Magnetic fields and time.

From The General Science Journal

http://www.network54.com/Forum/304711/thread/1261474920/last-1261489531/Experiments+Confirming+Two+Incompatible+Theories

"The Pound-Rebka experiment confirms Newton's emission theory of light if: 

1) photons accelerate in a gravitational field as cannonballs do.
 2) there is no gravitational time dilation.


The Pound-Rebka experiment confirms a fragment (not other fragments) of Einstein's inconsistent theory of relativity if:
 1) photons do not accelerate in a gravitational field.
 2) there is gravitational time dilation:

http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~djmorin/book.html
Chapter 14: "The equivalence principle has a striking consequence concerning the behavior of clocks in a gravitational field. It implies that higher clocks run faster than lower clocks. If you put a watch on top of a tower, and then stand on the ground, you will see the watch on the tower tick faster than an identical watch on your wrist. When you take the watch down and compare it to the one on your wrist, it will show more time elapsed."

Pentcho Valev

===============

I would like to examine this phenomena from the perspective of the Standard Vibration Model.

The Zeeman effect has shown a magnetic field spreads a photon wave into its component information. The photon wave returns to its changed vector after exiting the field. I also have shown it stops spinning during this transition. 

 Picture credit NOAO

This would account for the change in time. The clock at the beginning of the magnetic field does change at a normal rate. While the photon is travelling through the magnetic field separates and does not spin. The clock at the bottom of the magnetic field will be slower because the photon is not spinning. 

So as photons pass though the different strengths of the magnetosphere, the photons spin and separate depending on the strength of the magnetic field. 


I would like to thank Pentcho Valev for the amount of reading he does. He reads in many languages and is a great presence on the General Science Journal.

The Baryonic Bubble

A star is a Baryonic Bubble in a Dark Matter solution.

The core of the star generates W bosons (Magnetism) with such high current that it pushes back the Dark Matter to form a Baryonic Bubble.

In a previous posting I showed a picture from the Max Planck's Institute that was taken over 116 minutes. It showed, what we thought was a black hole at the center of the galaxy was ejecting flares.

What?

That means the center of the galaxy is ejecting material for star formation, much like a star ejects material.

Spiral over Norway

This is an amazing phenomena.

This was described by 'them' on CNN as a failed Russian ICBM test. Why can't 'they' say, 'I don't know'? Nobody has any idea what this is. This is not a failed missile test, this was an electric event. It shows similarities to an analog Mandelbrot set.

We can learn things from these pictures. I would like to know how long this remained in the sky.  Did pilots see this? Were there any electrical disturbances on the ground? Was this seen by other people and where were they? How many people saw this? Did the plume change position based on the observer? Did compasses or GPS systems work? Was the internet slow in the affected area? How long did it take for Google searches to return in the affected area? Did the event affect broadcast signals? Are there pictures over time of the event? What was the barometric pressure? Humidity? Did the magnetic probes around the earth pick up anything strange? What did the interstellar medium look like at this time? Were there other magnetic events occurring on other planets at this time? Was there a solar storm at this time?

One thing I noticed in the second picture is the lack of symmetry. I also noticed that the plume is changing position based on the spiral.

There are many more questions to be asked before any answers are developed.

Thanks to those who took the pictures and to Curt Youngs for the conversation.

Addendum: 01/18/2010
This is the description of what happened.
http://wwwppd.nrl.navy.mil/whatsnew/haarp/

This is a cool site.
http://truedeity.wordpress.com/

Standard Vibration Model Predictions

I was once asked what predictions could be made from this model, or something to that effect. At the time I wondered if this model could make a prediction of a new idea in physics. It can. This is more of an explanation of an existing problem.

A change in the magnetic field around a rocket will increase the altitude of the orbit. This magnetic field will create pressure against the dark matter. This is shown at this description of the Vanguard and Explorer spacecraft and the spinning ball experiment. http://www.enterprisemission.com/Von_Braun2.htm

The equations shown in the published papers show a change in the magnetic field will change the shape of the dark/baryonic matter bubble.

Or the change in the magnetic field changes the density of the baryons. This change in density changes the altitude of density equilibrium.

They are actually the same statement, just different sides of the equation. You optimize the altitude of the satellite by changing the magnetic field surrounding the spacecraft during launch.

These changes in the magnetic field will require a great level of stability and understanding of the geometry of dark matter bubbles.

Prior to this model there was no explanation for this problem.

First attempt at thought

This is an excellent question. What constitutes consciousness? Consciousness is a collection of vibrations created and emitted by the organic neural structure.

I now define a single vibration of meme as the interaction of organic chemistry and Z Bosons. I have defined memes as any information, but there is a specific vibration created by organic chemistry. I need to redefine memes to the common definition. From there I can evaluate the dynamics of neural networks.

The model that I have presented here allows for descriptions of different information types and their interactions. Thought produces a different type of vibration. Culture is the difference of this vibration between many organisms or nodes, the changes between equilibrium.

With this addition to the model, thought/organic chemistry has a specifically different vibration. This vibration is not a photon, gluon, or W+/- Boson. It could be that memes are enhanced Z Bosons. This is why we see data from EEG or PET. Z Bosons are capable of transmitting data structures, and analog information.

Seismic vibrations are the change in position of baryons. This vibration is not any of the Bosons, but the intense change in position of these baryons in relation to other baryons. This causes intensity changes in the emitting baryons. The receiving baryon change based on the information contained in the changed bosons emitted by the change in baryon's position.

Positron emission tomography shows intensity of organic chemistry. We have not ever used an accelerator to propel organics. So we cannot see the fundamental vibrations found in organics.

The above post comes from the General Science Journal.

Here comes the medium

I have been watching the words that come from people about the interstellar medium. I really hate poorly thought out media releases.

“This is the first detection of chromium and manganese from a cluster. Previously, these metals were detected only from stars in the Milky Way or from other galaxies. This is the first detection in intergalactic space,” JAXA astrophysicist and Perseus study leader Takayuki Tamura says.

You are aware that stars are always part of galaxies. When I talk about the interstellar medium, I am referring to non-baryonic matter between baryonic bubbles.

Pasta Universe - Geometry of State

The pasta structure in the hadron-quark phase transition and the effects on magnetized compact stars

This is important. They are showing the different geometries of state. Geometry of State. The bubble is natural. It shows up in soap bubbles. The bubble is an analog to this vibratory model.

This bubble is the interaction between 2 anti-gluon Dark Matter fabric solids and 3 gluon baryonic bubble matter. The mechanism for this interaction is the W+/- Boson or magnetism. Every boson is expressing information about the originating baryon. Every baryon is constantly going through a process of read/write phases. This allows for transmission of data about itself. It also receives data about other baryons. There is a third calculation phase.

Dark Matter, as is described in this model, is charge repugnant. They are not electrically neutral. The rule is : a dark matter, 2 anti-gluon vibration cannot occupy the same space as a 3 gluon, charged baryon. Dark Matter cannot form the lepton, electron. Thus Dark Matter is pushed aside by baryons producing the ball in the ribbon effect.

Magnetism is the rotation of the 3 gluons in a cone shape. The spinning magnet. Density is the compression of the length of the gluon. These interactions cause the bubble shape that spins and vibrates in a bubble shape.

Dark Matter is only the gluon forces of density. Dark Matter does not spin. Dark Matter exhibits density pressure force and reacts to magnetism. This interaction is the breaking of the bonds in the Dark Matter by magnetism or the W+/- Boson. The magnetic pressures of the baryons against the Dark Matter cause this interaction. There are areas of void of information in the Dark Energy that are neither Dark Matter or Baryonic Matter.

Disharmonic vibrations are not transmitted by Dark Energy from Ruleset to Ruleset. Disharmonic vibrations are absorbed by Dark Energy Rulesets.

The pictures from IBEX and other Magnetism Sensors show intense interactions at the boundries of Dark Matter and Baryonic Matter.
Credit IBEX

This model explains the pictures taken by IBEX.

Numerous Contrails today

Today over West Palm Beach there were more than the usual number of contrails in the sky. They were at extreme distance to each other. Rarely do I ever see contrails here in West Palm Beach. Planes usually fly over or under the altitude at which water freezes.

The temperature according to the Weather Channel was
Clear of clouds
80F
30.00 pressure and stable
Humidity 64
Dew point 67
Heat Index 82F
Ceiling 2300 feet
visibility 10 miles


My question is this. Was this a solar event that caused the extreme difference in altitude of the contrails? It appeared to extend the altitude at which contrails to more than usual. The trails were blowing at a rapid speed and perpendicular to the direction. I could see several trails spreading apart but never actually interacting with each other. They were at very different altitudes.

It was as if the area in which contrails expanded quickly and stayed expanded for only a few minutes. During that time 7 contrails existed from different planes going in different directions including one that was perpendicular to the other 6. The contrails started to blow away, dissipate. No new contrails in the sky, though planes are obviously flying over. The one trail that was going in the direction of the winds did not dissipate in the same manner as the other 6.

The event ended when a cloud expanded from low altitude on the horizon and met with the bottom area where the contrails formed. This singular cloud formed a discharge event, allowing the electrical energy to dissipate.

hypothesis: After the singular cloud extended from the ceiling at 2300 ft to the bottom of the contrail altitude, the energy in the contrail level discharged. The contrail area returned to its normal area. After this discharge the sky started producing lots of low level clouds across all of the sky. Within 15 minutes of the discharge the sky was full of low level clouds. I wish I had a camera with me. I should always carry my phone.

I think this was a magnetic event that pushed the altitude for contrails down to a low altitude. when the singular cloud met the altitude for contrails, it provided an area of conductivity that discharged the electricity in the magnetic event.

I also wish I had access to better local weather data. I really wish we could put cameras at schools with full weather labs. The kids can control the local cameras and weather gathering data systems. We should have these at all the schools.

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/wxwise/class/contrail.html

The Electric Universe Theory

The Electric Universe

I don't think it is a good idea to embed this video. It is large. It is a superb video. The Electric Universe theory can be found at http://www.holoscience.com/

For cosmologist, ignore it at your own peril. If the model you are working on does not identify and solve these problems then the model is incorrect.

What is being described in this model is the interaction between the Z Boson and the W+/- Boson. At the point of interaction between the Z and W+/- Bosons creates a unstable oscillating lepton called Electron. This lepton not only produces electricity, but it is responsible for the emission of the Photon Boson. This lepton is the point of read/write of memes or information from one Baryon to another.

Z Bosons connect to the nearest and strongest W+/-Boson. It does not necessarily connect to its own W+/- Boson. This process is ionization.

The unstable lepton vibrates in two ways. They are the same vibration. The continuum of vibration is asymptotic at the neutral or zero. The attractive vibration of the lepton is a positive charge. The opposite or negative charge vibration is expressive.

Ill add to this later. I have to think more on it.

GOCE thoughts

Some thoughts on GOCE

GOCE is a great spacecraft that is measuring density. There are some great videos of findings and the satellite itself. It only measures the change in altitude to the density of material below.

I noticed a couple of things here.

1)It is only measuring material directly below the satellite.
2)There are vast changes in density in small areas. If there were gravity waves this change would be gradual.
3) The satellite is only affected by densities below the craft. It is not pulled towards areas of greater density, which is required by gravity.

Parton Distribution Function

Yes, scientist. If you spend multi-billion dollars/euros on a project then you better expect people to evaluate the work. I have seen the reason for building a particle accelerator change over time. We have gone from the 'God particle', Higgs Boson, to mini black holes. Now we have Parton Distribution Function. It seems marketing has failed and we have returned to good old fashioned science.

Parton Distribution Function is the experimental data that shows the position and momentum for each destroyed particle. It seems we don't get a small black hole during collisions. We get what anyone would expect, pieces flying off in different directions. This shattering of vibration is Parton Distribution Function.

As usual anyone reading about the topic will instantly become confused with jargon. This site has helped in cracking the Parton code. This person asks great questions.
http://www.finestructure.com/2008/09/parton-distribution-functions/

Code and algorithms
http://durpdg.dur.ac.uk/hepdata/pdf.html

Protecting the ISS

The most important goal of the next few years in space science must be protecting the International Space Station. Robotic devices must be allowed to be tested to remove orbital debris.

Small Business grants must be given to innovate space science. Our entire culture is based on space science. Reward removal of orbital debris to protect existing systems. It is cheaper to remove orbital debris than it is to replace GPS or communication satellites.

Space junk storm will up mission costs: experts

Discrepencies in symmetry

This post is in response to US/LHC Blog.

"A particle is a particle is a particle!" This is not true.
1)The electron is not in the same place at any different time.
2)The fields emanating from a vibration is always different.
3) the Baryon's spin causes differences at each time.
Thus a particle is not a particle is not a particle!
This idea stems from the religion of the Higg's Boson. Marketed as the God particle with this belief The universe is perfect and perfect requires god. God makes particles using the Higg's Boson. Here is an example of belief in cosmology.

It is not possible for any object to be symmetrical. Let me repeat that, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR ANY OBJECT TO BE SYMMETRICAL!!! No object can be a sphere. Circles are two dimensional, thus cannot exist in nature. Most importantly, no object can be a sphere.

GOCE has produced data that shows the southern half of the Earth is concave in the Atlantic, Indian and Arctic oceans. This area is not convex which is required for a sphere.
This is the link to ESA/GOCE. This has a video showing the Earth's density in specific detail. This video shows the spinning planet is not a sphere. It has different densities at different latitudes and longitudes. The spinning Earth is so deformed it changes the spacecraft orbit.

I will continue this thought later. I have had a seizure and need to sleep. 12:30p

During my recovery today I had visualizations that will help add to this evaluation of symmetry.

Not only does the planet suffer from asymmetry, but our brains use asymmetry. A neural network is an error correction system. It optimizes information through error correction.

It is not possible for sub atomic vibrations to show symmetry. Asymmetry is a requirement for a baryon's existence. It has proven difficult for scientist to produce symmetrical molecules. The reason for this difficulty is a baryon is composed of three vibrating Gluons.

Two gluons meet to form a quark. This intertwining of gluons allow for storage of information. Kind of like RAM.

Although I will not quit using 8π in calculations this is only because we don't have a suitable replacement yet. An example is the photon radiation of the Sun. If evaluated by wavelength then U(λ,T)= (8πhc/λ^5)*(1/e^(hc/λT)-1) cannot account for changes on the surface of the Sun; Sun spots, solar flares...

This article shows Neutrino oscillation. This oscillation shows vibration in sub atomic particles. Oscillation is by default not symmetrical.

Data

This is where I am going to put links to Datasets from spacecraft and satellites. I am going to analyse the data in reference to the Standard Vibration Model described here.

The first project will be to analyze Mercury's orbit using all available data. I would like help in this project. I would also like to show the analyzed data here in an application for blogger in 3d.

MERCURY ORBITAL DATA EXPLORER

Ummmm, Plasma

VASIMR (Variable Specific Impulse Magnetoplasma Rocket)

Detecting Gravity

The detection of gravity should have been one of the simplest things scientists to detect. It should have been detected by the large particle accelerators. It should have needed to be accounted for in other findings.

Scientist have yet to find any evidence of gravity! Let me restate that. THERE IS NO GRAVITY!

Gravity should have messed up any experiment using a laser trying to define atomic measurements standards. These laser detection systems that measure changes in atoms should have had errors created by the distance function of the earth and sun gravitation. Every day there should be a modifier to account for the gravity of the sun in relation to the position of the earth. When you get down to this level of accuracy, minor changes mess things up. And Gravity should have messed up these experiments.

So, more anecdotal evidence showing the failure to detect gravity.

Thermodynamics is broken by logic

The first law/hypothesis of thermodynamics is conservation of energy.

The second law/hypothesis of thermodynamics is entropy.

These two are antithetical to each other. One cannot exist with the other.

Any "yeah, but." breaks the concept of a law.

Examples:
Shifting entropy

Magnetosphere and Solar Winds

There is a lot of interesting work being done on magnetospheres, solar winds, and solar flares. I am just going to put all the papers I find on this topic here. I will break them up into topics.

Space Mission Analysis and Design Pg 198 Second Edition.
"The Earth's magnetic field is roughly dipolar;",""

Where:
Local Magnetic Field Intensity
Radial Distance in Earth radii
= Magnetic Field intensity at the equator
Magnetic Latitude.


The authors are explicit in saying that this is a basic model and to examine further more complex models.
-------------


-------------
Solar Winds:
-------------
Sun Spots:
NSF Special Report
-------------
Solar Flares:
-------------
Solar Magnetosphere:
-------------
Interplanetary Magnetosphere:
Well IBEX is the spacecraft that could. These people did some great work. All hail IBEX. They have published their data publicly. I will put links to their data.

"The Sun moves through the local interstellar medium,
continuously emitting ionized, supersonic solar wind
plasma and carving out a cavity in interstellar space,
called the heliosphere." IBEX
-------------
Mercury's Magnetosphere:
MERCURY: MAGNETIC FIELD AND MAGNETOSPHERE


-------------
Venus' Magnetosphere:
VENUS: MAGNETIC FIELD AND MAGNETOSPHERE


-------------
Earth's Magnetosphere:

Extended Michelson-Morley Interferometer experiment. English version. I think this is the Zeeman effect. The vertical shows the dynamic changes in the Earth's magnetic field.
This is interesting. I wonder what would happen at different altitudes. It certainly would be a good project to put on the space station. This is cool!

Scientists Discover Surprise in Earth's Upper Atmosphere

-------------
Mars' Magnetosphere:
MARS: MAGNETIC FIELD AND MAGNETOSPHERE


-------------
Asteroid Belt Magnetic Anomalies:
-------------
Jupiter's Magnetosphere:
Ganymede
Properties of Ganymede's magnetosphere inferred from improved three-dimensional MHD simulations
Wiki
Ganymede's magnetosphere makes a big impression on Jupiter's auroral lightshows

Io
-------------
Saturn's Magnetosphere:
SATURN: MAGNETIC FIELD AND MAGNETOSPHERE

http://nasaimages.org/luna/servlet/detail/NVA2~1~1~2206~102356:Behold-Saturn-s-Magnetosphere!

New transient radiation belt discovered at Saturn

Science Centric (14 Sep 2009 00:02 GMT) - Scientists using the Cassini spacecraft's Magnetospheric Imaging instrument (MIMI) have detected a new, temporary radiation belt at Saturn, located around the orbit of its moon Dione at about 377 000 km from the centre of the planet. The discovery will be presented at the European Planetary Science Congress in Potsdam by Dr Elias Roussos on Monday 14 September... [full story]



-------------
Uranus' Magnetosphere:
URANUS: MAGNETIC FIELD AND MAGNETOSPHERE


-------------
Neptune's Magnetosphere:
NEPTUNE: MAGNETIC FIELD AND MAGNETOSPHERE


-------------
Pluto,Charon Magnetosphere:
-------------
Comets
-------------
Ice Belts
-------------
Magnetostatics
Biot–Savart



Where: = current [1]
is a vector, whose magnitude is the length of the differential element of the wire, and whose direction is the direction of conventional current [1]
B is the net magnetic field [1]
is the magnetic constant. (A confusion sometimes encountered is to think that μ0 is a physical constant that describes some physical property. This notion is not true: μ0 is a measurement-system constant introduced and defined as a result of international agreement) [2]
is the displacement unit vector in the direction pointing from the wire element towards the point at which the field is being computed. [1]
is the full displacement vector from the wire element to the point at which the field is being computed. [1]


-------------
Maxwell's
I am reading A treatise on electricity and magnetism, Volume 1 By James Clerk Maxwell, Joseph John Thompson

Maxwell describes "The Three Fundamental Units".
They are:
Length[L]l
Time[T]t
Mass[M]m.
So the dimensions of mass at rest is m=l^3t^-2. This is inline with Newton's Law.

The Derived Units.
Velocity = [LT^-1]
Acceleration = [LT^-2]
Density = [ML^3]
Momentum [MLT^-1]
Force = [MLT^-2]
Work = [ML^2T^-2]
Energy = [ML^3T^-2]

These derived units are well defined by Maxwell and others.

Now Einstein comes along an changes this. Energy = [MC^2]. I don't know how or why he made this change. Nor does it make sense nor does it match the Derived Units.

-------------
Faraday's
-------------
Gauss' law
-------------
Ampère's law
-------------
Other Laws
-------------
Coulomb's Law [1] [2]


-------------
Interesting Videos


Interesting Papers
The pasta structure in the hadron-quark phase transition and the effects on magnetized compact stars

Buoyancy and density

Chemists understand density. They understand why a tree floats on water. They use density in their equations. Specific gravity is the relationship between objects of differing densities. Then again it should be called specific density. They can even evaluate differing densities at changing temperatures or pressures.

Physicists do not understand this. It seems to me that physicists missed chemistry class in school. It is obvious from their equations. Every equation I have evaluated shows the physicist ignorance on this topic. F=ma, E=mc^2... Mass does not exist in the natural world. Mass is a zero dimensional measurement. To a physicist, an object falls because of this magical field called gravity. Gravity has never been proven and has never been observed. Gravity is the only concept/contruct that the Standard Model cannot produce.

The physicists' equations do not integrate temperature, pressure, electric or magnetic fields in their solutions. Yet those variables are all necessary to evaluate changes in position. Each variable is associated with a boson; Photon - Temperature, Gluon - Density, W+/- Boson - Magnetism, Z Boson - Electricity.

Why should a physicist care about density? First the planets are ordered by density. The planets closer to the sun are solids, next are the gas giants, then the ice planets.
• Mercury - 5.427 g/cm³
• Venus - 5.204 g/cm³
• Earth - 5.515 g/cm³
• Mars - 3.934 g/cm³
• Jupiter - 1.326 g/cm³
• Saturn - 0.687 g/cm³
• Uranus - 1.27 g/cm³
• Neptune - 1.638 g/cm³
• Pluto - 2.03 ± 0.06 g/cm³

Motion can only be determined by evaluating the Bosons involved. This series of pictures shows what happens to a floating piece of wood when photons excite the water below.







water
steam
wood
the data is from © 1998 - 2008 roger walker
The pictures are mine

Mining the moon for He3

Helium 3 is the best nuclear fuel. It is not radioactive and produces tremendous amounts of electricity. It has already been found on the moon by Dr Schmitt Link.

We need to take manned exploration of the solar system in stages. We need to learn to build in space. We must have refueling stations placed in the flight path for emergencies.

To not put a base on the moon is ludicrous.

Newton, Quantum Mechanics and Vibrations

THE PRINCIPIA. BOOK III
PROPOSITION IV. THEOREM IV.
That the moon gravitates towards the earth, and by the force of gravity is continually drawn off from a rectilinear motion, and retained in its orbit.

The mean distance of the moon from the earth in the syzygies in semidiameters of the earth, is, according to Ptolemy and most astronomers, 59 : according to Vendelin and Huygens, 60 ; to Copernicus, 60 1/3 ; to Street, 60 2/5 ; and to Tycho, 56 1/2. But Tycho, and all that follow his tables of refraction, making the refractions of the sun and moon (altogether against the nature of light) to exceed the refractions of the fixed stars, and that by four or five minutes near the horizon, did thereby increase the moon s horizontal parallax by a like number of minutes, that is, by a twelfth or fifteenth part of the whole parallax. Correct this error, and the distance will become about 60 1/2 semi-diameters of the earth, near to what others have assigned.

===========
Newton's calculations of the distance are close. But yet, so are all the listed astronomer. All within a few thousand kilometers.

I understand what you find so compelling about Newton's work. It is geometric. It is decidally understandable through drawings and averages. I see the importance of this work. It broke man out of the middle ages. It brought understandable science to a God ordered world. It maintained that order.

But the universe is based on chaos. This is determined by 3 gluons. Quantum Mechanics shows us it is impossible to determine the exact position of any sub-atomic particle. This is shown through the experiments of the giant accelerators.

Newton's work will bring an answer that is close, but understandable. Quantum Mechanics understands that it is probably not correct with a margin of error. My understanding is about the error or the change in fields and the effect that has on the baryon.
===========
This is from the General Science Journal Forums under 'theory of everything'

Aaron: Yes, they did a great job. All of them. At getting closer and closer to a more accurate system. It has been an amazing time.

But the Standard Particle Model shows that there is no gravity. It is easy to see the 4 forces and what they do. It is also glaringly apparent that gravity is not relevant. The same process of densities moving shows not an attractive unit to motion but a repulsive/expressive one. And I say expressive, because this is all about information. The forces are nothing but information in motion.

There is no chaos if one has control of the polarity, direction of charge,rate of spin of the baryon. Really all the information describing the baryon.

Chaos results when the model breaks down. Chaos occurs when the model can not finish, because it does not describe the relation to the other forces. Chaos is what we don't expect. And in this case all we have to do to bridge that line of thinking is reverse the direction of gravity, extend the 3 dimensional nature of density of the baryon. You have essentially the same result, but now you have finer control. You know the fields involved to remove the chaos.

No need for a flat universe. No need to explain a big bang as all the universe in a bang. Space is no longer relevant to matter. Matter expresses itself as information that passes through dark energy. Dark energy does not care if it Dark or Baryonic matter. It is the medium in which information vibrates.
=====
A baryon is repulsive and hot. It also has a charge, direction of charge and a spin. A baryon can bond to other baryons creating different results in vibrations. A baryon, a collection of gluons, expresses itself with/as forces.

The Z Boson is precise. The logic behind this vibration is to express the baryon's heat and electricity. It does this by creating a lepton which creates a boson. The lepton is the electron and the boson is the photon. It is required that the photon is emitted by the electron. It is also required that the electron read the photon.

The photon says my baryon is precisely this spectra, it was this hot when I left it, and I traveled this far to get you receiving lepton. (Frequency, Wave Length, Temperature, counter) The receiving baryon can now calculate heat, pressure from heat, direction of heat.

The electron also transmits information on the baryon's electrical information. This is my current, charge, voltage and spin. The spin is resistance.

The analogy to music is strong.

Memes Definition

Memes have been described as ideas that perpetuate through culture.

The definition at WIKI for a meme is "A meme (pronounced /ˈmiːm/, rhyming with "cream") is a postulated unit or element of cultural ideas, symbols or practices, and is transmitted from one mind to another through speech, gestures, rituals, or other imitable phenomena."

I will endeavor to redefine meme to a subatomic level, then show how these bits of information form physics, chemistry and culture. That all ideas have their basis in subatomic particles. Ideas are only collections forces from subatomic particles.

It is impossible for memes to have their basis in anything but baryonic matter. All cultural ideas must come from organic chemistry and some areas of inorganic chemistry, thus all ideas must come from collections of baryonic matter.

Memes are the bits of information needed to make bosons. Bosons are the analog forces of information used by baryons to communicate to other baryons and dark matter. For this topic dark matter is not needed since it is not part of organic chemistry.



Organic chemistry is the special rules needed for carbon based chains to communicate information to create more efficient carbon chains. DNA and RNA are the two easiest examples of this process. From WIKI Link "Organic chemistry is a discipline within chemistry which involves the scientific study of the structure, properties, composition, reactions, and preparation (by synthesis or by other means) of chemical compounds that contain carbon. These compounds may contain any number of other elements, including hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, the halogens as well as phosphorus, silicon and sulfur".

RNA is needed by the DNA to effect amino acid production in a DNA cell. All the baryons that form a chain communicate to each other in series to produce amino acids.

Baryons store information about their previous state in gluon structures call quarks. This previous state information is required to communicate current information. This structure of the baryon is formed by gluons using the strong nuclear force. The baryon communicates to other baryons using the other three emitting forces; W+/- Boson, Z Boson and the Photon. The chemical process used to create amino acids use only the information created by the baryons and expressed by the 3 emitting bosons.

This simple process is how all information is received, processed and emitted. It extends to collections of neurons. Thus extending to collections of organisms. From collections of organisms it extends to culture.

The universe is not expanding

The universe is not expanding. The material within the universe is expanding. Doppler shift shows the material in the universe is moving.

Dark Energy is the medium in which dark matter and baryonic matter exist. Baryonic matter produces magnetism. This applies pressure to the dark matter producing baryonic bubbles.

Near Space Security of Assets

Asset assurance needs to be top priority for near space security. Major manned and unmanned platforms are vulnerable to even the smallest bits of debris. Space debris is a matter of cleaning the environment for current and future usage of orbits. There are some major problems in cleaning orbits. First is identification, second is to deorbit the debris, third is protection of platforms.

Identification of debris:
There are several methods of debris identification. Some are more effective than others.
Radar is discussed as an option. There are several issues with radar that cannot be currently resolved in near space.
1. Range. The range of naval radar is no more then 100 miles. Debris travelling at 20,000 miles per hour will traverse 333 miles in a second. Any bit of debris would hit a platform before it could be identified.
2. Size of debris. Most space debris is very small. Most debris would never even show up on radar in optimal conditions.
3. Power requirements. The average power consumption of an Aegis ship based radar platform is 485 kwm^2. This would require putting a nuclear power plant in near earth orbit.
4. Effective platform. The platform required to utilize and maintain a radar platform along with its power supply would be as large as a naval frigate. This would take years to develop and deploy. It would be a project in the magnitude of deploying another International Space Station just to protect the current space station.
Ladar has similar problems as Radar. Reflectivity is the main issue. The debris must reflect the laser. This will not occur with small or poorly reflective debris.
Infrared Radhard CMOS camera would be the most effective tool currently available for detection of debris. CMOS cameras use <100 mW of power. These cameras can be placed on the current space station with little change to existing systems. They can take pictures of the sky above the space station identifying debris as it passes overhead. This can give exceptional lead time to controllers allowing for shielding or collection of debris.

Shielding: There are several methods that must be used in tandem to protect assets. These are physical protection, magnetic fields, collection, and changing orbits of larger pieces of debris.
1. Physical protection. The use of Kevlar needs to be developed by nations to protect near space assets. Kevlar encased aerogel should be used to shroud manned platforms. This provides layered protection to several hazards in space. By wrapping the spacecraft and by using shields on shock absorbing positional arms will provide excellent protection.
a. Debris
b. Thermal
c. Radiation

2. Magnetic fields. The use of magnetic fields has not been evaluated by nations as an effective form of protection. Using simple magnetic fields several thousand miles away from the platform will push most debris out of their current orbit. If done correctly, debris can be pushed into the Earth’s atmosphere. If used with identification tools, magnetic fields can be altered to match the debris’ size and speed. Small spacecraft can be deployed around the station as an effective barrier.
3. Collection vehicles. It is imperative that nations develop collection vehicles to be deployed from the station to recover debris and place it in a safe orbit.
4. Similar to collection vehicles. To remove large pieces of debris, vehicles would attach themselves to large garbage and use thrust to deorbit the junk.

In conclusion: It is imperative that nations protect space based assets. All these systems must be used in combination to provide effective protection.

I was asked to write this paper by Near Space Security for possible inclusion in March 24-25th 2010 conference in Amsterdam.

Flat Universe - Another silly result from relativity

I was reading an article in the NewScientist by Pedro Ferreira
"Dark energy may be bending the universe out of shape"

"WE LIVE in a special time. For the past two decades, most of my colleagues and I have been working under the assumption that we can know everything about the universe. We know the amount of matter and energy it contains. We know its shape is flat. We can trace its history from the earliest moments after the big bang and we can even predict its fate. Or at least we thought we could."

The article continues, "Together with later measurements from NASA's WMAP satellite, the results nailed down the geometry of the universe to within a few per cent."

And, "But it was only after a few years of whittling away at the signals in early 2000 that we saw our own clear evidence of hot and cold spots with a typical size of 1 degree."
==============

It is absolutely ridiculous to state the universe is flat. There are Gamma Ray Bursts occurring all over the celestial sphere. Many of them have a red shift that would put them at >10 billion light years away. These are enormous explosion that create GRBs. These GRBs are probably galactic clusters exploding. If the universe was flat then these GRBs would be in the universe's elliptic or that 1 degree. This is not occurring.

In this Standard Vibration Model, Dark Energy is the aether that fills the universe. 100% of the universe is Dark Energy. Dark Energy is the medium in which all vibrations occur. Only 4% of the known universe is Baryonic in nature and the other 96% is Dark Matter.