This picture is from wiki uploaded by Itamblyn
Thursday, April 16, 2009
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Hydrogen atom pictoral representation

This is the picture that shows all the vibrations of the atom at an instant.
I noticed the asymmetry in the picture. This helps describe the general asymmetry of the universe. While the atom is in motion, this asymmetry causes error. Error causes pattern.
Another thing I noticed, is how essential trigonometry is. Those three Quarks always form a triangle in 3d space. I see Sine waves and Cosine waves.
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
Spatial Geometry as Dark Energy
In several postings I describe in general terms how Dark Energy works. The problem I have is with the space created by Dark Energy. The space created by Dark Energy is not defined by any previous space; Hilbert, Einstein, or others. Previously defined space requires a flat universe, a vacuum and single point mass.(Crothers (3))
Dark Energy, in this model is a media. A media is more like a fluid. The specific vibration causes the media to form into specific matter.
In this media there is a hierarchy of vibrations.
Dark Energy, in this model is a media. A media is more like a fluid. The specific vibration causes the media to form into specific matter.
In this media there is a hierarchy of vibrations.
Labels:
Dark Energy
Saturday, March 21, 2009
Crothers' papers.
I am reading a series of papers that explain in mathematical rigor that, well, black holes cannot exist. Steve Crothers from Australia is the author. These papers are complex but thanks to the author they are easy to understand. He does this disproof using all the normal systems of General Relativity. They are amazing. He does a superior job in citations and explaining how these citations build his idea.
sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com
Thanks to Curt for sending me there.
sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com
Thanks to Curt for sending me there.
Labels:
Black holes,
Relativity,
Scientists
Saturday, March 14, 2009
ESA's GOCE
The E.S.A. has built a satellite called GOCE. This is one finely crafted vehicle. There is a great video on GOCE. I'm going to learn more about what they have built and learned.
GOCE Youtube video
GOCE Youtube video 1
ESA has a cool site
GOCE Youtube video
GOCE Youtube video 1
ESA has a cool site
Labels:
Density,
Spacecraft
Thursday, March 12, 2009
Why we see Anti-Gluons and Anti-Quarks
Why do we occasionally see Anti-Quarks and Anti-Gluons when particle accelerators teams do their amazing stuff?
The vibrations of Gluon and Anti-Gluon are so similar that during the collision of a normal atom, a Gluon may react to the collision by spinning in the opposite direction. This reverse spin Gluon is Dark Matter.
Anti-Gluons dissipate quickly into the Dark Energy on Earth. They cannot survive in an area of Dark Energy that is vibrating in the opposite direction. They are disharmonious to the distinctly different harmony of the Baryonic Matter. This exacerbated the Anti-Gluons' dissipation into the Dark Energy.
This same process occurs with Quarks. Although Anti-Quarks can bond with Quarks to form Mesons. Then the meson becomes disharmonic and dissipates. Some Mesons are more stable then others.
Anti-Gluons and Anti-Quarks in their normal vibration space form 4 Anti-Gluons per Anti-Quark. Where the Anti-Gluon has a piece of an Anti-Quark on each end of the Anti-Gluon. This geometry forms a sheet. Sheets forms a Dark Matter space.
The vibrations of Gluon and Anti-Gluon are so similar that during the collision of a normal atom, a Gluon may react to the collision by spinning in the opposite direction. This reverse spin Gluon is Dark Matter.
Anti-Gluons dissipate quickly into the Dark Energy on Earth. They cannot survive in an area of Dark Energy that is vibrating in the opposite direction. They are disharmonious to the distinctly different harmony of the Baryonic Matter. This exacerbated the Anti-Gluons' dissipation into the Dark Energy.
This same process occurs with Quarks. Although Anti-Quarks can bond with Quarks to form Mesons. Then the meson becomes disharmonic and dissipates. Some Mesons are more stable then others.
Anti-Gluons and Anti-Quarks in their normal vibration space form 4 Anti-Gluons per Anti-Quark. Where the Anti-Gluon has a piece of an Anti-Quark on each end of the Anti-Gluon. This geometry forms a sheet. Sheets forms a Dark Matter space.
Labels:
Anti-Gluon,
Anti-Quark,
Dark Energy,
Dark Matter,
Gluon,
Quark
Monday, March 9, 2009
The Z Boson and Electricity & Plasma
Much is known and being studied in the field of electricity. I mean, We have some really cool things because of people's understanding of electricity. I'm writing on a tablet pc. What could be more cool than that? Iphone, maybe. So, we already have an incredible understanding of electricity.
Plasma physicists on the other hand are doing some really cool things with new ideas. They get to play with some wild toys. Plasma engines teams are making huge achievements in their field(with their fields). Plasma is going to turn out to be the next major leap in physical technology.
The Z Boson transmits information from the Gluon to the Electron and back again. In conductors the Z Boson knocks Electrons from their orbit. In that, a Z Boson is responsible for changes in the Electron's distance to the nucleus. This strength in it's field is a measure of the intensity of the information that the Z Boson carries.
The information the Z Boson carries is it's charge and two compressed datasets for the Electron. The first is so the Electron can create a photon; temperature, wavelength, and frequency of the Quarks. The second dataset contains information for the Electron; current and voltage of the Quarks.
So now I can finish this table.
Table of information
Boson.| Gluon....| W Boson..| Z Boson.....| Photon
info.....| Voltage...| Charge.....|Current........| Frequency
info.....| Color......| Current.....|Photon data| Wave Length
info.....| Length....| Voltage....|Electron data| Temperature
Electricity occurs when the intensity of information(current) of the Z Boson ejects an Electron through a conductor. Plasma occurs when the intensity of information of the Z Boson extends it's field beyond it's atom to another atom or a free electron.
Plasma physicists on the other hand are doing some really cool things with new ideas. They get to play with some wild toys. Plasma engines teams are making huge achievements in their field(with their fields). Plasma is going to turn out to be the next major leap in physical technology.
The Z Boson transmits information from the Gluon to the Electron and back again. In conductors the Z Boson knocks Electrons from their orbit. In that, a Z Boson is responsible for changes in the Electron's distance to the nucleus. This strength in it's field is a measure of the intensity of the information that the Z Boson carries.
The information the Z Boson carries is it's charge and two compressed datasets for the Electron. The first is so the Electron can create a photon; temperature, wavelength, and frequency of the Quarks. The second dataset contains information for the Electron; current and voltage of the Quarks.
So now I can finish this table.
Table of information
Boson.| Gluon....| W Boson..| Z Boson.....| Photon
info.....| Voltage...| Charge.....|Current........| Frequency
info.....| Color......| Current.....|Photon data| Wave Length
info.....| Length....| Voltage....|Electron data| Temperature
Electricity occurs when the intensity of information(current) of the Z Boson ejects an Electron through a conductor. Plasma occurs when the intensity of information of the Z Boson extends it's field beyond it's atom to another atom or a free electron.
Monday, March 2, 2009
Time is not relative to speed of the object.
Here is another area where Einstein did not have enough information to create an adequate model of Physics.
Time is not relevant to Leptons or Quarks. Although they have a spin, it is not necessary for them to maintain a count. They have 1/2 and 1/3 spins respectively. For example, an Electron that is receiving information from a Photon adjusts its spin rate to the spin of the Photon. By doing this the Electron can now read the data from the Photon.
The 4 Boson's make time. All Bosons have a spin of one. Three of the Bosons express time by counting the number of spins they have travelled since their emission from another Gluon. This count is read by a Lepton or another Gluon. The Gluon reads data on spin and converts to the attached Quarks as pressure.
There is a hierarchy of of interactions between Bosons. This allows for consistent transfer of information. For example a Photon cannot transmit it's information directly to a Gluon. The Photon's information needs to be converted into a Z Boson first then to information that a Gluon can read.
Quarks, being the expressions of Gluons, only need to know the information about now. Whereas Gluons need to provide the information on now. Every now, the Gluon reads and expresses information on it's attached Quarks. This process is (magnetism, pressure (W Boson)), (electricity, data(spectra, heat, pressure) (Z Boson)), (spectra, heat, pressure (Photon)). Every now, the Gluon stores information to its attached Quark (Baryonic density, heat, pressure, spectra, magnetism, electricity (Quark)). Every now, a Quarks passes their information to both their attached Gluons to be expressed as a Z Boson and a W Boson. Since there are two Quarks to every Gluon, the Gluon must calculate/average information from both Quarks.
The speed of time is relative to baryonic density. A satellite's clock and a clock on the ground run at different rates. Like a satellite's orbital position over areas of differing densities, a satellite clock's rate changes based on the density of the ground below it. The speed of time is not relative to the speed of the object.
Time as we understand it, Past, Present, and Future is the result of a collection of molecules in a complex neural network. A neural network's primary purpose is to take tremendous amounts of information and convert it into useful actions.
Time is not relevant to Leptons or Quarks. Although they have a spin, it is not necessary for them to maintain a count. They have 1/2 and 1/3 spins respectively. For example, an Electron that is receiving information from a Photon adjusts its spin rate to the spin of the Photon. By doing this the Electron can now read the data from the Photon.
The 4 Boson's make time. All Bosons have a spin of one. Three of the Bosons express time by counting the number of spins they have travelled since their emission from another Gluon. This count is read by a Lepton or another Gluon. The Gluon reads data on spin and converts to the attached Quarks as pressure.
There is a hierarchy of of interactions between Bosons. This allows for consistent transfer of information. For example a Photon cannot transmit it's information directly to a Gluon. The Photon's information needs to be converted into a Z Boson first then to information that a Gluon can read.
Quarks, being the expressions of Gluons, only need to know the information about now. Whereas Gluons need to provide the information on now. Every now, the Gluon reads and expresses information on it's attached Quarks. This process is (magnetism, pressure (W Boson)), (electricity, data(spectra, heat, pressure) (Z Boson)), (spectra, heat, pressure (Photon)). Every now, the Gluon stores information to its attached Quark (Baryonic density, heat, pressure, spectra, magnetism, electricity (Quark)). Every now, a Quarks passes their information to both their attached Gluons to be expressed as a Z Boson and a W Boson. Since there are two Quarks to every Gluon, the Gluon must calculate/average information from both Quarks.
The speed of time is relative to baryonic density. A satellite's clock and a clock on the ground run at different rates. Like a satellite's orbital position over areas of differing densities, a satellite clock's rate changes based on the density of the ground below it. The speed of time is not relative to the speed of the object.
Time as we understand it, Past, Present, and Future is the result of a collection of molecules in a complex neural network. A neural network's primary purpose is to take tremendous amounts of information and convert it into useful actions.
Monday, February 9, 2009
Dark Energy : Ruleset
Dark Energy in its simplest form is a Ruleset.
1) A Ruleset is a computational engine.
2) A Ruleset is the media in which vibrations transverse.
3) A Ruleset is a 3 dimensional structure.
4) A Ruleset adds to the vibration's counter and reduces the intensity of the vibration as the vibration transverses the ruleset.
5) A Ruleset does not care which vibration it holds or if it is void of vibrations.
Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe is the best map of the contents of the universe that we can detect.
Currently
100% of the spaces of the detectable universe are Dark Energy Rulesets.
72% of those Rulesets are void of vibrations.
23% of those Rulesets contain Dark Matter vibrations.
4.6% of those Rulesets contain Baryonic Matter vibrations.

13.7 Billion Years ago
100% of the spaces of the detectable universe are Dark Energy Rulesets.
63% of those Rulesets contained Dark Matter vibrations.
12% of those Rulesets contained Baryonic Matter vibrations.
15% of those Rulesets contained photon vibrations
10% of those Rulesets contained Neutrino vibrations.
1) A Ruleset is a computational engine.
2) A Ruleset is the media in which vibrations transverse.
3) A Ruleset is a 3 dimensional structure.
4) A Ruleset adds to the vibration's counter and reduces the intensity of the vibration as the vibration transverses the ruleset.
5) A Ruleset does not care which vibration it holds or if it is void of vibrations.
Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe is the best map of the contents of the universe that we can detect.
Currently
100% of the spaces of the detectable universe are Dark Energy Rulesets.
72% of those Rulesets are void of vibrations.
23% of those Rulesets contain Dark Matter vibrations.
4.6% of those Rulesets contain Baryonic Matter vibrations.

13.7 Billion Years ago
100% of the spaces of the detectable universe are Dark Energy Rulesets.
63% of those Rulesets contained Dark Matter vibrations.
12% of those Rulesets contained Baryonic Matter vibrations.
15% of those Rulesets contained photon vibrations
10% of those Rulesets contained Neutrino vibrations.
Labels:
Dark Energy,
Information,
Physics
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
Shielding of spacecraft from solar radiation
The way you shield a spacecraft from solar radiation is to build a series of permanent magnets around the craft. This will allow the craft to be magnetically protected from solar radiation. It is like a magnetosphere. Solar radiation for the most part will go around the magnetic field.
They just need to be far enough apart to allow for an envelope to protect the computer. This is how you protect a spacecraft from solar radiation. I will look for some citations to support this but it is just obvious. Many people have written about this. A good paper is Townsend where several strategies are reviewed.
It is probably best to use permanent magnets, but if you have a nuclear reactor then electro-magnets are better for variable shielding.
They just need to be far enough apart to allow for an envelope to protect the computer. This is how you protect a spacecraft from solar radiation. I will look for some citations to support this but it is just obvious. Many people have written about this. A good paper is Townsend where several strategies are reviewed.
It is probably best to use permanent magnets, but if you have a nuclear reactor then electro-magnets are better for variable shielding.
Monday, February 2, 2009
The ridiculous Higgs Boson
This was a comment from Magnus. I thought it was humorous enough to make a posting of it. Magnus is known as TheBigParadox on Youtube. I would encourage you to make as many animations as you can about these paradoxes. There are many.
------
Many speculate about what this Higgs particle is, whether the Cern experiments are sensible etc.
I made a short animation, it could continue. Maybe I will make a continuation.
The Higgs Particle Adventure.
Best regards,
Magnus
I like the animation. It shows what ridiculous argument is necessary to even talk about the Higgs particle. The Higgs particle was developed when they tried to put what they saw together with what they believed.
Nothing works without gravity. That is what they believe. So there must be 4 forces ;Strong, weak, E/M and sometimes Gravity. Newton told us so.
But their work only shows 3 forces; strong, weak and E/M. They needed a system of reconciliation to keep gravity. In comes Higgs. If we had a new particle that does and does not exist when we need it to, then we can make the results that we think we are looking for. Thanks Higgs, we found the imaginary particle that produces the graviton on our chalk board. Newton proved that gravity exists, so there must be a graviton, thus there must be a Higgs Boson. Now that we have a Higgs Boson on the chalk board something magical happens here and look we now have a graviton. Tada. Newton is safe...
I explain in this blog how gravity has the appearance of working but is really density in action. Also it is not possible for CERN to produce a Black Hole in the sense that Newton/Einstein/Hawkins would describe. I have two articles on the topics of Black Holes that show evidence that these objects are Planck's Black Body radiators. The work at CERN is very important and cutting edge. I just disagree with the conclusions not their amazing work.
------
Many speculate about what this Higgs particle is, whether the Cern experiments are sensible etc.
I made a short animation, it could continue. Maybe I will make a continuation.
The Higgs Particle Adventure.
Best regards,
Magnus
I like the animation. It shows what ridiculous argument is necessary to even talk about the Higgs particle. The Higgs particle was developed when they tried to put what they saw together with what they believed.
Nothing works without gravity. That is what they believe. So there must be 4 forces ;Strong, weak, E/M and sometimes Gravity. Newton told us so.
But their work only shows 3 forces; strong, weak and E/M. They needed a system of reconciliation to keep gravity. In comes Higgs. If we had a new particle that does and does not exist when we need it to, then we can make the results that we think we are looking for. Thanks Higgs, we found the imaginary particle that produces the graviton on our chalk board. Newton proved that gravity exists, so there must be a graviton, thus there must be a Higgs Boson. Now that we have a Higgs Boson on the chalk board something magical happens here and look we now have a graviton. Tada. Newton is safe...
I explain in this blog how gravity has the appearance of working but is really density in action. Also it is not possible for CERN to produce a Black Hole in the sense that Newton/Einstein/Hawkins would describe. I have two articles on the topics of Black Holes that show evidence that these objects are Planck's Black Body radiators. The work at CERN is very important and cutting edge. I just disagree with the conclusions not their amazing work.
Labels:
Density,
Gravity,
Higgs Boson,
thebigparadox
Sunday, February 1, 2009
CERN

This picture is from CERN. It is described as a picture of a particle impacting on tungsten.
I would like to describe it as a single set of vibrations that hit an object where the density of tungsten vibrations caused the initial set of vibrations to shatter into pieces of vibrations. These pieces start out as intense in frequency and as they spread away from the point of impact they dissipate their frequency while increasing their wavelength. They cannot reform into standard vibrations so they absorb into the dark energy. We see this dissipation in the triangular shape of the ejecta. I wish the distances traveled was shown.
Gravity is shown not to exist here. If these vibrations were under the effect of gravity, they would arc towards each other or towards the center of the earth.
These ejecta also show that the conservation of energy does not exist. These pieces of vibrations are absorbed into the dark energy.
This is an amazing picture. Thanks for releasing it to the public. Thank you, CERN, for all the work you have done.
Labels:
Vibration
Tuesday, January 27, 2009
Speed of light is a variable
Citation http://www.rpi.edu/dept/phys/Dept2/APPhys1/optics/optics/node4.html
Cite DJ Wagner at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
The speed of light has a maximum velocity of 2.99792458 x 10^8 m/s in a vacuum.
Values of n come from the CRC Handbook
of Chemistry and Physics
v = c/n
Where
v = velocity of light through the medium
c = maximum speed of light in a vacuum
n = optical density or refractive index of media
--------------------------------------
v(lead) = c/n(lead)= (299792458 m/s) /(2.6) = 115304791.538 m/s through lead.
--------------------------------------
Dark Energy has a refractive index of ~<1. Though quite small Dark Energy still affects the speed, wavelength, frequency, and temperature of the photon-wave over great distances.
This is very important. I am beginning to think that the only constant is change.
Cite DJ Wagner at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
The speed of light has a maximum velocity of 2.99792458 x 10^8 m/s in a vacuum.
The index of refraction of some common materials are given below.
| material | n | material | n |
| Vacuum | 1 | Crown Glass | 1.52 |
| Air | 1.0003 | Salt | 1.54 |
| Water | 1.33 | Asphalt | 1.635 |
| Ethyl Alcohol | 1.36 | Heavy Flint Glass | 1.65 |
| Fused Quartz | 1.4585 | Diamond | 2.42 |
| Whale Oil | 1.460 | Lead | 2.6 |
of Chemistry and Physics
v = c/n
Where
v = velocity of light through the medium
c = maximum speed of light in a vacuum
n = optical density or refractive index of media
--------------------------------------
v(lead) = c/n(lead)= (299792458 m/s) /(2.6) = 115304791.538 m/s through lead.
--------------------------------------
Dark Energy has a refractive index of ~<1. Though quite small Dark Energy still affects the speed, wavelength, frequency, and temperature of the photon-wave over great distances.
This is very important. I am beginning to think that the only constant is change.
Labels:
Dark Energy,
Density,
Photon,
Physics,
Speed of Light
Friday, January 16, 2009
Harmonic Vibrations in Dark Energy
I have been asking myself about the nature of Dark Energy. How is energy/data transferred through a Dark Energy space? How does a photon's vibration data change over time? What happens if a Dark Energy space is occupied by another boson? What shape would be required to transfer information? Does the gluon preform the necessary calculations or does the Dark Energy preform these calculations?
This model's axiom is that Dark Energy is a computational engine.
Each Dark Energy space is called a Ruleset.
Each Ruleset can only be occupied by one Boson at a time. (almost)
:A Photon cannot enter a Ruleset that is occupied by any other Boson (except Z Boson).
:Whereas, the W Boson can move a Photon wave, 2 antispin-Gluon harmony(Dark Matter), or a Z Boson out of a Ruleset.
:Gluons absorb W Bosons and Z Bosons in a 3 Gluon harmony (Baryon).
:Gluons are repelled by a W Boson in a 2 antispin-Gluon harmony (Dark Matter).
:A Ruleset can be void of data.
The Ruleset is rigid and does not interact with its neighbor. A Ruleset is a cube of 3 dimensional space and a counter. Each Space is defined by the rules of the data of its Boson. A Ruleset domain is exactly the width of one Boson.
A Ruleset is a computational engine in that it adds one unit to the counter and removes one unit from the Boson's data. The Ruleset also maintains information on direction of the boson.
Table of information
Boson.| Gluon....| W Boson..| Z Boson..| Photon
info.....| Color.....| Current.....|Charge.......| Frequency
info.....| Charge..| Charge......|Electron data..| Wave Length
info.....| Width....| Voltage.....|Photon data...| Temperature
The Boson dissipates at a greater rate if it breaks the rules of the Ruleset. This is disharmony. Disharmony occurs in a particle accelerator (vibration accelerators).
addendum 5/30/09
I made a mistake in my axioms. I presumed that charge was necessary to convert electrical data. Charge is not intensity.
Table of information
Boson.| Gluon....| W Boson..| Z Boson..| Photon
info.....| Color.....| Current.....|Current.......| Frequency
info.....| Voltage..| Charge......|Electron data..| Wave Length
info.....| Length....| Voltage.....|Photon data...| Temperature
There that is better. Why the change? Current is the intensity of the vibration. Voltage is the strength of the emitter.
Aaron
Labels:
Dark Energy,
Physics,
Vibration
Tuesday, January 6, 2009
Long wave through a tiny hole
This is from Bill Beaty's antenna problem
http://amasci.com/elect/tinyhole.html
Here's a second answer to the original question. To allow EM waves to pass through the tiny hole in the infinite conductive plate, just place some molecules in the hole, but choose molecules which are resonant at the frequency of the EM waves. Suppose the EM waves are microwaves, and their frequency is at the ammonia resonance (think "ammonia maser"). If we place some ammonia molecules in that tiny hole, the molecules will strongly absorb the incoming radiation, then they will re-radiate it. Part will be scattered backwards, but part will move forwards through the hole. The presence of those ammonia molecules has allowed the EM radiation to pass through the hole.
The presence of the molecule can make a big difference. Suppose we make our hole somewhat larger than a single ammonia molecule. Without that molecule present, the amount of EM wave energy which passes through such a tiny hole will be vanishingly small. However, with the molecule placed into the hole, relatively enormous amounts of EM power suddenly can get through.
---------------------------------------
My elaboration on Bill Beaty's tiny hole thought experiment.
Now I would like to explain this a little more. Since the hole has an ammonia molecule in the hole, this is what I think happens. The microwave hits the electron of the ammonia molecule. The electron reads all the information of the EM wave. The electron processes the information and converts it to z boson. The z boson transmits the information to the gluon of the molecule. The gluon converts it to the attached quarks.
Next the gluon retrieves the information from the quark, here the molecule processes the heat, and pressure. This information alters the quark. The quark sends the information about the new state of the molecule with the changes in temperature and shape to the gluon. The gluon converts the information to a z boson and sends it to an electron. The electron converts the z boson to a photon wave and transmits the information through the hole.
I really think this is what is happening.
a
http://amasci.com/elect/tinyhole.html
Here's a second answer to the original question. To allow EM waves to pass through the tiny hole in the infinite conductive plate, just place some molecules in the hole, but choose molecules which are resonant at the frequency of the EM waves. Suppose the EM waves are microwaves, and their frequency is at the ammonia resonance (think "ammonia maser"). If we place some ammonia molecules in that tiny hole, the molecules will strongly absorb the incoming radiation, then they will re-radiate it. Part will be scattered backwards, but part will move forwards through the hole. The presence of those ammonia molecules has allowed the EM radiation to pass through the hole.
The presence of the molecule can make a big difference. Suppose we make our hole somewhat larger than a single ammonia molecule. Without that molecule present, the amount of EM wave energy which passes through such a tiny hole will be vanishingly small. However, with the molecule placed into the hole, relatively enormous amounts of EM power suddenly can get through.
---------------------------------------
My elaboration on Bill Beaty's tiny hole thought experiment.
Now I would like to explain this a little more. Since the hole has an ammonia molecule in the hole, this is what I think happens. The microwave hits the electron of the ammonia molecule. The electron reads all the information of the EM wave. The electron processes the information and converts it to z boson. The z boson transmits the information to the gluon of the molecule. The gluon converts it to the attached quarks.
Next the gluon retrieves the information from the quark, here the molecule processes the heat, and pressure. This information alters the quark. The quark sends the information about the new state of the molecule with the changes in temperature and shape to the gluon. The gluon converts the information to a z boson and sends it to an electron. The electron converts the z boson to a photon wave and transmits the information through the hole.
I really think this is what is happening.
a
Labels:
Information,
Physics,
Vibration
Friday, December 5, 2008
Space is not a vacuum
The vacuum of (Solar System: added 8/22/09) space is a fallacy. Space is full of radiation, ions, baryonic matter, dark matter, W boson, and photons. In space the density of baryonic matter is low but not 0 per cm^3.
When the ISS is not in the shadow of the sun it is under constant bombardment from the sun. In this case density of photon-waves is quite high in the area close to the sun (150m km). The Photon-wave transmits the information on temperature, wave-length and frequency of the star at that distance. E=hv.
Since we have different classes of vibrations , they can have different densities in an area of space. The Earth is an area of space where baryonic matter density is quite high. Also the Earth emits photon-waves, and magnetism. Yet the space between Earth and Venus is mostly filled with photon-waves and magnetism emitted from the Sun.
When the ISS is not in the shadow of the sun it is under constant bombardment from the sun. In this case density of photon-waves is quite high in the area close to the sun (150m km). The Photon-wave transmits the information on temperature, wave-length and frequency of the star at that distance. E=hv.
Since we have different classes of vibrations , they can have different densities in an area of space. The Earth is an area of space where baryonic matter density is quite high. Also the Earth emits photon-waves, and magnetism. Yet the space between Earth and Venus is mostly filled with photon-waves and magnetism emitted from the Sun.
Saturday, November 29, 2008
Gravity Anomaly Map of the Moon
This comes from The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency JAXA
Congratulations on such an excellent density map of Mascons on the Moon.
*******************************************************************************
Gravity Anomaly detected by using 4-way Doppler observation data from the RSTAR (OKINA) (RSAT)-New finding in study on the Origin of Dichotomy for the Moon-
*******************************************************************************
April 16, 2008 (JST)
Kyushu University
National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA)
JAXA announced a new finding of a gravity anomaly for both the near side and far side of the Moon by using 4-way Doppler observation data from the RSTAR (OKINA) with the main orbiter, the KAGUYA.
1)Gravity Anomaly Map by the KAGUYA

2)Gravity Anomaly Map in prior to the KAGUYA

3)The Apollo basin(S36,W150)

Until now, the gravity anomaly of the far side of the Moon has not been understood well. The gravity anomaly, which was obscure before, has been clearly revealed through observations by the Kaguya mission. For instance, the gravity anomaly of a basin on the far side is found to be characterized by a negative anomaly in a ring like the Apollo basin. On the other hand, the gravity anomaly of the basin on the near side is uniformly positive over the region such as with the Mare Serenitatis. Thus, the clear difference in gravity anomaly on the near side and the far side has been newly discovered and this fact brings a different story about the structure of the underground and the history of the evolution of the far side and near side of the Moon.
The gravity anomaly map for many regions will be developed more precisely and show the difference of gravity anomaly between the near side and the far side by adding more observation data. The latest observation data by the Kaguya will play a key role to promote the study of the origin and the evolution of the Moon. In addition, highly accurate lunar gravity distribution data will be useful for future lunar explorers.
*Gravity anomaly: The lunar gravity field is not homogenous. Any region of the Moon with a higher than expected mass density will produce a gravity anomaly.
*Dichotomy of the Moon: Between the near side and the far side, clear asymmetry is called the "Dichotomy of the Moon" as in the thickness of the lunar crust and the distribution of the lunar Maria.
Gravity Anomaly Map at the Apollo basin

Gravity Anomaly Map at the Mare Serenitatis(N26,E19)

*RSAT/VRAD mission instrument team:
Kyushu University (RSAT Principle Investigator), NAOJ (VRAD: VLBI Satellite radio source Principle Investigator), Researchers from JAXA also participate as sub-PI or Co-I in the mission instrument team.
Current lunar gravity field models include large uncertainties on the far side of the Moon. For instance, the figure in the middle shows the current gravity distribution model for the Apollo basin by LP165P. The color of the figure shows strength of the gravity field in blue, green, yellow, and red, in that order. Red indicates a positive gravity anomaly related to either a topographic high or a dense material in the subsurface. In contrast, blue shows that a negative gravity anomaly related to a topographic low or less dense material. The gravity anomaly shown in the figure on the left hand side is processed by new data taken by the KAGUYA. The gravity anomaly in the Apollo basin is now identified as concentric rings of yellow, blue, and thin red from the center to outside.
*LP165P: Lunar gravity model developed by Konopliv et al.. incorporating tracking data from the Lunar Prospector spacecraft into a historical data set.
A new gravity anomaly map developed by the KAGUYA reveals that not only the Apollo basin, but many other basins on the far side of the Moon are characterized by a large negative gravity anomaly. Such a signature of far side gravity is distinguished from that on the near side. For example, the Mare Serenitatis, the representative basin on the near side, shows a strong positive (red color) gravity anomaly at the center of the basin (figure in the middle). The newly found difference of gravity anomaly on the near side and the far side gives us clues to important questions regarding the structure of the lunar interior and the formation of the far side and near side of the Moon. The gravity anomaly map will become more precise as more observation data is obtained by the KAGUYA. The latest observation data by the Kaguya will play a key role to promote a study of the origin and the evolution of the Moon. In addition, highly accurate lunar gravity distribution data will be used for future lunar explorations.
Four-way Doppler observation scheme

A schematic figure showing the principle of the four-way Doppler measurements of the Main Orbiter (KAGUYA) by using a relay satellite (OKINA). The uplink radio wave from the Usuda Deep Space Center (UDSC) is relayed to the Main Orbiter via the relay satellite (OKINA), which is returned to the UDSC via relay satellite (OKINA) again. Then the Doppler frequency is measured at the UDSC.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2008/04/20080416_kaguya_e.html
Copyright 2007 Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency
Thanks to Curt Youngs for showing me this.
Congratulations on such an excellent density map of Mascons on the Moon.
*******************************************************************************
Gravity Anomaly detected by using 4-way Doppler observation data from the RSTAR (OKINA) (RSAT)-New finding in study on the Origin of Dichotomy for the Moon-
*******************************************************************************
April 16, 2008 (JST)
Kyushu University
National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA)
JAXA announced a new finding of a gravity anomaly for both the near side and far side of the Moon by using 4-way Doppler observation data from the RSTAR (OKINA) with the main orbiter, the KAGUYA.
1)Gravity Anomaly Map by the KAGUYA

2)Gravity Anomaly Map in prior to the KAGUYA

3)The Apollo basin(S36,W150)

Until now, the gravity anomaly of the far side of the Moon has not been understood well. The gravity anomaly, which was obscure before, has been clearly revealed through observations by the Kaguya mission. For instance, the gravity anomaly of a basin on the far side is found to be characterized by a negative anomaly in a ring like the Apollo basin. On the other hand, the gravity anomaly of the basin on the near side is uniformly positive over the region such as with the Mare Serenitatis. Thus, the clear difference in gravity anomaly on the near side and the far side has been newly discovered and this fact brings a different story about the structure of the underground and the history of the evolution of the far side and near side of the Moon.
The gravity anomaly map for many regions will be developed more precisely and show the difference of gravity anomaly between the near side and the far side by adding more observation data. The latest observation data by the Kaguya will play a key role to promote the study of the origin and the evolution of the Moon. In addition, highly accurate lunar gravity distribution data will be useful for future lunar explorers.
*Gravity anomaly: The lunar gravity field is not homogenous. Any region of the Moon with a higher than expected mass density will produce a gravity anomaly.
*Dichotomy of the Moon: Between the near side and the far side, clear asymmetry is called the "Dichotomy of the Moon" as in the thickness of the lunar crust and the distribution of the lunar Maria.
Gravity Anomaly Map at the Apollo basin

Gravity Anomaly Map at the Mare Serenitatis(N26,E19)

*RSAT/VRAD mission instrument team:
Kyushu University (RSAT Principle Investigator), NAOJ (VRAD: VLBI Satellite radio source Principle Investigator), Researchers from JAXA also participate as sub-PI or Co-I in the mission instrument team.
Current lunar gravity field models include large uncertainties on the far side of the Moon. For instance, the figure in the middle shows the current gravity distribution model for the Apollo basin by LP165P. The color of the figure shows strength of the gravity field in blue, green, yellow, and red, in that order. Red indicates a positive gravity anomaly related to either a topographic high or a dense material in the subsurface. In contrast, blue shows that a negative gravity anomaly related to a topographic low or less dense material. The gravity anomaly shown in the figure on the left hand side is processed by new data taken by the KAGUYA. The gravity anomaly in the Apollo basin is now identified as concentric rings of yellow, blue, and thin red from the center to outside.
*LP165P: Lunar gravity model developed by Konopliv et al.. incorporating tracking data from the Lunar Prospector spacecraft into a historical data set.
A new gravity anomaly map developed by the KAGUYA reveals that not only the Apollo basin, but many other basins on the far side of the Moon are characterized by a large negative gravity anomaly. Such a signature of far side gravity is distinguished from that on the near side. For example, the Mare Serenitatis, the representative basin on the near side, shows a strong positive (red color) gravity anomaly at the center of the basin (figure in the middle). The newly found difference of gravity anomaly on the near side and the far side gives us clues to important questions regarding the structure of the lunar interior and the formation of the far side and near side of the Moon. The gravity anomaly map will become more precise as more observation data is obtained by the KAGUYA. The latest observation data by the Kaguya will play a key role to promote a study of the origin and the evolution of the Moon. In addition, highly accurate lunar gravity distribution data will be used for future lunar explorations.
Four-way Doppler observation scheme

A schematic figure showing the principle of the four-way Doppler measurements of the Main Orbiter (KAGUYA) by using a relay satellite (OKINA). The uplink radio wave from the Usuda Deep Space Center (UDSC) is relayed to the Main Orbiter via the relay satellite (OKINA), which is returned to the UDSC via relay satellite (OKINA) again. Then the Doppler frequency is measured at the UDSC.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2008/04/20080416_kaguya_e.html
Copyright 2007 Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency
Thanks to Curt Youngs for showing me this.
Labels:
Density,
Gravity,
Lunar anomolies,
Physics
Wednesday, November 26, 2008
To every action there is NOT an equal and opposite reaction: Part 2
Israel Sadovnik: To every action there is NOT an equal and opposite reaction.
Why?
Because in QT " The third Newton's law " must submit to
The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle .
*************
This is the only resolution to the initial problem.
The universe is not symmetrical or static.
Information is processed before reacted to. Thus the loss of conservation is in time, thus the loss of time results in a loss of energy. For Example if Max hit Curt. It would take Curt a moment to realize that he was hit, from where he was hit, and how to hit back. These are all losses of energy. Curt's reaction would not be like a spring, but a new instance of hitting, once he collected his steel balls.
The real example is if a steel ball was floating in space and was hit by the pressure wave of an exploding star. It would not instantaneously move, it would move after the density of the ball was overcome by the energy of the wave. When the density of the ball was subtracted from the energy of the wave, the ball would move. So if the energy wave traveled a great distance, the ball may not move, but reflect the energy.
Why?
Because in QT " The third Newton's law " must submit to
The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle .
*************
This is the only resolution to the initial problem.
The universe is not symmetrical or static.
Information is processed before reacted to. Thus the loss of conservation is in time, thus the loss of time results in a loss of energy. For Example if Max hit Curt. It would take Curt a moment to realize that he was hit, from where he was hit, and how to hit back. These are all losses of energy. Curt's reaction would not be like a spring, but a new instance of hitting, once he collected his steel balls.
The real example is if a steel ball was floating in space and was hit by the pressure wave of an exploding star. It would not instantaneously move, it would move after the density of the ball was overcome by the energy of the wave. When the density of the ball was subtracted from the energy of the wave, the ball would move. So if the energy wave traveled a great distance, the ball may not move, but reflect the energy.
Labels:
Physics
Near and far fields
Curt Youngs: Yes! At longer wave lengths an antenna is required. Now, radiation around the antenna develops a near field at the transmitter and the receiver. This near field is a standing wave. Within the standing wave, the electric and magnetic fields are at 90 degrees. In the far field, these fields are parallel to each other, and parallel to the propagation, so it is said.
Aaron: The reason, in my model, the near and far fields must be perpendicular to each other is that they are different vibrations. The far field I have described as the W boson and the near field is the Z boson. They have two different functions.
The W boson carries information directly from Gluon to Gluon. This is the far field. This field can travel large distances. The information it carries is voltage, current and charge plus a counter. When the W boson is received by another pro-spin Gluon, it is read as magnetism.
When the W boson is read by an anti-spin Gluon, it is read as pressure. It too is magnetism but non-baryonic Dark Matter uses this information differently. Dark Matter reacts to magnetism as a pressure and is repulsed by it. This causes a bubble in the Dark Matter allowing for Baryonic Specific Density (what use to be known as gravity).
The Z boson is the near field electric component of the Gluon's transmission of information. The Z boson excites the electron. This can have two outcomes. First is the releasing of a photon wave. Second is to excite the electron with charge, current, and voltage causing the near field.
As an antenna, an electron can move from atom to atom to continue to read information from the same wavelength. The longer the wavelength the further the electron travels up the field while reading. The electron reads one entire spin of the wavelength, gathering all the information from the photon wave. This information is converted to a z boson and returned to a gluon for processing. The gluon reacts to the information by expressing pressure, heat, and charge.
(Addendum) 5/10/09 - The W+/- and Z Bosons are nearly perpendicular to each other. The spin of the Baryon causes variation in position of each field. This is an equilibrium point.
Aaron: The reason, in my model, the near and far fields must be perpendicular to each other is that they are different vibrations. The far field I have described as the W boson and the near field is the Z boson. They have two different functions.
The W boson carries information directly from Gluon to Gluon. This is the far field. This field can travel large distances. The information it carries is voltage, current and charge plus a counter. When the W boson is received by another pro-spin Gluon, it is read as magnetism.
When the W boson is read by an anti-spin Gluon, it is read as pressure. It too is magnetism but non-baryonic Dark Matter uses this information differently. Dark Matter reacts to magnetism as a pressure and is repulsed by it. This causes a bubble in the Dark Matter allowing for Baryonic Specific Density (what use to be known as gravity).
The Z boson is the near field electric component of the Gluon's transmission of information. The Z boson excites the electron. This can have two outcomes. First is the releasing of a photon wave. Second is to excite the electron with charge, current, and voltage causing the near field.
As an antenna, an electron can move from atom to atom to continue to read information from the same wavelength. The longer the wavelength the further the electron travels up the field while reading. The electron reads one entire spin of the wavelength, gathering all the information from the photon wave. This information is converted to a z boson and returned to a gluon for processing. The gluon reacts to the information by expressing pressure, heat, and charge.
(Addendum) 5/10/09 - The W+/- and Z Bosons are nearly perpendicular to each other. The spin of the Baryon causes variation in position of each field. This is an equilibrium point.
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
Electron minimum/maximum read/write
The electron has a minimum and a maximum temperature, frequency, wave length that it can read or write. If any of these exceeded then the electron cannot read or write the information.
So if there are photon wave that have frequencies that are below the electron threshold, this means that the photon wave has travel too far and it temp is to low, or it has been modified by other fields that would extend the wave length.
For maximum temperatures electrons cannot exist. For example those black holes that I described http://aaronsreality.blogspot.com/2008/10/black-hole-flares.html
The temperature for the black body object referred to as a black hole exceeds 15000k. This temperature is to high for atoms to fully form. When the temperature drops below 5200k electrons can release photon waves.
In conclusion a photon that has a wave length that is too long will have a temperature that is too low for the electron to read. Even the largest atoms cannot read a wave length that is larger than the atom electron path.
An antenna is a series of atoms that allow an electron to pass along the length of the antenna to read the long wave length. Some wave lengths are so long that they will pass around the solar system. These photon waves are so cold that they seem unnoticeable. But if you built an antenna large enough you would register them. They would be read.
If the temperature is too high, the electron cannot form.
So if there are photon wave that have frequencies that are below the electron threshold, this means that the photon wave has travel too far and it temp is to low, or it has been modified by other fields that would extend the wave length.
For maximum temperatures electrons cannot exist. For example those black holes that I described http://aaronsreality.blogspot.com/2008/10/black-hole-flares.html
The temperature for the black body object referred to as a black hole exceeds 15000k. This temperature is to high for atoms to fully form. When the temperature drops below 5200k electrons can release photon waves.
In conclusion a photon that has a wave length that is too long will have a temperature that is too low for the electron to read. Even the largest atoms cannot read a wave length that is larger than the atom electron path.
An antenna is a series of atoms that allow an electron to pass along the length of the antenna to read the long wave length. Some wave lengths are so long that they will pass around the solar system. These photon waves are so cold that they seem unnoticeable. But if you built an antenna large enough you would register them. They would be read.
If the temperature is too high, the electron cannot form.
Information Density and the Gluon
E = hv
Which says Energy = Planck's Constant h multiplied by the frequency of the vibration.
Now these are 19th century equations that have been purposefully discarded by einsteinians. Because they are difficult. Not a good reason.
Others density equations include (Planck)
Frequency
u(v,T) = ((8(pi)hv^3)/(c^3))*(1/(e^(hv/kT)-1)
Wave length
u(λ,T) = ((8(pi)hc)/λ^5)*(1/e^(hc/λkT)-1)
u = spectra. The emitting Baryon leaves its identification on the spectra. Along the spectral line, where the temperature = 0, identifies the emitting baryon.
So here we have an exactly derived system of equations that show the vibration of energy over time through its frequency or wave length. There are other equations that show the vibration of energy over time through its charge or current. This is the basis of my model.
Now the sender and receiver of this energy is the gluon. Gluons communicate like this.
This is me,
All of this information is in the photonwave. The gluon produces the photonwave by exciting a z boson (near field) and vibrating the loaded electron. Then the electron discharges the photonwave.
I have a frequency of u(v,T)
I have a wave length of u(λ,T)
I have an intensity of u(λ,v,T)
and my identity is where the information is 0
A similar process occurs with the W boson. The gluon vibrates and discharges the w boson.
it says I am a far field W boson
(I am not as familiar with these equations)
I have a charge of
I have a inducted current of
I have voltage of
I will fill these W boson magnetism equations
Simple Counter
Both the photonwave and the W boson have counters. This is a simple mechanism that counts the number of spins since existence. So
Distance traveled = number of dark energy units or spins counted.
This counter tells the receiving atom the temperature loss in the photon wave and the pressure loss in the W boson since inception
Which says Energy = Planck's Constant h multiplied by the frequency of the vibration.
Now these are 19th century equations that have been purposefully discarded by einsteinians. Because they are difficult. Not a good reason.
Others density equations include (Planck)
Frequency
u(v,T) = ((8(pi)hv^3)/(c^3))*(1/(e^(hv/kT)-1)
Wave length
u(λ,T) = ((8(pi)hc)/λ^5)*(1/e^(hc/λkT)-1)
u = spectra. The emitting Baryon leaves its identification on the spectra. Along the spectral line, where the temperature = 0, identifies the emitting baryon.
So here we have an exactly derived system of equations that show the vibration of energy over time through its frequency or wave length. There are other equations that show the vibration of energy over time through its charge or current. This is the basis of my model.
Now the sender and receiver of this energy is the gluon. Gluons communicate like this.
This is me,
All of this information is in the photonwave. The gluon produces the photonwave by exciting a z boson (near field) and vibrating the loaded electron. Then the electron discharges the photonwave.
I have a frequency of u(v,T)
I have a wave length of u(λ,T)
I have an intensity of u(λ,v,T)
and my identity is where the information is 0
A similar process occurs with the W boson. The gluon vibrates and discharges the w boson.
it says I am a far field W boson
(I am not as familiar with these equations)
I have a charge of
I have a inducted current of
I have voltage of
I will fill these W boson magnetism equations
Simple Counter
Both the photonwave and the W boson have counters. This is a simple mechanism that counts the number of spins since existence. So
Distance traveled = number of dark energy units or spins counted.
This counter tells the receiving atom the temperature loss in the photon wave and the pressure loss in the W boson since inception
Monday, November 24, 2008
The Gluon: The Master of Information
It is the Gluon that is the most important vibration in our universe. It communicates information to all other systems of vibrations as expressions. All information communication is essentially Gluon to Gluon communication. Each Gluon needs to communicate certain bits of information to other Gluons.
Gluons use certain vibrations to communicate different bits of information to other Gluons. The type of information determines the type of vibration used to communicate that information. The Bosons are the vibrations that transmit information. The Leptons and Quarks are expressions of the Gluon's information.
There are simple Gluon to Gluon communication through Quantumchromodynamics(QCD). The W+/- Boson communicates magnetism directly from Gluon to Gluon over a distance. The Photon communicates heat, pressure, and time to other Gluons through a more complicated system using both the Z Boson and the Electron. This system transmits information over great distances.
All Quarks store information for Gluons. The Strong Nuclear Force is the storage of Gluon information. Essentially a Quark is part of a Gluon and is the final expression of Gluon information.
All Leptons are responsible for secondary transmission of information for Gluons. The electron vibration loads information (described as Reiter Loading Theory) to be releasing the photon-wave as needed. The electron vibration now free of the photon-wave can accept a photon-wave and read the information from another Gluon.
Another important interaction the gluon is responsible for is the W boson communicates with dark matter. I postulate that the Gluon can have an anti-spin. This anti-spin Gluon causes expression of Dark Matter in a chain. The W boson provides magnetism information to the Dark Matter chain repelling it from the W boson. This is responsible for the bubble in Dark Matter causing Specific Baryonic Density (what was known as gravity).
Gluons use certain vibrations to communicate different bits of information to other Gluons. The type of information determines the type of vibration used to communicate that information. The Bosons are the vibrations that transmit information. The Leptons and Quarks are expressions of the Gluon's information.
There are simple Gluon to Gluon communication through Quantumchromodynamics(QCD). The W+/- Boson communicates magnetism directly from Gluon to Gluon over a distance. The Photon communicates heat, pressure, and time to other Gluons through a more complicated system using both the Z Boson and the Electron. This system transmits information over great distances.
All Quarks store information for Gluons. The Strong Nuclear Force is the storage of Gluon information. Essentially a Quark is part of a Gluon and is the final expression of Gluon information.
All Leptons are responsible for secondary transmission of information for Gluons. The electron vibration loads information (described as Reiter Loading Theory) to be releasing the photon-wave as needed. The electron vibration now free of the photon-wave can accept a photon-wave and read the information from another Gluon.
Another important interaction the gluon is responsible for is the W boson communicates with dark matter. I postulate that the Gluon can have an anti-spin. This anti-spin Gluon causes expression of Dark Matter in a chain. The W boson provides magnetism information to the Dark Matter chain repelling it from the W boson. This is responsible for the bubble in Dark Matter causing Specific Baryonic Density (what was known as gravity).
Labels:
Gluon,
Information,
Memes,
Physics,
Vibration
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
Disproof of Gravity
The standard particle model has yet to find any sign of Gravity. This is most concerning since gravity is used by most modern equations. Great particle accelerators have hunted for any signs of gravity. None found!
But one simple experiment shows there is no gravity. The Helium Balloon. It rises. How is this possible? Classical Mechanics shows that Force equals the inverse of the Constant of Gravity multiplied by the Mass of Object 1 multiplied by the Mass of Object 2 divided by the Distance between the two masses raised to the second power. F=-GM1M2/r^2
In this equation the mass of the earth is so great that the helium balloon would have no choice but to be attracted to the earth. It would not rise.
We see in the experiment that the helium is rising to meet its level of density.
Density is the most important function in determining the position of an object. Density is the vibration intensity within a volume in relation to the density of the surrounding medium.
Addendum 5/27/09: From the General Science Journal forum
Anonymous, (who ever you are?)
In standard conditions of temperature and pressure (SCTP), 1 kg of He fills a volume of 5.6 m³.
This also means that the density of He in SCTP is 0.1786 kg/m³.
This is an elementary secondary school calculation based of the atomic mass of Helium (4.0026 gr/mol) and the volume occupied by a mole in SCTP (0.022414 m³/mol).
Air composition is roughly 20.9% O2 and 79.1% N2.
This implies a volume of 0.777 m³ for 1kg of air, and a density of 1.287 kg/m³.
+++++++++++
So what you are saying is that lifting force is the differential between differing densities. Why does the balloon accelerate? Is there a terminal velocity for the balloon in SCTP?
If we were to create a box 500m in the y, 10m in both the x and z in reference to the ground. This box has door with a 500m on one side. We can open the door to introduce our SCTP. But we don't want other influences on our experiment. So we close the door. At the bottom of the box we have a mechanical device that will release the helium balloon as described above but including the density of the mylar balloon in our calculations.
What set of equations would accurately describe the balloon's voyage? Gravity suggests that the massive Earth would pull the balloon or any mass towards it. The balloon would never leave the ground. So any equation based on the axiom of gravity would not work. Mass does not accurately describe anything. So any equations based on mass will not work. Only density equations will work.

The Disproof of Gravity
But one simple experiment shows there is no gravity. The Helium Balloon. It rises. How is this possible? Classical Mechanics shows that Force equals the inverse of the Constant of Gravity multiplied by the Mass of Object 1 multiplied by the Mass of Object 2 divided by the Distance between the two masses raised to the second power. F=-GM1M2/r^2
In this equation the mass of the earth is so great that the helium balloon would have no choice but to be attracted to the earth. It would not rise.
We see in the experiment that the helium is rising to meet its level of density.
Density is the most important function in determining the position of an object. Density is the vibration intensity within a volume in relation to the density of the surrounding medium.
Addendum 5/27/09: From the General Science Journal forum
Anonymous, (who ever you are?)
In standard conditions of temperature and pressure (SCTP), 1 kg of He fills a volume of 5.6 m³.
This also means that the density of He in SCTP is 0.1786 kg/m³.
This is an elementary secondary school calculation based of the atomic mass of Helium (4.0026 gr/mol) and the volume occupied by a mole in SCTP (0.022414 m³/mol).
Air composition is roughly 20.9% O2 and 79.1% N2.
This implies a volume of 0.777 m³ for 1kg of air, and a density of 1.287 kg/m³.
+++++++++++
So what you are saying is that lifting force is the differential between differing densities. Why does the balloon accelerate? Is there a terminal velocity for the balloon in SCTP?
If we were to create a box 500m in the y, 10m in both the x and z in reference to the ground. This box has door with a 500m on one side. We can open the door to introduce our SCTP. But we don't want other influences on our experiment. So we close the door. At the bottom of the box we have a mechanical device that will release the helium balloon as described above but including the density of the mylar balloon in our calculations.
What set of equations would accurately describe the balloon's voyage? Gravity suggests that the massive Earth would pull the balloon or any mass towards it. The balloon would never leave the ground. So any equation based on the axiom of gravity would not work. Mass does not accurately describe anything. So any equations based on mass will not work. Only density equations will work.

The Disproof of Gravity
Labels:
Density,
Gravity,
Helium Balloon,
Physics,
Vibration
Standard Vibration Model
I am changing the name of my model to the Standard Vibration Model. This model relies on Eric Reiter's conclusions of waves and the work of many physicists who identified different classes of vibrations. Though they thought they were particles.
For example many physicist referred to the photon as a wave/particle duality. Reiter shows that the particle in any form is not a particle at all. http://www.unquantum.net
I will show how all these vibrations interact.
For example many physicist referred to the photon as a wave/particle duality. Reiter shows that the particle in any form is not a particle at all. http://www.unquantum.net
I will show how all these vibrations interact.
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
Reiter Waves
Eric S. Reiter at http://www.unquantum.net/
I need to show that I am referencing this dynamic and powerful tool called Photon Violation Spectroscopy which disproves the particle nature of light. This tool destroys concepts laid out in Quantum Mechanics and leaves open entire concepts for re-evaluation.
Particle Violation Spectroscopy is another tool that Reiter designed and built to disprove the particle nature of particles. This tool shows the wave nature of particles. This destroys Classical and Quantum Mechanics concepts. I will be referencing the results of his experiments in my blog.
His inventions produce incredible results and must be reproduced. I am going to continue work on my blog, if only to continue my understanding of the universe. Kudos to Eric Reiter on building an experiment that shows the true nature of matter and energy, and recording this in such detail.
I will also be referring to Reiter's Loading Theory in my blog. This is an important concept that is also described at CERN. Reiter's Loading Theory is a more in depth explanation of the problem.
I need to show that I am referencing this dynamic and powerful tool called Photon Violation Spectroscopy which disproves the particle nature of light. This tool destroys concepts laid out in Quantum Mechanics and leaves open entire concepts for re-evaluation.
Particle Violation Spectroscopy is another tool that Reiter designed and built to disprove the particle nature of particles. This tool shows the wave nature of particles. This destroys Classical and Quantum Mechanics concepts. I will be referencing the results of his experiments in my blog.
His inventions produce incredible results and must be reproduced. I am going to continue work on my blog, if only to continue my understanding of the universe. Kudos to Eric Reiter on building an experiment that shows the true nature of matter and energy, and recording this in such detail.
I will also be referring to Reiter's Loading Theory in my blog. This is an important concept that is also described at CERN. Reiter's Loading Theory is a more in depth explanation of the problem.
Monday, November 10, 2008
To every action there is NOT an equal and opposite reaction
To the simple eye, there is a simple law of conservation that tells us that every action causes an equal and opposite reaction. This is simply not true.
Two cue balls on earth with minor external friction from the media (atmosphere) on a pool table. Ball one is stationary, Ball two is charging at the Ball one at a speed of 1km/hr. When they hit, Ball two imparts energy as vibration into Ball one. They actually hit more than once in this instantaneous collision. The vibration causes a reduction in velocity of both objects. Ball one is not traveling at any factor of Ball two's original velocity. Ball two does not go in an exact negative velocity in any factor of the original velocity.
The collision causes a release of energy we refer to as sound. This is not an equal or opposite reaction. This pressure wave did not exist in any state before the collision. This equates to a loss of energy.
There is also a release of heat. This did not exist before the collision. This also equates to a loss of energy
Part of Ball two is left on Ball one and reverse. The amount is determined the densities of the balls and the speed of the collision. This also equates to a loss of energy.
The problem with classical physics is the need to reduce the problem to its simplest form. Instead of looking at the actual problem in its complexities.
We need to know the density, temperature, and magnetic field of the media, balls, and platform so we can know how long the vibration of the balls can continue.
There is no way to determine all the losses of energy in this collision. We cannot add up all the resultant energies to get the original energy.
Two cue balls on earth with minor external friction from the media (atmosphere) on a pool table. Ball one is stationary, Ball two is charging at the Ball one at a speed of 1km/hr. When they hit, Ball two imparts energy as vibration into Ball one. They actually hit more than once in this instantaneous collision. The vibration causes a reduction in velocity of both objects. Ball one is not traveling at any factor of Ball two's original velocity. Ball two does not go in an exact negative velocity in any factor of the original velocity.
The collision causes a release of energy we refer to as sound. This is not an equal or opposite reaction. This pressure wave did not exist in any state before the collision. This equates to a loss of energy.
There is also a release of heat. This did not exist before the collision. This also equates to a loss of energy
Part of Ball two is left on Ball one and reverse. The amount is determined the densities of the balls and the speed of the collision. This also equates to a loss of energy.
The problem with classical physics is the need to reduce the problem to its simplest form. Instead of looking at the actual problem in its complexities.
We need to know the density, temperature, and magnetic field of the media, balls, and platform so we can know how long the vibration of the balls can continue.
There is no way to determine all the losses of energy in this collision. We cannot add up all the resultant energies to get the original energy.
Labels:
Physics
Monday, November 3, 2008
Information in action and inaction
Energy is memes (information) in action. Whereas particles are that same memes in expression.
Photons waves hold 4 memes of information; Temp, freq, wave length and counter.
Magnetism waves hold 4 memes of information; Charge, current, voltage and counter.
Electrons reads and writes the photon wave
Gluons writes and reads the W+/- boson. (Far field)
Electrons and Gluon read and write the Z boson (Near field)
Quantumchromodynamics(QDC color) is the expression of all of those memes as Quarks and Dark Matter by Gluons.
QCD is also the primary interaction between magnetism and Dark Matter. Dark Matter particles react to W boson magnetism through the gluon between each Dark Matter particle. This far field interaction causes a bubble in the Dark Matter allowing for the interaction we know as density/buoyancy of Baryonic Matter. What use to be known as gravity.
p.s. still no graviton.
Photons waves hold 4 memes of information; Temp, freq, wave length and counter.
Magnetism waves hold 4 memes of information; Charge, current, voltage and counter.
Electrons reads and writes the photon wave
Gluons writes and reads the W+/- boson. (Far field)
Electrons and Gluon read and write the Z boson (Near field)
Quantumchromodynamics(QDC color) is the expression of all of those memes as Quarks and Dark Matter by Gluons.
QCD is also the primary interaction between magnetism and Dark Matter. Dark Matter particles react to W boson magnetism through the gluon between each Dark Matter particle. This far field interaction causes a bubble in the Dark Matter allowing for the interaction we know as density/buoyancy of Baryonic Matter. What use to be known as gravity.
p.s. still no graviton.
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Spacecraft Design

This is one of my designs to replace Hubble Space Telescope.
Schwartz from Sun Microsystems made $11,000,000 in bonuses for 2008.
Let's see what would happen if I took that $11,000,000 and applied it to a Space Program.
1) It would cost $2,000,000 to buy a launch vehicle from Orbital Sciences.
2) It would cost $2,000,000 to build a multi-telescope to replace Hubble. Hubble is scrap now. It cannot be fixed.
3) 1,000,000 plant and facilities
4) 6,000,000 could employ 20 people
5) Some money would be left over for whatever.
Since Hubble is toast, every University would need to buy time from us to maintain their Astronomy programs.
This is what I can do with Schwarz's bonus check. Imagine what I can do with real money.
Labels:
Spacecraft
Monday, October 20, 2008
Black Hole flares

Max Planck's Institute
There is baryonic matter exiting the equator of this object that is suppose to suck up all matter and energy. This matter is being ejected in flares. These flares occur at different temperatures, thus differing wavelengths. This is not Hawkins pseudo-matter or whatever. Its baryonic and in the Near Infrared range (740K - 5200K).
The video in the post below shows stars orbiting the Black Hole. Not being suck up or being spread out. They speed up and slow down, but this is due to orbital velocity changes during the orbit.
Matter is being ejected from the black hole. Under no circumstances should this occur in a Newton/Einstein/Hawkins universe.
I think the major variables here are the radial velocity of the object and the temp. Like the ice skater spinning; arms out slower, lower temp; arms in faster, higher temp. I predict that radial velocity and density will have more to do with the shape of the galaxy. Then we can plot the shapes of galaxies based on their black hole's radial velocity and temp.
Also if two black holes interact they can distort the surrounding galaxies. yet never actually accrete. There are many examples of two galaxies passing through one another and emerging on the other side, damaged but still spiral in nature. There are far fewer accretive galaxies than would be expected under gravity.
We dump the strange singularity for a squashed sphere. If the material is He or H it should be so pressurized that it is magnetic.
Gravity needs to be removed from the equation here to account for these ejections. When we agree that there is no graviton and the black hole is really a black body spectral radiator. Only then can we really explain how this material exists, how the stars do not get absorbed, and get rid of the singularity.
These black holes are emitting massive amounts of magnetism. In my model it is enough to bend a bubble in the dark matter to allow for part of the galaxy of baryonic matter. Every once in a while it ejects baryonic matter in the form of flares. These flares accrete into stars quickly. As the stars become more dense they travel further away from the spectral radiator(black hole)
It is almost inverse of the gravity model.
I have yet to find any issue that cannot be explained under this model. Gravity is what is causing so much mysticism in physics. It does not exist.
But for the most part everything is explained in Planck's spectral equations and a bunch of other stuff. The 19th century scientist got it right. They just did not have the data to put it all together. 20th Century marketing ruined it for all.
Labels:
Black holes,
Physics
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Aether
What is it with the concept of aether, that is so repugnant? What are the rules that this breaking? I would think the concept of an aether would just be an extension of the atmosphere or any other media. These differences between baryonic magnetic material and the non baryonic dark matter allows for bubbles in the aether. This bubble would be where baryonic matter can interact with the rules of magnetism, e/m, density...
If there is to be an aether, it needs a mechanism in which the baryonic bubble is defined. In my opinion this is magnetism. Magnetism through the W+/- boson vibrates charge and force. I am beginning to think that this W boson is only read/written by the gluon. That the electron converts photons into z bosons to pass to the gluon.
This transfer of information tells the dark matter particle how much magnetic pressure is being applied and how much it needs to recoil. At its root, all force is information. Each force/boson holds information on itself, describing its originator. The Quark or Dark Matter equivalent expresses this information.
If there is to be an aether, it needs a mechanism in which the baryonic bubble is defined. In my opinion this is magnetism. Magnetism through the W+/- boson vibrates charge and force. I am beginning to think that this W boson is only read/written by the gluon. That the electron converts photons into z bosons to pass to the gluon.
This transfer of information tells the dark matter particle how much magnetic pressure is being applied and how much it needs to recoil. At its root, all force is information. Each force/boson holds information on itself, describing its originator. The Quark or Dark Matter equivalent expresses this information.
Labels:
Aether,
Baryonic Matter,
Dark Matter,
Physics
Sunday, October 12, 2008
The Chain Nature of Dark Matter
In understanding the nature of memes(information) transmission in baryonic particles it becomes easier to understand the the nature of memes transmission between baryonic particles and dark matter. Memes needs to be transmitted from the baryonic atom to the dark matter particle through magnetism. Dark matter ignores photons because they lack charge. Dark matter reacts to charge, all charges +/- in the same manner. Dark matter is repulsed by charge.
There are 2 known particles that can convert magnetism into memes(information). The electron and the gluon. We can rule out the electron as a particle of dark matter because it has charge. Also if electrons were in interstellar space, photons would never make it through the medium and we would not see other galaxies. The gluon is a more promising particle that could be part of the dark matter chain.
We know that the gluon converts magnetism into color using quantum chromodynamics (QCD). When dark matter is in the presence of magnetism the dark matter is repelled. The interaction between dark matter sub-atomic particles is stronger than the magnetism applied to it. Magnetism is not strong enough to break the normal bond between the gluon and the dark matter particle attached to it. Magnetism bends this bond.
The chain nature of dark matter becomes obvious when gluons are inserted between dark matter particles. These chains form fabrics and the more dense they become the harder is becomes for baryonic particles and photons to move through them. Pioneer 10 and 11 show this in their attempts to exit the solar system.
There are 2 known particles that can convert magnetism into memes(information). The electron and the gluon. We can rule out the electron as a particle of dark matter because it has charge. Also if electrons were in interstellar space, photons would never make it through the medium and we would not see other galaxies. The gluon is a more promising particle that could be part of the dark matter chain.
We know that the gluon converts magnetism into color using quantum chromodynamics (QCD). When dark matter is in the presence of magnetism the dark matter is repelled. The interaction between dark matter sub-atomic particles is stronger than the magnetism applied to it. Magnetism is not strong enough to break the normal bond between the gluon and the dark matter particle attached to it. Magnetism bends this bond.
The chain nature of dark matter becomes obvious when gluons are inserted between dark matter particles. These chains form fabrics and the more dense they become the harder is becomes for baryonic particles and photons to move through them. Pioneer 10 and 11 show this in their attempts to exit the solar system.
Labels:
Dark Matter,
Density,
Magnetism,
Photon,
Physics
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
Free falling bodies
So If I understand the problem correctly, would two objects of different density dropped in the ISS, fall at different rate?
The major force on the above problem is the angular velocities of the two objects are the same as the space station and all will maintain the same orbit around the Earth. These three objects are falling at different rates but the angular velocity is more significant in this setup of the problem. Density has little to do with orbital periods, velocity is more significant here.
I would like to change the feather to a ball of water. Each ball is 1 kg.
What we would need to do is reduce the angular velocity of the lead ball and the ice ball to 0 km/sec in relation to a point on the Earth's surface. When this occurs the two objects are now falling to maintain their density.
Here the lead ball would turn to liquid, pass through the atmosphere and splat in the ocean. There it would cool again to a solid and fall to the ocean floor. It would continue falling for many eons through the sand, mantle to the core of the Earth. This is where it would meet its level of disbursement.
Whereas the water would start as ice and become vapor quickly. As a vapor it would disperse/equalize with other water vapor at its density level. In the high level atmosphere is where it would meet its level of disbursement. As it cooled it would then rain. The water would never have an altitude less than the ocean floor.
I was reading a paper on multiple instruction multiple data computing systems. What I got from it was that this is a multiple force problem. These forces; density and thermodynamic work together to create the bounds of the problem. When is the object is at a level of disbursement?
We cannot remove one of the forces from the problem to simplify the problem, because we would no longer have a valid problem/solution. It needs both thermodynamics and density to do this.
Both balls would have other forces acting upon them. For example both would have hydrodynamic issues of turning into a teardrop shape during decent. But I don’t see this as a major force acting upon the problem. I could be wrong.
So I see a summation of forces acting upon an object to determine its altitude of disbursement. But I can definitively say there is no gravity in this problem.
Question: What about this video?
Answer: Cinci, again you bring up a good point. And something that is difficult to explain in my model, but I will give it a try. First, this video is not a empirical test of falling bodies. We don't know the time it took to fall. Nor can we tell if the two object did hit the ground at the same time. We would also need the distance traveled. This is a good example of two different objects traveling in a vacuum.
Here what we are seeing needs an explanation of the moon's forward velocity. Here the Astronauts are on the face of the moon. The face of the moon is like the front of a NASCAR car. The moons forward motion is so great that it hits the hammer and feather. Also the distances here are not great so we cannot see the difference in density of the two objects. If these objects were release at 1000km altitude from the moon, we would see a different result.
The equations for this are found in chemistry. It is called Specific Gravity. rather a misnomer, but we work with what we are given. It really is the density of the objects and the density of the medium that are the main forces here.
I know that is rather weak, but those density(specific gravity) solutions work in chemistry, why not in physics? We just need to evaluate the media. Not every media is water.
The major force on the above problem is the angular velocities of the two objects are the same as the space station and all will maintain the same orbit around the Earth. These three objects are falling at different rates but the angular velocity is more significant in this setup of the problem. Density has little to do with orbital periods, velocity is more significant here.
I would like to change the feather to a ball of water. Each ball is 1 kg.
What we would need to do is reduce the angular velocity of the lead ball and the ice ball to 0 km/sec in relation to a point on the Earth's surface. When this occurs the two objects are now falling to maintain their density.
Here the lead ball would turn to liquid, pass through the atmosphere and splat in the ocean. There it would cool again to a solid and fall to the ocean floor. It would continue falling for many eons through the sand, mantle to the core of the Earth. This is where it would meet its level of disbursement.
Whereas the water would start as ice and become vapor quickly. As a vapor it would disperse/equalize with other water vapor at its density level. In the high level atmosphere is where it would meet its level of disbursement. As it cooled it would then rain. The water would never have an altitude less than the ocean floor.
I was reading a paper on multiple instruction multiple data computing systems. What I got from it was that this is a multiple force problem. These forces; density and thermodynamic work together to create the bounds of the problem. When is the object is at a level of disbursement?
We cannot remove one of the forces from the problem to simplify the problem, because we would no longer have a valid problem/solution. It needs both thermodynamics and density to do this.
Both balls would have other forces acting upon them. For example both would have hydrodynamic issues of turning into a teardrop shape during decent. But I don’t see this as a major force acting upon the problem. I could be wrong.
So I see a summation of forces acting upon an object to determine its altitude of disbursement. But I can definitively say there is no gravity in this problem.
Question: What about this video?
Answer: Cinci, again you bring up a good point. And something that is difficult to explain in my model, but I will give it a try. First, this video is not a empirical test of falling bodies. We don't know the time it took to fall. Nor can we tell if the two object did hit the ground at the same time. We would also need the distance traveled. This is a good example of two different objects traveling in a vacuum.
Here what we are seeing needs an explanation of the moon's forward velocity. Here the Astronauts are on the face of the moon. The face of the moon is like the front of a NASCAR car. The moons forward motion is so great that it hits the hammer and feather. Also the distances here are not great so we cannot see the difference in density of the two objects. If these objects were release at 1000km altitude from the moon, we would see a different result.
The equations for this are found in chemistry. It is called Specific Gravity. rather a misnomer, but we work with what we are given. It really is the density of the objects and the density of the medium that are the main forces here.
I know that is rather weak, but those density(specific gravity) solutions work in chemistry, why not in physics? We just need to evaluate the media. Not every media is water.
Sunday, October 5, 2008
Black holes are Planck’s Black Body Radiators
Black holes are Planck’s Black Body Radiators
Planck’s Black Body Spectral Objects are all radiators. This includes the Black Hole.
A black hole is a spectral emitter just like any star, just the temperature is too high to emit photons, except through the asymptote at the poles. Photons ejected from the poles of the black hole are highly excited Gamma Rays.
Black holes rotate at high radial velocities. ~17 minutes. When a black hole reduces it’s radial velocity and it's temperature dips below 1013, it burps a baryonic star. When the black hole ejects the baryonic star, the black hole increases radial velocity and temp. Stars ejected from the black hole will orbit in a manner similar to Mercury’s orbit. Ejected baryonic matter cannot be reabsorbed by the black hole.
Here is the physical evidence of star motion around a black hole.
This link also shows material being ejected by a black hole over a 116 minute period.
A black hole ejects magnetism from every part of the sphere except the poles. This magnetism is so intense that it bends the dark matter to form the space for galaxies. With this notion, we can go from the sub-atomic level all the way to the Black hole with these equations. There are 4 equations; Frequency, Wave Length, Inducted Current, and Voltage. Frequency and Wave Length are listed below.

Video Max Planck's Institute
Planck’s Black Body Spectral Objects are all radiators. This includes the Black Hole.
A black hole is a spectral emitter just like any star, just the temperature is too high to emit photons, except through the asymptote at the poles. Photons ejected from the poles of the black hole are highly excited Gamma Rays.
Black holes rotate at high radial velocities. ~17 minutes. When a black hole reduces it’s radial velocity and it's temperature dips below 1013, it burps a baryonic star. When the black hole ejects the baryonic star, the black hole increases radial velocity and temp. Stars ejected from the black hole will orbit in a manner similar to Mercury’s orbit. Ejected baryonic matter cannot be reabsorbed by the black hole.
Here is the physical evidence of star motion around a black hole.
This link also shows material being ejected by a black hole over a 116 minute period.
A black hole ejects magnetism from every part of the sphere except the poles. This magnetism is so intense that it bends the dark matter to form the space for galaxies. With this notion, we can go from the sub-atomic level all the way to the Black hole with these equations. There are 4 equations; Frequency, Wave Length, Inducted Current, and Voltage. Frequency and Wave Length are listed below.

Video Max Planck's Institute
Labels:
Baryonic Matter,
Black holes,
Physics,
Planck's
Saturday, October 4, 2008
The Relativity of Time
The Relativity of Time
This is where I would like to fully explain the time layer of my model.
Definitions:
Meme: a fundamental bit of information.
I have described in this forum and on my blog how memes transfers from one atom to another. The communication of forces(bosons: W+, W-, and photons) occur in waves. The electron is the only sub-atomic particle that can communicate with another atom. It does this by packaging memes into bosons.
Let examine a single gold atom and the forces that will interact upon it.
The simple model: a single photon wave
Our gold atom has 79 electrons. A single photon wave is absorbed by one of the electrons. The memes absorbed (read) by the electron is temperature ,frequency, wavelength and number of spins it has taken since it was created by another electron. This memes is converted (write) to a Z boson and communicated to a gluon. The gluon converts the Z boson to color and that memes is expressed by the different quarks.
The same thing occurs with magnetism. The W+/- bosons are expressed/absorbed by gluons. The information they express are induced current, voltage, charge and number of spins it has taken since it was created by another gluon. From there it is expressed by the quarks.
Now lets complicate things. Our little atom is unfortunate enough to have been hit by a super-nova event horizon. A billion photons and a billion W+/- bosons hit our gold atom at the same time. There are only 79 electrons to read the photons. Our atom needs to absorb all the information. Those 79 electrons need to read a billion photon-waves now. That is 12,658,227.8481 photons per electron at now. That is a lot of memes that needs to be read now. It has to be read now, because there are more memes in the next now.
Our electron reads/writes information at the speed of C. It cannot read/write faster than C. Something must give. This is time. Clocks have different rates at different altitudes. This has been proven. It is not the density of baryons that account for this change in time. It is the density of memes that bends time. The higher the altitude the less information.
This is where I would like to fully explain the time layer of my model.
Definitions:
Meme: a fundamental bit of information.
I have described in this forum and on my blog how memes transfers from one atom to another. The communication of forces(bosons: W+, W-, and photons) occur in waves. The electron is the only sub-atomic particle that can communicate with another atom. It does this by packaging memes into bosons.
Let examine a single gold atom and the forces that will interact upon it.
The simple model: a single photon wave
Our gold atom has 79 electrons. A single photon wave is absorbed by one of the electrons. The memes absorbed (read) by the electron is temperature ,frequency, wavelength and number of spins it has taken since it was created by another electron. This memes is converted (write) to a Z boson and communicated to a gluon. The gluon converts the Z boson to color and that memes is expressed by the different quarks.
The same thing occurs with magnetism. The W+/- bosons are expressed/absorbed by gluons. The information they express are induced current, voltage, charge and number of spins it has taken since it was created by another gluon. From there it is expressed by the quarks.
Now lets complicate things. Our little atom is unfortunate enough to have been hit by a super-nova event horizon. A billion photons and a billion W+/- bosons hit our gold atom at the same time. There are only 79 electrons to read the photons. Our atom needs to absorb all the information. Those 79 electrons need to read a billion photon-waves now. That is 12,658,227.8481 photons per electron at now. That is a lot of memes that needs to be read now. It has to be read now, because there are more memes in the next now.
Our electron reads/writes information at the speed of C. It cannot read/write faster than C. Something must give. This is time. Clocks have different rates at different altitudes. This has been proven. It is not the density of baryons that account for this change in time. It is the density of memes that bends time. The higher the altitude the less information.
Friday, October 3, 2008
Death to Symmetry
The two rods problem is often brought up to explain time or relativity.
Einstein's basic assumption was symmetry. This is not shown in nature. This has nothing to do with belief or frame reference. The basis of Einstein's work is wrong in this, symmetry.
The basis of my model is that these two rods can not be equal in any regards. Here is why.
Even two gold atoms, in the middle of nowhere, with no outside influences can not be equal. Their electrons are not in the same positions, their quarks are at different lengths because of gluon interaction. The quarks express different color based on the interactions of each gold atom on each other.
This stems from Asymmetry.
Asymmetry stems from the interactions between the Strong Nuclear Force, The Weak Nuclear Force, Electromagnetism, Memes information, and the undefined position of electrons, protons, and neutrons. All of these interactions make it not possible for two identical atoms. Let alone two identical rods. Even the density of two gold atoms will be different, because they occupy different volumes based on strong nuclear forces.
addendum: 10/7/08
The Nobel prizes were awarded to 3 Asymmetrists. Yoichiro Nambu was a discover of Quantum Chromodynamics and considered a founder of string theory. Makoto Kobayashi's and Toshihide Maskawa's work is about violation and renormalization of weak nuclear force in gluons.
If you listen softly you can hear the crash of the religion of Einstein, Newton and Hawkins. Gravity is done for. So are those irrelevant equations that they teach as gospel.
http://nobelprize.org
addendum 4/27/09 : A high symmetry state is NOT symmetric.
Einstein's basic assumption was symmetry. This is not shown in nature. This has nothing to do with belief or frame reference. The basis of Einstein's work is wrong in this, symmetry.
The basis of my model is that these two rods can not be equal in any regards. Here is why.
Even two gold atoms, in the middle of nowhere, with no outside influences can not be equal. Their electrons are not in the same positions, their quarks are at different lengths because of gluon interaction. The quarks express different color based on the interactions of each gold atom on each other.
This stems from Asymmetry.
Asymmetry stems from the interactions between the Strong Nuclear Force, The Weak Nuclear Force, Electromagnetism, Memes information, and the undefined position of electrons, protons, and neutrons. All of these interactions make it not possible for two identical atoms. Let alone two identical rods. Even the density of two gold atoms will be different, because they occupy different volumes based on strong nuclear forces.
addendum: 10/7/08
The Nobel prizes were awarded to 3 Asymmetrists. Yoichiro Nambu was a discover of Quantum Chromodynamics and considered a founder of string theory. Makoto Kobayashi's and Toshihide Maskawa's work is about violation and renormalization of weak nuclear force in gluons.
If you listen softly you can hear the crash of the religion of Einstein, Newton and Hawkins. Gravity is done for. So are those irrelevant equations that they teach as gospel.
http://nobelprize.org
addendum 4/27/09 : A high symmetry state is NOT symmetric.
Saturday, September 27, 2008
Newton/Einstein fail under data
http://www.mindfully.org/Heritage/2008/Pioneer-10-Einstein16may08.htm
This is the page describing how NASA failed to protect our data. The Planetary Society came to the rescue.
"We would expect the two spacecraft to follow Newton's law of gravity," Dr. Turyshev said, "but they in fact fail to confirm Newton's law. If Newton is wrong, Einstein is wrong too."
Then we have the orbital issues of the Lunar Prospector.
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/281/5382/1476
Both of these paper are data based descriptions of how Newton's Law of Gravity is wrong. Since Newton is wrong then all model that are based on Newton's Model of Gravity are wrong.
If this does not convince you, then there is no evidence of a Graviton. None has ever been found. In Newton's model it would be the most abundant particle.
In my model gravity is the effect caused by the interaction of magnetism on the background dark matter. This allows for density, thermodynamics, plasmadynamics, E/M and other systems to take effect in the bubble caused by the interaction of magnetism and dark matter.
In the end, we are going to have an ugly equation that is filled with fractals and is a sum of all the systems.
We really need to clear the table and start over.
Aaron Guerami
Addendum 7/6/2009
General Relativity Shown to be Newtonian Gravitational Theory by Roger Anderton
This is the page describing how NASA failed to protect our data. The Planetary Society came to the rescue.
"We would expect the two spacecraft to follow Newton's law of gravity," Dr. Turyshev said, "but they in fact fail to confirm Newton's law. If Newton is wrong, Einstein is wrong too."
Then we have the orbital issues of the Lunar Prospector.
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/281/5382/1476
Both of these paper are data based descriptions of how Newton's Law of Gravity is wrong. Since Newton is wrong then all model that are based on Newton's Model of Gravity are wrong.
If this does not convince you, then there is no evidence of a Graviton. None has ever been found. In Newton's model it would be the most abundant particle.
In my model gravity is the effect caused by the interaction of magnetism on the background dark matter. This allows for density, thermodynamics, plasmadynamics, E/M and other systems to take effect in the bubble caused by the interaction of magnetism and dark matter.
In the end, we are going to have an ugly equation that is filled with fractals and is a sum of all the systems.
We really need to clear the table and start over.
Aaron Guerami
Addendum 7/6/2009
General Relativity Shown to be Newtonian Gravitational Theory by Roger Anderton
Labels:
Physics
Friday, September 26, 2008
Pioneer 10 & 11 Anomaly

Newton, Einstein Lost in Space? Hotz
Let me describe what happen here and how it is explained by this model. These two spacecraft hit the dense dark matter barrier. This is the edge of the baryonic radiation bubble.
Being that the spacecraft are baryonic in nature, they are experiencing resistance from the pressurized dark matter. They have a small magnetic field caused by the baryons that make up the spacecraft. That field creates a bubble in the dark matter. But that dark matter is pressurized by the baryonic radiation emitted from the Sun. This pressurization is what reduced the velocity and changed the trajectory. Their trajectories will continue to change and they will return to the solar system. The dense dark matter is the primary influence in this interaction.
In one of the previous postings I describe a Dark Matter engine that will provide thrust to exit the solar system.
Labels:
Physics,
Spacecraft
Plasma in interstellar space?
I have several issues with Dark Matter having any electrons, ionized He or not. If dark matter turns out to be only protons (ionized H), then I guess I can be ok with that. But I don't think that is what is occurring here.
I need the photon wavefront to move unimpeded from galaxy to galaxy. With the exception of gravitational lensing. but even here we don't lose photons. They are bent or in the case of the Bullet Nebula they prove Reiter's point. They are split (4 times). But we don't lose them to electrons. If the interstellar media is charged particles other than protons (He-, He3, or He4), any electrons would absorb our photons. This is why we see ionized gas when excited by photons. We don't see the original memes here. We see the interaction of the secondary information, the ion releasing a new photon wave.
I agree with almost everything in the first paper
http://www.electric-cosmos.org/electricplasma.htm
but, Pioneer 11 lost velocity while exiting the solar system.
In my model, I see solar systems like bubbles in the ocean. Bubbles can coalesce, bubbles can separate, but there is a difference between inside the bubble and outside the bubble. These are two disparate systems trying to maintain some equilibrium. Its the pressure outside the bubble pressing on the pressure inside the bubble. Solar system are not bubble shapes they are modified torus.
In the case of the solar system as a bubble, the two systems are (inside) Baryonic in nature and Non-Baryonic in nature (outside). Non-Baryonic particles (photons, free electrons, neutrinos and others) can flow between these two systems. Its the baryons that cannot leave the bubble.

Photo by enoeske on Picasa
We know that the interstellar media cannot be void.
Now for the missing matter, lets look at our friend Oort and his cloud. I think there is more matter here than previously described. Stellar Nucleosysthesis occurs here. Protons collide here and attract electrons. 3 Alphas can easily form a carbon ion. It starts sliding back towards the sun on the bent dark matter. In stellar lightning speed (a couple of million years) our carbon ion is now a small comet. This process reduces the need for Dark Matter to be heavily massive.
This above model only requires E/M and baryonic density, sprinkle some thermodynamic and others and it works. As arrogant as it sounds. I think my model is better than Newton, Einstein, and Hawkins put together (MOND). They require attraction through mass. G has never been found. I think CERN is starting to accept this.
Oh, the reason we don't find He3 on earth, at all, ever, is because of the magnetosphere. The magnetosphere forces the He3 around the earth and deposits it on the moon. Dr Schmitt of Apollo 17 found this ion in ~abundance on the moon. He3 when excited produces tremendous amounts of electricity. With no deuterium.
Thanks to Curt Youngs
I need the photon wavefront to move unimpeded from galaxy to galaxy. With the exception of gravitational lensing. but even here we don't lose photons. They are bent or in the case of the Bullet Nebula they prove Reiter's point. They are split (4 times). But we don't lose them to electrons. If the interstellar media is charged particles other than protons (He-, He3, or He4), any electrons would absorb our photons. This is why we see ionized gas when excited by photons. We don't see the original memes here. We see the interaction of the secondary information, the ion releasing a new photon wave.
I agree with almost everything in the first paper
http://www.electric-cosmos.org/electricplasma.htm
but, Pioneer 11 lost velocity while exiting the solar system.
In my model, I see solar systems like bubbles in the ocean. Bubbles can coalesce, bubbles can separate, but there is a difference between inside the bubble and outside the bubble. These are two disparate systems trying to maintain some equilibrium. Its the pressure outside the bubble pressing on the pressure inside the bubble. Solar system are not bubble shapes they are modified torus.
In the case of the solar system as a bubble, the two systems are (inside) Baryonic in nature and Non-Baryonic in nature (outside). Non-Baryonic particles (photons, free electrons, neutrinos and others) can flow between these two systems. Its the baryons that cannot leave the bubble.

Photo by enoeske on Picasa
We know that the interstellar media cannot be void.
Now for the missing matter, lets look at our friend Oort and his cloud. I think there is more matter here than previously described. Stellar Nucleosysthesis occurs here. Protons collide here and attract electrons. 3 Alphas can easily form a carbon ion. It starts sliding back towards the sun on the bent dark matter. In stellar lightning speed (a couple of million years) our carbon ion is now a small comet. This process reduces the need for Dark Matter to be heavily massive.
This above model only requires E/M and baryonic density, sprinkle some thermodynamic and others and it works. As arrogant as it sounds. I think my model is better than Newton, Einstein, and Hawkins put together (MOND). They require attraction through mass. G has never been found. I think CERN is starting to accept this.
Oh, the reason we don't find He3 on earth, at all, ever, is because of the magnetosphere. The magnetosphere forces the He3 around the earth and deposits it on the moon. Dr Schmitt of Apollo 17 found this ion in ~abundance on the moon. He3 when excited produces tremendous amounts of electricity. With no deuterium.
Thanks to Curt Youngs
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
Density gradient : Vibration
Density gradient vibration
E = emitter
O = atom preloaded photon
-p = photon vibration heading left
p+ = photon vibration heading right
-p+ = one photon vibration heading left one right
B = atom accepting/releasing vibration photon
( = extreme change in atom shape due to 2 photon vibration
| = reflective wall
1) |O O O O E
2) |O O O O -pE
3) |O O O O-p E
4) |O O O-pB -pE
5) |O O-pB O-p E
6) |O-pB O-pB -pE
7) |Bp+O-pB O-p E
8) |O-p(p+O-pB -pE
9) |Bp+O-p(p+O-p E
10)|O-p(p+O-p(p+-pE
I still like calling the process a photon, although it is obvious it is not a particle. I think it will cause less confusion if we change the process not the name.
Eric Reiter is responsible for this change with his experiment. This vibration allows for more information to be passed through the bandwidth in this process.
It should have been obvious to me in this chart by PBS Nova and Fermilab,

A photon has no mass.
It is only a vibration.
E = emitter
O = atom preloaded photon
-p = photon vibration heading left
p+ = photon vibration heading right
-p+ = one photon vibration heading left one right
B = atom accepting/releasing vibration photon
( = extreme change in atom shape due to 2 photon vibration
| = reflective wall
1) |O O O O E
2) |O O O O -pE
3) |O O O O-p E
4) |O O O-pB -pE
5) |O O-pB O-p E
6) |O-pB O-pB -pE
7) |Bp+O-pB O-p E
8) |O-p(p+O-pB -pE
9) |Bp+O-p(p+O-p E
10)|O-p(p+O-p(p+-pE
I still like calling the process a photon, although it is obvious it is not a particle. I think it will cause less confusion if we change the process not the name.
Eric Reiter is responsible for this change with his experiment. This vibration allows for more information to be passed through the bandwidth in this process.
It should have been obvious to me in this chart by PBS Nova and Fermilab,

A photon has no mass.
It is only a vibration.
Friday, September 19, 2008
E ≠ mc^2
I have problems with Einstein's equations. It is saying that the only main variables in Energy are mass and the speed of light. No time, temp, freq, wave length... Not even x,y,z.
Mass is a zero dimension point. Mass does not exist in 4 dimensions. Density exists in 4 dimensions.
And the speed of light. Where did he get this stuff? What about electromagnetism, thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, radiation... He had to be aware of these. How could these systems be dismissed? Why do we have to have pretty equations? The universe is a violent and inhospitable place. Yet, we need simple pretty equations. e=mc^2, f=ma. f=gm1m2/r^2. These are too simple to explain complex interactions.
There is a major difference between symmetry and equilibrium. Simply, equilibrium occurs at the boundaries of two disparate systems, symmetry occurs in the mind.
There are so many variables in how the universe operates. Planck's black body spectral emissions. Maxwell's, Navier & Stokes, Peter Duffett-Smith... These are much better examples of thinking.
Mass is a zero dimension point. Mass does not exist in 4 dimensions. Density exists in 4 dimensions.
And the speed of light. Where did he get this stuff? What about electromagnetism, thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, radiation... He had to be aware of these. How could these systems be dismissed? Why do we have to have pretty equations? The universe is a violent and inhospitable place. Yet, we need simple pretty equations. e=mc^2, f=ma. f=gm1m2/r^2. These are too simple to explain complex interactions.
There is a major difference between symmetry and equilibrium. Simply, equilibrium occurs at the boundaries of two disparate systems, symmetry occurs in the mind.
There are so many variables in how the universe operates. Planck's black body spectral emissions. Maxwell's, Navier & Stokes, Peter Duffett-Smith... These are much better examples of thinking.
Labels:
Physics
Thursday, September 18, 2008
Density gradient
Density gradient simple
E = emitter
O = atom preloaded photon
-p = photon heading left
p+ = photon heading right
-p+ = one photon heading left one right
B = atom accepting/releasing photon
( = extreme change in atom shape due to 2 photon exchange
| = reflective wall
1) |O O O O E
2) |O O O O -pE
3) |O O O O-p E
4) |O O O-pB -pE
5) |O O-pB O-p E
6) |O-pB O-pB -pE
7) |Bp+O-pB O-p E
8) |O-p(p+O-pB -pE
9) |Bp+O-p(p+O-p E
10)|O-p(p+O-p(p+-pE
What I understood from the CERN video is that the moment a photon hits an electron it accepts the photon and fires a photon. Loading Theory is needed for this model. Eric Reiter
This does not show the effect of magnetism. It just shows how information directly affects the shape of the atom. Also this is only a linear example.
E = emitter
O = atom preloaded photon
-p = photon heading left
p+ = photon heading right
-p+ = one photon heading left one right
B = atom accepting/releasing photon
( = extreme change in atom shape due to 2 photon exchange
| = reflective wall
1) |O O O O E
2) |O O O O -pE
3) |O O O O-p E
4) |O O O-pB -pE
5) |O O-pB O-p E
6) |O-pB O-pB -pE
7) |Bp+O-pB O-p E
8) |O-p(p+O-pB -pE
9) |Bp+O-p(p+O-p E
10)|O-p(p+O-p(p+-pE
What I understood from the CERN video is that the moment a photon hits an electron it accepts the photon and fires a photon. Loading Theory is needed for this model. Eric Reiter
This does not show the effect of magnetism. It just shows how information directly affects the shape of the atom. Also this is only a linear example.
Exact center of the Earth and it motion
Lets talks about how I see the exact center of the Earth and it motion.
Most excellent questions from Curt Youngs.
Does your theory explain why the plumb bob normally points to the center of the earth? (some times it is off a little bit, regardless of whose it is.) There seems to be a relation between gravity and inertia. Nobody has explained that very well, except in their own mind, well, maybe some that are not well known. Do you have some ideas about this?
Yes, I have thought on this. I think the plumb bob is pointing to where the center of the Earth was. I just ran out and got my plumb bob. I tied the bob in our moving car.
My wife drove us to McDonald's to get milkshakes(helps the tongue after a seizure). When the car was accelerating ~consistently it would point to where the center of the Earth was plus the car's acceleration as theta. The only severe changes occurred during gear shifts and bumps.
Does your theory explain why the plumb bob normally points to the center of the earth?I think this effect is caused by the spin of the earth.
'some times it is off a little bit, regardless of whose it is.'I think this relationship is the changing velocity of the Earth around the Sun. The longer the string the more accurate the measure. The change in theta is the velocity. The reason for the sometimes is the position in its orbit. Angular Velocity of the Earth is different at each clock point around the sun.
There even will be a slight error because of the Sun's velocity around the galaxy.
The Earth is spinning on its axis. The Earth is in Orbit around the Sun. The Sun is in orbit around the galaxy.
So. Lets change the plumb bob to a pulse laser. The laser is pointing to the center of the earth. There is this amazing vacuum tube that has been inserted to the center of the earth from my house. It won't crush, bend or melt. The tube is 1 meter in diameter. At the top of the tube the pulse laser is placed exactly in the center of the tube. There is a exact detector at the other end. The detector shows us the exact amount the laser is off the center of the earth.
When the laser pulses it travels 6,375 km and hits the detector. It does not hit the center of the detector. This error is caused by the motion of the earth around the sun. Where the earth was. It may take less than a sec to get to the center of the earth but the earth has moved around the sun in that time. The motion of the spin of the earth is removed by the vacuum tube.
This is another major issue I have with the n-body problem. Euler transformation kind of solves this issue but it doesn't. We always have an issue with where things were vs where they are now. Its a clock problem. Gravity, not well thought out.
I wrote this first on GSJ
Added 9/18/08
Ok. Lets forget about the laser. I just think it was a more stable example of the motion of the earth. The plumb bob is affected by gear changes, bumps and atmosphere. Just trying to remove a few variables.
Lets build a 1000m stand holding the plumb bob. The stand is held in a vacuum tube so the atmosphere is not relevant here. The spin of the Earth stabilized the bob to always point down. Let the bob hang there for several years. The bob would only show the error Curt is referring to.
If we were to do this experiment on Eros(an irregular shape strange spin) the bob would take time to stabilize. By adding the bob it would move the barycenter of Eros. The pattern drawn by the bob would be irregular but different than the original pattern when the bob was first added.
Its the spin of the earth that causes the stability.
The error is caused by the earth's position about the sun. The angular velocity of the earth changes for every position. This change is the error.
(Addendum:9/25/08) Curt Youngs - Mascons also affect the plumb bobs on Earth.
Labels:
Physics
Tuesday, September 16, 2008
Magnetism and information
The nature of the Boson is to transport information. This transference of information is done in waves. The W and Z carry; induced current, voltage, and magnetism as information (meme). Whereas; temp, wavelength and freq are the domain of the photon. The electron and gluon convert the Meme into W and Z boson magnetism.
The W and Z transport; induced current, voltage, and magnetism as meme information. One of the bosons(Z?) is responsible for writing to the gluon. The others W+ and W- are responsible for broadcasting magnetism.
--------------------
my attempt at GSJ
I want to say that the photon carries more information that just time counter. A photon is vibrated by the electron so it has no charge and no mass. This way it can pass though interstellar space almost unimpeded (gravitational lensing: explained at the blog). A photon (sum of its wiggles and forward motion) moves at the speed of C. The photon only imparts its energy/memes when it vibrates another electron. This is where it converts information into Freq, temp and wave length. The electron converts this info into current, voltage, and magnetism and passed to the W and Z bosons where it now has mass. From the Z boson the current, voltage and magnetism are converted into color by the gluon and passed to the Quarks. The W bosons broadcast the meme as magnetism.
The process reverses. Quark to Gluon to W & Z bosons to electron to photon.
All forces travel in waves. The vibration may impart mass depending on the type of boson.
Its like a .txt file. the file can be read as a document or transmitted as a wave.
The W and Z transport; induced current, voltage, and magnetism as meme information. One of the bosons(Z?) is responsible for writing to the gluon. The others W+ and W- are responsible for broadcasting magnetism.
--------------------
my attempt at GSJ
I want to say that the photon carries more information that just time counter. A photon is vibrated by the electron so it has no charge and no mass. This way it can pass though interstellar space almost unimpeded (gravitational lensing: explained at the blog). A photon (sum of its wiggles and forward motion) moves at the speed of C. The photon only imparts its energy/memes when it vibrates another electron. This is where it converts information into Freq, temp and wave length. The electron converts this info into current, voltage, and magnetism and passed to the W and Z bosons where it now has mass. From the Z boson the current, voltage and magnetism are converted into color by the gluon and passed to the Quarks. The W bosons broadcast the meme as magnetism.
The process reverses. Quark to Gluon to W & Z bosons to electron to photon.
All forces travel in waves. The vibration may impart mass depending on the type of boson.
Its like a .txt file. the file can be read as a document or transmitted as a wave.
Labels:
Boson,
Information,
Magnetism,
Physics
Monday, September 15, 2008
The hidden Higgs Boson
So, the LHC is looking for the Higg's Boson. Good luck. I am convinced that you will never find it on Earth.
In my previous writing I describe Dark Matter as a Massive particle that has an anti-spin and is charge repugnant. This particle find Baryons repugnant. The earth has a massive magnetic field. So we will only find Dark Matter in interstellar space. These particle will be massive.
The other reason I don't want to call this a Boson is that, in my opinion, bosons transport information. Information require a charge to impart energy. Dark matter reacts poorly to charge. It may be more like a mix between a lepton and a quark, but it is definitely not a boson.
The Higg's Boson is not necessary.
a
In my previous writing I describe Dark Matter as a Massive particle that has an anti-spin and is charge repugnant. This particle find Baryons repugnant. The earth has a massive magnetic field. So we will only find Dark Matter in interstellar space. These particle will be massive.
The other reason I don't want to call this a Boson is that, in my opinion, bosons transport information. Information require a charge to impart energy. Dark matter reacts poorly to charge. It may be more like a mix between a lepton and a quark, but it is definitely not a boson.
The Higg's Boson is not necessary.
a
Labels:
Boson,
Dark Matter,
Higgs Boson,
Physics
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
Don't ask the epileptic for the time
For disclosure purposes, I am the epileptic. This is my experience of time. I also ask everyone who is unfortunate enough to be around me when I have one, what they experience? This is the usual response.
The purpose of a Neural Network is to process more memes than the basic memes of baryonic information. The brain is an optimized information system.
A seizure occurs when the brain no longer processes information in its usual optimal network. It only processes the baryonic information to the density of organic compounds. The difference between the normal memes information processing when I am functioning and the amount of information being processed when my neural network is not processing, is the information called me. The is no difference in the amount of baryons involved, those baryons are no longer processing optimally( above the normal amount for a baryon).
When I have a seizure. I have asymptotes in time. Time ends at T0 and starts again in the next available moment. That can be 30 seconds later. So for me T0 and T0+30 occur one after another. For me the experience of time accelerates during the event or 30 seconds occurred while I was not processing complex information. At this time my body is only processing information about the baryons that compose my body.
When I have a seizure and there is a unfortunate person to witness the event. They will always report to me that the experience of time for them slowed down. What took 30 seconds according to the clock, to them lasted several minutes. It is as if they are processing more information during that same 30 seconds. Since the Speed of Light may or may not be constant, The information system needs to slow down time to process the larger load in the same time frame.
When I have a seizure and there is a person in another building completely unaware of the event will experience time on their norm.
This is not the only observation that helps me show the relationship between time and information. It just is the most obvious.
Time is independent of baryonic matter. Time is independent of information. Both information and baryonic matter interact within time as a clock.
A clock (trying to remove the metaphysical time and be discrete) is different at different distances from baryons. A clock on the earth, a clock in heliocentric orbit between earth and mars, and a clock in heliocentric orbit between the Earth an Venus. The clock on the earth will be the fastest, followed by the one closest to the sun. The further away from baryons the slower the clock. The clock approaches zero the further away from baryonic matter.
UNFORTUNATELY this is not testable to zero. It is not possible to have a detector and an absence of memes. This should tell the mathematicians that the density of memes(change - baryon, it is really the information) is in the divisor of their equations.
I want to thank Harry H. Ricker III. You can find his amazing papers at
http://www.wbabin.net/index.htm
He has a draft paper on time that I am enjoying now. Just amazing.
The clock in me is different by baryonic structure than the clock in you, or the dog, or the cookoo clock. They are all clocks. They all express/experience time just different based on density of baryons and the density of memes.
The purpose of a Neural Network is to process more memes than the basic memes of baryonic information. The brain is an optimized information system.
A seizure occurs when the brain no longer processes information in its usual optimal network. It only processes the baryonic information to the density of organic compounds. The difference between the normal memes information processing when I am functioning and the amount of information being processed when my neural network is not processing, is the information called me. The is no difference in the amount of baryons involved, those baryons are no longer processing optimally( above the normal amount for a baryon).
When I have a seizure. I have asymptotes in time. Time ends at T0 and starts again in the next available moment. That can be 30 seconds later. So for me T0 and T0+30 occur one after another. For me the experience of time accelerates during the event or 30 seconds occurred while I was not processing complex information. At this time my body is only processing information about the baryons that compose my body.
When I have a seizure and there is a unfortunate person to witness the event. They will always report to me that the experience of time for them slowed down. What took 30 seconds according to the clock, to them lasted several minutes. It is as if they are processing more information during that same 30 seconds. Since the Speed of Light may or may not be constant, The information system needs to slow down time to process the larger load in the same time frame.
When I have a seizure and there is a person in another building completely unaware of the event will experience time on their norm.
This is not the only observation that helps me show the relationship between time and information. It just is the most obvious.
Time is independent of baryonic matter. Time is independent of information. Both information and baryonic matter interact within time as a clock.
A clock (trying to remove the metaphysical time and be discrete) is different at different distances from baryons. A clock on the earth, a clock in heliocentric orbit between earth and mars, and a clock in heliocentric orbit between the Earth an Venus. The clock on the earth will be the fastest, followed by the one closest to the sun. The further away from baryons the slower the clock. The clock approaches zero the further away from baryonic matter.
UNFORTUNATELY this is not testable to zero. It is not possible to have a detector and an absence of memes. This should tell the mathematicians that the density of memes(change - baryon, it is really the information) is in the divisor of their equations.
I want to thank Harry H. Ricker III. You can find his amazing papers at
http://www.wbabin.net/index.htm
He has a draft paper on time that I am enjoying now. Just amazing.
The clock in me is different by baryonic structure than the clock in you, or the dog, or the cookoo clock. They are all clocks. They all express/experience time just different based on density of baryons and the density of memes.
Labels:
Baryonic Matter,
Physics,
Time
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
Taking a Hammer to Symmetry
Symmetry
“Consistency is the enemy of enterprise, just as symmetry is the enemy of art.”
George Bernard Shaw
Symmetry is akin to religion in science. 'The Universe is perfect, God is perfect, God made a perfect intellect in man, Thus God made a symmetrical universe.'
Where do we find symmetry? Let's look to the atom. "Three quarks for Muster Mark! "(Joyce). When you have 3 of anything you have stability not symmetry. Now there can be 1 of 8 gluons for any 2 of Muster Mark's quarks. Now we have enormous combination of differences in gluon/quark pairing. Add to that gluon length, color changes and the amount of different expressions a baryon can have is chemistry and everything defined by chemistry.
Just a note, on this blog I will be referring to T quark as Truth and the B quark as Beauty. I feel top and bottom are too close in wording with up and down and may cause confusion in descriptions. Their expressions will be referred to as Truthiness and Beautiness.
So I don't find symmetry in atoms. If I were to hire a crew to drop a billion bags of sand. Each bag of sand has exactly the same number of grains of sand in them. 1 billion counted by a computer(ha ha). Each bag is dropped from the same height. Every bag would have a different disbursement. This asymmetry stems from the asymmetrical baryon.
I would love to see an example of symmetry in the universe.
“Consistency is the enemy of enterprise, just as symmetry is the enemy of art.”
George Bernard Shaw
Symmetry is akin to religion in science. 'The Universe is perfect, God is perfect, God made a perfect intellect in man, Thus God made a symmetrical universe.'
Where do we find symmetry? Let's look to the atom. "Three quarks for Muster Mark! "(Joyce). When you have 3 of anything you have stability not symmetry. Now there can be 1 of 8 gluons for any 2 of Muster Mark's quarks. Now we have enormous combination of differences in gluon/quark pairing. Add to that gluon length, color changes and the amount of different expressions a baryon can have is chemistry and everything defined by chemistry.
Just a note, on this blog I will be referring to T quark as Truth and the B quark as Beauty. I feel top and bottom are too close in wording with up and down and may cause confusion in descriptions. Their expressions will be referred to as Truthiness and Beautiness.
So I don't find symmetry in atoms. If I were to hire a crew to drop a billion bags of sand. Each bag of sand has exactly the same number of grains of sand in them. 1 billion counted by a computer(ha ha). Each bag is dropped from the same height. Every bag would have a different disbursement. This asymmetry stems from the asymmetrical baryon.
I would love to see an example of symmetry in the universe.
Labels:
Baryonic Matter,
Physics,
Symmetry
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
Memes Definition
I strongly disagree with memes.org definition of a meme. I do not think they are looking at the fundamental interactions of information. I think there are great sets of complexities that rise between basic information transformation in the atom and complex neural networks, but they use the same process and particles. A complex neural network is just a group of information efficient atoms.
Attempt at a definition of Memes
A meme is a fundamental vibration of information that describes the Quark it represents.
All of the Boson forces transmit meme information. All of the Quarks express memes information. A Meme is a dataset.
A single meme wavefront exists as 4 dimensions
Photon meme wave hold Temperature, Frequency, and Wave Length. plus the number of spins since creation.
Magnetic meme wave hold Induced current, Voltage, and Charge. plus the number of spins since creation.
A meme does manipulate baryonic matter during it life cycle. A meme attempts to manipulate baryonic matter more efficiently.
The density of the meme wavefront within the space causes distortions in time and spacial space.
Attempt at a definition of Memes
A meme is a fundamental vibration of information that describes the Quark it represents.
All of the Boson forces transmit meme information. All of the Quarks express memes information. A Meme is a dataset.
A single meme wavefront exists as 4 dimensions
Photon meme wave hold Temperature, Frequency, and Wave Length. plus the number of spins since creation.
Magnetic meme wave hold Induced current, Voltage, and Charge. plus the number of spins since creation.
A meme does manipulate baryonic matter during it life cycle. A meme attempts to manipulate baryonic matter more efficiently.
The density of the meme wavefront within the space causes distortions in time and spacial space.
Labels:
Baryonic Matter,
Memes,
Physics
Thursday, August 14, 2008
Gravity is based on density and magnetism

Improved Gravity Field of the Moon from Lunar Prospector
A. S. Konopliv, A. B. Binder, L. L. Hood, A. B. Kucinskas, W. L. Sjogren, J. G. Williams
This is evidence of my argument. Here is a picture of the topography (top) and gravitational field (bottom) as shown from orbital error correction.
Although I would state we are seeing an increase of gravity in this area due to the change in density of baryonic material and it's magnetic field. This magnetic field change pushes against the dark matter in this area causing the changes in orbit.
Labels:
Baryonic Matter,
Dark Matter,
Gravity,
Physics
Tuesday, August 5, 2008
Fun with He: Logic Problem
So I had some fun with Pb. Now that it is in the center of the Earth, the magnetosphere is just a touch stronger.
Lets look at that He balloon. We are going to use the large rubber red balloon and fill it with 5kg of He. Naturally it also has some natural air gasses in the balloon before we filled it. Those sink to the bottom. We let them out and tie off the balloon.
Now I let go of the balloon. As it rises, more radiation from the Sun hits the balloon. This allows He to escape and continue its ascent. When the helium inside the balloon has less mass then the rubber balloon, the balloon will sink. But the He continues to rise to the level of its density.
If we change the material of the balloon to Mylar it would be months or years before the Helium could escape. I know, there is a birthday balloon around here that is older than some of my birds.
This floating Mylar balloon should not occur. It has a mass of 5kg + the mass of the balloon. Yet it rises. It can only rise the average of the densities.
This should not happen with gravity. The balloon has mass. Its mass is less than the earth. So it should drop to the ground at Gm1m2/r^2. This is not what the data shows. The balloon rises. Sorry guys. There is no Graviton.
Lets look at that He balloon. We are going to use the large rubber red balloon and fill it with 5kg of He. Naturally it also has some natural air gasses in the balloon before we filled it. Those sink to the bottom. We let them out and tie off the balloon.
Now I let go of the balloon. As it rises, more radiation from the Sun hits the balloon. This allows He to escape and continue its ascent. When the helium inside the balloon has less mass then the rubber balloon, the balloon will sink. But the He continues to rise to the level of its density.
If we change the material of the balloon to Mylar it would be months or years before the Helium could escape. I know, there is a birthday balloon around here that is older than some of my birds.
This floating Mylar balloon should not occur. It has a mass of 5kg + the mass of the balloon. Yet it rises. It can only rise the average of the densities.
This should not happen with gravity. The balloon has mass. Its mass is less than the earth. So it should drop to the ground at Gm1m2/r^2. This is not what the data shows. The balloon rises. Sorry guys. There is no Graviton.
Labels:
Density,
Gravity,
Logic Problem,
Physics
Saturday, August 2, 2008
Fun with Pb: Logic Problem
Pb (Lead)
Melting point 327.46 °C
Boiling point 1749 °C
Density 11.34 g/cm^3
Density of magma ~3.33 g/cm^3
Temp of Magma 700C - 1600C
If I dropped a 50 kg lead weight into the mouth of an active volcano like Mt. Kilauea. It would rapidly turn into a liquid and sink. It is not sinking, the Pb is equalizing to its density. It will continue to displace other molecules until it is surrounded by molecules of similar density.
Melting point 327.46 °C
Boiling point 1749 °C
Density 11.34 g/cm^3
Density of magma ~3.33 g/cm^3
Temp of Magma 700C - 1600C
If I dropped a 50 kg lead weight into the mouth of an active volcano like Mt. Kilauea. It would rapidly turn into a liquid and sink. It is not sinking, the Pb is equalizing to its density. It will continue to displace other molecules until it is surrounded by molecules of similar density.
Labels:
Density,
Gravity,
Logic Problem,
Physics
Friday, July 25, 2008
Dark Energy: a second try
Each bit of Dark Energy is rigid and consistent along with its neighbor as per Carroll. Every bit of Dark Energy is mass less, has no spin, and no charge. It only has state.
That state is always on. This proves existence. If this bit is off then no existence.
When the Dark Energy state is on, then the bit can store information as vibrations.
The Dark Energy has at least 4 dimensions within it's state. There are 3 spacial dimensions and 1 time dimension.
The other really interesting thing about Dark Energy is that it communicates information to its neighbor. This this the transfer of force information. This happens regardless of time or space.
The Dark Energy can have information on multiple vibrations in its domain or entering and leaving its domain. Though it follows the Pauli exclusion principle, no two identical fermions can occupy the domain.
Dark Energy is analog.
The purpose of the Dark Energy is to store, process, and communicate information onto and about the vibrations within it.
That state is always on. This proves existence. If this bit is off then no existence.
When the Dark Energy state is on, then the bit can store information as vibrations.
The Dark Energy has at least 4 dimensions within it's state. There are 3 spacial dimensions and 1 time dimension.
The other really interesting thing about Dark Energy is that it communicates information to its neighbor. This this the transfer of force information. This happens regardless of time or space.
The Dark Energy can have information on multiple vibrations in its domain or entering and leaving its domain. Though it follows the Pauli exclusion principle, no two identical fermions can occupy the domain.
Dark Energy is analog.
The purpose of the Dark Energy is to store, process, and communicate information onto and about the vibrations within it.
Labels:
Physics,
Vacuum Energy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

