081v1.pdf

Thursday, December 24, 2009

Spiral Periodic Table

http://dwb.unl.edu/teacher/nsf/C04/C04Links/chemlab.pc.maricopa.edu/periodic/stowetable.html

Timmothy Stowe's physicists periodic table. I would like to learn more about this. What I would like to know is what differences are required to produce these different shapes.


http://www.wou.edu/las/physci/ch412/alttable.htm

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Magnetic fields and time.

From The General Science Journal
http://www.network54.com/Forum/304711/thread/1261474920/last-1261489531/Experiments+Confirming+Two+Incompatible+Theories

"The Pound-Rebka experiment confirms Newton's emission theory of light if: 
1) photons accelerate in a gravitational field as cannonballs do.
 2) there is no gravitational time dilation.


The Pound-Rebka experiment confirms a fragment (not other fragments) of Einstein's inconsistent theory of relativity if:
 1) photons do not accelerate in a gravitational field.
 2) there is gravitational time dilation:

http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~djmorin/book.html
Chapter 14: "The equivalence principle has a striking consequence concerning the behavior of clocks in a gravitational field. It implies that higher clocks run faster than lower clocks. If you put a watch on top of a tower, and then stand on the ground, you will see the watch on the tower tick faster than an identical watch on your wrist. When you take the watch down and compare it to the one on your wrist, it will show more time elapsed."

Pentcho Valev

===============
I would like to examine this phenomena from the perspective of the Standard Vibration Model.


The Zeeman effect has shown a magnetic field spreads a photon wave into its component information. The photon wave returns to its changed vector after exiting the field. I also have shown it stops spinning during this transition. 

 Picture credit NOAO
This would account for the change in time. The clock at the beginning of the magnetic field does change at a normal rate. While the photon is travelling through the magnetic field separates and does not spin. The clock at the bottom of the magnetic field will be slower because the photon is not spinning. 


So as photons pass though the different strengths of the magnetosphere, the photons spin and separate depending on the strength of the magnetic field. 


I would like to thank Pentcho Valev for the amount of reading he does. He reads in many languages and is a great presence on the General Science Journal.

Thursday, December 17, 2009

The Baryonic Bubble

A star is a Baryonic Bubble in a Dark Matter solution.

The core of the star generates W bosons (Magnetism) with such high current that it pushes back the Dark Matter to form a Baryonic Bubble.

In a previous posting I showed a picture from the Max Planck's Institute that was taken over 116 minutes. It showed, what we thought was a black hole at the center of the galaxy was ejecting flares.

What?


That means the center of the galaxy is ejecting material for star formation, much like a star ejects material.

Friday, December 11, 2009

Spiral over Norway

This is an amazing phenomena.





This was described by 'them' on CNN as a failed Russian ICBM test. Why can't 'they' say, 'I don't know'? Nobody has any idea what this is. This is not a failed missile test, this was an electric event. It shows similarities to an analog Mandelbrot set.

We can learn things from these pictures. I would like to know how long this remained in the sky.  Did pilots see this? Were there any electrical disturbances on the ground? Was this seen by other people and where were they? How many people saw this? Did the plume change position based on the observer? Did compasses or GPS systems work? Was the internet slow in the affected area? How long did it take for Google searches to return in the affected area? Did the event affect broadcast signals? Are there pictures over time of the event? What was the barometric pressure? Humidity? Did the magnetic probes around the earth pick up anything strange? What did the interstellar medium look like at this time? Were there other magnetic events occurring on other planets at this time? Was there a solar storm at this time?

One thing I noticed in the second picture is the lack of symmetry. I also noticed that the plume is changing position based on the spiral.

There are many more questions to be asked before any answers are developed.

Thanks to those who took the pictures and to Curt Youngs for the conversation.

Addendum: 01/18/2010
This is the description of what happened.
http://wwwppd.nrl.navy.mil/whatsnew/haarp/

This is a cool site.
http://truedeity.wordpress.com/

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Standard Vibration Model Predictions

I was once asked what predictions could be made from this model, or something to that effect. At the time I wondered if this model could make a prediction of a new idea in physics. It can. This is more of an explanation of an existing problem.

A change in the magnetic field around a rocket will increase the altitude of the orbit. This magnetic field will create pressure against the dark matter. This is shown at this description of the Vanguard and Explorer spacecraft and the spinning ball experiment. http://www.enterprisemission.com/Von_Braun2.htm

The equations shown in the published papers show a change in the magnetic field will change the shape of the dark/baryonic matter bubble.

Or the change in the magnetic field changes the density of the baryons. This change in density changes the altitude of density equilibrium.

They are actually the same statement, just different sides of the equation. You optimize the altitude of the satellite by changing the magnetic field surrounding the spacecraft during launch.

These changes in the magnetic field will require a great level of stability and understanding of the geometry of dark matter bubbles.

Prior to this model there was no explanation for this problem.

Saturday, December 5, 2009

First attempt at thought

This is an excellent question. What constitutes consciousness? Consciousness is a collection of vibrations created and emitted by the organic neural structure.

I now define a single vibration of meme as the interaction of organic chemistry and Z Bosons. I have defined memes as any information, but there is a specific vibration created by organic chemistry. I need to redefine memes to the common definition. From there I can evaluate the dynamics of neural networks.

The model that I have presented here allows for descriptions of different information types and their interactions. Thought produces a different type of vibration. Culture is the difference of this vibration between many organisms or nodes, the changes between equilibrium.

With this addition to the model, thought/organic chemistry has a specifically different vibration. This vibration is not a photon, gluon, or W+/- Boson. It could be that memes are enhanced Z Bosons. This is why we see data from EEG or PET. Z Bosons are capable of transmitting data structures, and analog information.

Seismic vibrations are the change in position of baryons. This vibration is not any of the Bosons, but the intense change in position of these baryons in relation to other baryons. This causes intensity changes in the emitting baryons. The receiving baryon change based on the information contained in the changed bosons emitted by the change in baryon's position.

Positron emission tomography shows intensity of organic chemistry. We have not ever used an accelerator to propel organics. So we cannot see the fundamental vibrations found in organics.

The above post comes from the General Science Journal.

Here comes the medium

I have been watching the words that come from people about the interstellar medium. I really hate poorly thought out media releases.

“This is the first detection of chromium and manganese from a cluster. Previously, these metals were detected only from stars in the Milky Way or from other galaxies. This is the first detection in intergalactic space,” JAXA astrophysicist and Perseus study leader Takayuki Tamura says.

You are aware that stars are always part of galaxies. When I talk about the interstellar medium, I am referring to non-baryonic matter between baryonic bubbles.

Sunday, November 29, 2009

Pasta Universe - Geometry of State

The pasta structure in the hadron-quark phase transition and the effects on magnetized compact stars

This is important. They are showing the different geometries of state. Geometry of State. The bubble is natural. It shows up in soap bubbles. The bubble is an analog to this vibratory model.

This bubble is the interaction between 2 anti-gluon Dark Matter fabric solids and 3 gluon baryonic bubble matter. The mechanism for this interaction is the W+/- Boson or magnetism. Every boson is expressing information about the originating baryon. Every baryon is constantly going through a process of read/write phases. This allows for transmission of data about itself. It also receives data about other baryons. There is a third calculation phase.

Dark Matter, as is described in this model, is charge repugnant. They are not electrically neutral. The rule is : a dark matter, 2 anti-gluon vibration cannot occupy the same space as a 3 gluon, charged baryon. Dark Matter cannot form the lepton, electron. Thus Dark Matter is pushed aside by baryons producing the ball in the ribbon effect.

Magnetism is the rotation of the 3 gluons in a cone shape. The spinning magnet. Density is the compression of the length of the gluon. These interactions cause the bubble shape that spins and vibrates in a bubble shape.

Dark Matter is only the gluon forces of density. Dark Matter does not spin. Dark Matter exhibits density pressure force and reacts to magnetism. This interaction is the breaking of the bonds in the Dark Matter by magnetism or the W+/- Boson. The magnetic pressures of the baryons against the Dark Matter cause this interaction. There are areas of void of information in the Dark Energy that are neither Dark Matter or Baryonic Matter.

Disharmonic vibrations are not transmitted by Dark Energy from Ruleset to Ruleset. Disharmonic vibrations are absorbed by Dark Energy Rulesets.

The pictures from IBEX and other Magnetism Sensors show intense interactions at the boundries of Dark Matter and Baryonic Matter.
Credit IBEX

This model explains the pictures taken by IBEX.

Friday, November 20, 2009

Numerous Contrails today

Today over West Palm Beach there were more than the usual number of contrails in the sky. They were at extreme distance to each other. Rarely do I ever see contrails here in West Palm Beach. Planes usually fly over or under the altitude at which water freezes.

The temperature according to the Weather Channel was
Clear of clouds
80F
30.00 pressure and stable
Humidity 64
Dew point 67
Heat Index 82F
Ceiling 2300 feet
visibility 10 miles


My question is this. Was this a solar event that caused the extreme difference in altitude of the contrails? It appeared to extend the altitude at which contrails to more than usual. The trails were blowing at a rapid speed and perpendicular to the direction. I could see several trails spreading apart but never actually interacting with each other. They were at very different altitudes.

It was as if the area in which contrails expanded quickly and stayed expanded for only a few minutes. During that time 7 contrails existed from different planes going in different directions including one that was perpendicular to the other 6. The contrails started to blow away, dissipate. No new contrails in the sky, though planes are obviously flying over. The one trail that was going in the direction of the winds did not dissipate in the same manner as the other 6.

The event ended when a cloud expanded from low altitude on the horizon and met with the bottom area where the contrails formed. This singular cloud formed a discharge event, allowing the electrical energy to dissipate.

hypothesis: After the singular cloud extended from the ceiling at 2300 ft to the bottom of the contrail altitude, the energy in the contrail level discharged. The contrail area returned to its normal area. After this discharge the sky started producing lots of low level clouds across all of the sky. Within 15 minutes of the discharge the sky was full of low level clouds. I wish I had a camera with me. I should always carry my phone.

I think this was a magnetic event that pushed the altitude for contrails down to a low altitude. when the singular cloud met the altitude for contrails, it provided an area of conductivity that discharged the electricity in the magnetic event.

I also wish I had access to better local weather data. I really wish we could put cameras at schools with full weather labs. The kids can control the local cameras and weather gathering data systems. We should have these at all the schools.

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/wxwise/class/contrail.html

Monday, November 16, 2009

The Electric Universe Theory

The Electric Universe

I don't think it is a good idea to embed this video. It is large. It is a superb video. The Electric Universe theory can be found at http://www.holoscience.com/

For cosmologist, ignore it at your own peril. If the model you are working on does not identify and solve these problems then the model is incorrect.

What is being described in this model is the interaction between the Z Boson and the W+/- Boson. At the point of interaction between the Z and W+/- Bosons creates a unstable oscillating lepton called Electron. This lepton not only produces electricity, but it is responsible for the emission of the Photon Boson. This lepton is the point of read/write of memes or information from one Baryon to another.

Z Bosons connect to the nearest and strongest W+/-Boson. It does not necessarily connect to its own W+/- Boson. This process is ionization.

The unstable lepton vibrates in two ways. They are the same vibration. The continuum of vibration is asymptotic at the neutral or zero. The attractive vibration of the lepton is a positive charge. The opposite or negative charge vibration is expressive.

Ill add to this later. I have to think more on it.