The balloon and the lead ball: logic problem

Two objects of the same mass (1 kg), a lead ball and a helium balloon, released at the same time will not hit the earth at the same time. Gravity is based on density.

The lead weight is falling to its density level. If left alone it would over billions of years fall to the center of the earth.

The balloon is rising to its density level.

Interesting.

Specific strange Gravity

I have never setup a problem like this before. I want to show the pressure on the water from the gas bubble.

I was thinking of lava tubes in the ocean at shallow depths. When C and S gasses are released from the surface their temperature instantly raises the temp of the H₂O to several thousand degrees. So all particles inside the bubble are gasses; our carbon is >3550°C. Specific gravity within the bubble causes the particles to layer and cool according to density. When the Carbon temp drops below 3550°C it exits the gas bubble and floats in the ocean. Likewise when the Sulfur temp drops below 115.21°C it exits the gas bubble and falls. The sulfur falls because it is more dense than the H₂O or Carbon. Some of our H₂O bubble manages to cool to 105°C at the surface causing bubbles. The H₂O is still a gas when entering the atmosphere and instantly cools to the air temperature. The H₂O condenses to a liquid drop eight feet above sea level and is hit by a wave.

This is an example of temperature assisted density driven specific gravity. But here the particles are not falling to meet the more massive earth. They are rising to their level of density.

The face of the moon

Pic link

Why does the one face of the moon always point to the earth? I think it is because that side of the moon is more dense and is falling faster than the back side.

I am going to think about that!!!

Sun's effect called Gravity

Everything in the solar system falls towards the sun. Baryonic radiation from the sun causes the dark matter to be pushed back. All the baryonic matter that is maintaining a correct angular momentum will maintain its current solar orbit minus the minor friction caused by the dark matter. This is like a marble in a bowl with the system in space.

Even on the earth. The baryonic effect of the earth does cause a deep run into the dark matter. The earth spins. This effect at the bottom of the earth's baryonic bowl effect on the dark matter will cause everything around the earth to fall towards the earth. If I move 3km/h I will still fall towards the earth. If I move 11.186 km/s then I have achieved enough angular momentum to fall away from the earth but now towards the sun.

This includes the moon. The moon is in equilibrium between falling towards the earth and falling towards the sun. The tides show this.

If a marble was shot from the earth, it would need to increase momentum to 42.1 km/sec to pierce the denser dark matter at 1au. If the marble were to try to escape the sun's baryonic effect on dark matter at a distance of ~10au, I would need to increase momentum to >~10 km/sec to pierce the dark matter. This shows that there is a distinct pressure field on the dark matter from the baryonic radiation.

This general shape of the effect of baryonic matter on dark matter as a squashed spheroid/torus shows a physical reason for different angular momentum at different points in the elliptical orbit.

Another Lunar Issue

I have been thinking about how Density(gravity) affects the Earth. We know that the tides are caused by the moon's Density(gravitational) effect on the Earth. The tidal period is 12h 25.2m, 1/2 of a tidal day.

An intuitive knowledge of physics, states that if the moon is closest to the Earth every other 12h 25.2m then we would see a high tide at those intervals. This means that the moon falls towards the sun every other 12h 25.2m also.

I think the sun and the earth are interacting on the moon. This can only occur if the moon is trailing the earth. With the earth moving around the sun, the earth's magnetic field creates a teardrop shape in the dark matter. As the dark matter is returning to equilibrium against the sun's alpha particles, the moon would be trailing in the tail of this teardrop. This 12h 25.2m period is the time it takes to move from one side of the tail to the other.

The moon does not actually orbit the cross-section of the teardrop tail in a elliptical orbit. It never goes above the focus that is on the plane with the sun.(well it goes slightly above the focus). There are 2 focii that account for this behavior. One is on the sun side of the tail furthest from the earth. The other is on the opposite side of the sun but is closest to the earth. This path is the lunar tidal period.

The moon moves kinda like a snowboarder in a 1/2 pipe run. This is inline with Peter Duffett-Smith's description of the lunar orbit of the sun.

"A celestial observer viewing the solar system from a great distance would not, however see the Moon making loops in space about the Earth. Rather, he would describe the situation by saying that the Moon is in orbit around the Sun, as is the Earth, and that the effect of the Earth's influence is to make the Moon's orbit wiggle a little as the relative positions of the Earth and Moon change. This is because the Sun's Gravitation force on the Moon is much greater than that of the Earth, even though the latter is nearer. "

Addendum: 4/29/09 : Predictions. I have been asked to make some predictions in my model. But this is a big one. The Moon follows the Earth as described above.

Symmetric form: Logic problem

Symmetry is not natural in the universe. There are always differences.

For example a star has a great solar flare at T(n). A tremendous amount of energy has been released at one point on the star. Symmetry demands that a solar flare of equal strength and opposite direction is required at T(n). This is not natural.

Symmetry is a construct used to simplify multi-variable systems. Einstein and others only had their intuition to create these great thories, symmerty made these intuitions almost explainable. We barely know now how orbits function and they are not exactly as Newton, Einstein and others suggest. But, if it was not for their work we would still be living in caves. Symmetry is necessary to make the intuitive jump from 'the particles want to be together', to 'there is an observable process in particle dynamics'.

Symmetry has no physical evidence.

These are systems where certain variables do not induce a massive change to the overall system, yet do affect small variances to the system.

We know the earth does not have a symmetrical curvature of space/time. It is squashed and some areas have more pertubations than others. These variations occur when the density directly under the spacecraft changes. Traveling over an ocean has one curvature of space/time, whereas a massive mountain range has more density, thus a different curvature of space/time. These variations need to be incorperated in orbit design, else you lose the satellite.

Asymmetry occurs from the inablity to predict electron position. Nature is asymmertical.

The removal of symmetry allows discussuion on the effect of the shape of the earth at rest and at motion on the curvature of space/time.

Curvature of Space/Time

The curvature of space is a function of the density of baryons, the magnetic field, and radioactive particles emitted from the baryonic object. Really it is just the pressurization of dark matter against the baryonic matter's magnetism.

The magnetic field planets/planetoids:
Many of the planets have a magnetic field. This field is called the magnetosphere. Any of the spinning massive bodies has magnetism if it has a warm metalic core. These magnetic fields repel dark matter at a much greater rate than the baryons alone.


The non-magnetic field planet/planetoids:
The general density of an object's baryons has magnetism. This inherit magnetism causes dark matter to repel. But not nearly as much as the magnetic field. The lunar surface shows differentials in gravity to the topology [Cite:A. S. Konopliv].

The massive gas giants have cores that are magnetic. The magnetic field has been examined by NASA and others. The curvature of the space/time around Jupiter is far greater than the mass of the planet alone.

A day in the life of an Alpha Particle.

Here I am going to describe the importance Alpha Particles play in the interaction between dark matter and baryonic matter. We will theoretically follow a few particles from when they are emitted from the star to their end of life.

Our star has been burning for a few years now since it winked into existence. Nothing has really changed.

An Alpha particle is emitted from 15 degrees off the south pole of the star. It travels with all the other particles in a straight line to just past .1 au and it starts hitting resistance from the other alpha particles that have previously encountered the dark matter. These particles form a river of alpha particles that includes all the particles from 0>n>15deg. This river goes in a straight line until it again hits resistance from dark matter.

Alpha particle triptych
Degree from pole Theta:: Distance traveled before hitting resistance from dark matter
0>θ>15:: >.1 au
θ = 55:: ~.4 au
θ = 75:: ~.75 au
θ = 80:: ~1 au
θ = 85:: ~2 au
θ = 87:: ~3 au
θ = 88:: ~40 au
θ = 88.1:: ~100 au
θ = 89:: ~20000 au
θ = 89.5:: ~50000 au

This data is for explanation purposes only.
Testing is required for validation.
This torus shape surrounds the star. This is not a standard torus. It looks like M104. This galaxy has a bulbous core, but the galaxy extends along the equator. Our star exhibits similar properties. Our star is bulbous in the inner planetary core, which extends to just past 3 au. Its equatorial region extends past the ice clouds 50000+ au.




Particles emitted closer to the poles encounter dark matter resistance earlier and start changing direction to the outline of the torus towards the equator. This causes a river effect of charge particles along the baryonic side of the barrier between the dark matter and the baryonic matter.

An Alpha particle emitted from near the pole of the star (<~1 degree) will almost immediately encounter dark matter. There is an asymptotic behavior to the star’s emission of baryonic radiation. The star exhausts high energy non-baryonic sub-atomic particles from the other side of the asymptote closest to the pole.

Our alpha particles die when they crash into hydrogen or helium gas between 20000 and 50000+ au. The interesting thing here is, there is a possibility of Neucleosynthesis here in the outer region of our solar system. As Alpha particles collide with H or He they become heavier elements. For example three Alpha particles can fuse together to form a nucleus of a Carbon-12 ion(Stellar Nucleosynthesis). Free electrons would be attracted to complete the atom. These heavier particles fall again back towards the sun based on their density and angular momentum.

Other particles; Beta, Gamma, photons, are all examples of non-baryonic matter and pierce through the dark matter.

(7/30/08)addendum:: This pattern of alpha distribution will also account for mercury's orbit. Mercury will never fall into the sun because alphas push dark matter down away from the sun, at the asymptote. Thus the planet cannot fall up into the sun.

Continuance of the universe

With a multi-particle (vibration) model we no longer have a singular event for the big bang. The big bang becomes a baryonic event in a dark matter universe. Space/Time exists before and after the big bang through the Dark Energy and existence occurs through the interactions between dark matter, baryonic matter and memes matter.

Effectively the big bang becomes a repeatable process.

First attempt at a description of Gravity.

Peter Duffett-Smith's amazing paragraph.

"A celestial observer viewing the solar system from a great distance would not, however see the Moon making loops in space about the Earth. Rather, he would describe the situation by saying that the Moon is in orbit around the Sun, as is the Earth, and that the effect of the Earth's influence is to make the Moon's orbit wiggle a little as the relative positions of the Earth and Moon change. This is because the Sun's Gravitation force on the Moon is much greater than that of the Earth, even though the latter is nearer. "

I would like to use this paragraph to describe gravity.

"This is because the Sun's Gravitation force on the Moon is much greater than that of the Earth, even though the latter is nearer". The Sun is an absolutely massive radiation emitter. Its primary radiation strength extends to beyond Mars, Its secondary fields extend past planets into the ice fields beyond Pluto. These areas of radiation are well defined.

At this point lets consider our star has no orbiting debris. Also our star does not exist before time T0. Time exists before T0 but the Baryonic matter star does not exist. We have a Riemannian manifold in Hilbert space. This is a massive space. Each point in the space is filled with a Dark Energy. The Dark Energy contains information on the Dark Matter particle that fills the Dark Energy space.

Upon time reaches T0 our Baryon filled star winks into existence inside our space as a manifold. As the baryonic radiation emissions of the star expands to it maximum, Dark Matter particles are pushed back, repelled by the existence of Baryons. Within days Dark Matter particles have been pushed back past ~3 au. Now Dark Matter particles have mass. Our baryon radiation from the star has traveled far enough that there is enough distance between them to no longer be strong enough to push the now pressurized Dark Matter particles. Dark matter particles start to push back on the baryons. We get an equilibrium between dark and baryonic matter. There are some areas of Void between the Dark and Baryonic particles. This is important.

Now between the star’s edge and the edge of the Dark matter is 3 au. This area is Void except for odd bits of baryonic radiation. Each bit of baryonic radiation has its own magnetic field and charge. Non-baryonic radiation (photons, free electrons) pass through the non-baryonic dark matter. This is why we can see galaxies through the soup of non-baryonic dark matter.

So in our space we have the star emitting its baryonic radiation and its non-baryonic radiation in the form of photons and others. Folks on the planet orbiting the neighboring star will see our existence in a few years.

N-body problem and the Moon

The Earth Moon Sun gravitational relationship is a n-body problem. It is not a series of 2 body problems. This problem has stumped me since I was 11. I did not realize then that this was considered an impossible problem to solve. What really frustrates me is that the universe solves this problem so effortlessly. Its like an elegant ballet.

The general 2 body problem is F = -m₁m₂G / r^2

The problem I have with many n-body attempts continue the linear solution. Solve one set of 2 body problems and continue this until particle positions/velocities/... all have been solve. The problem here is that it never works.

Here is the reason why. Most of the solutions always return to a series of 2-d problems. The universe is at least 4-d. And Gravity is a function of density.

The best/most correct/closest solution I have found is that by Peter Duffet-Smith. His book "Practical Astronomy with your Calculator" has follow me most of my life. In this book he describes the moon's orbit.
"A celestial observer viewing the solar system from a great distance would not, however see the Moon making loops in space about the Earth. Rather, he would describe the situation by saying that the Moon is in orbit around the Sun, as is the Earth, and that the effect of the Earth's influence is to make the Moon's orbit wiggle a little as the relative positions of the Earth and Moon change. This is because the Sun's Gravitation force on the Moon is much greater than that of the Earth, even though the latter is nearer. "

This is a brilliant book. He should get a Nobel Prize just for that paragraph. And he is correct. Please buy his book. He even has great calculations to prove his theory. He needs to be planted firmly in the lexicon of great physicists.

A logic problem about gravity

If a star system has the cumulitive mass x. x = the star's mass + all planets mass + all the junk that spins around the star.

If we look at that star's gravitational field 1 day before the star explodes. We would see a high g number. If we look at the star 1 day after the star explodes we will see that the area that was the star now has a smaller gravitational field or g. The mass has been spread over the entire area, but its the same amount of mass.

Why?
Gravity is a function of density.

Introduction to new classifications of particles.

Introduction

This chapter gives a brief introduction to the Standard Model v2008. Each particle will be defined and each inferred relationship will be introduced.

Baryonic matter: Has mass, charge, state, spin/vibration
Non-baryonic Dark matter: has mass, state, anti-spin, charge adverse.
Non-baryonic Memes matter: (all the bosons, information)
Non-baryonic Dark Energy: Has no mass, no charge, and no spin; just state.

Dark Matter reacts to Baryons through charge causing the effect called magnetism. (addendum(11,1,08): It is easy to explain Dark Matter particles as massive, non-spining, chargeless particles that are connected in chains by gluons. The gluons read the magnetic properties and bend to the pressure described by the W boson.)

Memes Matter reacts to Baryons through efficient energy processing. Dark Energy holds Dark matter, Memes matter and Baryonic matter as an information system.

I developed these concepts while trying to explain certain phenomena. I have been working on various forms of this for the last 30 years.

Baryonic matter is everybody's favorite. It is ice cream, it is people, it is rock, it is well everything that we refer to as matter. Baryonic Matter has a specific definition. Simply, it all matter that has some form of Baryons. That cleared it up. Baryons are made of 3 quarks. Baryons are all things that have heavy mass. Anything that has a proton or a neutron has Baryons.

There are some excellent pages on WIKI that helped me understand this.

List of Baryons

Definition of Baryons

Its almost easier to define what does not have Baryons in its composition in the pantheon of sub-atomic particles . The electron, photon, and neutrinos. There may be more but that's not relevant now.

So what were the problems that made me think of this.

The electron causes the most problems. That little electron has been the bane of many physicist. It has mass, but it is not used in some calculations because its really, really small or not there at all. Even worse, you cannot predict its position or direction at any given time.

Where is the graviton? We have yet to really describe gravity. Why is there no graviton? In a previous post here I have described some of the issue I have with the moon. Also on this blog are some wonderful pic of galaxies that are being pulled apart by something that is not Baryonic matter.

Why do Natural Neural Networks form? What causes organic chemistry? Why is it that when Carbon, Nitrogen, Oxygen, and Hydrogen are placed together they form a mixture? But if you shock that mixture, you get protein chains. Memes as a particle describe this process.

Why is there a vacuum in space? This is weird. How does a particle re-fill the vacuum? Why is a Vacuum so important? It shows that there is an on/off. This is called state. When the vacuum is state off there is no information in that vacuum. When the vacuum state is on there is information in that vacuum.

I can understand the need for electrons and proton, but what about that neutron.
Pic by Derek

Lunar orbit precession issue

If the moon orbits the earth every 28 days, the effect of gravity would cause tremendous precession on the night sky. Every 14 days the sky would move forward and every 14 days it would move backwards. Because the masses of the objects are such the precession would be more than noticeable. The two massive objects would be in jeopardy of collision.

I know how the moon moves with the earth. I just need to get it out. I have an idea on how to describe it.

I will have it out in a couple of days.

The Big Bang in a Dark Matter/Energy Universe.

I love this picture. Those are millions of galaxies!

The Big Bang in a Dark Matter/Energy Universe.

The main but yet false conjecture of the big bang theory is that all the universe’s space, time, energy and matter came from a singularity. That in this singularity all time and space comes to zero. This is where this theory falls apart.

The assumption that the universe is only E-M radiation, matter and energy is being reevaluated. Dark galaxies like VirgoHi21 show that there is matter coalescing and that this matter falls under the rules of time, space, and gravity. But Dark Matter does not have the same set of rules as baryonic matter.

Dark Matter galaxies do exhibit gravitational effects on baryonic matter galaxies. The pictures of NGC 4254 and VirgoHi21 show jets of Hydrogen being pulled/pushed from the visible Galaxy to the denser Dark Galaxy. There is gravitational lensing in the galactic cluster CL0024+17. This shows that the amount of energy needed to create the galactic cluster causes ripples in the dark matter.

The Dark Matter/Energy media

It is now hypothesized that the universe is made up of 74% dark energy, 22% dark matter and 4% baryonic matter and energy. These estimations would account for the odd behavior of stars in galaxies. Their overall velocities do not change based upon their position within the galaxy.

This paper goes to describe the Dark Matter/Energy universe as the medium of the universe and that the Big Bang was only an ultramassive supernova of baryonic matter and energy. This would require that time and space existed as they do now before the Big Bang. The Big Bang was the result of only the 4% of all of the universe’s baryonic matter and energy exploding within the Dark Matter/Energy universe.

This understanding would go to show that the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metric is the shock wave that occurred within the existing Dark Matter/Energy universe caused by the exploding ultramassive super nova. This shockwave can be seen in the galactic cluster CL0024+17. This paper also attempts to show how small ultramassive black holes produce galactic clusters.

Every ultramassive black hole explosion follows approximately the same timeline as the Big Bang.

• Around 10^-32 second the temperature is ~10²⁷˚C. This allows for the development of electrons, quarks and other sub-atomic particles. The size of the explosion at this time is dependent on the mass
• At 10^-6 the resulting explosion cools to 10¹³˚C allowing for the formation of neutrons and protons.
• The first atoms form ~300,000 years after the explosion. These collect into protogalaxies over the next few million years. The temperature within the explosion is still around 10,000C.

This conjecture can be justified by examination of galactic cluster formation. The galactic cluster CL0024-16 T-R diagram shows disbursement of galaxies around a center point (TELESCOPE STUDY OF THE CLUSTER CL0024+16, Tommaso Treu, et.al. 2003). Other candidates include CL0024-17,…

These small ultramassive black holes explosions did not have any effect on the universe’s general time line or space volume. They just occurred within the current universe structure.

Creation of an ultramassive black hole.

The creation of an ultramassive black hole occurs when many supermassive black holes accrete into an ultramassive black hole. At some point the ultramassive black hole becomes unstable and explodes. Gravity from dark matter and Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metric can add to this instability causing ultramassive black holes to explode by bending or breaking the singularity.

Conclusion

Time and space are not relevant to the Big Bang Theory. Time and space are a function of dark matter and dark energy. We need to rethink these equations and remove the problem of universal time and space.

Many Thanks

Aaron Guerami

aguerami@gmail.com

Another Dark ... Matter

Addendum 2/16/2010:


--------------------------
Well again I am looking at Dark Matter. Well not exactly looking at it.




Here is a picture of NGC 4254. It is a beautiful spiral galaxy in the Virgo cluster. Notice its arm is pulled away from the galaxy. This is a question that has perplexed astronomers for years. Now it is understood.

The radio telescope of Arecibo Observatory, Cardiff University, Isaac Newton Telescope, and Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope have found a gas cloud of neutral Hydrogen and dark matter nearby. The finding of this cloud goes along way to understanding NGC 4254's outstretched arm.




Here is a picture of the area in the Virgo Cluster called VIRGOHI 21. Notice that the area is not visible. This is a Dark Matter Galaxy.


When we look at the area in the 21cm wavelength we see hydrogen gas jetting from NGC 4254 to VIRGOHI 21. In the third picture the Neutral hydrogen gas streams between NGC 4254 (top left) and the Dark Galaxy VIRGOHI 21 (center right) in this image made from radio telescope observations at a wavelength of 21 centimetres. This interaction could explain the mystery of NGC 4254's peculiar lopsided shape. To the bottom left, a ring of gas can be seen around the galaxy NGC 4262. This material was presented to the American Astronomical Society meeting in Washington, D. C. on January 12, 2006.

Even though Neutral Hydrogen is detected streaming into VIRGOHI 21, there is not enough hydrogen to cause the extension of the arm in NGC 4254. Something dense but dark is necessary to explain this. This is an example of Dark Matter.

Aaron

CREDIT: Arecibo Observatory / Cardiff University / Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope.

Dark Matter - the other matter

We have known for some time that we were missing something. Every time we tried to model galaxy formation the stars would just fly apart. Then there was the problem that stars on the outer rims of galaxies moved at the same speed as those in denser regions.

For years now I have been contemplating the n-body problem. This problem is the model of Gravity. I noticed in my tea every morning that when I put the sugar in my tea and gave it a stir it would form the shape of a galaxy. The only way it could do this is if our models were missing the tea. Physicist also saw this problem, their galaxies were spinning out of control. Everything was in chaos. They were missing the tea too.

This picture is of the galactic cluster CL0024+17. Each point of light is a galaxy. Notice the dark ring. The amount of energy in the initial explosions caused a ripple in the dark matter. Visible matter is just a small part of the universe. Present estimates show the universe is made up of 22% Dark Matter, 74% Dark Energy, leaving only 4% of the universe made of light and normal matter.

What does this mean. We only understand ~4% of the universe. But with pictures like this we can start to understand the remaining 96%.

Picture, thanks to Hubble Space Telescope and to all the people who made this possible.
Aaron
----------
Addendum 5/16/2010